Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
i
5
&
#
-&#i&n&
De!iciul *e
'&u#&$ie,
6 *e l& '&u#&$i&
*e/lin%
C(n*uci)ili&e&
'(7&&l%,
0 1 *7
34
Inen'i&e&
#&n'/i#&$iei,
70 1 *7
34
18
3,
Stresul hidric 96::"e %ile;
P
9
:
;
*./ 1, )( d ., .) )),18 d .,\- 8.\,* d 1),'
*./ M MeSal 1, 2( d ., .2 )*,8) d .,\1 828,( d 18,-
2./ 1\, *. d ., (2 1-,2) d .,-\ (.1,* d \,)8
2./ M MeSal 1), .1 d ., (8 (),1* d .,*1 ((8,- d 1.,*
M
(
l
*
(
5
9
<
*./ .,'8 d ., .) 8',(. d 1,12 \)),\8 d 1\,)
*./ M MeSal .,*- d ., .( -2,\8 d 1,\2 \((,*) d ',8
2./ (,*( d ., .* )*,)( d 1,1( -*-,** d 1-,2
2./ M MeSal 1,*1 d ., .8 82,.. d 1,)'
*1',2- d 1(,'
eeaprovi%ionarea cu ap 96::"e %ile;
P
9
:
;
*./ 1,)8 d ., .2 )-,)( d .,\* ).(,8( d 11,-
*./ M MeSal 1,)) d ., .( 8*,88 d .,\2 )-),)8 d \,(
2. " *./ (,.* d ., .8 )1,)2 d .,*' 22),)' d ),(
2. " *./ MMeSal 1,)2 d ., .2
)*,8\ d .,\. 2*1,8- d -,8
M
(
l
*
(
5
e
n
e
'
c
9
<
*./ (,88 d ., .( 8',.* d 1,2( )(',.- d 1), (
*./ M MeSal 1,'* d ., .1 -*,'. d 1,2( 88*,2) d 1(,1
2./ (,(* d ., .8 8.,82 d 1,.1 2-(,*1 d 1.,*
2./ M MeSal (,1. d ., .) 88,' d 1,2.
)22,)\ d ',8
5e msura scderii umiditii solului i deshidratrii esuturilor se mrete
re%istena stomatelor i scade conductibilitatea lor pentru vaporii de ap. S"a stabilit,
)
c plantele tratate cu SV$ pstrea% conductibilitatea stomatelor un timp mai
ndelungat 9tab. (;. $ceasta permite plantei de a evita ofilirea, dar, totdat micorarea
aperturii stomatelor poate limita activitatea fotosintetic. S"a constatat c la plantele
tratate cu combinaia compuilor acidului salicilic cu &L
)
M
, N
M
, Mg
MM
conductibilitatea
stomatelor n condiii de secet se pstrea% la un nivel mai mare comparativ cu
plantele netratate 9martor, 2./ 01$;. 1otui, din datele obinute urmea%, c
re%istena stomatelor nu se schimb proporional cu ma,orarea deficitului de saturaie,
ceea ce sugerea% c i ali factori influenea% starea stomatelor. 4ac valoarea
deficitului de saturaie n frun%ele plantelor de porumb n condiii de secet s"a mrit
de 12,( ori, conductibilitatea stomatelor s"a redus numai de (,2 ori. >n conformitate cu
starea stomatelor se schimb i intensitatea transpiraiei 9tab. (;.
>n condiii optime de umiditate se ntrevede o tendin de intensificare a
transpiraiei plantelor tratate, ceea ce, de altfel, este i o consecin a optimi%rii
potenialului apei i presiunii de turgescen 9fig. 1;. >n condiii optime de umiditate
vite%a mare a flu7ului apei 9intensitii transpiraie; se afl n legtur corelativ
po%itiv cu potenialul apei 9Y
[
; i cel hidrostatic 9Y
p
, turgescen; i n cea mai mare
msur este determinat de particularitile genotipice.
