Sunteți pe pagina 1din 7

Universitatea Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iai Facultatea .................................................... Departamentul ............................................. Domeniul de studii...........................................

FISA DISCIPLINEI DENUMIREA DISCIPLINEI Construcia Uniunii Europene COD: CICLUL DE STUDII (L-licen/MSTATUTUL DISCIPLINEI M master/D-doctorat) I ANUL DE STUDIU Semestrul 1 (OB-obligatorie/OP-opional/F-facultativ) OB (1,2,3,4) NUMRUL ORELOR PE TOTAL ORE NUMR TIPUL DE EVALUARE LIMBA DE PREDARE TOTAL ORE SAPTMN ACTIVITATE DE (P-pe parcurs, C-colocviu, ESEMESTRU INDIVIDUALA* CREDITE examen, M-mixt) C S L Pr. 2 4 84 156 M Romn TITULARUL
ACTIVITILOR DE CURS

GRADUL DIDACTIC I TIINIFIC, PRENUMELE, NUMELE LECTOR DOCTOR CORNELIU BLB GRADUL DIDACTIC I TIINIFIC, PRENUMELE, NUMELE LECTOR DOCTOR CORNELIU BLB

DEPARTAMENTUL

tiine politice i Relaii Internaionale


DEPARTAMENTUL

TITULARUL
ACTIVITILOR DE SEMINAR/L.P.

tiine politice i Relaii Internaionale

DISCIPLINE ABSOLVITE ANTERIOR OBIECTIVE* a) dobndirea cunotinelor de baz i formarea abilitilor analitice necesare pentru a nelege i analiza procesele legate de UE; b) cunoaterea aprofundat a teoriilor construciei europene i a modelelor de integrare puse n practic; c) formarea i exersarea spiritului critic prin frecventarea unor texte originale i prin ncurajarea judecilor evaluative; d) depirea descriptivismului naiv prin construirea i consolidarea unui ansamblu de concepte i prin reflecia asupra cauzelor i semnificaiilo r; e) examinarea unor chestiuni centrale n studiile europene, cu privire la evenimente actuale i evoluii posibile; f) participarea, prin analiz, dezbatere i producie textual, la constituirea unei filosofii a construciei europene, avnd de a face cu transformarea conceptelor clasice ale filosofiei politice.
COMPETENE SPECIFICE ACUMULATE
COMPETENE PROFESIONALE**

COMPETENE TRANSVERSALE

CONTINUTUL CURSULUI

1) cunoaterea aprofundat i utilizarea specializat a conceptelor, teoriilor i paradigmelor din domeniul construciei comunitare europene; 2) explicarea adecvat i interpretarea pertinent a proceselor, fenomenelor i tendinelor din instituiile UE i din societatea european; 3) cunoaterea modelelor de integrare, a metodelor de decizie, a practicilor democratice i a mecanismelor instituionale de la nivelul UE; 4) utilizarea teoriilor i modelelor studiate pentru a analiza situaii particulare i evoluii posibile; 5) identificarea problemelor specifice ale integrrii Romniei n UE i interpretarea politicii naionale n lumina procesului european. 1) manifestarea autonomiei n procesul de documentare i nvare (stabilirea obiectivelor proprii, alegerea cilor i mijloacelor adecvate, producerea de idei i argumente care s suscite interesul audienei) ; 2) producerea unui discurs de tip expert cu privire la valorile i ideile europene; 3) comunicare profesional personalizat (evitarea limbii de lemn i a jargonului specific). 1. Obiectul Europa n cmpul tiinelor sociale. Problema interdisciplinaritii. Filosofia politic i studiile europene. Paradigme de gndire n studiile europene. (Christiansen et al. 2001, 22-49; Saurugger 2004; Parsons 2002; Wiener and Diez 2009). 2. Modele de integrare (I). Funcionalismul internaional i arhitectura comunitii europene. Reconcilierea franco-german ca motor al construciei europene. Confruntri ideologice i raiuni strategice. (Layne 2011, 129-258; Hammarlund 2005; Devin 2008; McLaren 1985; Gerbet 1956; Wall 1991). 3. Modele de integrare (II). Statul naional, globalizarea i transformrile suveranitii. Neofuncionalismul: governance guvernmnt fr guvern. Constructivismul. Societatea popoarelor liberale i problema extinderii. Uniunea european ca utopie realist. (Moss 2005, 7491; Rosenau 2004; Rosenau and Czempiel 1992, 1-29; Crowley 2003; Vayssiere 2007; Christiansen et al. 2001, 50-65, 101-175; Rawls 1999). 4. Modele de integrare (III). Viziunea realist: politica european a generalului De Gaulle. De la Atlantic la Urali: Ideea unei confederaii europene. (Nuenlist et al. 2010, 25 -82; Moravcsik 1998; Moravcsik 1999; Moravcsik 2000; Trachtenberg 2000). 5. Principii ale cooperrii europene. Cooperarea interguvernamental i metoda comunitar. Subsidiaritatea i proporionalitatea. Statul de drept i Drepturile Omului. (Blom -Hansen 2011, 5393; Marjolin 1958; Carp et al. 2008, 61-73; Tridimas and Nebbia 2004, 65-94, 113-142; Chalmers et al. 2010; Senden 2004).

