PROIECT

ANALIZA MULTIDIMENSIONALA

~ANALIZA DE CORESPONDENTE MULTIPLE~

 CUPRINS

Introducere..................................................................................................................... 3
Variabilele folosite in proiect.............................................................................................. 4
Calcularea frecventelor...................................................................................................... 5
Analiza de corespondente multiple..................................................................................... 10

2
 Introducere

Sondajul folosit in acest proiect contine intrebari referitoare la satisfactia angajatilor

dintr-o firma in legatura cu jobul pe care il au, dar si fata de organizatia pentru care lucreaza.Alte
intrebari sunt:efortul pe care il depun la locul de munca si cat de important este efortul in ceea ce
fac pentru a promova.

Sondajul contine raspunsul a 166 de respondenti.

In acest proiect am urmarit sa aflu daca efortul depus de catre angajati are legatura cu
dorinta de a promova in companie , dar si faptul daca efortul este influentat de parerea
angajatilor fata de jobul avut si compania pentru care lucreaza.

Sondajul in SPSS:

3
 Variabilele folosite in proiect

Variabile de opinie:

1. Overall, how satisfied are you with: satjob( cat de satisfacut sunteti de job)
2. Overall, how satisfied are you with: satorg(cat de satisfacut sunteti de
organizatia pentru care lucrati)
3. How would you describe the level of effort you put into your job?-effort
4. How important are the following factors to getting ahead in your
organisation? -d6a(Hard work&effort)

Variabile socio-demografice:

1. Gender=genul
2. Age=varsta
3. Highest level of education=nivelul de educatie

4
 Calcularea frecventelor

Statistics

Gender Age Highest level Satisfaction Satisfaction Effort into Hard

of education with present with job work&effort
job organisation

Valid 166 165 163 163 162 165 164

N
Missing 0 1 3 3 4 1 2

Se observa pe coloana Valid ca majoritatea variabilelor sunt valide.

Apoi vom lua fiecare tabel in parte , uitandu-ne pe coloana Valid Percent , iar daca
valorile sunt mai mari decat 2 % , le vom lasa asa. In schimb, daca sunt mai mici decat 2 % ,
vom cumula respectivele categorii .

Frequency Table

Gender

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

Male 93 56.0 56.0 56.0

Valid Female 73 44.0 44.0 100.0

Total 166 100.0 100.0

5
 AGE Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative -Percent

20 1 .6 .6 .6

21 2 1.2 1.2 1.8

22 8 4.8 4.8 6.7

23 2 1.2 1.2 7.9

24 7 4.2 4.2 12.1

25 10 6.0 6.1 18.2

26 10 6.0 6.1 24.2

27 12 7.2 7.3 31.5

28 12 7.2 7.3 38.8

29 11 6.6 6.7 45.5

30 11 6.6 6.7 52.1

31 8 4.8 4.8 57.0

32 6 3.6 3.6 60.6

33 7 4.2 4.2 64.8

34 6 3.6 3.6 68.5

35 5 3.0 3.0 71.5

Valid 36 10 6.0 6.1 77.6

37 8 4.8 4.8 82.4

38 3 1.8 1.8 84.2

39 1 .6 .6 84.8

40 2 1.2 1.2 86.1

41 1 .6 .6 86.7

42 4 2.4 2.4 89.1

43 5 3.0 3.0 92.1

44 2 1.2 1.2 93.3

45 1 .6 .6 93.9

46 1 .6 .6 94.5

47 1 .6 .6 95.2

48 2 1.2 1.2 96.4

50 3 1.8 1.8 98.2

52 1 .6 .6 98.8

54 2 1.2 1.2 100.0

Total 165 99.4 100.0

Missing System 1 .6
Total 166 100.0

6
 Observam in tabelul de mai sus faptul ca exista valori mai mici decat 2 %
( varstele:20, 21, 23, 38, 39, 40, 41, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50, 52, 54) . Aceste valori le-
am grupat pe grupe de varsta.Rezultatul a fost urmatorul:

AgeGroups

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

1.00 30 18.1 18.2 18.2

2.00 88 53.0 53.3 71.5

Valid 3.00 37 22.3 22.4 93.9

4.00 10 6.0 6.1 100.0

Total 165 99.4 100.0

Missing System 1 .6
Total 166 100.0

Highest level of education

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

< yr10 4 2.4 2.5 2.5

Yr10 9 5.4 5.5 8.0

Yr10 + TAFE 14 8.4 8.6 16.6

HSC 34 20.5 20.9 37.4

Valid
HSC + TAFE 23 13.9 14.1 51.5

Uni degree 50 30.1 30.7 82.2

Postgrad 29 17.5 17.8 100.0

Total 163 98.2 100.0

Missing System 3 1.8
Total 166 100.0

7
 Satisfaction with present job

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

Very dissatisfied 3 1.8 1.8 1.8

Dissatisfied 16 9.6 9.8 11.7

Neutral 25 15.1 15.3 27.0

Valid
Satisfied 87 52.4 53.4 80.4

Very satisfied 32 19.3 19.6 100.0

Total 163 98.2 100.0

Missing System 3 1.8
Total 166 100.0

Pe coloana Valid Percent este o singura valoare mai mica de 2%, si anume:variabila very
dissatisfied=1.8.Variabila very dissatisfied o grupam cu dissatisfied.
Rezultatul este urmatorul:

Satisfaction with present job

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

Dissatisfied 19 11.4 11.7 11.7

Neutral 25 15.1 15.3 27.0

Valid Satisfied 87 52.4 53.4 80.4

Very satisfied 32 19.3 19.6 100.0

Total 163 98.2 100.0

Missing System 3 1.8
Total 166 100.0

Satisfaction with organisation

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

Very dissatisfied 17 10.2 10.5 10.5

Dissatisfied 29 17.5 17.9 28.4

Neutral 34 20.5 21.0 49.4

Valid
Satisfied 68 41.0 42.0 91.4

Very satisfied 14 8.4 8.6 100.0

Total 162 97.6 100.0

Missing System 4 2.4
Total 166 100.0

8
 Effort into job

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

Less than necessary 1 .6 .6 .6

What is necessary 23 13.9 13.9 14.5

Little harder than necessary 57 34.3 34.5 49.1

Valid
Quite a bit harder 50 30.1 30.3 79.4

Lot harder 34 20.5 20.6 100.0

Total 165 99.4 100.0

Missing System 1 .6
Total 166 100.0

Aici am grupat less than necessary cu what is necessary.Rezultatul este:

Effort into job

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

What is necessary 24 14.5 14.5 14.5

Little harder than necessary 57 34.3 34.5 49.1

Valid Quite a bit harder 50 30.1 30.3 79.4

Lot harder 34 20.5 20.6 100.0

Total 165 99.4 100.0

Missing System 1 .6
Total 166 100.0

Hard work&effort

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

Not important 13 7.8 7.9 7.9

Sl important 16 9.6 9.8 17.7

Mod important 15 9.0 9.1 26.8

Valid Quite important 53 31.9 32.3 59.1

Very important 41 24.7 25.0 84.1

Ext important 26 15.7 15.9 100.0

Total 164 98.8 100.0

Missing System 2 1.2
Total 166 100.0

9
 Analiza de corespondente multiple

Model Summary

Dimension Cronbach's Variance Accounted For

Alpha Total Inertia
(Eigenvalue)

1 .621 1.873 .468

2 .504 1.608 .402
Total 3.482 .870
a
Mean .567 1.741 .435

a. Mean Cronbach's Alpha is based on the mean Eigenvalue.

In tabelul de mai sus, inertia totala explicata de model este de 0.870.

Inertia primelor doua variabile este de 0.468 pe linia 1 si 0.402 pe linia 2.
Variabila explicate de model este urmatoarea:

(0.468+0.402)/0.870=1=> 100%

10
 In graficul de mai sus, dimensiunea 1 este explicata de variabilele: Satisfaction with
present job si Hard work&effort,Dimensiunea 1 este explicata si de variabilaSatisfaction
with organization.
Cea de-a doua dimensiune este explicata de variabilele: Satisfaction with present job si
Effort into job .Intr-o mai mica masura este explicata de variabila Satisfaction with
organization.

Se poate observa in cadranul 4 faptul ca cei care depun efort la munca considera ca este
foarte important pentru a avansa in functie.De asemenea, acestia sunt satisfacuti in ceea ce
priveste jobul avut, dar si compania pentru care lucreaza.

11
 In primul cadran se remarca faptul ca cei angajatii care fac doar ceea ce este necasar la
locul de munca nu sunt multumiti de organizatia pentru care lucreaza si au un nivel neutru in
ceea ce priveste locul de munca.

In graficul de mai sus respondentii nu au o opinie medie in legatura cu cele 4

variabile.Deci nu toti depun efort in ceea ce fac la locul de munca.De aici rezulta ca nu toti
considera ca este necesar sa depuna efort pentru a avansa in functie.De asemenea, efortul depus
la locul de munca nu e influentat de satisfactia fata de organizatie si fata de jobul avut.

12