Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • Modelling Pollution in Yamuna River Using ARC-SWAT

    Încărcat de

    Dhananjay Mishra
    32 vizualizări15 pagini
    This document describes using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to model point and non-point source pollution in the Yamuna River basin in India. Key steps included delineating sub-basins and stream networks from a digital elevation model, overlaying land use and soil data to identify hydrologic response units, and simulating water quality parameters like sediment, nutrients, and chemical oxygen demand. Model results were compared to actual water quality monitoring data. The study found the model needs calibration to increase accuracy and more data on factors like fertilizer application rates is required for the Indian situation. Overall, SWAT shows potential for evaluating pollution contributions from different sources but has limitations without further refinement.

    Descriere originală:

    Titlu original

    BTP_PPT_2

    Drepturi de autor

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formate disponibile

    PPTX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    This document describes using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to model point and non-point source pollution in the Yamuna River basin in India. Key steps included delineating sub-basins and stream networks from a digital elevation model, overlaying land use and soil data to identify hydrologic response units, and simulating water quality parameters like sediment, nutrients, and chemical oxygen demand. Model results were compared to actual water quality monitoring data. The study found the model needs calibration to increase accuracy and more data on factors like fertilizer application rates is required for the Indian situation. Overall, SWAT shows potential for evaluating pollution contributions from different sources but has limitations without further refinement.

    Drepturi de autor:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Descărcați ca PPTX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    32 vizualizări15 pagini

    Modelling Pollution in Yamuna River Using ARC-SWAT

    Încărcat de

    Dhananjay Mishra
    This document describes using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to model point and non-point source pollution in the Yamuna River basin in India. Key steps included delineating sub-basins and stream networks from a digital elevation model, overlaying land use and soil data to identify hydrologic response units, and simulating water quality parameters like sediment, nutrients, and chemical oxygen demand. Model results were compared to actual water quality monitoring data. The study found the model needs calibration to increase accuracy and more data on factors like fertilizer application rates is required for the Indian situation. Overall, SWAT shows potential for evaluating pollution contributions from different sources but has limitations without further refinement.

    Drepturi de autor:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Descărcați ca PPTX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 15

    MODELLING OF NON-POINT AND POINT SOURCES OF POLLUTION IN YAMUNA USING ARC-SWAT

    DHANANJAY MISHRA

    ARC-SWAT MODEL

    1.

    2.

    3.

    Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is used to simulate point and non-point source pollution. It is used to study the impact of land use on water quality. Basic processes areFirst the sub-basins, stream network, channel length and hill slopes are derived from DEM. Homogeneous land use and soil classes are overlaid to yield HRU. SWAT simulates evapo-transpiration, infiltration, runoff, nutrient cycling and transport for each HRU.

    DATA REQUIRED & COLLECTION


    Fertiliser Data Fertiliser association of India Pesticide Data Indiastat.com/PMFAI ( Spraying schedule)

    Point sources Data Internally available


    Weather data, DEM, Geo-database

    BOD and other actual water quality data - CPCB

    ASSUMPTIONS
    1.

    Pesticide spraying has been assumed constant in the entire river basin

    2.

    Point sources pollution from sewage has been neglected to study the effect of non-point sources only

    3.

    Yamuna river basin has been truncated to study the areas upto Delhi.

    4.

    Fertilizer consumption has been assumed same over the


    year 2000-2005.

    YAMUNA RIVER BASINWATERSHED

    HRU

    RESULTS

    Projects\BTP\SWATOutput.mdb

    Simulation was done using two different basins a. region only

    upto Delhi b. Complete Yamuna basin

    Complete Yamuna basin simulation was done without any fertilizer or pesticide dosage.

    Sample Result of Sub-basin 1 (Uttarkashi)


    Year Area(km2) Flow_In(cms) Flow_out(cms) EVAP(cms) SED_In(ton) SED_out(ton) ORGN_In(Kg) ORG_out

    2000

    315.6

    1.145

    1.127

    0.01818

    2824000

    2824000

    2166000

    2156000

    2001

    315.6

    0.7205

    0.7027

    0.01771

    510100

    510100

    240600

    239300

    2002

    315.6

    3.034

    3.014

    0.01933

    18290000

    18290000

    2013000

    2006000

    2003

    315.6

    5.491

    5.472

    0.01852

    18290000

    15270000

    600600

    598800

    2004

    315.6

    3.769

    3.749

    0.01962

    6625000

    6625000

    543900

    541500

    2005

    315.6

    0.1698

    0.1587

    0.01102

    35030

    35030

    5259

    5044

    Simulated CBOD vs Actual BOD (Yamunanagar)


    Year
    2000

    CBOD (Kg)
    1733000

    CPCB CBOD (mg/l) BOD (mg/l)


    NA

    2001
    2002 2003 2004 2005

    300500
    1398000 715300 1585000 39100 0.007 0.01 0.007

    NA
    NA 1.3 1.9 1.8

    CBOD vs Flow
    Year CBOD (Kg) Flow (Cms)

    2000

    1733000 300500 1398000

    2.206 1.907 3.103

    2001
    2002 2003 2004 2005

    715300
    1585000 39100

    3.194
    2.95 0.1745

    Dissolved Oxygen Transported in & out


    DO (MG/L) DO ACTUAL year

    0.006

    8.6

    2003

    0.007

    8.6

    2004

    8.1

    2005

    CAVEATS OF THE PRESENT STUDY


    1.

    Single HRU in a sub-basin limits the accuracy of the model.

    2.

    Fertilizer data used in the model is for the entire year while
    Land use data is only for Kharif Period.

    3.

    Parameters like fertilizer applied to top 10 mm of the soil, heat input required for the plant etc. not available for Indian situations.

    4. 5.

    Truncated area of study limits the accuracy of results. Many imp. Water quality parameters like PH, Temperature and Coliform are not obtained.

    FUTURE SCOPE OF WORK-MODEL CALIBRATION & Validation

    Model needs to calibrated for the system to increase the accuracy. SWAT would be calibrated manually for the system by changing sensitivity parameters for the simulation period 1990-2000.

    Model validation will be done for the period 2000-2005 and efficiency of the model will be calculated at the basin outlet.

    Contribution of point and non-point sources will be compared

    during various seasons.

    Various scenarios can be generated and analysed.

    THANK YOU !!

    S-ar putea să vă placă și