6.

BIBLIOGRAFIE (SELECTIV)

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18.

Legitimitatea UE (I): sensul normativ. UE i noile surse de autoritate. Procesul european de decizie. Democraie procedural i control instituional. (Phinnemore and Warleigh -Lack 2009, 43-92; Banchoff and Smith 1999, 94-157; Tsebelis and Garris 2001; Moravcsik 2000; Ballaman, Epstein and OHalloran 2002). 7. Europa constituional. Tratatul de la Maastricht i vocaia federalist a UE. Constituia ca simbol al unitii politice. Constituionalism fr Constituie. Viziuni cu privire la constituionalismul internaional. (Quermonne 2005; Castiglione et al. 2007; Christiansen et al. 2001, 66-84; Tsagourias 2007, 305-367, Church and Phinnemore 2006 ; Riedel and Wolfrum 2006, 1-62; Von Bogdandy 2006). 8. Legitimitatea UE (II): sensul descriptiv. Deficitul democratic i democraia participativ. Constituirea unei opinii publice europene. Uniunea European ca sfer public. (Della Porta and Caiani 2009; Reynie 2005; Goriely 1953; de Vreese 2007; Cohendet 2004; Carp 2009, 11-23). 9. Federalism i cetenie. Cetenie european i cetenie naional. Dimensiuni ale ceteniei. Drepturi i ndatoriri. Paradoxul ceteniei europene. Legitimarea prin drepturile omului (Lister and Pia 2008; Balibar 2004, 21-77, 180-202; Kymlicka 2004; Habermas 2001, 113-129). 10. Europa conflictului social. Politica recunoaterii n UE. Identitatea ca surs de conflict. Egalitatea anselor ntr-o Europ multidimensional. State-Providen semi-suverane. (Anderson 2006, 9-46; Della Porta and Caiani 2009; Moss 2005, 92-144; De Master and Le Roy 2000; Berny 2008; Rodden 2002). 11. Conflictul surselor normative n UE. Religie vs. Laicitate. Ordine mondial vs. ordine european. Supranaional vs. Interguvernamental. Naional vs. Comunitar. Problema teologico -politic n istoria european. (Schmidt 2009; Harmsen and Spiering 2004; Van Apeldoorn et al. 2009 , 21-86; Gamble and Lane 2009, 177-194; Gorski 2000). 12. Criza Uniunii Europene. Capitalismul mondial i discursul crizei. Geopolitic i euroscepticism. Semnificaia politic a crizei: Mai mult integrare! (Werthers 2011; Della Posta and Talani 2011; Habermas 2012; Harmsen and Spiering 2004). 13. Integrarea prin procese paralele (NATO, Bologna, Schengen). Integrarea proceselor paralele (Bologna, Schengen). Spaiul european al nvmntului i al cercetrii. (Kesselman et al. 2009; Gamble and Lane 2009, 257-273; Johansson 2007; Gelauf et al. 2008, 65-127; Maasen and Olsen 2007; Dale 2006). 14. Evaluare i discuii. Anderson, Benedict. 2004. Imagined Communities Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised Edition. London and New York: Verso. Ballmann, Alexander, David Epstein, Sharyn O'Halloran. 2002. "Delegation, Comitology, and the Separation of Powers in the European Union". International Organization 56(3): 551-574. Banchoff, Thomas, Mitchelle P. Smith. 1999. Legitimacy and the European Union. London and New York: Routledge. Berny, Nathalie. 2008. "Le lobbying des ONG internationales denvironnement Bruxelles. Les ressources de rseau et dinformation, conditions et facteurs de changement de laction collective". Revue franaise de science politique 58(1) : 97-121. Blom-Hansen, Jens. 2011. The EU Comitology System in Theory and Practice: Keeping an Eye on the Commission? New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Bossuat, Grard. 1996. Jean Monnet. La mesure d'une influence. Vingtime Sicle. Revue d'histoire 51(1) : 6884. Bowman, Jonathan. 2006. The European Union Democratic Deficit Federalists: Skeptics, and revisionists. European Journal of Political Theory 5(2): 191212. Carp, Radu et al. 2008. n cutarea binelui comun. Pentru o viziune cretin a democraiei romneti. Cluj-Napoca: Eikon. Carp, Radu. 2009. Dumnezeu la Bruxelles. Religia n spaiul public european. Cluj Napoca: Eikon. Castiglione, Dario et al. (eds.). 2007. Constitutional Politics in the European Union: The Convention Moment and its Aftermath. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Chalmers, Adam. 2006. Refiguring the European Unions Historical Dimension. European Journal of Political Theory 5(4): 437454. Chalmers, Damian et al. 2010. European Union Law: Cases and Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Christiansen, Thomas, Knud Erik Jrgensen, Antje Wiener. 2001. The Social Construction of Europe. London: Sage. Church, Clive H., David Phinnemore. 2006. Understanding the European Constitution: An introduction to the EU Constitutional Treaty. London and New York: Routledge. Clifford J. Carrubba, Anand Singh,. 2004. A Decision Theoretic Model of Public Opinion: Guns, Butter, and European Common Defense. American Journal of Political Science 48(2): 218-231. Cohendet, Marie-Anne. 2004. Une crise de la reprsentation politique? . Cits 18(2): 4161. Crowley, John. 2003. Usages de la gouvernance et de la gouvernementalit. Critique internationale 21-61. Dale, Roger. "Construire lEurope en btissant un Espace Europen de lducation". ducation et

