Apops Pres Hsu Redundant Service

Redundant Internet service provision customer viewpoint
Kae Hsu kae@du.net.tw Communication Network Dept.
http://www.seed.net.tw
Agenda
Requirement of redundant Types of redundant
Backup Load-sharing Multihoming
Challenge to service provider Solution for consumers Another redundant issue MPLS VPN Next challenge
2 2006/09/07
Agenda
3 2006/09/07
Requirement of redundant
Internet access is a very important service today for:
Enterprise/business
Tools of operation Decreasing the cost Increasing the revenue

Consumers
Communication tools Entertainment Customers need redundant service provision

4 2006/09/07
It was expensive to build a redundant Internet topology for end-user before:
Use leased line/ISDN for backup only Less circuit utilization Expensive network equipments Complex network operation
2006/09/07
Today, new type of circuit provides simple and convenient way to build a redundant Internet access service
FTTx xDSL Wireless
More and more cheap and efficient network equipments appear SP could provide enough redundant service for customer requirements
6 2006/09/07
Agenda
7 2006/09/07
Types of redundant
3 types of redundant (1)
Backup
Redundant circuit
Primary: expensive, better quality Backup: cheap, less bandwidth
Use backup circuit only when primary circuit is

failure
2006/09/07
Types of redundant - Backup

Traditional circuit backup topology
ISP PE PE Leased Line ISDN CE User
ISP
PE PE
Leased Line
ISDN
CE User
Customers need cheaper and higher bandwidth backup solution

9 2006/09/07

New circuit backup topology
ISP PE Leased Line xDSL BRAS PE Leased Line FTTx BRAS PE FTTx xDSL CE User CE User CE User
ISP
ISP
10 2006/09/07
BRAS

New circuit backup topology
xDSL ISP BRAS PE wireless CE User
When customers use two permanent circuits, they hope to use these two circuits at the same time
11
2006/09/07
Agenda
12 2006/09/07
Types of redundant
Load-sharing
Redundant circuit
Usually use the same type of circuit Sometimes two circuits with the different type but the same bandwidth is possible
Sharing traffic among those circuits Redundant PE/CE (option)

Prevent any single-point failure
13
2006/09/07
Types of redundant Load-sharing

Basic topology of load-sharing
ISP
Leased line PE Leased line CE User
ISP
Leased line PE Leased line CE User
14
2006/09/07
Types of redundant Load-sharing

Advanced topology of load-sharing
Leased line PE ISP PE Leased line CE User CE
Some customers think to connect to only one SP is risky They need redundant option on SP issue
15 2006/09/07
Agenda
16 2006/09/07
Types of redundant
Multihoming
Redundant circuit
Usually use the same type of circuit Sometimes two circuits with the different type but the same bandwidth is possible
Sharing traffic between those circuits Redundant CE (option)

Prevent single-point failure on CE router
Redundant service provider

Prevent single-point failure on SP
17
2006/09/07
Types of redundant - Multihoming

Lots of documents talks about BGP multihoming Only discuss REAL cases that our customer ask us to provision here Our customer uses the IP block(s) from RIR (TWNIC) only
seednet did not provide IP blocks for multihoming service
18
2006/09/07

Three ways to provision multihoming service
Customers use BGP to exchange routing information between SP with their AS# from RIR Customers use BGP to exchange routing information between SP with private AS# Customers do not use BGP to exchange routing information between SP
19
2006/09/07

Customers use BGP to exchange routing information between SP with their AS# from RIR
300 AS .0/20 00+ 0 S1 2.20. e A 17 unc /21, o ISP1 AS100 ann 0.0.0 .2 172
ann oun 172 ce AS3 .2 0 172 0.0.0/2 0 .20. 1 0.0/ 20
AS300
Internet
a 17 nno 2.2 un 0.8 ce A .0/ 21 S200 ,1 72 +AS .20 30 .0. 0 0/2 0
172.20.0.0/20
User ISP2 AS200

