1800TEU Container Ship

Team 4 Jin ho, Chun / Seung jong, Kim / Hong sik, Min / Ki young, Lee / Jong chun, Kim / Shin ho, Choi / Dae hyuk, Kim / Jung kyu, Song

Contents
0. Overview (Jin-ho Chun)
1.

Estimation of L,B,D of the Design ship (Jong-chun Kim, Shin-ho Choi) LWT, DWT, Hull form coefficient (Jong-chun Kim) Estimation of Resistance (Jung-kyu Song) Estimation of Main Engine (Dae-hyuk Kim) Calculation of Freeboard (Hong-sik Min) Equipment number Calculation (Seung-jong Kim) Hull form design (Ki-young Lee)

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

0. Overview
Owners Requirement
Loa Lbp B,mld Depth,mld Td(design) Ts(scant.) Deadweight Speed Basis ship (1,600 TEU) abt. 168.00 m 58.00 m 27.20 m 13.80 m 8.75 m 9.20 m 21,500 Ton 20.7 Knots abt. 10.0 m Max. 11.4 m 27,000~32,000 Ton DWT At design draft, 90% MCR, 17.0 Knots (with 15% Sea Margin) 28 m Design ship(1,800 TEU) 200 m
(1)

FREEBOARAD CALCULATION: ICLL 1966 (PROTOCOL 1988 / 2006 AMENDMENT)

(2) FUEL OIL TANK PROTECTION (MARPOL ANNEX 1, REG.12A) (3) STABILITY: IMO REG.A 749 (4) 2011 1 , 2011 10 KEEL LAYING, 2012 7 RULE

TYPE M / E MCR NCR DFOC Cruising range

MAN B&W 7S60MC-C 21,490 PS x 105.0 RPM 19,340 PS x 101.4 RPM 60.6 ton/day 12,000 N/M abt. 14,000 N/M

0. Overview
G/A 1800 TEU Container ship

0. Overview
G/A 1800 TEU Container ship Profile

0. Overview
G/A 1800 TEU Container ship

Midship

0. Overview
Section arrangement of the Design ship
Frame Range -8~0 Stern 0~13 EA 8 13 28 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 15 8 104 Gap 0.600 0.600 0.790 3.160 3.160 3.160 3.160 3.160 3.160 3.160 3.160 0.790 0.600 0.600 Section[m] Range [m] -4.800~0.000 0.000~7.800 7.800~29.920 29.920~44.360 44.360~58.800 58.800~73.240 73.240~87.680 87.680~102.120 102.120~116.560 116.56~131.000 131.000~153.560 153.560~157.51 157.51~166.51 166.51~171.31 0~166.51 Length [m] 4.800 7.800 22.120 14.44 14.44 14.44 14.44 14.44 14.44 14.44 22.56 3.95 9.00 4.8 166.51 Stem bulkhead ~ (F.P.-0.07m) (F.P.-0.07m) ~ Bulwark A.P. ~ (F.P-0.07m) No.4 Container Hold No.3 Container Hold No.2 Container Hold No.1 Container Hold Description Stern ~ A.P. A.P. ~ Engine Room After Bulkhead Engine Room No.7 Container Hold No.6 Container Hold No.5 Container Hold

Engine room 13~41 No.7 Hold No.6 Hold No.5 Hold No.4 Hold No.3 Hold No.2 Hold No.1 Hold 41~46 46~51 51~56 56~61 61~66 66~71 71~76 76~84 84~89 89~104 104~112 0~104 112