Socits 18(2): 35-53. 19. Della Porta, Donatella, Manuela Caiani. 2009. Social Movements and Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 20. Della Posta, Pompeo, Leila Simona Talani. 2011. Europe and the Financial Crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 21. De Master, Sara, Michael K. Le Roy. 2000. "Xenophobia and the European Union". Comparative Politics 32(4): 419-436. 22. Devin, Guillaume. 2008. Que reste-t-il du fonctionnalisme international? Relire David Mitrany (18881975). Critique internationale 38/1: 137-152. 23. De Vreese, Claes H. 2007. The EU as a public sphere. Living Reviews in European Governance 2(3). http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2007-3. 24. Gelauff, George, Isabel Grilo, Arjan Lejour (eds.). 2008. Subsidiarity and Economic Reform in Europe. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. 25. Gerbet, Pierre. 1956. La gense du plan Schuman. Des origines la dclaration du 9 mai 1950. Revue franaise de science politique 6(3) : 525 - 553. 26. Giorgi, Liana, Ingmar von Homeyer, Wayne Parsons (eds.). 2006. Democracy in the European Union: Towards the Emergence of a Public Sphere. London And New York: Routledge. 27. Gorily, Georges. 1953. "L'opinion publique et le Plan Schuman". Revue franaise de science politique 3(3) : 585 - 611. 28. Gorski, Philip S. 2000. "Historicizing the Secularization Debate: Church, State, and Society in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, ca. 1300 to 1700". American Sociological Review 65(1): 138-167. 29. Habermas, Jurgen. 2001. The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press. 30. Habermas, Jrgen. 2012. The Crisis of the European Union. Cambridge: Polity Press. 31. Hammarlund, Per A. 2005. Liberal Internationalism and the Decline of the State: The Thought of Richard Cobden, David Mitrany, and Kenichi Ohmae. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 32. Harmsen, Robert, Menno Spiering (eds.). 2004. Euroscepticism: Party Politics, National Identity, and European Integration. Amsterdam - New York: Editions Rodopi. 33. Hoffman, Stanley. 2003. Sisiful european. Studii despre Europa (1964 1994). Bucureti: Curtea Veche. 34. Johansson, Jonna. 2007. Learning To Be (come) A Good European A Critical Analysis of the Official European Union Discourse on European Identity and Higher Education. Linkping: Linkping University. 35. Kesselman et al. 2008. European Politics in transition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. 36. Kymlicka, Will. 2004. Le mythe de la citoyennet transnationale. Critique internationale 23: 97- 111. 37. Lister, Michael, Emily Pia. 2008. Citizenship in Contemporary Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Press University. 38. Ludlow, N. Piers. 2007. European Integration and the Cold War: OstpolitikWestpolitik, 19651973. London and New York: Routledge. 39. Marjolin, Robert. 1958. Coopration intergouvernementale et autorits supranationales . Revue conomique 9(2): 267-277. 40. Maassen, Peter, Johan P. Olsen. 2009. University Dynamics and European Integration. Dordrecht: Springer. 41. McLaren, Robert I. 1985. Mitranian functionalism: possible or impossible? Review of International Studies 11: 139-152. 42. Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. De Gaulle and European Integration. Historical Revision and Social Science Theory. Center for European Studies Working Paper Series, Program for the Study of Germany and Europe, Working Paper Series 8.5. 43. Moravcsik, Andrew. 1999. "Le grain et la grandeur : les origines conomiques de la politique europenne du gnral de Gaulle". 1re partie. Revue franaise de science politique 49/4: 507 - 544. 44. Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000 a. "Le grain et la grandeur : les origines conomiques de la politique europenne du gnral de Gaulle". 2me partie. Revue franaise de science politique 50/1 : 73 - 124. 45. Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000 b. The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization 54(2): 217-252. 46. Moss, Bernard H. (ed.). 2005. Monetary Union in Crisis The European Union as a Neo-liberal Construction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 47. Nuenlist, Christian, Anna Locher, Garret Martin (eds.). 2010. Globalizing de Gaulle International Perspectives on French Foreign Policies, 19581969. Plymouth: Lexington Books. 48. Parsons, Craig. 2002. Showing Ideas as Causes: The Origins of the European Union. International Organization 56(1): 47-84. 49. Phinnemore, David, Alex Warleigh-Lack (eds.). 2009. Reflections on European Integration 50 Years of the Treaty of Rome. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 50. Piris, Jean-Claude. 2006. The Constitution for Europe: A Legal Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 51. Quermonne, Jean-Louis. 2005. "Le trait constitutionnel europen est-il un acte refondateur?" Politique trangre 2 : 243-256. 52. Reyni, Dominique. 2005. "Lide dune opinion europenne". Raisons politiques 19: 99-117.

