Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Qualitative Study
Findings Descriptive of site or individuals Analysis of themes Discussion Major findings Comparison of findings with existing studies Limitation of the study Implications for future research Overall significance of the study Back Matter References Appendices (e.g., instruments, table, etc.)
Title page
It contains running head, title, author(s), and institutional affiliation of the author(s). The running head is the abbreviated title, in uppercase letters, places at top left, and not more than 50 characters including the space. The title should be 10 to 12 words long. The title page and each subsequent page have a header and page number in the upper-right hand corner. The header consists of the first one to three words of the title placed above or five spaces to the page number. All pages should be numbered consecutively, beginning with the title page.
Shah Shamim Ahmed, EER, IER, DU
Abstract
The abstract is the comprehensive summary of the contents of the research report. It should not be exceed 120 words. It should be typed on a separate page with the word Abstract centered at the top of the page in uppercase and lowercase letters. It should be accurate, concise, specific, and self-contained. It should include a brief statement of the problem, a description of the research participants, a summary of the method used, the findings or results of the study.
Introduction
The research report begins with the introduction, which is not labelled. It presents the specific problem being investigated in the context of prior research and describes the research strategy. It begins with a general introduction to the problem area and perhaps a statement of the point of the study. It explains clearly the purpose of your study. It continues with a review of prior studies that have been conducted in the area and relating to the specific issue being investigated. After that you should tell what you did in the study.
Shah Shamim Ahmed, EER, IER, DU
Method
The method section follows the introduction. The purpose of it is to tell the reader exactly how the study was conducted.
It permits the reader to evaluate the appropriateness of the design of the study and be able to make an assessment of the reliability, and validity of the results.
To facilitate communication of the method section, it is typically divided into subsections.
Shah Shamim Ahmed, EER, IER, DU
Participants
The participants subsection should identify the major demographic characteristics of the participants e.g., age, gender, etc. You should tell how they were selected for the study, the number according to their characteristics and other factors that were considered during sample selection.
Instrumentation
This subsection describes the apparatus or instruments used and they were used. Sufficient detail should be included to enable the reader to obtain comparable materials or equipment. Commercial marketed equipment should be accompanied by the suppliers name and location as well as model number of the equipment or, in the case of a measuring instrument such as an achievement test, a reference that will able the reader to obtain the same test.
Shah Shamim Ahmed, EER, IER, DU
Procedure
The procedure section tells the reader exactly how the study was executed, from the moment the participant and the researcher came into contact to the time the participant left the study. It represents a step-by-step account of what the experiment and participant did during the study, including any instructions, stimulus conditions that were presented to the participants and the responses they were to make, and any control techniques that were used.
Internal validity
It is becoming common today for the qualitative research report that the researchers include a section in which they reflect on their personal biases and their disciplinary background.
They also describe that how they may affect the validity of their research.
Researcher should also discuss what strategies they used to ensure qualitative research validity (e.g., triangulation, lowinference description, extended fieldwork, and reflexivity).
Shah Shamim Ahmed, EER, IER, DU
Discussion
The discussion section has the purpose of interpreting and evaluating the results obtained, giving primary emphasis to the relationships between the results and the hypothesis of the study. Begin the discussion by stating the answer of your research question generally. Follow this statement with an interpretation of the results, telling the reader what you think they mean. In doing so, you should attempt to integrate your research findings with the results of prior research. Note that this is the only place in the research report where you are given any latitude for stating your own opinion. When discussing the shortcomings, you should mention only the flaws that might have had a influence on the result obtained.
Shah Shamim Ahmed, EER, IER, DU
Discussion (cntd)
In general, the discussion should answer the following questions:
What does the study contribute? How has it helped solve the study problem? What conclusion and theoretical implications can be drawn from the study?
References
For further study:
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating Qualitative and Quantitative research. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction. New York: Allyn and Becon. Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed approaches. Los Angeles: Sage. Lunenburg, F. C., & Irby, B. J. (2008). Writing a Successful Thesis or Dissertation. California: Corwin Press. Sharp, J. G. (2009). Success with your education research project. Cornwall, UK: Learning Matters
Shah Shamim Ahmed, EER, IER, DU