Stem LBP(*) Total Frame

0. Overview
Principal dimensions
Category Loa Lbp B,mld Depth,mld Td Ts Cb at Td Cm at Td Cp at Td Cw at Td Deadweight Speed Basis ship(1,600 TEU) 168.00 m 158.00 m 27.20 m 13.80 m 8.75 m 9.20 m 0.6925 0.9838 0.7039 0.8514 21,500 Ton 20.7 Knots Design ship (1,800TEU) 176.58 m 166.58 m 27.20 m 16.40 m 10.00 m 11.40 m 0.6949 0.9827 0.7003 0.8385 32,000 Ton Ballast 17.0 Knots Complement 23 23 abt. 6,700 m3 Capac ity DFOC Prop. Blade x Dia. x No Cruising range Container (deck/hold) H.F.O. D.O. Fresh Water TYPE MCR M/E NCR MAN B&W 7S60MC-C 15,806 kW x 105.0 RPM 14,225 kW x 101.4 RPM 60.6 ton/day 5x6.5 12,000 N/M 1,679 (1,069/610) abt. 1,770 m3 abt. 160 m3 abt. 200 m3 MAN B&W 6S60MCC8 12,232 kW x 102.0 RPM 11,008 kW x 98.5 RPM 43.7274 ton/day 5x6.52 14,000 N/M 1,890 (1124/766) abt. 1,764 m3 abt. 220 m3 abt. 289 m3

Mai n di me nsi on

0. Overview
Stowage Table of the Design ship
HOLD No. HATCH NO. BAY NO. 20 FT 40 FT 6TH 5TH 4TH ON DECK 3TH 2TH 1TH SUB. T. 6TH 5TH 4TH IN HOLD 3TH 2TH 1TH SUB. T. GRAND TOT. 39 11 11 11 11 11 11 66 11 11 11 11 11 11 9 75 MOOR. DK 37 34 11 11 11 11 11 11 9 75 11 11 11 11 11 11 66 9 9 9 9 7 3 46 35 No. 7 Hold No. 6 Hold No. 5 Hold No. 4 Hold No. 3 Hold No. 2 Hold No. 1 Hold No. 1 Hat. 5 2 11 11 11 11 44 9 9 7 7 5 5 42 86 11 11 11 11 44 9 9 7 5 5 3 38 82 9 9 9 9 36 7 7 5 3 3 0 25 61 3 9 9 9 9 36 5 5 3 1 1 0 15 51 77 165 216 216 216 216 1124 147 147 139 133 109 91 766 1890 1 SUB.TOT.

No. 8 Hat. No. 7 Hat. No. 6 Hat. No. 5 Hat. No. 4 Hat. No. 3 Hat. No. 2 Hat. 33 30 11 11 11 11 11 11 66 9 9 9 9 9 5 50 11 11 11 11 11 11 66 9 9 9 9 9 7 52 31 29 26 11 11 11 11 11 11 66 9 9 9 9 9 9 54 11 11 11 11 11 55 9 9 9 9 27 25 22 11 11 11 11 11 55 9 9 9 9 11 11 11 11 11 55 9 9 9 9 9 9 54 23 21 18 11 11 11 11 11 55 9 9 9 9 9 9 54 11 11 11 11 11 55 9 9 9 9 9 9 54 19 17 14 11 11 11 11 11 55 9 9 9 9 9 9 54 11 11 11 11 11 55 9 9 9 9 9 9 54 15 13 10 11 11 11 11 11 55 9 9 9 9 9 7 52 11 11 11 11 44 9 9 9 9 7 7 50 94 11 9 6 7

HFO TANK 36 91 36 91

112 116 118 120

109 109 109 109 109 107

HFO tank Arrangement

Origin state

This is HFO tank arrangement of the basis ship. However, it is not satisfied with oil tank protection rule. So, we remove it to cargo hold No. 4.

1010

HFO tank Arrangement

Design ship

We arrange HFO tank in No.4 cargo hold, and change midship section to satisfy the rule. We will optimize it after performing loading conditions.

