CALCUL GRINDA DE RULARE

ALCATUIRE CALE DE RULARE

c= distanta minima fata de axul grinzii cai de rulare la care se poate gasi sarcina ridicata
P1, P2, P3, P4 – presiunile pe rotile podului rulant;
P1 ,P3- presiunile maxime pe roti
P2 ,P4- presiunile minime pe roti
A= ampadament
B= distanta intre tampoane

INCARCARI PRODUSE DE EXPLOATAREA PODURILOR RULANTE

 INCARCARI PRODUSE DE EXPLOATAREA PODURILOR RULANTE

Grupa de functionare HC2: ϕ1 ≔ 1.1 ψ0.1 ≔ 1.35

Pod A B a bsina h q P1n P2n P3n P4n hsina

[mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [tf] [tf] [tf] [tf] [mm]

40tf 5800 7100 275 80 2500 6.3 26.2 6.0 30.4 7.3 130

16tf 4750 5500 225 60 2000 3.7 12.0 3.2 13.9 4.6 105

a) Podul de 40 tf

Q1 ≔ 400 kN

P1n ≔ 262 kN P2n ≔ 60 kN P3n ≔ 304 kN P4n ≔ 73 kN

P1 ≔ P1n ⋅ ϕ1 ⋅ ψ0.1 = 389.07 kN P3 ≔ P3n ⋅ ϕ1 ⋅ ψ0.1 = 451.44 kN

b) Podul de 16 tf

Q2 ≔ 160 kN

P'1n ≔ 120 kN P'2n ≔ 32 kN P'3n ≔ 139 kN P'4n ≔ 46 kN

P'1 ≔ P'1n ⋅ ϕ1 ⋅ ψ0.1 = 178.2 kN P'3 ≔ P'3n ⋅ ϕ1 ⋅ ψ0.1 = 206.415 kN

B ≔ 7100 mm
B' ≔ 5500 mm

IPOTEZE DE INCARCARE
 IPOTEZE DE INCARCARE
Ipoteza I ( pe deschiderea grinzii caii de rulare actioneaza patru forte )

Btotal ≔ B + B' = 12600 mm > t ≔ 10 m nu este valabila ipoteza

Ipoteza II ( pe deschiderea grinzii caii de rulare actioneaza trei forte )

Ipoteza III (pe deschiderea grinzii caii de rulare actioneaza trei forte )

Ipoteza IV ( pe deschiderea grinzii caii de rulare actioneaza doua forte de poduri diferite )

Ipoteza V ( pe deschiderea grinzii caii de rulare actioneaza doua forte generate de acelasi
pod de rulare, cel care are capacitatea de ridicare mai mare )

CALCULUL MOMENTULUI MAXIM MAXIMORUM

 CALCULUL MOMENTULUI MAXIM MAXIMORUM
Ipoteza II
R ≔ P1 + P3 + P'1 = 1018.71 kN
x1 ≔ 0 mm

x3 ≔ 5800 mm

x'1 ≔ 6825 mm

⎛⎝P1 ⋅ x1 + P3 ⋅ x3 + P'1 ⋅ x'1⎞⎠

Σ Mc=0 xR ≔ ――――――――= 3764.14 mm
R

P1 ⋅ 9782 mm + P3 ⋅ 3982 mm + P'1 ⋅ 2957 mm

Σ Mb=0 VA ≔ ―――――――――――――― = 613.045 kN
10000 mm

P1 ⋅ 218 mm + P3 ⋅ 6018 mm + P'1 ⋅ 7043 mm

Σ Mc=0 VB ≔ ――――――――――――――= 405.665 kN VA + VB = 1018.71 kN
10000 mm
MP1 ≔ VA ⋅ 218 mm = 133.644 kN ⋅ m
MP3 ≔ -P'1 ⋅ 1025 mm + VB ⋅ ((1025 mm + 2957 mm )) = 1432.701 kN ⋅ m
MP'1 ≔ VB ⋅ 2957 mm = 1199.55 kN ⋅ m

