Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Compensation:
SRF Limited
GROUP 14
PA & COMPENSATION WERE NOT UNIFORM AND RATHER
HAPHAZARD
NO UNIFORM PA AND COMPENSATION WAS THERE AMONG
DIFFERENT BUSINESS UNITS
THIS LEAD TO DIFFICULTY IN TRANSFER OF EMPLOYEES
PA & THE PERFORMANCE WAS ASSESSED AT FOUR DIFFERENT LEVELS:
Compensation of 1 GOOD
2. VERY GOOD
SRF
AVERAGE
POOR
DIVIDING THE PERFORMANCE IN THESE FOUR BROAD CATEGORIES
LEAD TO GENERALIZATION AND INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE FOCUS
COMPENSATION LACKED FOCUS ON OVERALL COMPANY
PERFORMANCE
PRINCIPLES OF COMPENSATION WAS NOT CHANGED
NO JOB EVALUATION ON REGULAR BASIS
5 Specific features of the earlier Compensation
System
1. Four broad Job Grades included annual cost of living, individual performance and personal growth
3.Job grades were increased to 14 and then decreased to 6 but principle components remained unchnged
Contribution to SRF
Responsibility based
SRF
Compensation based on PA
3. Indirect Pay
Benefits
Health Insurance
Travel Allowance
Accommodation
Housing
Thank You