53. Rodden, Jonathan. 2002. "Strength in Numbers? Representation and Redistribution in the European Union." European Union Politics 3(2): 151175. 54. Rosenau, James N., Ernst-Otto Czempiel (eds.). 1992. Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 55. Rosenau, James N. 2004. Strong Demand, Hige Supply: Governance in an Emerging Epoch. In Multilevel Governance, edited by Ian Bache and Mathew Flinders, 31-48. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 56. Saurugger, Sabine. 2004. tat de la littrature. Conceptualiser lintgration europenne: tat de lart thorique. Revue internationale et stratgique 54(2): 165-176. 57. Schmidt, Vivien A. 2009. The EU and its Member States: From Bottom Up to Top Down. In Reflections on European Integration 50 Years of the Treaty of Rome, edited by David Phinnemore and Alex Warleigh-Lack, 194-211. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 58. Senden, Linda. 2004. Soft Law in European Community Law. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing. 59. Smith, Karen E. 2004. Politica extern a Uniunii Europene. Bucureti: Editura Trei. 60. Sderbaum, Fredrik, Luk Van Langehove. 2005. "Introduction: The EU as a Global Actor and the Role of Interregionalism." European Integration 27(3): 249262. 61. Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2004. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 62. Trachtenberg, Marc. 2000. De Gaulle, Moravcsik, and Europe. Journal of Cold War Studies 2/3:101 116. 63. Tridimas, Takis, Paolisa Nebbia. 2004. European Union Law for the Twenty-First Century: Rethinking the New Legal Order. Volume 1: Constitutional and Public Law External Relations. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing. 64. Tsagourias, Nicholas (ed.). 2007. Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 65. Tsebelis, George, Geoffrey Garrett. 2001. The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union. International Organization 55(2): 357-390. 66. Van Apeldoorn, Bastiaan, Jan Drahokoupil, and Laura Horn (eds.).2009. Contradictions and Limits of Neoliberal European Governance: From Lisbon to Lisbon. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 67. Vayssiere, Bertrand. "Europe et souverainet. La notion dtat, des penseurs classiques aux ralits actuelles". Vingtime Sicle. Revue d'histoire 95(3): 151-166. 68. Riedel, Eibe. Rdiger Wolfrum (eds.). 2006. Recent Trends in German and European Constitutional Law: German Reports Presented to the XVII th International Congress on Comparative Law, Utrecht, 16 to 22 July 2006. Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer. 69. Wall, Irwin M. 1991. "Jean Monnet, les tats-Unis et le plan franais". Vingtime Sicle. Revue d'histoire 30(1): 3 - 21. 70. Werthers, Patrick B. (ed.). 2011. Europe: Financial Crisis and Security Issues. New York: Nova Science Publishers. 71. Wiener, Antje, Thomas Diez. 2009. European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cele 4 ore de seminar se vor desfura astfel: Seminarul A: Concepte i teorii ale construciei europene (2 ore sptmnal) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Construcia social a acquis-ului comunitar (Jorgensen 1999). Funcionalismul, pacea perpetu i securitatea (Mitrany 1948; Mitrany 1971). Conceptul de suveranitate post-westfalian (Pogge 1992). Ordine mondial i ordine european dup cel de-al doilea rzboi mondial (Sperling 2001; Duke and Ojanene 2006; Peyrefitte 1958). Principiul subsidiaritii (Carozza et al. 2003). Legalizarea politicii internaionale (Goldstein et al. 2001, 105-134). Constituia politic i societatea mondial (Habermas 2008, 312-352). Modele ale spaiului public n UE (Ferree et al. 2002). Federalism i cetenie n UE i n SUA (Neuman 2003). Recunoatere i conflict n UE (Gamble and Lane 2009, 97-136). Naionalism vs. patriotism constituional (Follesdal 2000; Laborde 2002) Cosmopolitismul realist i criza european (Beck and Grande 2007). Confiscarea procesului Bologna (Croche 2006; Charlier and Croche 2003). Evaluare.