300 e AS 1 c /2 oun ann .20.8.0 /20 2 0 17 0.0. 72.2 1
SP announce full Internet routes or default

20 2006/09/07
route only to customer

Discussion for customers use BGP to exchange routing information between SP with their AS# from RIR:
Customers have to apply AS# from RIR

It is no necessary if those customers use their BGP network for redundant Internet access only (e.g. NOT for transit)
Customers have to maintain BGP by themselves

Not so much engineers in customer site know well and have no fear on BGP
Any more suitable solution?
21
2006/09/07

Customers use BGP to exchange routing information between SP with private AS#
/20 100 AS 20.0.0 nce 2. nou 1, 17 an 0/2 ISP1 AS100 . 0.0 .2 172
ann oun c 172 e AS65 .20. 500 0 172 .20. .0/21 0.0/ 20
AS65500
Internet
17 2.2 ann 0.8 oun .0/ ce 21 , 1 AS20 72 .20 0 .0. 0/2 0
172.20.0.0/20
500 S65 A 21 nce nou 20.8.0/ 0 an . 2 172 0.0.0/ .2 172
User
ISP2 AS200
SP announce full Internet routes or default

22 2006/09/07
route to customer

Customers use BGP to exchange routing information between SP with private AS#
Customer have to maintain BGP by themselves

Not so much engineers in customer site know well and have no fear on BGP
Obviously, the ability for BGP is the key Any solution to remove BGP here?
23
2006/09/07

Customers do NOT use BGP to exchange routing information between SP
/20 100 AS 20.0.0 nce 2. nou 1, 17 an 0/2 ISP1 AS100 0. 20.
export IGP 172.20.0.0/21 172.20.8.0/21
. 172
Internet
17 2.2 ann 0.8 oun .0/ ce 21 , 1 AS20 72 .20 0 .0. 0/2 0
172.20.0.0/20
User ISP2 AS200

export IGP 172.20.0.0/21 172.20.8.0/21
SP does not announce any route to customer

24 2006/09/07

Customers do not use BGP to exchange routing information between SP
Customer have to maintain their output traffic

by some ways
Flow based load-sharing
Use equal cost default route only Asymmetric routing status happened Keep the symmetric routing status Use PBR Recursive Next Hop to increase the reliability Keep the symmetric routing status Use multiple routing table to increase the reliability
Policy-based routing (Cisco)
Filter-based forwarding (Juniper)
25
2006/09/07
Agenda
26 2006/09/07
Challenge to service provider

To provide the new topology for backup and load-sharing redundant, SP needs new equipments and routing architecture too.
New equipments for new circuit New routing architecture
Ways to control customer routes in SP

backbone
27
2006/09/07

In the old backup topology, backup route would not appear in backbone
export IGP
ISP
PE PE
Leased Line ISDN CE User
When the primary circuit fail, the ISDN dialup and change the routing status
export IGP
ISP
PE PE
Leased Line
export IGP
ISDN
CE User
28
2006/09/07

In the new backup topology, customers use permanent circuit for backup
Backup route leaks in the network Need to differentiate the primary/backup routes in the backbone network
export iBGP, high local-preference
ISP
export iBGP, low local-preference
PE
Leased Line xDSL CE User
BRAS
Have to re-configure backbone routing topology if the old one is not suitable now
29 2006/09/07

In the redundant load-sharing topology, suitable routing architecture is necessary too
export iBGP 192.168.100.0/25 high 192.168.100.128/25 low
ISP
PE
FTTx xDSL CE
192.168.100.0/24
BRAS
export iBGP 192.168.100.0/25 low 192.168.100.128/25 high
User
Customers have to maintain default route by themselves

30 2006/09/07
Agenda
31 2006/09/07
Solution for consumers

Basically, only enterprises will use those redundant solution above Sometimes consumers/SOHO would use Internet access for crucial purpose:
Health and Medical Care Small business
Any solution for consumers/SOHO to own their reliable Internet access?
32
2006/09/07