6alorile medii ale Y
p
n frun%ele plantelor 5 )8' n varianta PmartorQ
constituia .,)8- M5a# ale plantelor pretratate seminal i foliar = .,8)( M5a. 4up *
%ile de secet presiunea hidrostatic s"a redus pn la .,(*( M5a n frun%ele plantelor
netratate i .,2-- M5a = celor tratate cu salicilai. >n condiii de insuficien de
umiditate n frun%ele plantelor tratate foliar cu SV$ de tipul salicilailor potenialul
apei se pstrea% la un nivel mai ridicat 9fig. 1, (;. 5robabil, are loc ma,orarea livrrii
apei din rdcini spre frun%e, fapt argumentat indirect i de valorile deficitului de
saturaie i turgescen a acestora. 1ensionarea regimului de umiditate a solului
condiionea% reducerea veridic a consumului de ap n procesul transpiraiei 9tab. (;.
Micorarea aprovi%ionrii cu ap a plantelor i evoluarea n timp a secetei a condus la
o inhibare semnificativ a transpiraiei plantelor martor. $stfel, dup * %ile de stres
hidric 92./ 01$; s"a nregistrat un decala, al transpiraiei cu -.,2 la sut la plantele
netratate de porumb i cu 1','/ la cele de sorg, pe cnd stresul hidric de aceeai
intensitate i durat a condiionat o micorare a intensitii transpiraiei plantelor
tratate cu 88,-/ i 1),\8/ corespun%tor. 4e menionat, c seceta provoac reduceri
autentic mai mari ale parametrilor status"ului apei n frun%ele inferioare spre deosebire
de frun%ele nivelului superior de inserie 9fig. (;. Vrun%ele de la nivelul mediu i n
deosebi, cele cu creterea neterminat, au proprietatea de a pstra Y
[
la un nivel mai
stabil comparativ cu frun%ele de la nivelul inferior de inserie 9fig. (;.
Vrun%ele de la nivelul mediu i n deosebi, cele cu creterea neterminat, au
proprietatea de a pstra Y
[
la un nivel mai stabil comparativ cu frun%ele de la nivelul
inferior de inserie. 4atorit acestui fapt se creea% un gradient al Y
[
i presiunii de
turgescen pentru compensarea apei n frun%ele n cretere 9fig. (;.Salicilaii
ma,orea% capacitatea de atracie a apei n frun%ele de la vrful plantei, inducnd
redistribuirea apei n organe.
8
-0.9
-0.8
-0.7
-0.6
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
w
,
M
P
a
a b
I
-0.9
-0.7
-0.5
-0.3
-0.1
w
,
M
P
a
a b
II
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
p
,
M
P
a
a b
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
p
,
M
P
a
a b
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
L
p
,
g
/
h
.
d
m
2
.
M
P
a
a b
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
L
p
,
g
/
h
.
d
m
2
.
M
P
a
a b
*./01$ *./MSV$
2./01$ 2./MSV$
Fi0. ,. :nfluena stresului hidric asupra potenialelor apei 9Y[, M5a;, turgescenei
9Yp, M5a; frun%elor i conductibilitii hidraulice n segmentele Ptulpin = frun%eQ la plantele
de ea !a"s 3., cv. 5 )8\ 9:; i #orgu! $icolor, 3., cv. Moldovenesc ). 9::;, tratate cu
combinaia compuilor acidului orto"o7i"ben%oic cu &L)
M
, Mg
MM
, N
M
. +7p. de veget. (..-.
)egend( a = n a 6::"ea %i de stres hidric# b = dup * %ile de reversie a umiditii la *./ 01$.
-
I
-0.9
-0.8
-0.7
-0.6
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
*
.
/
0
1
$
8
.
/
0
1
$
S
9
1
;
S
9
8
;
S
9
*
;
M
e
S
9
2
;
M
e
)
.
/
M
e
-
.
/
M
e
II
-0.9
-0.8
-0.7
-0.6
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
*
.
/
0
1
$
8
.
/
0
1
$
S
9
1
;
S
9
8
;
S
9
*
;
M
e
S
9
2
;
M
e
)
.
/
M
e
-
.
/
M
e
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
*
.
/
0
1
$
8
.
/
0
1
$
S
9
1
;
S
9
8
;
S
9
*
;
M
e
S
9
2
;
M
e
)
.
