Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The Indian Economy has been much affected due to lack of infrastructure facilities, sticky legal system, cutting of exposures to emerging markets by FII s,etc. Under such a situation it goes without saying that banks are no exception and are bound to face the heat of a global downturn. Banks and FII s in India hold NPA s worth around Rs 1,10,000 crores.
The core banking business is of mobilizing the deposits and utilizing it for lending to industry. Lending business is encouraged which helps in productive purposes which results in economic growth. However lending also carries credit risk, which arises from the borrower s inability to repay it .
Recent happenings in the business worldworldEnron, Worldcom, Xerox, global crossing do not give much confidence to banks. The history of FII s also reveals the fact that the biggest banking failures were due to credit risk. Due to this, banks are restricting their lending operations to secured avenues only with adequate collateral on which to fall back upon in a situation of default.
Why NPAs have become an issue for banks and FIIs in India?
The origin of the problem of burgeoning NPA s lies in the quality of managing credit risk by the banks concerned. What is needed is having adequate preventive measures in place namely, fixing pre-sanctioned preappraisal responsibility & having an effective postpostdisbursement supervision. Banks concerned should continuously monitor loans to identify accounts that have potential to become non-performing. non-
Resolution of NPAs
At present, local banks are saddled with the management of NPA s for which they do not have management time for proper resolution. As a result, they are reluctant to make new loan to industrial or commercial enterprises as NPA s have strained their resources. The unavailability of new loans has therefore hindered economic growth and development.
Contd
ADB intends to assist local banks resolve their problems with NPA s by facilitating the financing of SPV s and other mechanisms designed to acquire and service such assets. This will enable the local banking system to focus on its core operations and provide financing to productive sectors of economy. In addition ADB will assist distressed companies in their restructuring & rehabilitation efforts.
Gross NPA s of the financial system is placed at Rs 1,35,000 crore, of which, over Rs 98,000 crore pertains to Scheduled Commercial Banks (SCB s) and FII s. Gross NPA s showed increasing trend over the yrs and accretion to gross NPA s by SCB s during last two fiscals were Rs 24,824 crore(2001crore(2001-02) & Rs 21,862 crore(2002-03). crore(2002-
Contd.
This accretion is not considering the cases restructured through CDR mechanism during 20022002-03 and thereafter (Rs 46,000 crore). On account of low Loan to GDP Ratio (around 60%) in India, the enormity of NPA s in India in GDP term appears to be low in comparison with china, korea, etc. 43% of the capital base of the financial system stands eroded on account of net NPA s.
For banks and Financial Institutions, both the balance sheet and income statement have a key role to play by providing valuable information on a borrowers ability The key accounting ratios generally used for the purpose of ascertaining the creditworthiness of a business entity are that of debt-equity ratio & debtinterest coverage ratio.
Provision of bad debts from net profit. Implementation of Securitisation Act 2002. Increasing the share of Retail business i.e., personal loans, vehicle loans, home loans, credit cards, etc. Increasing the deposits. Increase lending share to priority sector.
Quite often genuine borrowers face difficulties in raising funds from banks due to mounting NPA s. With the enactment of the Securitiastion and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, banks can issue notices to pay up the dues And the borrowers will have to clear the dues within 60 days. If the defaulters don t pay the dues, then the banks can takeover the possession of assets & also takeover the management of the company.