CONINUTUL LUCRRILOR DE SEMINAR/LABORATOR

Seminarul B: Istoria construciei europene (2 ore sptmnal). 1. 2. Cooperarea euro-atlantic ntre 1945 i 1950 (Pun 1999, 21-63; McCormick 75-84, Layne 2011, 129-150). Europa celor ase. Tratatul de la Paris. Proiectul Comunitii Europene de Aprare. Tratatul de la Roma. (Pun 1999, 63-109; Magnette 2005, 33-61; McCormick 84-90; Sidjanski 2010, 47-57).

3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. BIBLIOGRAFIE (SELECTIV) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14.

Istoria construciei europene III. Planul Fouchet i politica scaunului liber. Problema extinderii (Marea Britanie). Comunitatea Economic European (Pun 1999, 110 -124; Magnette 2005, 6175; McCormick 90-96; Sidjanski 2010, 58-65, 75-91). Europa celor nou. Cooperarea franco-german. Evoluia instituional i Actul Unic European. (Pun 1999, 124-144; McCormick 97-102, Sidjanski 2010, 115-147; 173-198; Ptruiu-Balte 2012, 313-441). Tratatul de la Maastricht: Uniunea European. (Pun 1999, 145 -188,; McCormick 102-112; Sidjanski 2010, 237-261). Instituiile Uniunii Europene i procesul de decizie (Pun 1999, 189 sq.; McCormick 113 -154; Sidjanski 2010, 262-280; Brbulescu 2008). Extinderea Uniunii Europene (Brbulescu 2006, Smith 2004) Dup Mastricht: de la idealism la realism. (Tsoukalis 2005, 166-193; Hoffman 2003, 339-363, 441456; Sidjanski 2010, 343-365, Brbulescu 2005). Tratatul de la Lisabona (Sidjanski 2010, 366-381; Luzarranga and Llorente 2011, 57-123, 157-172, 241-253; Brbulescu 2011) Prezentare proiecte Prezentare proiecte. Prezentare proiecte. Evaluare.