/
M
e
-
.
/
M
e
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
*
.
/
0
1
$
8
.
/
0
1
$
S
9
1
;
S
9
8
;
S
9
*
;
M
e
S
9
2
;
M
e
)
.
/
M
e
-
.
/
M
e
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
*
.
/
0
1
$
8
.
/
0
1
$
S
9
1
;
S
9
8
;
S
9
*
;
M
e
S
9
2
;
M
e
)
.
/
M
e
-
.
/
M
e
L
p
,
g
/
h
.
d
m
2
.
M
P
a
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
*
.
/
0
1
$
8
.
/
0
1
$
S
9
1
;
S
9
8
;
S
9
*
;
M
e
S
9
2
;
M
e
)
.
/
M
e
-
.
/
M
e
L
p
,
g
/
h
.
d
m
2
.
M
P
a
Fr. super Fr. medii Fr.infer.
Fi0. 4. Modificarea Yi 9M5a;, :1 9g S dm
"(
S h
"1
; i 3p 9g S h
"1
Sdm
"(
S M5a; n cone7iunea
Qtulpin"frun%eQ la diferite nivele de inserie la plantele de ea !a"s 3., cv. 5 )8\ 9:; i
#orgu! $icolor, 3., cv. Moldovenesc ). 9::; n condiii de fluctuaie a umiditii i stres hidric
de diferit durat. +7periena de vegetaie (..-.
*
Y
i
,
M
5
a
:
1
,
g
S
d
m
"
(
S
h
"
1
:
1
,
g
S
d
m
"
(
S
h
"
1
Y
i
,
M
5
a
4e e7emplu, s"a stabilit, c Y
[
n frun%ele inferioare ale plantelor ea !a"s 3.
se reduce dup * %ile de insuficien de umiditate i atinge cele mai mici valori =
".,-)( M5a# n frun%ele de la nivelul mediu = ".,-.. M5a i n cele superioare =
".,8). M5a. 0orespun%tor diminuea% presiunea de turgescen. 6alori ma,ore ale Y
p
s"au nregistrat la plantele tratate n frun%ele de la nivelul superior att n condiii
optime de umiditate, ct i dup * %ile de stres hidric 9fig. (, ::;. :ntensitatea
transpiraiei frun%elor inferioare a plantelor de porumb dup * %ile de secet drastic
92./ 01$, 1,2 coef. de ofilire; constituia att la plantele tratate ct i la cele netratate
doar 2*,8 / din intensitatea procesului caracteristic plantelor bine aprovi%ionate cu
ap. +fectul SV$ s"a pstrat la frun%ele de la nivelele mediu i superior de inserie.
$cestea se deosebeau prin valori de 2\,8 i 8),- la sut mai mari comparativ cu
gradul de reducere a procesului n frun%ele respective 92-,' i )2,-; a plantelor
netratate pe fond de secet 9tab. (;. 5articularitile de modificare a intensitii
transpiraiei, potenialului apei i presiunii de turgescen, condiionate de reducerea
umiditii solului, reflect deosebirile n conductibilitatea hidraulic a plantelor i
vice"versa. Ma,orarea conductibilitii apei este asociat cu sporirea transpiraiei [1,
2\]. 1otodat, s"a demonstrat, c 3
p
depinde de valoarea absolut a curentului de ap
[1\]. 4in re%ultatele e7perimentale obinute n studiul dat, urmea% c dup * %ile de
insuficien de umiditate, la porumb 3
p
se reduce cu 8\,.. la sut, la sorg = cu 28,* la
sut 9fig. 1# (;. S"au depistat deosebiri n conductibilitatea apei n dependen de
po%iia frun%elor pe plant 9fig 1# (;. 0ele mai mari valori ale 3
p
au fost nregistrate n
segmentul Ptulpini = frun%e superioareQ la ambele culturi. eeacia la secet a plantelor
de sorg se caracteri%ea% nu att prin reducerea consumului de ap n procesul de
transpiraie, ct prin proprietatea de a se aprovi%iona cu ap din contul ma,orrii
suprafeei i forei de absorbie a apei din sol de ctre rdcini i conductibilitii
hidraulice a plantei. Sporirea intensitii de livrare a apei permite plantei de a pstra
stomatele ntredeschise un timp mai ndelungat, ceea ce facilitea% asimilarea 0R
(
i
acumularea biomasei.
