Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
What is a research paradigm? Characteristics of research paradigms Ontology, epistemology, axiology, methodology Pragmatism Research Approaches Induction & Deduction The most important paradigms to know Positivsm, realism (post/neo positivism), Interpretivism
Research philosophy
Research philosophy is an over-arching term relating to the development of knowledge and the nature of that knowledge
Adapted from Saunders et al, (2009)
A paradigm is a basic set of beliefs that guide action, whether of the everyday garden variety or action taken with a disciplined inquiry.
Guba, Egon 1990. The Paradigm Dialog. London: Sage, p. 17.
Ontology
What is the nature of reality? Is there a reality?
Epistemology
What is the relationship between the knower (the researcher) and the know(able)?
Axiology
The role of values and ethics in research
Methodology
How should the researcher/inquirer go about finding out knowledge?
A mix of Guba and Saunders et al.
Deduction
Generation of hypotheses from theory (knowledge). Can be in the form of axioms
Deduction
5 sequential stages of testing theory
Deducing a hypothesis Expressing the hypothesis operationally Testing the operational hypothesis Examining the specific outcome of the enquiry Modifying the theory (if necessary)
Adapted from Robson (2002)
Characteristics of Deduction
Explaining causal relationships between variables Establishing controls for testing hypotheses Independence of the researcher Concepts operationalised for quantative measurement Generalisation
Induction
Building theory by
Understanding the way human build their world Permitting alternative explanations of whats going on Being concerned with the context of events Using more qualitative data Using a variety of data collection methods
Positivism
Tries to uncover the one truth about how things are or a least what we focus on. (Social) Science then is: A structured method combining logical deduction with precise empirical observations (of the behaviour of individuals) to reveal and confirm causal relationships that are generally valid with a known probality and which can therefore be used for prediction.
Positivism
The purpose of science is then to uncover the truth to be able to control and predict. Humans are expected to be rational. Objectivity and precision is important. Therefore measurement and measures, tools and procedures are very important. Because reality is stable and thruths are generally valid, vi kan deduct new thruths from the ones that we know.
10
Positivism How must we conduct research? Set up hypotheses which the researcher seeks to verify logically and empirically It is important that hypotheses are set up in a way that makes testing possible. Test by different researchers under different circumstances is important - replication If empirical research does not support the hypothesis, it may be an anomali, methodological problems or that the theory is not correct.
11
Positivism
Facts, and how these facts were reached. Research is assumed to be free of values and values therefore has no influence on research or results. The good academic secretary (Den gode embedsmand)
12
Epistemology
Relationship with the researched : Objectivity (observing) or Subjectivity (empathy)
Axiology
The role of values and ethics
Methodology
How should research be conducted?
Realism there is one reality, and we can find it. We can describe thruths that are valid at all times, regardsless of persons and places (contexts). Research is to find these.
The researcher should not influence what is research. Objectivity requires refrainment from contact observation of facts is preferable
The researcher must be(and can is, in fact) free from value ladennes and does not interpret. Knowledge must be independent of the individual conducting the research.
Verification of hypotheses RCT Randomized controlled trial If necessary interviews about facts Analytical mindset - Split problem in small entities - Aggregate results by summing up Optimization
13
Guba pp. 21
14 Business Research Methods 2011 Anna Lund Jepsen
Epistemology
Relationship with the researched : Objectivity (observing) or Subjectivity (empathy)
Axiology
The role of values and ethics
Methodology
How should research be conducted?
There is one reality but humans have a bounded rationality and are therefore not capable of fully understanding it. Critical realism
Complete objectivity is not possible but the good researcher must try to acheive it. Accept that interaction in some instances is unavoidable. But the researcher must act as neutral as possible.
Falsification of hypoteses Multiple methods depending on research topic and context Triangulation methods, data, theories, researchers A focus on context and synergies. Systems Satisfication
15
Interpretivism
Related to humanism, hermeneutic, konstructivism There is not an eternally valid truth about reality. Reality is a social construction (social constructivism) A lot of concepts describe things that are not physically there Science should aim at understanding how the individual perceives reality
16
17
18
Interpretivism - results
Descriptions of the observed and the interpretations made and development of concepts which can describe the experienced Results often presented with data in the form of citations Results can be a theory about how an individual or a group of people experince something. This theory is put into some form of theoretical context
19
Epistemology
Relationship with the researched : Objectivity (observing) or Subjectivity (empathy) Reality is the common realization of the world. The social reconstruction. This requires empathy and thus the researcher must be subjective. And use subjective judgements which still have to be valid and argumented for.
Axiology
The role of values and ethics
Methodology
How should research be conducted?
Relativistic reality is a social construction something that is recreated by human minds No theory can ever be verified beyond everything. Every test is partial.
Data are never free of interpretation. They are interpreted based on prior theoretical knowledge and experiences of the researcher. Data are never free of values. Whether a result is bad, good, important or not is judged on the basis of ethical values. Whether a problem is relevant to use resources to solve is based on ethical values.
The choice of methodology must ensure that the social reconstruction of reality is correct . Often, this is done in a hermeneutic circle. Constant shift between fieldwork and interpretation.
20
21
22