MIImm ≔ MP3 = 1432.701 kN ⋅ m

Ipoteza III
 MIImm ≔ MP3 = 1432.701 kN ⋅ m

Ipoteza III

R ≔ P3 + P'1 + P'3 = 836.055 kN

x3 ≔ 0 mm x'1 ≔ 1025 mm x'3 ≔ 5775 mm

⎛⎝P3 ⋅ x3 + P'1 ⋅ x'1 + P'3 ⋅ x'3⎞⎠
Σ Mc=0 xR ≔ ―――――――― = 1644.272 mm
R

P3 ⋅ 6334.5 mm + P'1 ⋅ 5309.5 mm + P'3 ⋅ 559.5 mm

Σ Mb=0 VA ≔ ―――――――――――――――― = 392.129 kN
10000 mm

P3 ⋅ 3665.5 mm + P'1 ⋅ 4690.5 mm + P'3 ⋅ 9440.5 mm

Σ Mc=0 VB ≔ ――――――――――――――――= 443.926 kN
10000 mm
VA + VB = 836.055 kN

MP3 ≔ 3665.5 mm ⋅ VA = 1437.348 kN ⋅ m

MP'1 ≔ VA ⋅ ((1025 mm + 3665.5 mm )) - P3 ⋅ 1025 mm = 1376.554 kN ⋅ m

MP'3 ≔ VB ⋅ 559.5 mm = 248.377 kN ⋅ m

MIIImm ≔ MP3 = 1437.348 kN ⋅ m

Ipoteza IV
 Ipoteza IV

R ≔ P3 + P'1 = 629.64 kN x3 ≔ 0 mm x'1 ≔ 1025 mm

⎛⎝P3 ⋅ x3 + P'1 ⋅ x'1⎞⎠
Σ Mc=0 xR ≔ ―――――― = 290.094 mm
R

P3 ⋅ 5145 mm + P'1 ⋅ 4120 mm

Σ Mb=0 VA ≔ ―――――――――― = 305.684 kN
10000 mm

P3 ⋅ 4855 mm + P'1 ⋅ 5880 mm

Σ Ma=0 VB ≔ ―――――――――― = 323.956 kN VA + VB = 629.64 kN
10000 mm
MP3 ≔ VA ⋅ 4855 mm = 1484.097 kN ⋅ m

MP'1 ≔ VB ⋅ 4120 mm = 1334.698 kN ⋅ m MIVmm ≔ MP3 = 1484.097 kN ⋅ m

Ipoteza V
Ipoteza V

R ≔ P1 + P3 = 840.51 kN x1 ≔ 0 mm x3 ≔ 5800 mm
⎛⎝P1 ⋅ x1 + P3 ⋅ x3⎞⎠
Σ Mc=0 xR ≔ ――――― = 3115.194 mm
R

P1 ⋅ 9457.5 mm + P3 ⋅ 3657.5 mm
Σ Mb=0 VA ≔ ――――――――――― = 533.077 kN
10000 mm

P1 ⋅ 542.5 mm + P3 ⋅ 6342.5 mm
Σ Ma=0 VB ≔ ――――――――――= 307.433 kN VA + VB = 840.51 kN
10000 mm
MP1 ≔ VA ⋅ 542.5 mm = 289.194 kN ⋅ m

MP3 ≔ VB ⋅ 3657.5 mm = 1124.436 kN ⋅ m MVmm ≔ MP3 = 1124.436 kN ⋅ m

MMM ≔ max ⎛⎝MIImm , MIIImm , MIVmm , MVmm⎞⎠ = 1484.097 kN ⋅ m Ipoteza 4

EVALUAREA SOLICITARILOR PENTRU DIMENSIONAREA GRINZII DE RULARE

 EVALUAREA SOLICITARILOR PENTRU DIMENSIONAREA GRINZII DE RULARE

Incarcare Tip Valoarea Coe Valoarea de Coe Valoarea de

caracteristica f. calcul SLS (kN/ f. calcul SLU (kN/
(kN/mp) SLS mp) SLU mp)