Credit risk is a much more forward-looking forwardapproach and is mainly concerned with managing the quality of credit portfolio before default takes place
Credit Rating
Definition by Moody
Credit rating has been explained as forming an opinion of the future ability, legal obligation and willingness of a bond issuer or obligor to make full and timely payments on principal and interest due to the investors
Indian banks so far were encircled by the chains of regulation and aegis of protection No formal policies, procedures, systems, tools and techniques of credit risk assessment
Accounting policies has loopholes Chartered Accountants make their balance sheet look as they want it to look like Past performance is no indicator of the future performance ideally
Hasty commitments to expand rapidly by rediff have brought it to red Its share price is ruling well below its issue price So relying completely on the past ratios meant no monitoring of the management decisions and no control over their decisions
Collateral was another way to judge the credit quality A client is good if she had attractive assets to put as collateral and bad otherwise. Poor decision making-accepted clients of poor makingquality and rejected the clients of good quality Collateral is hardly a security
Qualitative
Play or Leave
3.0 or more : Most likely safe 2.8 to 3.0 : Just safe 1.8 to 2.7 : likely to bankrupt in two years Below 1.8 : Recovery least expected
Credit metrics works on the statistical concepts like probability, means, and standard deviation, correlation, and concentrations
Reduce the portfolio risk : reevaluate obligors having the largest absolute size arguing that a single default among these would have the greatest impact reevaluate obligors having the highest percentage level of risk arguing that these are the most likely to contribute to portfolio losses
Balancing Act
Identifying the correlations across the portfolio so that the potential concentration may be reduced and the portfolio is adequately diversified across the uncorrelated constituents Concentration may lead to an undue accumulation of risk at one point.
ARCIL
system-wide clean up of systemNPAs result in creation of Asset Reconstruction Company Governments may also provide special powers to ARCs that are not otherwise available to banking system
ARCIL Objectives
Convert NPA into performing assets Act as nodal agency for NPA resolution Create a vibrant market for NPA\ NPA\restructured debt ReRe-energize the financial sector.
Transaction Structure
In 1980s, U.S. used government sponsored ARC Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) to overcome thrift crisis. RTC acted as a bad bank and functioned as an effective sales mechanism for disposal of assets In early 1990s Mexico and Sweden demonstrated successful use of ARC mechanism (Fobaproa and Securum respectively) as a bad bank and to clean and reprivatise/ recapitalise the banks Korea used KAMCO as the nodal agency for acquiring and disposing NPAs. KAMCO has used securitisation and joint venture route for investor participation in the assets
Quantitative Factors
Carrying Cost of NPAs 6.50% Management Cost 0.75% Total Cost 7.25% Net NPAs of banks/FIs is Rs. 470 billions Total holding Cost comes to Rs. 35 billions p.a. for banks/FIs. Which is around 20% of the reported Net profit (i.e., including non-core income) non-
Qualitative Factors
Banks fail to get Interest spread on the net realizable value of NPAs so long they carry them in their books. Reduction of Risk Adjusted Capital Adequacy Ratio (RACAR). RBI deducts net NPA from capital and risk weighted assets to compute RACAR. Carrying NPAs in books affects Rating and Capital mobilization.
MANAGING NPA
There are two issues, which, if tackled properly, would efficiently solve the problem of NPAs viz. (i) STOCK ( accumulation of NPAs) problem and (ii) FLOW ( accretion ) problem. Several measures like Lok Adalat, DRTs( Debt Recovery Tribunals),Strengthening of credit appraisal and monitoring system have been initiated by the regulators to tackle the flow problem. Towards resolution of the stock problem of NPAs GOI took proactive steps and enacted the Securitasation & Reconstruction Act 2002 in December 2002.
MANAGING NPA- Models NPAGlobally there have been two models: (i) A central disposition agency which takes bad loans from all financial institutions or (ii) An entity specific to a particular bank or a group of banks e.g. Arcil.
MANAGING NPA-Through ARCs NPAARCs are governed by the provisions of Securitisation Act 2002 and operates within the perview of RBI guidelines. The salient features of the Securitisation Act in respect of ARCs are as follows: - Unfettered right to the lenders acting in majority (> 75% by value) to enforce security rights without judicial intervention
Salient Features .
- Establishment & empowerment of ARCs No single investor / sponsor to have majority control over ARCs - Paves way for debt aggregation in ARCs by enabling acquisition of assets - Accords ARCs the rights of the lenders - Additional rights to ARCs not available with lenders Sale or lease of businesses by superceding board powers -Enables foreign investor participation
MANAGING NPA
MEASURES FOR RECONSTRUCTION ( SECTION 9) - Change in or takeover of management of business of the borrower - Sale or lease of part or whole business of the borrower (Above two powers not available as of now, because RBI guidelines have not been issued for the same)
MANAGING NPA
- Rescheduling of payment of debt - Enforcement of security interest in accordance with the Act - Settlement of dues payable by the borrower - Taking possession of secured assets in accordance with the Act