Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ii) Survey methods insensitive to social nature of language; QR is a learning language process
iii) Survey destroys naturalistic setting of real life; QR attempts to preserve it.
iv) Surveys utilise third or fourth hand information; QR attempts to get first hand information
METHODS USED BY QR
Observation Textual analysis
Transcripts
Interviews
Textual Analysis
Interviews
Transcripts
Used to understand how participants organise their talk (transcription of audio/video recording)
DATA COLLECTION
Structured or open ended depending on the purpose of the interview, the researchers familiarity with and knowledge about the setting, and the exploratory or confirmatory nature of the study
Interview Provides a method for collecting data imbedded in the interpretations, perceptions, and experiences of respondents
DATA COLLECTION
Nonparticipation Observation researcher is not directly engaged in activities and central behaviours within the situation under study
Observation
Participation Observation Individual conducting the investigation participates in the setting/activities being observed Provides a direct method to record human behaviour and events as they occur
DATA COLLECTION
Minutes of meetings, newspaper and magazine articles, diaries, videotapes, audiotapes, memoranda and correspondence
Existing Documents or Archival Research Archival records add data that are independent of the researchers presence, interpretation, or preexisting theories
STANDARDS OF RIGOR
As with other research designs, qualitative researchers must ask specific questions regarding conceptualization and research process in order to assure trustworthiness of a study. QUESTION QUALITATIVE TERM 1. Is it the right thing Appropriateness to do; is it needed? 2. Can we trust the Unbiased researchers? 3. Do the results stand Dependable up; same results with repetition? 4. Can it be used in various Generalizable settings/situation free? 5. Are the results subject Credible/Authentic to contamination? QUANTITATIVE TERM Problem Significance Objective Reliable
STANDARD OF RIGOR
Reliability in Qualitative designs has much the same general meaning as it does in quantitative design ie. Under similar circumstances, can the study be replicated with similar results? Are the results an accurate reflection of what actually occurred? Internal Reliability means the objectivity is maintained and the findings will be similar within the site eg in a given group of youths, a researcher describing social patterns can expect that expectations, beliefs etc. will be similar among those who belong to the group. External Reliability suggests a relicability of concepts across and between sites. Designs across sites such as comparative case studies make it possible for researchers to describe patterns existing in broader social environments and describe more abstract and general concepts related to specific findings.
INTERNAL RELIABILITY
5 steps that can help the qualitative researcher protect internal reliability
Use low inference descriptors Use multiple researchers whenever possible Create a careful audit trail (record of data that can be followed by another scholar back from conclusions to the raw data) Use mechanical recording devices where possible (and with permission) Use participant researchers or informants to check the accuracy or congruence of perceptions.
EXTERNAL RELIABILITY
Procedures that can help protect external reliability Clearly specify the researchers status or position so that readers know exactly what point of view drove the data collection Clearly state who informants are (or what role they play in the natural context) and how and why they are selected or chosen (while maintaining confidentiality) Carefully delineate the context or setting boundaries and characteristics so that a reader can make judgements about similar circumstances or settings Define the analytic constructs that guided the study (describe specific conceptual frameworks used in design and deductive analysis) Specify the data collection and analysis procedures meticulously
STANDARDS OF RIGOR
Validity in qualitative research captures the accuracy or truthfulness of the findings. 1. Duration and intensity of data gathering assure that a plethora of important events and details is recorded over time involving all the participants in the group and in many situations and combinations. Prevents unique or unrepresentative events from receiving unwarrented attention.
2. Rich and supportive data from a variety of sources rich description and valid analysis
Lecompte and Goetz (1982): Validity to be the strength of qualitative research, because it sets findings in the natural settings, free from contaminating effects of control or variable manipulation. Miles & Huberman (1994); Trustworthiness, credibility, authenticity
iv) v)
vi)
Classifying/Categorising data: Fragmenting data and labelling to make sense of it (Coding 1st. Level analysis)
Connecting categories: Linking data categories together (Pattern coding/making: 2nd. Level analysis)