G.P grinda G 1,5 1 1,5 1,35 2,025

de rulare

G.P sina G 0,8 1 0,8 1,35 1,08

+prinderi

1/2 G.P G 0,4 1 0,4 1,35 0,54

grinda
franare

1/2 G.P G 0,3 1 0,3 1,35 0,405

C.O.L

G.P G 0,1 1 0,1 1,35 0,135

balustrada

Spatiu tehnic G 2 1 2 1,35 2,7

1/2 circulatie G 0,8 0,7 0,56 1.05 0,84

pasarela

∑p 5,66 kN/m ∑pk 7,725 kN/m

= =

INCARCARI ORIZONTALE PRODUSE DE PODURILE RULANTE

HL1 ≔ 1.35 ⋅ 19.94 kN = 26.919 kN

H'L2 ≔ 1.35 ⋅ 11.83 kN = 15.971 kN

HT1 ≔ 1.35 ⋅ 29.69 kN = 40.082 kN

HS1T ≔ 1.35 ⋅ 72.94 kN = 98.469 kN
HT3 ≔ 1.35 ⋅ 12.4 kN = 16.74 kN

H'T1 ≔ 1.35 ⋅ 16.35 kN = 22.073 kN

H'T3 ≔ 1.35 ⋅ 6.16 kN = 8.316 kN

L ≔ max ⎛⎝HL1 , H'L2⎞⎠ = 26.919 kN

Mz,1Ed (HT,1,H'T,1)
 Mz,1Ed (HT,1,H'T,1)

Mz,1Ed (HT,1,-H'T,1)

Mz,1Ed (HS,1T,)

Mz,1Ed (HT,3, H'T,3)

DIMENSIONAREA SECTIUNII TRANSVERSALE A GRINZII CAII DE RULARE

DIMENSIONAREA SECTIUNII TRANSVERSALE A GRINZII CAII DE RULARE

SOLICITARILE PENTRU DIMENSIONAREA GRINZII

MyEd ≔ 1580.85 kN ⋅ m

VEd ≔ 306.52 kN

MzEd ≔ 245.98 kN ⋅ m

L = 26.919 kN

1. stabilirea modulului de rezistenta necesar

N
fy ≔ 235 ―― γM0 ≔ 1.0
mm 2 ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
N
235 ――
MyEd mm 2
Wnec ≔ ――= 6727.021 cm 3 ε ≔ ―――― =1
fy fy
――
γM0

2. se propune o grosime a inimii tw ≔ 9 mm

‾‾‾‾‾
Wnec
3. se apreciaza inaltimea optima a inimii hwoptim ≔ 1.15 ⋅ ――= 994.233 mm
tw
hw ≔ 1000 mm

4. se verifica supletea inimii

hw
100 ε = 100 < ― = 111.111 < 124 ⋅ ε = 124
tw
5. se determina nivelul de solicitare la forta taietoare
fy VEd
VcRd ≔ hw ⋅ tw ⋅ ―――= 1221.096 kN ν ≔ ―― = 0.251
‾‾
3 ⋅ γM0 VcRd

6. se stabileste aria necesara pentru talpa inferioara a grinzii

Wnec 1
Afnec_My ≔ ――- ―hw ⋅ tw ⋅ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
1 - 3 ν 2 = 5376.216 mm 2
hw 6
7. se descompune momentul Mz,Ed intr-un cuplu de forte H
MzEd
d ≔ 1400 mm H ≔ ――= 175.7 kN
d
8. se stabileste aria necesara a talpii superioare
H+L
Afnec ≔ Afnec_My + ――= 6238.425 mm 2
fy
――
γM0
9. se propune grosimea talpii tf ≔ 15 mm

1.5 ⋅ tw = 13.5 mm < tf = 15 mm < 3.0 ⋅ tf = 45 mm

10. se stabileste latimea necesara a talpii superioare

 1.5 ⋅ tw = 13.5 mm tf = 15 mm 3.0 ⋅ tf = 45 mm

10. se stabileste latimea necesara a talpii superioare

Afnec
b1nec ≔ ――= 415.895 mm b1 ≔ 420 mm
tf
11. se verifica supletea talpii superioare
b1 - tw
―――
2
――― = 13.7 < 15 ⋅ ε = 15
tf
12. se stabileste latimea talpii inferioare
Afnec_My
bnec ≔ ―――= 358.414 mm b ≔ 360 mm
tf