There are many multihoming gateway network equipment The function of those equipment include:
Load balance capacity Security VPN QoS Common service Basic routing Reliability ..........
33
2006/09/07

Consumers/SOHO could buy those equipment and use them for redundant Internet access This kind of redundant does NOT need the help from SP
ATU-R
ISP1
ATU-R
Multihoming gateway
Internet
ISP2
ATU-R
consumer network
ISP3
ATU-R
Multihoming gateway
34
2006/09/07
SP has to increase the quality to keep the customers
Agenda
35 2006/09/07
Another redundant issue MPLS VPN

If customers only want to use backup or loadsharing solution, they could use the architectures above But to use multihoming solution is difficult, Inter-AS MPLS VPN is not widespread like Internet access Mostly customers use MPLS VPN for crucial service How can we propose suitable solution for MPLS VPN redundant?
2006/09/07
36

Build redundant network on Internet
For security reason, IPsec is required
Leased Line
CE
IPsec Tunnel
xDSL
PE seednet MPLS core
BRAS
Internet
PE
Leased Line 2006/09/07 xDSL
BRAS
CE
37

Build redundant network on different SP network
Leased Line
CE
xDSL
PE
BRAS
seednet MPLS core
ATM core
BRAS
ATM trunk
PE
PE
Leased Line 2006/09/07 xDSL
BRAS
CE
38

Build redundant network on 3G network
Leased Line
CE
IPsec Tunnel
PE seednet MPLS core
3Gcore
PE
Leased Line 2006/09/07
CE
39
Agenda
40 2006/09/07
Next challenge
More redundant circuit type in future? More redundant service provision?
BGP anycast
Next challenge to service provider??
41
2006/09/07
sees your needs

Apops Pres Hsu Redundant Service

Încărcat de

Informații document

Descriere originală:

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Apops Pres Hsu Redundant Service

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Redundant Internet service provision customer viewpoint

Kae Hsu kae@du.net.tw Communication Network Dept.

Tools of operation Decreasing the cost Increasing the revenue

Communication tools Entertainment Customers need redundant service provision

Use backup circuit only when primary circuit is

Types of redundant - Backup

Customers need cheaper and higher bandwidth backup solution

Types of redundant - Backup

Types of redundant - Backup

Sharing traffic among those circuits Redundant PE/CE (option)

Types of redundant Load-sharing

Leased line PE Leased line CE User

Leased line PE Leased line CE User

Types of redundant Load-sharing

Sharing traffic between those circuits Redundant CE (option)

Redundant service provider

Types of redundant - Multihoming

Types of redundant - Multihoming

Types of redundant - Multihoming

ann oun 172 ce AS3 .2 0 172 0.0.0/2 0 .20. 1 0.0/ 20

User ISP2 AS200

SP announce full Internet routes or default

route only to customer

Types of redundant - Multihoming

Customers have to apply AS# from RIR

Customers have to maintain BGP by themselves

Any more suitable solution?

Types of redundant - Multihoming

SP announce full Internet routes or default

Types of redundant - Multihoming

Customer have to maintain BGP by themselves

Types of redundant - Multihoming

export IGP 172.20.0.0/21 172.20.8.0/21

User ISP2 AS200

SP does not announce any route to customer

Types of redundant - Multihoming

Customer have to maintain their output traffic

Policy-based routing (Cisco)

Filter-based forwarding (Juniper)

Challenge to service provider

Ways to control customer routes in SP

Challenge to service provider

Leased Line ISDN CE User

Challenge to service provider

Leased Line xDSL CE User

Challenge to service provider

Customers have to maintain default route by themselves

Solution for consumers

Any solution for consumers/SOHO to own their reliable Internet access?

Solution for consumers

Solution for consumers

SP has to increase the quality to keep the customers

Another redundant issue MPLS VPN

Another redundant issue MPLS VPN

PE seednet MPLS core

Another redundant issue MPLS VPN

seednet MPLS core

Another redundant issue MPLS VPN

PE seednet MPLS core

Next challenge to service provider??

sees your needs

S-ar putea să vă placă și