15.

16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25.

Brbulescu, Iordan Gheorghe. 2005. Uniunea European de la naional la federal. Bucureti: Tritonic. Brbulescu, Iordan Gheorghe. 2006. Uniunea European. Politicile extinderii. Bucureti: Tritonic. Brbulescu, Iordan Gheorghe. 2008. Procesul decizional n Uniunea European. Iai: Polirom. Brbulescu, Iordan Gheorghe. 2011. Tratatul de la Lisabona. Implicaii asupra instituiilor i politicilor romneti. Bucureti: Institutul European din Romnia. Beck, Ulrich, Edgar Grande. 2007. Cosmopolitanism: Europes Way Out of Crisis. European Journal of Social Theory 10(1): 6785. Carozza, Paolo G. 2003. Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law. The American Journal of International Law 97(1): 38-79. Charlier, Jean-Emile, Sarah Croch, 2003. "Le processus de Bologne, ses acteurs et leurs complices". ducation et Socits 12(2) : 13-34. Croch, Sarah. 2006. "Qui pilote le processus de Bologne?" ducation et Socits 18(2): 203-217. Duke, Simon, Hanna Ojanene. 2006. Bridging Internal and External Security: Lessons from the European Security and Defence Policy. European Integration, 28(5): 477494. Goldstein, Judith, Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane, Anne-Marie Slaughter (eds.). 2001. Legalization and World Politics. Cambridge (Mass.) and London: The MIT Press. Ferree, Myra Marx et al. 2002. Four Models of the Public Sphere in Modern Democracies. Theory and Society 31(3): 289-324. Fllesdal, Andreas. 2000. The Future Soul of Europe: Nationalism or Just Patriotism? A Critique of David Miller's Defence of Nationality. Journal of Peace Research 37(4): 503-518. Gamble, Andrew, David Lane (eds.). 2009. The European Union and World Politics: Consensus and Division. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Habermas, Jrgen. 2005. A Political Constitution for the Pluralist World Society? In Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays, by Jrgen Habermas, translated by Ciaran Cronin, 312352. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. Jrgensen, Knud Erik. 1999. The Social Construction of the Acquis Communautaire: A Cornerstone of the European Edifice. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), Vol. 3, no. 5. http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-005a.htm Laborde, Ccile. 2002. From Constitutional to Civic Patriotism. British Journal of Political Science 32(4): 591-612. Layne, Christopher. 2011. Pacea iluziilor. Iai: Polirom. Luzarranga, Francisco Aldecoa, Mercedes Guinea Llorente. 2011. Europa viitorului. Tratatul de la Lisabona. Iai : Polirom. Magnette, Paul. 2005. Europa, statul i democraia. Iai: Institutul European. McCormick, John. 2006. S nelegem Uniunea European. Bucureti: Editura Codecs. Mitrany, David. 1948. The Functional Approach to World Organization. International Affairs 24/3: 350363. Mitrany, David. 1971. The Functional Approach in Historical Perspective. International Affairs 47/3: 532-543. Neuman, Gerald L. 2003. Fdralisme et citoyennet aux tats-Unis et dans lUnion europenne. Critique internationale 21: 151-162. Pun, Nicolae. 1999. Istoria construciei europene. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Fundaiei pentru Studii Europene. Ptruiu-Balte, Loredana. 2012. Epoca Mitterrand i impactul su asupra construciei europene. Iai: Lumen.