VERIFICARI DE REZISTENTA SECTIUNE GRINDA DE RULARE

- se stabileste pozitia centrului de greutate

-420 mm ⋅ 15 mm ⋅ 507.5 mm + 360 mm ⋅ 15 mm ⋅ 507.5 mm
zG ≔ -――――――――――――――――――― = 22.065 mm
420 mm ⋅ 15 mm + 1000 mm ⋅ 9 mm + 360 mm ⋅ 15 mm

- calculez momentul de inertie Iy in raport cu axa y-y

2 2
tw ⋅ hw 3 tf 3 ⋅ b1 tf 3 ⋅ b ⎛ hw tf ⎞ ⎛ hw tf ⎞
Iy ≔ ――― + ――― + ――+ hw ⋅ tw ⋅ zG 2 + tf ⋅ b1 ⋅ ⎜― + ―- zG⎟ + tf ⋅ b ⋅ ⎜― + ―+ zG⎟
12 12 12 ⎝ 2 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 2 ⎠
Iy = 3753549211.957 mm 4

z1 ≔ 477.94 mm
z1 ≔ 477.94 mm

z2 ≔ 537.06 mm

z3 ≔ 462.94 mm

z4 ≔ 522.06 mm
MyEd N
1. σxEd_My_1 ≔ ――⋅ z1 = 201.29 ――
Iy mm 2

L N
σxEd_L ≔ ――= 4.273 ――
b1 ⋅ tf mm 2

H N
σxEd_H ≔ ――= 27.889 ――
b1 ⋅ tf mm 2

N fy N
σxEd_1 ≔ σxEd_My_1 + σxEd_L + σxEd_H = 233.452 ―― 2
< ―― = 235 ――
mm γM0 mm 2

MyEd N fy N
2. σxEd_2 ≔ ――⋅ z2 = 226.189 ―― < ―― = 235 ――
Iy mm 2
γM0 mm 2

VEd N fy N
3. τEd_V ≔ ―― = 34.058 ―― < ――― = 135.677 ――
hw ⋅ tw mm 2
‾‾
3 ⋅ γM0 mm 2

4.

Pmax ≔ P3 = 451.44 kN
Pentru sina KP80: hr ≔ 130 mm bfr ≔ 130 mm Ir ≔ 15.47 ⋅ 10 6 mm 4

beff ≔ bfr + hr + tf = 275 mm 1

―
3
beff ⋅ tf 3 ⎛ Ir + If_eff ⎞
If_eff ≔ ――― = 77343.75 mm 4 leff ≔ 3.25 ⋅ ⎜―――⎟ = 0.39 m
12 ⎝ tw ⎠

Pmax N fy N
σzEd ≔ ――― = 128.628 ―― < ―― = 235 ――
leff ⋅ tw mm 2 γM0 mm 2

5. MyEd N
σxEd3 ≔ ――⋅ z3 = 194.972 ――
Iy mm 2
 5. MyEd N
σxEd3 ≔ ――⋅ z3 = 194.972 ―― 6. ⎛ σzEd ⎞ 2 ⎛ τEd_V ⎞ 2
Iy mm 2 ⎜―― ⎟ + 3 ⋅ ⎜――⎟ = 0.363 <1
⎜ fy ⎟ ⎜ fy ⎟
⎛ σxEd3 ⎞ 2 ⎛ τEd_V ⎞ 2 ――
⎜γ ⎟ ⎜ ―― ⎟
⎜――⎟ + 3 ⋅ ⎜――⎟ = 0.751 <1 ⎝ M0 ⎠ ⎝ γM0 ⎠
⎜ fy ⎟ ⎜ fy ⎟
――
⎜ γ ⎟ ⎜ ―― ⎟
⎝ M0 ⎠ ⎝ γM0 ⎠

