Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Delays in one project delays others Inefficient use of resources Bottlenecks in resource availability
Project Results
30
Percent late Over half 190 percent over budget Over half 220 percent late
Challenges
Making
sure projects closely tied to goals and strategy How to handle growing number of projects How to make projects successful
management maturity refers to mastery of skills required to manage project competently Number of ways to measure Most organizations do not do well
selection
Same
Types of Companies
Companies whose core business is completing projects Companies whose core business is something else Companies looking at projects to do for others Companies looking at projects to do for themselves
Project Companies
Must
Preparing
a bid is expensive They do not want to waste that effort on bids where they are unlikely to be successful
Non-Project Companies
Must
decide which potential projects they will pursue Available capital is the major constraint Profitability is often the major criteria Must evaluate approaches when there is more than one project that can accomplish a goal
Models
Models
are used to select projects All models simplify reality That is, they only look at the key variables involved in a decision The more variables included in a model, the more complex it becomes Simpler models usually work better
Types of Models
Stochastic
Model
A model that includes the probabilities of events occurring within the model. In other words, the same inputs might yield different outputs at different runs. Also known as a probabilistic model.
Deterministic
Model
A model that does not include probabilities. Given the same inputs, the outputs will always be the same.
Companies only want to undertake successful projects Projects that fail waste resources and hurt profitability and competitiveness Projects that succeed improve profitability and competitiveness It is not possible to know ahead of time if a project will succeed or fail In fact, there is a continuum of possible results from total success through absolute failure
Criteria
(Continued)
Companies
need a way of weeding out the bad projects while keeping the good ones No model can predict with absolute certainty No model could predict
What
Model Criteria
Realism Capability Flexibility Easy
Realism
Needs
to include all objectives of the firm Needs to include the firms expertise as well as its limitations Needs to report results in a fashion that allows different projects to be compared, e.g. how do we compare a project to lower production cost and one to raise market share
Capability
Model
Needs
Flexibility
Needs
to be able to work with all projects Needs to be updated as the firm and its environment evolves
Easy to Use
Needs
to be quick to gather the data and easy to use Easy to be able to fit the project in the model
Inexpensive
Do
not want the model to eat up all the savings that result from using the model Expenses include the cost of writing and maintaining the model Also includes the expense of gathering the data needed by the model
Easy to Implement
This
is less of an issue with modern spreadsheets However, a model to be used to evaluate all the firms projects should be centrally maintained
turn inputs into outputs Managers decide on the values for the inputs and evaluate the outputs The inputs never fully describe the situation The outputs never fully describe the expected results Models are tools Managers are the decision makers
Not
all factors are equally important Critical factors on one project may be trivial on another project
Nonnumeric Models
Models
that do not return a numeric value for a project that can be compared with other projects These are really not models but rather justifications for projects Just because they are not true models does not make them all bad
Cow
A project, often suggested by top management, that has taken on a life of its own. It continues, not due to any justification, but just because.
Operating
Necessity Necessity
A project that is required in order to protect lives or property or to keep the company in operation. A project that is required in order to maintain the companys position in the marketplace.
Competitive
Continued
Line Extension
Often, projects to expand a product line are evaluated on how well the new product meshes with the existing product line rather than on overall benefits.
Comparative
Benefit
Projects are subjectively rank ordered based on their perceived benefit to the company.
Numeric Models
Models that return a numeric value for a project that can be easily compared with other projects Two major categories:
1. 2.
Profit/profitability Scoring
Profit/Profitability Models
Models
Payback period Discounted cash flow (NPV) Internal rate of return (IRR) Profitability index
NPV
Payback Period
The
length of time until the original investment has been recouped by the project A shorter payback period is better
Project Cost Payback Period = Annual Cash Flow $100,000 Payback Period = =4 $25,000
Does not consider time value of money More difficult to use when cash flows change over time Less meaningful over longer periods of time (due to time value of money)
value of a stream of cash inflows and outflows in todays dollars Also know as discounted cash flow or just discounting Widely used to evaluate projects Includes the time value of money Includes all inflows and outflows, not just the ones through payback point
Continued
The
discount rate may also be know as a hurdle rate or cutoff rate There will usually be one overall discount rate for the company
NPV Formula
Ft NPV (project) = A0 + t =1 t (1 + k )
n
A higher NPV is better The higher the discount rate, the lower the NPV
NPV Example
$25,000 NPV (project) = $100,000 + t t =1 (1 + 0.15 + 0.03) = $1,939
8
discount rate (k) that causes the NPV to be equal to zero The higher the IRR, the better
While it is technically possible for a series to have multiple IRRs, this is not a practical issue
Finding
Profitability Index
a.k.a.
Benefit cost ratio NPV divided by initial cash investment Ratios greater than 1.0 are good
to use and understand Based on accounting data and forecasts Familiar and well understood Give a go/no-go indication Can be modified to include risk
non-monetary factors Some ignore time value of money Discounting models (NPV, IRR) are biased to the short-term Payback models ignore cash flow after payback
Scoring Models
Unweighted
factor is weighted the same Less important factors are weighted the same as important ones Easy to compute Just total or average the scores
Figure 2-2
good way to include non-numeric data in the analysis Factors need to sum to one All weights must be set up so higher values mean more desirable Small differences in totals are not meaningful
Figure B
to do with projects is risky Some projects, like R&D, are more risky than others, like construction Risks include
The timing of the project and its associated cash flow Risk regarding the outcome of the project Risk about the side effects
Uncertainty
1. 2. 3.
Pro forma financial statements Risk analysis Simulation (requires detailed probability information)
Accounting Data
1. 2.
3.
Cost and revenue are linear Cost-revenue data derived using standard cost standardized revenue assumptions Costs may include overhead
Measurements
1. 2. 3. 4.
Subjective versus objective Quantitative versus qualitative Reliable versus unreliable Valid versus invalid
Uncertain Information
Must
estimate inputs for risk analysis These inputs cannot be known exactly Inputs must be adjusted over time
projects directly to the goals and strategy of the organization Means for monitoring and controlling projects
PPP Steps
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Establish a project council Identify project categories and criteria Collect project data Assess resource availability Reduce the project and criteria set Prioritize the projects within categories Select projects to be funded and held in reserve Implement the process
management The project managers of major projects The head of the Project Management Office Particularly relevant general managers Those who can identify key opportunities and risks facing the organization Anyone who can derail the PPP later on
the data Document assumptions Screen out weaker projects The fewer projects that need to be compared and analyzed, the easier the work
both internal and external resources Assess labor conservatively Timing is particularly important
goals Have competence Market for offering How risky Potential partner Right resources Good fit
Use
the scores and criterion weights Consider in terms of benefits first, resource costs second Summarize the returns from the projects
the mix of projects across the categories Leave some resources free for new opportunities Allocate the categorized projects in rank order
Project Proposals
The
bid Putting together a project proposal requires a detailed analysis of the project Project proposals can take weeks or months to complete A more detailed analysis may result in not bidding on the project
letter Executive summary The technical approach The implementation plan The plan for logistic support and administration Past experience