Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The
firms production function for a particular good (q) shows the maximum amount of the good that can be produced using alternative combinations of capital (K) and labor (L ) q = f(K,L)
study variation in a single input, we define marginal physical product as the additional output that can be produced by employing one more unit of that input while holding other inputs constant
q marginal physical product of capital = MPK = = fK K q marginal physical product of labor = MPL = = fL L
marginal physical product of an input depends on how much of that input is used In general, we assume diminishing marginal productivity
MPK 2q = = fKK < 0 K K MPL 2q = = fLL < 0 L L
of diminishing marginal productivity, 19th century economist Thomas Malthus worried about the effect of population growth on labor productivity But changes in the marginal productivity of labor over time also depend on changes in other inputs such as capital.
To
K = 10 q = 60,000L2 - 1000L3
The
APL
fact, when L=30, both APL and MPL are equal to 900,000 when APL is at its maximum, APL and MPL are equal
Thus,
Isoquant Maps
To
illustrate the possible substitution of one input for another, we use an isoquant map An isoquant shows those combinations of K and L that can produce a given level of output (q0) f(K,L) = q0
Isoquant Map
Each
K per period
q = 30 q = 20
L per period
K per period
KA
LA
LB
L per period
Returns to Scale
How
does output respond to increases in all inputs together? Suppose that all inputs are doubled, would output double? Returns to scale have been of interest to economists since the days of Adam Smith
Returns to Scale
Smith
identified two forces that come into operation as inputs are doubled
greater
labor loss in efficiency because management may become more difficult given the larger scale of the firm
Returns to Scale
If
the production function is given by q = f(K,L) and all inputs are multiplied by the same positive constant (m > 1), then
Effect on Output f(mK,mL) = mf(K,L) f(mK,mL) < mf(K,L) f(mK,mL) > mf(K,L) Returns to Scale Constant Decreasing Increasing
Returns to Scale
It
is possible for a production function to exhibit constant returns to scale for some levels of input usage and increasing or decreasing returns for other levels
economists
refer to the degree of returns to scale with the implicit notion that only a fairly narrow range of variation in input usage and the related level of output is being considered
returns-to-scale production functions have the useful theoretical property that that the MRTS between K and L depends only on the ratio of K to L, not the scale of operation all of the isoquants are radial blowups of the unit isoquant
Geometrically,
a ray from the origin (constant K/L), the RTS will be the same on all isoquants
The isoquants are equally spaced as output expands
q=3 q=2 q=1
K per period
L per period
Returns to Scale
Returns
If
k=1, we have constant returns to scale If k<1, we have decreasing returns to scale If k>1, we have increasing returns to scale
production function exhibits constant returns to scale isoquants are straight lines
is constant
q1
q2
q3
L per period
Fixed Proportions
No substitution between labor and capital is possible
K per period
q3/a q2 q1 q3/b
q3
L per period
f(mK,mL) = A(mK)a(mL) b = Ama+b KaLb = ma+bf(K,L) if a + b = 1 constant returns to scale if a + b > 1 increasing returns to scale if a + b < 1 decreasing returns to scale
Since
MRTS declines as L rises and K falls The MRTS depends only on the ratio of K and L