4eci, seceta condiionea% schimbri prompte att n intensitatea transpiraiei
apei, cuplate cu modificarea conductanei stomatelor, ct i n valoarea potenialelor
apei i presiunii hidrostatice ale frun%elor plantelor. Micorarea flu7ului apei spre
frun%e 9:1; i ma,orarea gradienilor Y
[
i Y
p
n condiii de insuficien de umiditate
sunt asociate cu reducerea conductibilitii hidraulice a esuturilor = mai semnificative
la plantele sensibile. +fectul de stabili%are a status"ului apei produs de compuii
acidului salicilic, probabil, se datorea% proprietii acestora de reglare a
conductibilitii hidraulice i strii stomatelor.
BIBLIO2RAFIE
1. Aaron *.,#han+ ,., -ininger #., .endo/ *., 0a&ulini+ ,., Galili G. Rvere7pression of a
5lasma Membrane $juaporin in 1ransgenic 1obacco :mproves 5lant 6igor under Vavorable
Tro[th 0onditions but &ot under 4rought or Salt Stress WW5lant 0ell. (..2. 6.18.5.)2'"))*.
(. Alla1a" -.G., Pit!an M.G., #tore" *., 2"er!an #. eelationships bet[een sap flo[ and
[ater porential in [oodk or perennial plants on islands of Treat larrier reef WW 5lant, 0ell and
+nvironment. 1'\1. 6. ). 5. 2('"22*.
2. .latt M.e.0a
(M
Signaling and 0ontrol of Tuard"0ell 6olume in Stomatal Movements WW
0urr.Rpin.5lant liol.(....6.2.5.1'-"(.).
\
). 3etting A.G. pL, $bscisic $cid and the :ntegration of Metabolism in 5lants under Stressed
and &onstressed 0onditions! 0ellular eesponses to Stress and 1heir :mplcation for 5lant iater
eelationsWWm.+7p.lot. (....6.81.5.1)*"18\.
8. .o"er 4.#. iater transport WW $nn. eev. 5lant 5hksiol. 1'\8. 6. 2-. p. )*2"81-.
-. Car/a5ac M., Coo+e D.2., Clar+son D.2. eesponses of [heat plants to nutrition
deprivation mak invole the regulation of [ater"channel function WW 5lanta. 1''-. 6. 1''. 5.
2*("2\1.
*. Clar+son D.2., Car/a5al M., 6enzler 2., -aterhouse *.3., #!"th A.4., Coo+e D.t., #teudle
7. eoot Lkdraulic 0onductance! 4iurnal $juaporin +7pression and the +ffects of &utrient
Stress WWm. +7p. lot. (.... 6. 81. 5. -1"*..
\. Cohen I., Moreshet #., Fuchs M. 0hanges in hidraulic conductance of citrus trees
follo[ing a reduction in [etting soil volume WW 5lant, 0ell1 and +nvironment. 1'\*. 6. 1.. 5.
82"8*.
'. 7hlers -. :nfluence of root skstem parameters on [ater uptaOe of field crops WW $mer. Soc.
$gon. $nnu. Meet. Madison. 1''1. 5. 1(8.
1.. 4ones 6., )eight *.A, -zin 4ones *.G., 2o!os A.D. 1he integration of [hole root and
cellular hkdraulic conductivities in cereal roots.WW 5lanta. 1'\\. 6. 1*). 5. 1"*.
11. 0ra!er P.4., .o"er 4.#. iater relations of plant and soil. San 4iego! $cademic 5ress.
1''8. )\' p.
1(. )"nch 4. eoot architecture and 5lant 5hksiol. 1''8. 6. 1.'. &. 1. 5. *"12.
12. Moreshet #., Cohen ,. Green G.C., Fuchs M. 1he 5artitioning of Lidraulic 0onductances
[ithin Mature Rrange 1rees WW m. of +7p. lot. 1''.. 6. )1. &o. ((\. 5. \22"\2'.