1111

1. Estimation of L , B , D
1.1 When Increasing only Length

Basis Ship CTN Capacity LBP 1643 TEU 158.0m

Increase 1 bay

Increase 2 bay

1643+100=1743 1643+200=1843 TEU TEU 165.37m 171.69m

1. Estimation of L , B , D
1.2 When Increasing only Depth

Basis Ship CTN Capacity D 1643 TEU 13.8m

Increase 1 tier

Increase 2 tier

1643+138=1781 1643+276=1919 TEU TEU 16.391m 18.982m

1. Estimation of L , B , D
1.3 When Increasing Length and Depth

Basis Ship CTN Capacity LBP D 1643 TEU 158.0m 13.8m

Increase 1 bay & 1 tier 1643+138+109=1890 TEU 165.37m 16.391m

1. Estimation of L , B , D
1.4 Analysis of 3 Case
Increase 2 bay CTN Capacity LBP D 1843 TEU 171.69m 13.8m Increase 2tier 1919 TEU 158m 18.982m Increase 1 bay & 1 tier 1890 TEU 165.37m 16.391m

First, we calculate GM In 3 case.

1. Estimation of L,B,D of the Design ship

Stability Estimation for Determinating Main Dimension

1. Estimation of L,B,D of the Design ship

GM of Basis Ship
Basis Ship LBP(m) B(m) D(m) (m) LWL(m) 158 27.2 13.8 9.2 161.5 0.701 Cargo Capacity Loading Condition Loaded Cargo(20FT) Displacement Volume total Displacement Light ship Weight Light ship VCG(m) 1679 TEU Homo. Scant. Dep. (14mt/TEU) 1217 TEU (14mt/TEU) 27583.024 28272.6 ton 6932.1 ton 9.938 204748.79 KB(m) BM(m) KG(m) GM(m) 4.989 7.423 11.621 0.791

1. Estimation of L,B,D of the Design ship

The Case of Extending Length
Dimension LBP(m) B(m) D(m) (m) LWL(m) Value 171.69 27.2 13.8 9.2 175.19 0.706 1843 TEU Homo. Scant. Dep. (14mt/TEU) 1373 TEU (14mt/TEU) 2184ton 156 TEU 30955.368 m3 31729.252 ton 7738.170 ton 9.938 m 227706.518 4.989 7.356 11.676 0.669 12.345 13.69 0 0 806.070 8010.720 22957.728 36466.560 31262.670

Cargo Capacity Loading Condition Loaded Cargo(20FT) Increased Cargo Weight Increased number of Cargo Displacement Volume Total Displacement Light ship Weight Light ship VCG

KB(m) BM KG(m) GM(m) KMT(KB+BM) Increased Length(m) Increased Breadth(m) Increased Draft(m) Increased LWT Increased 1st Moment of Inertia about LWT Increased Increased 1st Moment of Inertia(Cargo+LWT) Total Weight after Increasing all factors

1. Estimation of L,B,D of the Design ship

The Case of Extending Depth
Dimension LBP(m) B(m) D(m) (m) LWL(m) Value 158 27.2 18.982 12.7 161.5 0.683 1903TEU Homo. Scant. Dep. (14mt/TEU) 1477 (14mt/TEU) 3640 tones 260 TEU 37990.614 m3 38940.379 tones 7510.361 tones 9.938 m 204748.79 6.859 5.389 12.219 0.029 12.248 0 0 3.5 578.261tones 5746.754 0 68463.954 32490.861

Cargo Capacity Loading Condition Loaded Cargo(20FT) Increased Cargo Weight Increased number of Cargo Displacement Volume Total Displacement Light ship Weight Light ship VCG

KB(m) BM KG(m) GM(m) KMT(KB+BM) Increased Length(m) Increased Breadth(m) Increased Draft(m) Increased LWT Increased 1st Moment of Inertia about LWT Increased Increased 1st Moment of Inertia(Cargo+LWT) Total Weight after Increasing all factors

1. Estimation of L,B,D of the Design ship

The Case of Extending Length and Depth
Dimension LBP(m) B(m) D(m) (m) LWL(m) Value 165.37 27.2 16.391 10.9 168.87 0.694 1882 Homo. Scant. Dep. (14mt/TEU) 1434 (14mt/TEU) 3038 tones 217 TEU 34845.051 m3 35716.178 tones 7673.029 tones 9.938m 217108.064 5.923 6.231 11.904 0.249 12.153 7.37 0 1.7 740.929 7363.350 12359.274 52981.090 32051.529