MyEd N
7. σxEd4 ≔ ――⋅ z4 = 219.872 ――
Iy mm 2
⎛ σxEd4 ⎞ 2 ⎛ τEd_V ⎞ 2
⎜――⎟ + 3 ⋅ ⎜――⎟ = 0.938 <1
⎜ fy ⎟ ⎜ fy ⎟
⎜ ―― ⎟ ⎜ ―― ⎟
⎝ γM0 ⎠ ⎝ γM0 ⎠

VERIFICAREA STABILITATII LOCALE A INIMII GRINZII DE RULARE(SLU)

Se propune a=1250mm

VERIFICAREA IMPOTRIVA PIERDERII STABILITATII LOCALE A INIMII GRINZII

DE RULARE SUB ACTIUNEA MOMENTULUI INCOVOIETOR SI AL FORTEI
 VERIFICAREA IMPOTRIVA PIERDERII STABILITATII LOCALE A INIMII GRINZII
DE RULARE SUB ACTIUNEA MOMENTULUI INCOVOIETOR SI AL FORTEI
TAIETOARE

1. a ≔ 1000 mm

η ≔ 1.2 pentru fy=235N/mm2

⎛ hw ⎞ 2 a
kτ ≔ 5.34 + 4.0 ⋅ ⎜―⎟ = 9.34 daca ― = 1 >= 1
⎝ a ⎠ hw

hw 31
― = 111.111 > ― ⋅ ε ⋅ ‾‾
kτ = 78.95 => trebuie efectuata verificarea
tw η sub actiunea fortei taietoare

2. verificarea sub actiunea momentului incovoietor

zc ≔ z1 = 477.94 mm

Iy = 3753549211.957 mm 4

MyEd = 1580.85 kN ⋅ m
Iy
Wcy ≔ ―= 7853599.222 mm 3
zc

MyEd
η1 ≔ ―――― = 0.857 <1.00 se verifica
fy
Wcy ⋅ ――
γM0

3. se calculeaza tensiunea critica Euler

bp ≔ min ⎛⎝a , hw⎞⎠ = 1000 mm

N ⎛ tw ⎞ 2 N
σE ≔ 190000 ―― ⋅ ⎜―⎟ = 15.39 ――
mm ⎝ bp ⎠
2
mm 2

4. se calculeaza tensiunea critica de voalare elastica

4. se calculeaza tensiunea critica de voalare elastica
N
τcr ≔ σE ⋅ kτ = 143.743 ――
mm 2
5. se determina coeficienti de zveltete
‾‾‾
fy 0.83
λw ≔ 0.76 ⋅ ―― = 0.972 > ―― = 0.692
τcr η
6. se stabileste valoarea coeficientului de reducere
0.83
χw ≔ ―― = 0.854
λw
7. se determina c
⎛ 1.6 ⋅ b1 ⋅ tf 2 ⋅ fy ⎞
⎜
c ≔ a ⋅ 0.25 + ――――― ⎟ = 266.8 mm
⎜⎝ tw ⋅ hw 2 ⋅ fy ⎟⎠

8. se calculeaza γM1 ≔ 1.0

χw ⋅ fy ⋅ hw ⋅ tw
VbwRd ≔ ――――― = 1042.973 kN
‾‾
3 ⋅ γM1

9. se determina Iyf al sectiunii formate doar din talpi

⎛ hw + tf ⎞ ⎛ hw + tf ⎞
-b1 ⋅ tf ⋅ ⎜――― ⎟ + b ⋅ tf ⋅ ⎜――― ⎟
⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
zGtalpi ≔ -――――――――――― = 39.038 mm
b1 ⋅ tf + b ⋅ tf

2 2
tf 3 ⋅ b1 tf 3 ⋅ b ⎛ hw tf ⎞ ⎛ hw tf ⎞
Ify ≔ ――― + ――+ tf ⋅ b1 ⋅ ⎜― + ―- zGtalpi⎟ + tf ⋅ b ⋅ ⎜― + ―+ zGtalpi⎟ = 2995796682.692 mm 4
12 12 ⎝ 2 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 2 ⎠