1). *as+in I. eole of Salicilkc $cid in 5lants WW$nnu. eev. 5lant 5hksiol. 5lant Mol. liol.
1''(. 6. )2. 5. )2'")-2.
18. #eaton 0.A., )ands$erg 4.4., #eadgle" *.6. 1ranspiration and leaf [ater potential of [heat
in relation to changing soil [ater potential WW $ustral. m. $gr. ees. 1'**. 6. (\. &. (. 5. 288"
28'.
1-. #hachiro/a F.M., #a+ha$utdino/a A.*., .ezruco/a M.8., Fat+hutdino/a *.A.,
Fat+hutdino/a D.*. 0hanges in Lormonal Status of ieat Seedlings :nduced bk Salicilkc $cid
and Salinitk WW 5lant Sci., (..2. 6. 1-). 5. 21*"2((. SharOek 1.4., 1'\).
1*. te9:r' A., Melenciuc M. $cidul salicilic = factor de reglare a creterii, de%voltrii i
re%istenei plantelor de nea !a"s 3. i Sorgu! $icolor 3. n condiii de deficit moderat de
umiditate luletinul $oM. otiinele vieii. Seria t. biol., chim. i agricole. 0hiinu, (..-.
1\. #teudle 7., eam Rren, and +rnst"4etlef Schul%e. iater 1ransport in Mai%e eoots WW 5lant
5hksiol. 1'\*. 6.\). 5. 1((."1(2(
1'. hang Fisuo, Cao #i&ing WW 1urand 7uebao. $cta pedol. Sin 1''(. 6. ('. &. 2. 5. (2'"(8..
(.. hongin )u., 3e1!ann P. iater stress inhibits Lkdraulic 0onductance and 3eaf Tro[th
in 5ice Seedlings but &ot the 1ransport of iater via Mercurk Sensitive iater Thanneles in
the eoot WW 5lant 5hksiologk, 1'''. 6. 1(.. &o. 1. 5. 1)2"181.
(1. ;<=>?@AB C. p]JaB] qIC Jrs_]_DJC t@uBvDBwB ]Ft^BqF EBqx DF u]FDtyJ]FzJ{. |].
}BIq. DF@v."JttI_q JD"uF B]BbF_sBwB r_sI_q_IJC J BEB~_EBqtuEF. |. ), Exy. 1.
JbJD_E! rq"EB tW^ IJu_]Fu@]x. 1'-(. 0. -'"*2.
((. ;DEF>@GH< I.;., J<K<=>LMABGH< N.O., P<@AFGH< Q.I. }_^FDJrsx rF~JuDBwB
q_tuEJC tFIJzJIBEB AJtIBux DF ]Ftu_DJC yb_DJzx E @tIBEJC^ q_JzJuF EIFwJ WW }Fu.
}_q. BD. PJrJBIBwJC ]Ftu_DJ = DF@AF ::: |xt_v_I_uJCQ. }.! cF@AF. 1'''. G. 2((.
(2. ;DEF>@GH< I.R., J<K<=>LMABGH< N.O., Q<LK>LMABGH< O.N., SATUMAVFGH< W.N.,
P<@AFGH< Q.I. IJCDJ_ tFIJzJIBEB AJtIBux DF tBq_]FDJ_ wB]sBDBE E AB]DC^ J ]Btu
y]B]BtuABE yb_DJzx y]J EBqDBs q_JzJu_ WW Hw]B^JsJC, (..1. (. G. 81"8).
(). XFAYGFZ@ W.N., [DLFDB@G C.W., PHDMGH< \.]., ^FG?DB@G ].N. BqDx J FrBuDx
Bas_D r_]DBEx^ A@Iu@] E @tIBEJC^ ]FrDB EBqBBa_ty_v_DDBtuJ WW JrJBI. J aJB^.
A@Iu. pFtu. (.... |. 2(. 8. 0. ).1").'.
(8. _F<Y<H`DH R.N., aMGHDB@G X.R., ;<LbYAB C.Q., J q]. JrJBIBwJv_tAJ_ BtDBEx
t_I_AzJJ ]Ftu_DJ W pBq ]_q. qBE_DAB .. Gpa.! rq"EB , 1''8.-(( t.