Cargo Capacity Loading Condition Loaded Cargo(20FT) Increased Cargo Weight Increased number of Cargo Displacement Volume Total Displacement Light ship Weight Light ship VCG

KB(m) BM KG(m) GM(m) KMT(KB+BM) Increased Length(m) Increased Breadth(m) Increased Draft(m) Increased LWT Increased 1st Moment of Inertia about LWT Increased Increased 1st Moment of Inertia(Cargo+LWT) Total Weight after Increasing all factors

1. Estimation of L,B,D of the Design ship

Comparing Stability & Checking IMO Rule
Extending Length 0.669m Extending Depth 0.029m Extending Length and Depth 0.249m

Basis Ship GM 0.791m

At 57.3, GM should be bigger than 0.15m

1. Estimation of L , B , D
Basis Ship GM 0.791m Extending Length 0.669m Extending Depth 0.029m Extending Length and Depth 0.249m

1.We Can not Method of Extending Length Freeboard of Basis ship. Summer Draft=9.910m<Required Td=10m 2. In terms of Building Cost, Extending only length is the most expensive So, we select the method of Extending Length and Depth

1. Estimation of L , B , D

1. Lbp = 165.37m -> 167.37m (by even Division in cargo hold) It can load 45ft CTN 2. Lbp = 167.37m -> 166.58m (by Engine room, 1 frame=0.79m) 3. D = 16.391m -> 16.4m (by Considering midship section member arrangement)
Basis Ship CTN Capacity LBP D 1643 TEU 158.0m 13.8m Increase 1 bay & 1 tier 1890 TEU 167.37m 16.4m

1. Estimation of L,B,D of the Design ship

Visibility
Minimum of twice LOA or 500m LOA of the design ship is 176.58m. Therefore, 353.16m is limit of visibility View point Check point

Visibility is satisfied!

2. LWT & DWT & Hull form coefficients

2.1 Estimate LWT

LWT(Lightweight) = WS(Steel weight) + WO(Outfitting weight) + WM(Machinery weight)

Estimation of LWT WS(Steel weight) WO(Outfitting weight) WM(Machinery weight) Total LWT 5294.90 ton 1892.05 ton 481.97 ton 7668.9273 ton

2. LWT & DWT & Hull form coefficients

2.1 Estimate DWT Owners Requirment : 27000~32000 DWT First, We select 32000 DWT
Why? 1. Speed of Design ship is Low(17knot)

2. Obtain Maximum Cb Estimation of Consumable DWT HFO Fresh water Diesel oil Lubricating oil Miscell DWT Constant Total consumable DWT Assumption
-

-> Obtain Maximum CTN in hold

1694.1414 289.1385 95.6726 180.1459 333.5037 175.8 2592.6021

The consumption is same as that of the basis ship The margin is same as that of the basis ship The specific gravity of diesel oil is 0.9, 98% fill.

2. LWT & DWT & Hull form coefficients

2.3 Hull form coefficients From Cp curve, we can find out Hull form coefficients of hull form designed ship by EzShip. Cp-curve at Td(10m) C
-0.44ST -0.02ST 0.42ST 0.69ST 0.95ST 1.44ST 1.93ST 2.92ST 3.91ST 4.92ST 5.94ST 6.96ST 8.00ST 10.00ST 0.0000 0 0.0000 0 0.0188 0 0.0712 0 0.1408 1 0.2744 2 0.3983 3 0.6056 6 0.7677 7 0.8900 8 0.9672 9 0.9956 9 1.0000 0 1.0000 0

TERM PROJECT2 2
2010.06.28 2 TEAM 4
10.00ST 11.00ST 12.04ST 13.06ST 14.08ST 15.09ST 16.09ST 17.08ST 18.06ST 18.55ST 19.04ST 19.52ST 20.00ST 20.23ST 20.46ST 20.57ST 1.0000 0 1.0000 0 0.9922 9 0.9642 9 0.9089 9 0.8056 8 0.6502 6 0.4586 4 0.2741 2 0.1970 1 0.1357 1 0.0918 0 0.0632 0 0.0507 0 0.0264 0 0.0000 0