10. se calculeaza modulul de rezistenta in raport cu axa extrema comprimata

hw tf
zcf ≔ ― + ―- zGtalpi = 468.462 mm
2 2

Ify
Wfy ≔ ―― = 6394.968 cm 3
zcf
fy
11. MfRd ≔ Wfy ⋅ ―― = 1502.818 kN ⋅ m
γM0

b1 ⋅ tf 2 ⋅ fy ⎛ MyEd ⎞
12. VbfRd ≔ ―――― ⋅ ⎜1 - ――⎟ = -4.322 kN
c ⋅ γM0 ⎝ MfRd ⎠
13. se determina capacitatea de rezistenta la voalare prin forfecare
VbRd ≔ VbwRd + VbfRd = 1038.651 kN

14. verificarea la voalare sub actiunea fortei taietoare

VEd
η3 ≔ ――= 0.295 <1.00
VbRd

15. se determina
15. se determina
MyEd ⎛ hw ⎞ N
σ'Ed ≔ ――⋅ ⎜― - zGtalpi - tf⎟ = 187.822 ――
Iy ⎝ 2 ⎠ mm 2

σ'Ed VEd
η'1 ≔ ―― = 0.799 η'3 ≔ ―― = 0.294
fy VbwRd
――
γM0

16. se verifica sectiunea la voalare sub efect combinat

⎛ Wfy ⎞ 2
η'1 + ⎜1 - ―― ⎟ ⋅ ⎛⎝2 ⋅ η'3 - 1⎞⎠ = 0.831 <1.00
⎝ Wcy ⎠

VERIFICAREA IMPOTRIVA PIERDERII STABILITATII LOCALE A INIMII GRINZII DE

RULARE SUB ACTIUNEA FORTEI CONCENTRATE
Pmax N
σzEd ≔ ――― = 128.628 ――
leff ⋅ tw mm 2

- verificarea la voalare

FzEd ≔ Pmax = 451.44 kN

1. se calculeaza factorii m1 si m2 necesari la Leff

fy ⋅ b1 ⎛ hw ⎞ 2
m1 ≔ ――= 46.667 m2 ≔ 0.02 ⋅ ⎜―⎟ = 88.889
fy ⋅ tw ⎝ tf ⎠

2. se determina lungimea pe care se considera incarcarea pe roata aplicata rigid

ss ≔ leff - 2 ⋅ tf = 359.961 mm

3. se evalueaza lungimea incarcata eficace

ly ≔ ss + 2 ⋅ tf ⋅ ⎛⎝1 + ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
m1 + m2 ⎞⎠ = 739.246 mm <a

4. se calculeaza coeficient de voalare la forte concentrate

⎛ hw ⎞ 2
kF ≔ 6 + 2 ⋅ ⎜―⎟ = 8
⎝ a ⎠
N
5. se determina efortul critic E ≔ 2.1 ⋅ 10 5 ――
mm 2
tw 3
Fcr ≔ 0.9 ⋅ kF ⋅ E ⋅ ―― = 1102.248 kN
hw

6. se calculeaza coeficientul de zveltete relativa

6. se calculeaza coeficientul de zveltete relativa
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾ fy
λ'F ≔ ly ⋅ tw ⋅ ―― = 1.191
Fcr

7. se determina coeficientul de reducere

0.5
χF ≔ ―― = 0.42
λ'F
8. se calculeaza lungimea eficace pentru rezistente la forte concentrate

Leff ≔ χF ⋅ ly = 310.348 mm

9. se determina capacitatea de rezistenta la voalare a inimii sub actiunea fortei concentrate

fy ⋅ Leff ⋅ tw
FRd ≔ ―――― = 656.386 kN
γM0
10. se efectueaza verificarea impotriva pierderii stabilitatii locale a inimii grinzii sub actiunea
fortei concentrate
FzEd
η2 ≔ ―― = 0.688 <1.0
FRd
11. sub efect combinat al fortei concentrate si al momentului incovoietor se verifica relatia:

η1 = 0.857

η2 + 0.8 ⋅ η1 = 1.373 <=1.4 se verifica

Obs: Pentru inceput a fost propus a=1250mm, dar nu se verifica relatia=> a=1000mm

VERIFICAREA LA STAREA LIMITA DE OBOSEALA

 VERIFICAREA LA STAREA LIMITA DE OBOSEALA

- Se iau in considerare incarcarile orizontale pe roti cu valorile normate din ipoteza de

incarcare ce conduce la atingerea momentului maxim maximorum.