26. Peyrefitte, Alain. 1958. Comment se pose en 1958 le problme de la communaut politique europenne. Politique trangre 23(3) : 294311. 27. Pogge, Thomas. 1992. Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignity. Ethics 103/1: 48-75. 28. Sidjanski, Dusan. 2010. Viitorul federalist al Europei. Iai: Polirom. 29. Sperling, James. 2001. Neither Hegemony nor Dominance: Reconsidering German Power in Post Cold War Europe. British Journal of Political Science 31(2): 389-425. 30. Tsoukalis, Loukas. 2005. Ce fel de Europ? Bucureti: Editura ALL.
REPERE METODOLOGICE***

EVALUARE metodele

forme

ponderea formelor de evaluare n formula notei finale

standardele minime de performan****

Evaluare oral, tip: continu, la curs i seminar Evaluare scris, tip: pe parcurs (etap distinct), la seminar Evaluare scris, tip: final, n sesiunea de examene Formele de evaluare continu, oral: expunere oral, dialog, conversaie (criterii: observarea interesului pentru disciplin, contribuia la desfurarea activitilor comune, la curs i seminar, prezentare referat de seminar). 2) Forme de evaluare scris, pe parcurs: referat de seminar (3 pagini) predat n sptmna 13 (referatul va fi fost prezentat, n prealabil, la seminar). 3) Forme de evaluare scris final: examen, n sesiune (tipul probei: eseu n clas pe o tem dat, pe baza bibliografiei furnizate, timp de lucru: 3 ore). 1) N1 - Evaluare continu la seminar: 25 % 2) N2 Evaluare n scris la seminar (test scris): 25 % 3) N3 - Evaluare continu la curs: 10 % 4) N4 - Evaluare final (eseu): 40 % NB: Nota de la seminar (N1 +N2) = 50 %. Nota de la curs (N3 +N4)= 50 %. Notele (Ni) se dau de la 1 la 10. Nota final se calculeaz dup formula: N1 x 25/100 + N2 x 25/100 + N3 x 10/100 + N4 x 40/100 Standarde minime: 1). O intervenie la seminar de minim 15 minute: - prezentarea unui referat - expunere clar i exhaustiv a ideilor i/sau argumentelor principale - susinerea unui punct de vedere cu argumente i cunotine din domeniu 2). Test de seminar: - cunoaterea a minim 50 % din informaia subiectului anunat la testul de seminar: - scriere corect n limba romn - folosirea vocabularului de specialitate i a locurilor comune - analiz i sintez a cunotinelor 3) Eseu n clas pe o tem dat: - structurarea materialului, expunerea clar as obiectivelor i a conceptelor utilizate - folosirea a minim 3 lucrri de specialitate din bibliografia cursului - redactare ngrijit i exprimare corect n limba romn - utilizarea formelor deictice i inserarea unui punct de vedere personal Criterii de interpretare a standardelor minime: 1) recunoaterea conceptelor fundamentale i a ipotezelor teoretice studiate; se va evalua capacitatea de a evita confuziile teoretice i de a repera ideea fundamental a textelor studiate (cunoaterea elementelor simple) 2) analiza comparativ a unor concepte, ipoteze sau teorii din aceeai familie i folosirea lor n cadrul unei structuri coerente (reconstruirea ansamblului original) 3) urmrirea i descifrarea unei structuri argumentative prezente n corpusuri diferite (construirea de noi ansambluri) 4) utilizarea corect a conceptului de cauz cu privire la o serie de fenomene (gndire aplicativ) 5) reconstruirea mental a unui lan de condiii i variaia intern a condiiilor (gndire contrafactual) 6) nelegerea unei situaii plecnd de la un concept de scop (gndire instrumental) 7) nelegerea unei situaii plecnd de la o valoare personal (gndire comprehensiv) 8) adoptarea (cu titlu de exerciiu) a unui stil tiinific i analitic (neutralitate axiologic)

1) 2) 3) 1)

* obiectivele sunt formulate n funcie de grila competenelor profesionale pentru programul de studii ** la nivel de descriptor *** strategia didactic, materiale, resurse **** raportate la competenele formulate la Obiective sau la Standardele minime de performanta din grila 1L/1M dup caz

Data completrii Data avizrii n departament

Semntura titularului de curs

Semntura titularului de seminar/l.p.

Semmntura directorului de departament