Sunteți pe pagina 1din 22

Chapter 34

Trade Policy

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


In this chapter you will learn to

1. Describe the various situations in which a country may


rationally choose to protect some industries.
2. Describe the most common fallacious arguments in favor of
protection.
3. Describe the effects of a tariff or quota on imported goods.
4. Explain why trade-remedy laws are sometimes just thinly
disguised protection.
5. Explain the distinction between trade creation and trade
diversion.
6. Describe the main features of the North American Free
Trade Agreement.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-2
Free Trade or Protection?

Protectionism:
- any policies designed to protect domestic industries
from foreign competition

Important examples:
- tariffs
- nontariff barriers
- import quotas and VERs
- cumbersome customs regulations

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-3


The Case for Free Trade

Free trade encourages countries to specialize along the lines


of comparative advantage:
 allows an increase in average material living
standards

The gains from specialization and trade make the country as


a whole better off.

But free trade does not necessarily make every individual


better off.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-4


The Case for Protection

Two important valid arguments for protection:


1. Objectives other than maximizing national income

a) Diversification
- advantages from a diversified pattern of production

b) Social
- the protection of specific groups

In both cases, the cost is reduced average income.


Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-5
The Case for Protection

2. Maximize national income, possibly at the expense of


other countries’ incomes:
a) Improve the terms of trade
- only possible for large countries
b) Protect “infant” industries
- do scale economies exist?
- must make sure they eventually “grow up”
c) Earn pure profits in foreign markets
- “strategic” trade policy
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-6
Fallacious Arguments for Protection

Many arguments against free trade are based on popular


misconceptions about markets and economies:

a) Protectionist policies help “keep the money at home”


b) Protection from low-wage foreign labor
c) Exports are “good” whereas imports are “bad”
d) Protectionist policies create more domestic jobs

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-7


Methods of Protection

Tariffs
Consider the market
for some imported
Price

D S
good with a world
price of pw .
world
• price
Under free trade,
domestic production
pw • • is Q1 whereas
Imports domestic
consumption is Q2.
Q1 Q2
Quantity
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-8
Figure 34.1 The Deadweight
Loss of a Tariff
Domestic producer
surplus rises by area 1.

Domestic consumer
surplus falls by areas
1 + 2 + 3 + 4.

Imports fall, but the


government receives
tariff revenue equal to
area 3.

The overall loss to the


domestic economy
=2+4
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-9
Quotas and Voluntary Export
Restraints (VERs)
The same result can be accomplished by a quantity
restriction:
- import quota
- voluntary export restriction (VER)

Same effect on the domestic consumers and producers:


- but foreign producers now receive higher price
- area 3 is extra revenues for foreign producers
rather than tariff revenues for government

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-10


Figure 34.2 The Deadweight
Loss of an Import Quota

Deadweight loss = Areas 2 + 3 + 4


Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-11
Tariffs versus Quotas?

In general, a quota and a volume-equivalent tariff have


different welfare implications for the two countries.
- exporting country prefers a quota
- importing country prefers a tariff

The recently resolved Canada-U.S. trade dispute over


softwood lumber is a good example of the use of both tariffs
and import quotas.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-12


Trade-Remedy Laws and Nontariff
Barriers

Some nontariff barriers were originally created to remedy


problems that arise from international trade.
Dumping:
- when a product is sold in export markets for a
lower price than in the domestic market for reasons
unrelated to costs

Countervailing duties:
- a tariff used to offset the effects of subsidies paid by
foreign governments
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-13
Current Trade Policy

The GATT and the WTO


Under the GATT, countries agreed to reduce trade barriers
through multilateral negotiations and not to raise them
unilaterally.

With the end of the Uruguay Round in 1994, the GATT was
succeeded by WTO.

The current round is the Doha Round (2000)


- the very contentious issue is agriculture
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-14
Current Trade Policy

In recent years, there has been an emerging debate about


the WTO:

- should environmental and labor issues be


included within the agreements?

- are the negotiations undemocratic?

- the Doha Round includes very little on environmental


issues and labor standards

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-15


Regional Trade Agreements

Attempts to liberalize trade over a much smaller group of


countries include:
• free-trade agreements (e.g., NAFTA)

• customs unions (e.g., Mercosur)

• common markets (e.g., EU)

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-16


Regional Trade Agreements

Trade agreements usually reallocate resources through two


effects:
1. Trade creation

When producers in one member country find that they


can export to another member country as a result of the
elimination of the tariffs.
For example:
Under NAFTA, some U.S. firms find that they could
undersell their Mexican competitors in some product
lines, and some Mexican firms find that they could
undersell their U.S. competitors in other product lines.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-17
Regional Trade Agreements

2. Trade diversion

When exporters in one member country replace foreign


exporters as suppliers to another member country.
For example:
Under NAFTA, U.S. firms find that they can undersell
competitors from the rest of the world in the Mexican
market, not because they are the cheapest source of
supply, but because their tariff-free prices under NAFTA.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-18


Trade Creation versus Trade
Diversion

Trade creation represents efficient specialization according to


comparative advantage.

From the global perspective, trade diversion represents an


inefficient reallocation of resources.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-19


Trade Creation versus Trade
Diversion

APPLYING ECONOMIC CONCEPTS 34.1


Should the WTO Be Abolished?

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-20


The North American Free Trade
Agreement

NAFTA is guided by the fundamental principle of national


treatment.

Other provisions include:


• the elimination of tariffs by 2010
• national treatment to foreign investment
• existing trade restrictions are “grandfathered” or have
“sunset” clauses
• some goods remain subject to non-tariff trade restrictions
(such as Canadian cultural industries)
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-21
Dispute Settlement Mechanism for
NAFTA

There is also an important dispute settlement mechanism:


- a review panel has the power to suspend any
antidumping or countervailing duties

The results of NAFTA:


- Industry has restructured in the direction of greater
export orientation in all three countries, and trade creation has
occurred.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 34-22

S-ar putea să vă placă și