P3n = 304 kN P'1n = 120 kN

kN
pk ≔ 5.66 ――
m

M'mm ≔ 999.7 kN ⋅ m V'mm ≔ 205.7 kN

In situatia de incarcare cea mai favorabila se obtin solicitarile

In situatia de incarcare cea mai favorabila se obtin solicitarile

Mmin ≔ 70.7 kN ⋅ m

Vmin ≔ 0.79 kN

In situatia de incarcare mai defavorabila se obtin solicitarile (Clasa S4)

λσi ≔ 0.5 Mmax ≔ 70.7 kN ⋅ m + M'mm ⋅ λσi = 570.55 kN ⋅ m

λτi ≔ 0.66 Vmax ≔ 0.79 kN + V'mm ⋅ λτi = 136.552 kN

b1 = 420 mm

b = 360 mm

tf1 ≔ tf = 15 mm

Mmax = 570.55 kN ⋅ m

Vmax = 136.552 kN

z2 = 537.06 mm

z4 = 522.06 mm

γFf ≔ 1.0 coeficient partial de siguranta aplicat incarcarilor ce produc fenomene de oboseala

γMf ≔ 1.35 coeficient partial de siguranta aplicat aparitiei de rezistenta la oboseala

N
Δσc ≔ 125 ――
mm 2
valorile de referinta ale rezistentei la oboseala pentru 2*10^6 cicluri
N
Δτc ≔ 80 ――
mm 2

Mmax N Mmax N
Δσmax2 ≔ ――⋅ z2 = 81.635 ―― Δσmax4 ≔ ――⋅ z4 = 79.355 ――
Iy mm 2 Iy mm 2

Mmin N Mmin N
Δσmin2 ≔ ――⋅ z2 = 10.116 ―― Δσmin4 ≔ ――⋅ z4 = 9.833 ――
Iy mm 2 Iy mm 2

N N
Δσ2 ≔ Δσmax2 - Δσmin2 = 71.519 ―― Δσ4 ≔ Δσmax4 - Δσmin4 = 69.521 ――
mm 2 mm 2

Vmax N
Δτmax4 ≔ ―― = 15.172 ――
tw ⋅ hw mm 2

Vmin N
Δτmin4 ≔ ―― = 0.088 ――
tw ⋅ hw mm 2

N
Δτ4 ≔ Δτmax4 - Δτmin4 = 15.085 ――
mm 2
VERIFICARE IN PUNCTUL 2
 N
Δτ4 ≔ Δτmax4 - Δτmin4 = 15.085 ――
mm 2
VERIFICARE IN PUNCTUL 2

γFf ⋅ Δσ2
―――= 0.772 <1.0
Δσc
――
γMf

VERIFICARE IN PUNCTUL 4

γFf ⋅ Δσ4
―――= 0.751
Δσc
――
γMf
γFf ⋅ Δτ4
―――= 0.255
Δτc
――
γMf

3 5
⎛ γFf ⋅ Δσ4 ⎞ ⎛ γFf ⋅ Δτ4 ⎞
⎜―――⎟ + ⎜―――⎟ = 0.424 <1.0
⎜ Δσc ⎟ ⎜ Δτc ⎟
⎜ γ ―― ⎟ ⎜ ―― ⎟
⎝ Mf ⎠ ⎝ γMf ⎠

VERIFICAREA LA STAREA LIMITA DE DEFORMATIE (SLS) t = 10 m

VERIFICAREA LA STAREA LIMITA DE DEFORMATIE (SLS) t = 10 m
t
fmax ≔ ―― = 16.667 mm
600 2
a3 2 ⋅ t a3 2 ⋅ a3
a3 ≔ 4.855 m b3 ≔ 5.145 m α3 ≔ 2 ⋅ ―+ 1 + ―― - ―- ―― = 3.998
t b3 b3 b3 ⋅ t
2
a'1 2 ⋅ t a'1 2 ⋅ a'1
a'1 ≔ 5.880 m b'1 ≔ 4.120 m α'1 ≔ 2 ⋅ ― + 1 + ―― - ― - ――― = 3.925
t b'1 b'1 b'1 ⋅ t

N
E = 210000 ―― Iy = 375354.921 cm 4
mm 2

Sageata maxima fmax se calculeaza cu valorile normate ale incarcarilor.