Hull form coefficients(at Td=10m)

Value

CP = 0.7071 7 CPF = 0.6815 6 CPA = 0.7327 7

Cb Cm Cw

0.6949 0.9827 0.8385 0.7003

L O A L B P BEAM DEPTH DRAFT

= = = = = = SPEED = FN = SCH = DIA =

176.58 M 166.58 M 27.20 M 16.40 M 10.00 M(TF) ) 10.00 M(TA) ) 20.00 KTS K 0.2545 2 4.132 M 6.000 M

L/B = B/T = CB = CBF = CBA = CM = CW = CWF = CWA = CB/(L/B)=

6.1243 1 2.7200 7 0.6949 6 0.6697 6 0.7201 7 0.9827 9 0.8435 8 0.7635 7 0.9236 9 0.1135 1

LCB VCB KMT LE LX LR AFP BL WSA VOL

= = = = = = = = = =

1.04 5.41 12.0663 74.961 24.987 66.632 16.883 0.000 6157.2 31485.2

% LPP L M M M(45.00 %) % M(15.00 %) % M(40.00 %) % M^2( 6.32 % AM) ) M( 0.00 % LPP) ) M^2 2 M^3

Cp

2. LWT & DWT & Hull form coefficients

Cp-curve at Ts(11.4m)
T E R M P R O J E2C T 2
2 0 1 0 0 6.2 8 . 2 T E A M4
-0.4 4S T -0.0 2S T 0.4 2S T 0.4 7S T 0.6 9S T 0.9 5S T 1.4 4S T 1.9 3S T 2.9 2S T 3.9 1S T 4.9 2S T 5.9 4S T 6.9 6S T 8.0 0S T 1 0.0 0S T 0.0 1 5 1 0 0.0 4 5 6 0 0.0 9 6 5 0 0.0 9 9 1 0 0.1 5 5 4 1 0.2 2 4 7 2 0.3 5 1 8 3 0.4 6 6 4 4 0.6 5 4 1 6 0.7 9 6 7 7 0.9 0 3 7 9 0.9 7 1 2 9 0.9 9 6 2 9 1.0 0 0 0 0 1.0 0 0 0 0 1 0.0 0S T 1 1.0 0S T 1 2.0 4S T 1 3.0 6S T 1 4.0 8S T 1 5.0 9S T 1 6.0 9S T 1 7.0 8S T 1 8.0 6S T 1 8.5 5S T 1 9.0 4S T 1 9.5 2S T 2 0.0 0S T 2 0.2 3S T 2 0.4 6S T 2 0.5 7S T 1.0 0 0 0 0 1.0 0 0 0 0 0.9 9 3 2 9 0.9 6 8 7 9 0.9 1 9 2 9 0.8 2 4 8 8 0.6 7 7 2 6 0.4 8 7 1 4 0.2 9 6 9 2 0.2 1 4 1 2 0.1 4 5 0 1 0.0 9 2 2 0 0.0 5 5 6 0 0.0 4 4 4 0 0.0 2 3 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 0

Hull form coefficients(at Ts=11.4m) Cb Cm Cw Cp

Value

C P = 0.7 2 7 2 7 C P F = 0.6 9 3 1 6 C P A = 0.7 6 1 4 7

0.7162 0.9848 0.8932 0.7272

0

L O A= L B P= BEAM = D E P T H= D R A F T= S P E E D= FN = SCH = DIA =

17 6 8 M .5 16 6 8 M .5 2 7.2 0 M 1 6.4 0 M 1 1.4 0 M(T F) ) = 1 1.4 0 M(T A) ) 2 0.0 0 K T S 0.2 5 4 5 2 4.1 3 2 M 6.0 0 0 M

L/B = B/T = CB = C BF = C BA = CM = CW = C WF = C WA = C B/ (L/B) =

6.1 2 4 3 1 2.3 8 6 0 3 0.7 1 6 2 7 0.6 8 2 6 6 0.7 4 9 8 7 0.9 8 4 8 9 0.8 9 3 2 8 0.7 8 7 7 7 0.9 9 8 8 9 0.1 1 6 9 1

