A Comparative Study of Students’ Listening Comprehension

Achievement Between Students Who Are Taught by Using Video

and Those Who Are Taught by Using Tape Recorder
at First Grade of SMA N 1 Sukoharjo, Pringsewu

By: Leni Karlina

0413042036

Bandar Lampung, Friday 20th November 2009

lenikarlina@teacher.com
IV. Result and Discussion

A. Result of research
1. Result of Pretest
2. Result of Posttest
B. Hypothesis Testing
C. Discussion
 Result of Pretest

Experimental Experimental
Class I Class II

N 30 30
Mode 32 20
Median 32.00 32.00
Minimum 16 16
Maximum 44 44
Mean 30.67 30.53
Homogeneity

Std.
Std.
Class N Mean Error
Deviation
Mean
Experimental I 30 30.67 8.683 1.585
Pretest
Experimental II 30 30.53 8.169 1.492
 Levene's Test for
Equality of t-test for Equality of Means
Variances

95% Confidence
Interval of the
Sig. Std.
Mean Differences
(2- Error
F Sig. t df Diffe
taile Differe
rence
d) nce
Lower Upper

Pretest
Equal
variances .070 .739 -.061 58 .951 -.133 2.177 -4.491 4.224
assumed

Equal
variances not -.061 57.785 .951 -.133 2.177 -4.491 4.224
assumed
Result of Posttest

Experimental Experimental
Class I Class II
N 30 30
Mode 32 32
Median 44.00 32.00
Minimum 32 20
Maximum 68 60
Mean 46.27 32.53
 Hypothesis Testing

Levene's Test
for Equality of t-test for Equality of Means
Variances

95% Confidence
Sig. Std. Interval of the
Mean
(2- Error Differences
F Sig. t df Differenc
taile Differ
e
d) ence
Lower Upper

Pretest Equal
variances 4.467 .039 -.5.273 58 .000 -.13.733 2.604 -18.947 -8.520
assumed

Equal
variances
-.5.274 54.470 .000 -.13.733 2.604 -18.954 -8.513
not
assumed
Discussion
1. There is a significant different of the students’
listening comprehension achievement between
students who are taught by using video and those who
are taught by using tape recorder with the
p = 0.000, and the different score was 13.74

2. The students’ achievement increased significantly

since video is interesting and attractive thus it can
motivate students in the learning process. It supports
Walker (1997)

3. The students in Experimental class I were active, it

proves Sheerin’s statement (1982)

4. The students in experimental class II were passive,

they found difficulties in differentiate the sound they
heard. It proved Ledgerwood (2004)
V. Conclusion and Suggestion
A. Conclusion
B. Suggestion
 Conclusion

1. There is a significant difference of student’s listening

comprehension achievement between those who were
taught by using video and those who were taught by using
tape recorder within experimental class I (video class).

2. The use of video could increase the students’ motivation.

3. The increase of the score of the experimental class II

(tape recorder) shows that the increase is not merely
because of the use of video, but there were the other
factors that affected the students’ achievement in the
experimental class II (tape recorder class).
Suggestion
1. From the conclusion number 1, the use of video gives a
better result than tape recorder. It is suggested that the
English teachers to applied video in teaching listening
comprehension.

2. the teacher should have well preparation on the

equipment and also manage the time well in order to
make the learning process effective.

3. it is suggested to the future researcher who wants to do

the similar research to have longer period since the
present research was conducted only for four weeks. This
is intended to see the real and accurate result of the
research because in learning language there is a process
which might influence the achievement like habit, the
learners’ characters, motivation, learning strategies, etc.
Thank You

lenikarlina@teacher.com