P3n = 304 kN

M3k ≔ 759.4 kN ⋅ m
α3 M3k ⋅ t 2
f3 ≔ ― ⋅ ――― = 8.025 mm
48 E ⋅ Iy

P'1n = 120 kN

M'1k ≔ 290 kN ⋅ m
α'1 M'1k ⋅ t 2
f'1 ≔ ―― ⋅ ―――= 3.008 mm
48 E ⋅ Iy

kN
pk = 5.66 ――
m 4
5 pk ⋅ t
fp ≔ ―― ⋅ ――= 0.935 mm
384 E ⋅ Iy

fmax ≔ f3 + f'1 + fp = 11.968 mm < 16.667 mm

VERIFICAREA REZEMARII GRINZI DE RULARE

 VERIFICAREA REZEMARII GRINZI DE RULARE

1. determinarea reactiunii maxime ce poate actiona pe un reazem al tronsonului de grinda

P1 = 389.07 kN P'1 = 178.2 kN

P3 = 451.44 kN P'3 = 206.415 kN

P'3 ⋅ 3475 mm + P'1 ⋅ 8975 mm + P3 ⋅ 10000 mm

V1 ≔ ――――――――――――――― = 683.104 kN
10000 mm

P1 ⋅ 4200 mm + P3 ⋅ 5800 mm
V2 ≔ ―――――――――― = 425.245 kN
10000 mm

Vmax ≔ max ⎛⎝V1 , V2⎞⎠ = 683.104 kN

2. verificarea la strivire a piesei de rezemare

b = 360 mm

tw = 9 mm

t54 ≔ 20 mm
N
fy = 235 ――
mm 2
γM0 = 1
Vmax N
σstrivire ≔ ――= 94.876 ――
t54 ⋅ b mm 2

σstrivire
―――= 0.269
fy
1.5 ⋅ ――
γM0

3. determinarea caracteristicilor geometrice pentru sectiune

A ≔ ⎛⎝b ⋅ t54⎞⎠ + ⎛⎝tw ⋅ 15 ⋅ tw⎞⎠ = 8415 mm 2

b 3 ⋅ t54 ‾‾‾
Ix
Ix ≔ ――― = 77760000 mm 4 ix ≔ ―= 96.128 mm
12 A

4. determinarea coeficientului de flambaj

4. determinarea coeficientului de flambaj

hGR ≔ ⎛⎝tf - 10 mm ⎞⎠ + hw + tf + 1.5 ⋅ t54 = 1050 mm

hGR
λx ≔ ―― = 10.923
ix

5. se calculeaza coeficientul de zveltete Euler

‾‾‾
E
λ1 ≔ π ⋅ ―= 93.913
fy

6. se calculeaza coeficientul de zveltete relativa

λx
λ'x ≔ ―= 0.116
λ1

7. se determina factorul de corelatie (curba c a=0.49)

αx ≔ 0.49

ϕx ≔ 0.5 ⋅ ⎛⎝1 + αx ⋅ ⎛⎝λ'x - 0.2⎞⎠ + λ'x 2 ⎞⎠ = 0.486

1.00
8. χ'x ≔ ―――――― = 1.043 χx ≔ 1
ϕx + ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
ϕx 2 - λ'x 2

9. se determina efortul capabil de rasturnare

fy
NbxRd ≔ χx ⋅ A ⋅ ―― = 1977.525 kN
γM0

10. verificarea la rasturnare

Vmax
――= 0.345 <1.0
NbxRd