Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Systems
Incident rate
Improved culture
Time
SCMM - what is it ?
Tool & technique to improve safety performance Systematic process to assist in : the establishment of the current culture ; and identifying actions necessary to reach the next level. Developed by the Kiel Centre & HSE to tackle the behavioural & cultural issues offshore. Identifies five cultural levels :
Cultural level measured by evaluating against 10 elements : management commitment & visibility, communication, safety vs production, learning organisation, safety resources, participation, shared perceptions, trust, IR/job satisfaction & training.
Management Commitment
SCMM - Characteristics?
GENERATIVE chronic unease believe accidents safety seen as a profit centre new ideas are welcomed resources are available to fix things before an accident management is open but still obsessed with statistics procedures are owned by the workforce we cracked it! lots and lots of audits HSE advisers chasing statistics we are serious, but why dont they do what theyre told? endless discussions to re-classify accidents you have to consider the condition under which we are working the lawyers/regulator said it was OK of course we have accidents, its a dangerous business sack the idiot who had the accident
PROACTIVE
CALCULATIVE
REACTIVE
PATHOLOGICAL
SCMM Delivery.
Interactive workshop format, which allows participants to use a card-sort method to identify the current levels of safety culture maturity for each of the 10 elements. Working in pairs, participants used the card-sort method to identify current levels of safety culture maturity for each of the 10 elements. Individual ratings summarised on a wall chart. Working through each of the 10 elements, participants :
explained why they chose this level of safety culture maturity; and identified practical and realistic action which they believed would move forward safety culture to the next level of maturity.
2 - REACTIVE
Output - Leadership.
Chart 6: Safety Culture Maturity - Leadership Team summary results
100% 90% 80% 50% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 50% 25% 50% 25% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 50% 100% 25% 50% 50% 50% 50% 25%
0%
Safety communication
Safety resources
Participation in safety
Key
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Safety training
Learning organisation
Trust
Safety resources
Safety communication
Key
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Participation in safety
Safety training
0%
Learning organisation
Trust
Output - Contractors
Chart 9: Safety Culture Maturity - Contractors summary results
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 31% 10%
Safety communication
8% 15%
8% 15% 31%
8% 15%
8% 15%
8% 15% 31%
15% 31% 23% 54% 23% 31% 46% 38% 23% 15%
Productivity versus safety Safety resources Visible management commitment Learning organisation
38% 31%
31%
23%
8% 15%
46%
31%
15%
Shared perceptions about safety Participation in safety Trust
8%
Industrial relations and job satisfaction
15%
Safety training
0%
Seeing Ourselves.
Perceived frequently with which we demonstrate good HSE behaviours gap analysis.
Aligned to learnings from Texas City.
Seeing Ourselves-delivery
Texas City pre-read & question set at point of registration for the session via peoplesoft. Interactive workshop format, which discusses HSE behaviours using their participants experience & Texas City pre-read work. Participants use a gap analysis work book to assess their own HSE behaviours on a scale of 1 5 against those best practice behaviours. Participants assess their line manager & subordinate team members behaviours on a scale of 1 5. Analysis of behavioural ratings to identify areas for improvement. Commitment to making a specific change to behaviours to prevent potential for an event such as Texas City send postcard to DM.
Regulatory
Organisation : 4 Cs
Plan & Implement Delivery
Year 1, Year 2, Year 3