Sunteți pe pagina 1din 23

Motivation and Reward

What does it mean to be motivated? Questions: What motivates you? What demotivates you? How is one motivated? Why is one motivated to do x or y?

Performance problems
Signs and symptoms:Organization Group/Team Individual role of motivation?

Performance Regulation
External regulation (Scientific Mgt) Subjective regulation (Human Relations) Regulation through understanding and managing the employee mind-set (cooperative systems approach) Topic of satisfaction and motivation entered the agenda

Motivation and Reward


.for loveisnt that the reason why we do anything.? Do you love to work? Do you work for love? Do you work to enable you to love? Would you work if you didnt have to? Pay might be the reason why millions of people get out of bed in the morning and go to work but what they do when they get there is an entirely different manner.(the lottery question)

Herzberg (1968)
The simplest method of getting someone to move is to kick him in the pants However, if you kick your dog it moves, but was it motivated to move? ..it would certainly be motivated to move away! True motivation comes from within the person who wants to move => goal directed

When we go out to play


How might the concept of play inform our understanding of motivation? What is play? What is work? Can we play in work? Can we work in play?

What motivates?
Content Theories = taxonomic lists of need (e.g. Maslows Hierarchy), motives (e.g. sensation seeking, need for achievement, need for power) - e.g. Maslows Hierarchy: theory of motivation in general versus work in particular => attractive holistic idea survival, security/safety, social/belonging, esteem, cognitive, aesthetic, self-actualising Hierarchical proposition => movement into a higher order domain presupposes to fulfilment of lower order needs

Evaluation..
Popularity versus scientific integrity- intuitive plausibility Difficult to test needs can operate simultaneously, depends on relative salience

Arbitrary categorisation one may seek to fulfil a higher order need to satisfy lower order needs - e.g. for employability
Does need fulfilment motivate? (complete satisfaction or continuous striving) So what? How do needs they work? How might we use the theory?

Two Factor Theory


Herzberg (1968) intrinsic (from within) extrinsic (from outside)

Hygiene needs = disatisfiers, must be fulfilled to prevent disatisfaction but wont increase satisfaction
Motivators = satisfiers, but wont prevent disatisfaction

Evaluation..
No direct evidence, but again, plausible - e.g. tip of the iceberg effect in absence of satisfiers, dissatisfiers become more salient Also maybe a threshold of hygiene needs after which more pay adds nothing to satisfaction (Law of Diminishing Returns) But, distinction intrinsic and extrinsic dubious e.g. payment (hygiene/extrinsic) makes possible the fulfilment of intrinsic (satisfiers) needs, also depends what pay means (could be intrinsic motivator for some) Again, so what?

How does motivation come about?


Process theories - e.g. equity theory (distributive justice, procedural justice) instrumentality-expectancy theory, social exchange theory, goal setting theory Social comparisons = reference point Presuppose a superordinate need for equity/justice/balance of exchange Presuppose rational calculation of inputs/outputs Highly cognitive where is the sentiment? So what? What do they tell us about motivation?

What, Why and How?


Content = what? Arbitrary lists of needs Process = how? Cognitive mechanisms How useful is either without an answer to why is one motivated to do x rather than y? Importance of theory -> source of explanation and intervention leverage

Absence of coherent theory


Piecemeal/fragmented, mini-models, laboratory based, decontextualised A theory of motivation must be able to deal with:Individual differences Motivated behaviour can occur in adverse circumstances - e.g. demoralised but continue to work hard Why there might be opposite reactions of some people to the same objective circumstances

Motivation and Satisfaction


All theories incorporate satisfaction, but, one can be motivated even if dissatisfied Why? Scenario -> professional person in the caring professions, there is low morale and high turnover, but not necessarily poor performance.. Work => self-expressive (directly or indirectly)

Motivation as an expression of identity


What higher order needs does work fulfil? Competence/efficacy, achievement, meaning, esteem /worth / validation Why are we motivated to do what we do? Can one be motivated in a have to situation? - i.e. is pure want to or intrinsic motivation possible without constraint?

Implications
An identity theory of motivation Does the term motivation signify something unitary (uni-dimensional) or multidimensional? Is it more useful as an analytic framework than a concept? Still doesnt answer the question of how?

How?
Theories of goal directed and self-regulated behaviour Psychological Contract Theory = schema theory (Rousseau) and/or relationship psychology (Herriot) Critical importance of understanding processes, not just inside the head, but between people and the artefacts in their environment

Universal and Particular


How can universal theories be used in particular instances? Importance of context universal theories are acontextual particularistic situations apply only in a particular context Contingency theory.

The context of motivation


Adequacy of individual level of analysis Groups as a critical link pin and source of psychological leverage Understand group processes formal and informal e.g. how do people maintain motivation in boring jobs? Informal compensatory mechanisms where there is some creative licence afforded by mgt (informal job redesign)

The context of reward


Payment systems => rarely truly contingent on performance (PRP) Complex relationship between payment and intrinsic motivation e.g. can change the meaning of work

Individual PRP in a team context can undermine teamwork by creating interpersonal competition

Control or Facilitation
Balance between management control and personal/team autonomy Critical importance of informal as well as formal processes Imposition of new formal processes (e.g. job redesign, new technology) can undermine informal processes with big performance costs

Doing more harm than good


Sweeping potted job design solutions, out-ofcontext, potentially disruptive of informal processes naturally evolved to increase/maintain motivation in otherwise boring (formal) jobs.. Context, history, meaning

What is the context? Context is created in part by informal processes History? Of the current situation, of the individual/group situation.. Meaning? What does work mean to an individual or group

Work flow
What is the task and task objective? What are the task conditions and constraints? How will the task be completed (processes) -optimise process by taking into consideration the task and its requirements and the people involved -select process that is win-win for task and people; involve people in deciding on process Control versus Autonomy Formal versus Informal Processes

S-ar putea să vă placă și