LCB = VCB = KMT = LE = LX = LR = AFP = BL = WSA = VOL =

1.5 6 % L P P 6.2 0 M 1 2.2 6 2 9 M 7 4.9 6 1 M(4 5.0 0 % ) 2 4.9 8 7 M(1 5.0 0 % ) 6 6.6 3 2 M(4 0.0 0 % ) 1 6.9 6 6 M^2( 5.5 6 % A M) ) 0.0 0 0 M( 0.0 0 % L P P ) 6 7 7 3 8 M^2 . 2 3 6 9 9 .8 M^3 3

3. Resistance
Holtrop & Mennen method

LWL 166.28 m B 27.2 m Td 10 m Tf 10 m V 17 knots Disp. Vol. 31181.5 m2

Cb Cm Cw Cp LCB

0.6949 0.9827 0.8385 0.7003 -1.02

3. Resistance
Frictional Resistance

Basis ship L.W.L Reynolds Number CF Sbh 1+k1 RF 159.9 1.403 x 10^9 0.0014683 5581.10 1.2299551 456.5911

Design ship 166.71 1.227 x 10^9 0.001492513 6132.35 1.217733793 358.7061

3. Resistance
Resistance by appendage

Basis ship SAPP (1+k2)eq CF RAPP 113.4 1.451499 0.0014683 13.467

Design ship 116.3867 1.450178 0.001492513 9.8727

3. Resistance
Resistance by wave-making

Basis ship 2.642483 0.710156 1 -2.13603.

d

Design ship 2.513353 0.755952 1 -2.0983 -0.9 -0.00313 0.856127 143.0762

-0.9 -0.04358 0.841479 389.7127 kN

3. Resistance
Resistance by wave-making of bulb
According to recent result of model test and trial test, RB suggested by Holtrop&Mennen may be ignored. In other words, RB=0.

Resistance by immersed transom

Both transoms of basis ship and design ship are not submerged at design draft. It means AT=0. Therefore, Resistance by transom is zero.

3. Resistance
Resistance by model-ship correlation

The Basis Ship Stotal CA RA 14543.6588 0.000261736 283.869 kN

The Design Ship 13277.0776 0.000282155 268.746 kN

3. Resistance
Total Resistance by Holtrop & Mennen

RF 1+k1 RAPP RW RB RTR RA RT

358.7061 kN 1.217733793 9.872711 kN 122.2323 kN 0 0 99.0924 kN 702.5713 kN

3. Resistance
Holtrop & Mennen method
In this relation,

We can calculate Total Resistance of the Design ship,

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.1 Background theory - For selection of main engine, we first have to know total resistance of the ship. Speed Resistance
17.0 knot 627.16 kN

- is propeller efficiency. So For selection of main engine, we have to - Selection of main engine and estimation of estimate propeller in advance.
principal dimensions of propeller are related each other.

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.1 Background theory
Type MCR NCR DFOC at NCR The basis ship Main Engine MAN B&W 7S60MC-C 15,806 kW x 105.0 RPM 14,225 kW x 101.4 RPM 60.6 ton/day Propeller Diameter Pitch ratio Expansion area ratio The number of blade 6.5 m 0.95 0.98 5

Stage1

- Calculate power and RPM with estimated propeller.

Stage2

- Determine principal dimensions of propeller with modified main engine.

Stage3

- Check that main engine and propeller can perform design speed.

