Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Table of Contents
Soil Background Methodology Raw Data
(All data compiled) (Conifers removed from Aspen Stands in Bulls Prairie) Dense stands slash busted then burned to reduce fuel load and mistletoe in Cox Flat Harvest and Non Harvest Comparisons
(Thomas, Grizzly, Winter, South Warner, Grassy, Toolbox Complex)
Juniper Treatments
Soil Background Information and Chemistry Testing Methodology Methods Beginning in 2006, Soils were analyzed for soil chemistry using LaMotte Smart 2 Soil Spectrophotometer/ Colorimeter. Protocols developed by LaMotte for Soil Ammonia, Nitrate, Nitrite, Phosphate and Potassium were used. All concentrations are recorded in parts per million and milligrams per liter (ppm, mg/L).
5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.02 0.11 0.04 0.00 PO4 K 2.70 4.70 Conifer removed 3.53 Outside Stand Mixed aspen / conifer
1.49 1.29
NH4-N
NO3-N
NO2-N
Ammonia appears to increase significantly during first year in aspen stands when conifers removed. Nitrites also increase significantly probably due to the conversion of ammonia to nitrites in the process of becoming nitrates. Potassium increases are barely significant (a=.05) Other differences are statistically insignificant
Based on 16 comparative samples
Burning appears to increase ammonia and nitrate significantly Burning appears to decrease potassium though barely significant (a=.043) Control and slashbusted sites are not statistically different
Based on 30 comparative samples
3.00
2.50 2.00
2.35
Non Slash Bust 1.50 1.11 1.00 0.86 0.50 0.00 NH4-N NO3-N 0.68 0.32 Slash Bust SB Burn
NO2-N
Com parision of Soil Chem istry in Slash Bust Treatm ents 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 PO4 K 0.58 1.77 0.75 10.4 7.8 Non Slash Bust Slash Bust SB Burn 14.4
Comparison of Soil Chemistry by Treatment (harvest vs non-harvest) post Toolbox Complex Wildfire
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 PO4 K 5.13 7.17 6.3 7.61 Harvest Non Harvest
Concentration (ppm)
NO2-N
Though no nutrient levels went up following harvest, ANOVA tests indicate that there were no statistically significant differences between harvested and nonharvested wildfire sites in the Toolbox Complex. The most significant was nitrate with an alpha value of .055
Results based on 27 comparable samples
Concentration (ppm)
8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 PO4
1.64 0.60 1.87 1.79
6.99
6.72 6.12
6.23
Nitrates increase significantly compared to all other treatments when juniper is burned. Phosphates decrease significantly when juniper is cut. All other values are statistically insignificant.
Based on 73 comparative samples
3.5
1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 NH4-N NO3-N 0.07 0 0.00 0.70 Under Duff Exposed Under DWD 0.40 0.38 0.42 0.35
3 2.5 2
0.75
NO2-N
The small number of comparative samples rends all data statistically insignificantly It does appear that there may be a strong correlation between thatched duff / litter and nutrient cycling. It does not appear that downed woody debris plays much of a role until it is in later stages of decomposition.
Results are based on 9 comparative samples
Chemical
Protocol
LaMotte Code
Ammonia-N
Nesslerization
3642SC
Nitrate-N
Cadmium Reduction
3649SC
Nitrite-N
Diazotization
3650SC
Phosphate
3653SC
Potassium
Tetraphenylboron
3639SC