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.1 Background theory Constraint 1 : Condition that propeller absorbs torque delivered by main engine Torque delivered by main engine = Torque absorbed by propeller
-

Constraint 2 : Condition that propeller perform thrust which is demanded at certain speed for certain speed = Thrust that propeller should perform Thrust that needed
-

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.2 Stage1
Items Diameter Expansion area ratio The number of blade Ship speed Total resistance Propeller pitch ratio Power RPM Dp[m] Ae/Ao Z V[knot] RT[kN] Pi/Dp P[kW] n[1/s] Data 6.5 0.824 5 17.0 627.16 Unknown Unknown Unknown

given

Find

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.2 Stage1
Ship speed[knot] 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0
-

Thrust deduction(t) 0.225 0.227 0.228 0.229 0.230 0.230 0.230

Wake fraction(w) 0.302 0.301 0.300 0.298 0.296 0.295 0.295

Relative rotative efficiency 1.021 1.024 1.026 1.028 1.029 1.030 1.030

In actual, above have to be measured by model test. But we dont have model, so we use data of the basis ship.

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.2 Stage1

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.2 Stage1

> Result of calculation by manual method

-

> Result of calculation by computer programming

-

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.2 Stage1
By using advanced ratio and constraint(1), we can calculate RPM and Power
-

We know relation of Power and RPM through constraint(1)

-

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.2 Stage1

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.2 Stage1

Error rate of manual method and computer programming is about 7%

-

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.2 Stage1

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.3 Stage2
Items Power RPM The number of blade Total resistance Diameter Propeller pitch ratio Expansion area ratio Ship speed NCR[kW] nMCR[RPM] Z RT[kN] Dp[m] Pi/Dp Ae/Ao V[m/s] Data 9,545.6130 kW 96.28 RPM 6 627.16 kN Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown

Given

Find

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.3 Stage2
POW curve is made based on open water condition, so we have to consider relative rotative efficiency for transform horse power delivered by the stern into single operating horse power.
-

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.3 Stage2

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.3 Stage2

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.3 Stage2

Thrust of the ship is larger than thrust of the propeller. It means that main engine and propeller can perform larger speed. That is, there is waste of the thrust. Thus we have to carry out previous procedure and interpolate to find point that two thrust is same.
-

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.3 Stage2

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.3 Stage2

If expansion area ratio is not satisfy Kellers minimum expansion area ratio empirical formula, we calculate again Stage2 with changed speed.
-

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.3 Stage2

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.4 Stage3

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.4 Stage3

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.4 Stage3

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.4 Stage3

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.4 Stage3

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.4 Stage3

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.4 Stage3

4. Estimation of Main Engine

4.4 Stage3

5. Calculation of Freeboard
Principal dimensions for freeboard calculation
Dimensions L.O.A L.B.P B (mld) D (mld, to upper deck) DFM (mld, to freeboard deck) 0.85 DFM (mld, to freeboard deck) Scantling Draft (mld) Thickness of Deck stringer plate Freeboard type Displaced volume Design Ship 176.58 m 166.58 m 27.2 m 16.4 m 16.4 m 13.94 m 11.4 m 0.024 m B 47596.0 m3

5. Calculation of Freeboard

Ships Type : Container ship // B Freeboard length (Lf)

0.96 LWL at 0.85 DFM = 165.858 m From A.P. to fore side of stem = 168.32 m We got the largest value; 168.32 m

Freeboard breadth (Bf) = 27.2 m Freeboard depth (Df) = Dmld + Thickness of deck stringer plate = 16.4 + 0.024 = 16.424 m

5. Calculation of Freeboard

Tabular freeboard (Reg. 27 ~ 29) 168.0 m 169.0 m 2,680 2,698

We use this table to calculate tabular freeboard by interpolation method Tabular freeboard = 2,685.76 mm

Correction for block coefficient (Reg. 30)

(Cb + 0.68) / 1.36 = (0.745767 + 0.68) / 1.36 = 1.048358

Correction for depth (Reg. 31)

5. Calculation of Freeboard

Correction for superstructure and trunk (Reg. 33 ~ 37)

LE (Effective length) = 13.061 m, LE/Lf = 0.077596

We use these tables to get the correction for superstructures and trunk Deduction percentage = 5.431737 % Correction for superstructure and trunk = 1070 0.05431737 = 58.12 mm

5. Calculation of Freeboard

Correction for sheer (Reg. 38) (1)

Standard fore sheer mean height = 4409.315 / 8 = 551.1643 mm Standard aft sheer mean height = 8818.629 / 8 = 1102.329 mm Standard sheer mean height = S0 = 826.7465 mm Actual fore sheer mean height = 184 / 8 = 23 mm Actual aft sheer mean height = 0 mm Actual sheer mean height = 11.5 mm

5. Calculation of Freeboard

Correction for sheer (Reg. 38) (2)

Sheer credit for a poop or forecastle Sfcle = (y / 3) (L1 / Lf) = (444 / 3) (13.061 / 168.32) = 11.48424 mm According to Reg. 33, Standard superstructure height is 2,300 mm So, y = 2,744 2,300 = 444 mm L1 is mean length; 13.061 m Spoop = 0, because it is lower than standard superstructure height. S = 11.5 + 11.48424 = 22.98424 mm Correction for sheer = (S0 S) (0.75 0.5 LE / Lf) = 571.637 mm

5. Calculation of Freeboard
Correction process Tabular freeboard Correction for block coefficient Correction for freeboard depth Correction for sheer Correction for superstructure and trunk Summer Freeboard Freeboard depth Allowed summer load water line (Freeboard depth Required freeboard) Scantling draft Value (mm)
2685.76 X 1.048358 + 1300.667 +571.637 - 58.12 4629.8222 16424 11794.1778 11400

Therefore, summer load water line is 11.4 m. Next, we check the minimum bow height and reserve buoyancy in accordance with Reg. 39.

5. Calculation of Freeboard

Reserve buoyancy (Reg. 39)

A1 = 126.24 m2 A2 = 2.489 m2 A3 = 37.321 m2 Projected area = A1 + A2 + A3 = 166.05 m2 Required area = 148.4368 m2

Minimum bow height (Reg. 39)

Projected area > Required area, it is satisfied with the rule.

Fcle mean length = 13.061 > 0.07 Lf; 11.7824 m (Reg. 39 (2)) Sheer extension = 33.9 > 0.15 Lf; 25.248 m (Reg. 39 (2)) Minimum bow height Fb = 5,942.196 mm Ha = Df(mld) + Fcle height at F.P + Sheer + Stringer plate th. Ts(mld) = 7,937 mm

6. Equipment number Calculation

Equipment number is guidance of shipboard towing and mooring equipment

Weight and number of Anchor Length and diameter of anchor chain Number, Length and breaking load of mooring line Length and breaking load of tow line

7272

6. Equipment number Calculation

7373

6. Equipment number Calculation

Description Summer load waterline ~ U deck U deck ~ A deck A deck ~ B deck B deck ~ C deck C deck ~ D deck D deck ~ E deck E deck ~ NAV. Deck NAV. Deck ~ COM. Deck h

Height (m) 5.00 2.80 2.95 2.95 2.95 2.95 2.95 2.70 25.25

7474

6. Equipment number Calculation

A.P. to stem 0.96 LWL 0.97 LWL

166.8128 m 164.0148 m 165.7233 m 165.7233 m 165.7233 x 5.0 = 828.6165 m2

A = 828.6165 + 273.354
=1101.9705 m2 7575
Area

6. Equipment number Calculation

7676

Reference : KR

7.Hull form design

7.1 Hull form design by Ez-ship

Using lines plan of basis ship. We can convert this drawing to computer data.

7.Hull form design

7.1 Hull form design by Ez-ship

This is hull form of basis ship drawn by Ezship. We should vary this data.

7.Hull form design

7.1 Hull form design by Ez-ship

Loa Lbp B,mld Depth,mld Td Ts Cb at Ts

abt. 168.00 m 158.00 m 27.20 m 13.80 m 8.75 m 9.20 m 0.701

7.Hull form design

7.2 Cp variation by Lankenby method

7.Hull form design

7.2 Cp variation by Lankenby method

7.Hull form design

7.3 Fairing Design ships surface

7.Hull form design

7.3 Design ship

Loa Lbp B,mld Depth,mld Td Ts Cb at Ts

abt. 176.58 m 166.58 m 27.20 m 16.40 m 10.00 m 11.40 m 0.7161

Thank You !