'
(-. .c<K<FAB N.N. }_uBq JttI_qBEFDJC axtu]B AJD_uJAJ EBqBBas_DF ]Ftu_DJ y]J
Jrs_D_DJ_ BtsBuJv_v_tABwB qFEI_DJC ExtbD_wB ]FtuEB]F WW JrJBIBwJC ]Ftu_DJ. (..1.
|. )\. 1. G. 1)2"1)'.
(*. cVT<TGH N.N., WGBDB@G W.Q. K s_^FDJrsF^ EBqDBwB Bas_DF ]Ftu_DJ A @tIBEJCs
EBqDBwB q_JzJuF J rFt@^J WW G_]. aJBIBwJC ]Ftu_DJ. 1''). 8. 1("(. t.
(\. SGTDdBA@ e.W., ]YGFGH R.X. BqDx ]_Js J y]Bq@AuJEDBtu yb_DJzx E tECrJ t
FqFyuFzJ_ A @tIBEJCs @EIFD_DJC WW }Fu. ::: ]_ty@a. tJsy. Jr. J aJB^. }BIqFEJJ
PBqDx ]_Js t_ItAB^BrCtuE_DDx^ ]Ftu_DJQ, (8"(* sFC 1'\\. JbJD_E! uJJDzF.
1'\'. G. 11'"1(1.
('. SGFBDd@> N.J. p]JaB] qIC By]_q_I_DJC u]FDtyJ]FzJJ IJtu_E ]Ftu_DJ. WW rE. Hc
}GG. G_]. aJBI. J ^Js. DF@A. 1'\1. G.\."\(.
2.. S>EBD`GH RT., CDLG _.J., ;GFAdGH< C.C., _<f c.;. J q]. Gu]_tt"JDq@zJ]BEFDDB_
B]sJ]BEFDJ_ GH} J y]_q_IDx FqFyuFzJBDDx yBu_DzJFI ]Ftu_DJ
Mese!$r"anthe!u! cr"stallinu! 3. E Atu]_sFIDx^ @tIBEJC^ WW JrJBIBwJC ]Ftu_DJ.
(.... |. )*. (. G. 1'."1'\.
21. Mao g., _EUVB h., R<BY i., gE> i., RGFGBAB [.i. BqDx Bas_D IJtuF a_]_rx J J^
@tuBvJEBtu A A]FuABE]_s_DDB J qIJu_IDB yBvE_DDB rFt@^_ WW JrJBIBwJC
]Ftu_DJ. (..). |. 81. 8. t. **2"***.
2(. j<FKDF .. ABIBwJC ]Ftu_DJ. }.! }J]. 1'*\. 2\( t.
22. j>@oVBGH< J.N. `JBJrJv_tAJ_ BtDBEx AB]D_EB Att@qFzJJ WW `JBJrJAF ]Ftu_DJ
J JuBsBDJuB]JDw. pBq ]_q. K.K. ?CIJDF. ?! H. 1''.. G. )8.
2). jVTAB \.\. |]FDtyB]uDx_ @DAzJJ AB]DC JDuFAuDBwB ]Ftu_DJC WW JrJBIBwJC
]Ftu_DJ.1''2. |. ).. 8. G. \11"\(..
28. jVTAB \.\., IDTDkDB@G J.C., SLALGFGH< W. A MF. GFIJzJIBEFC AJtIBuF AFA
JDwJaJuB] u]FDtyB]uF EBqx v_]_r AB]_D ]Ftu_DJC WW .H.c. 1''2. |. 221. . ).
2-. JT<HBbl [.J., CDLAd W.e., R<FmDB@G R.N., e<F<B C.i. KtBa_DDBtuJ EBqBBas_DF J
]FrEJuJ_ AB]D_EB tJtu_sx @ ]Ftu_DJ BrJsB yb_DJzx y]J @tIBEJC^
EBqBBa_ty_v_DJC WW G. . `JBIBwJC. 1'\-. *. G. *1"*2.
2*. Q<FK>LMABGH O.X., RDdDTGH< J.R., cGTGLGH N.j., jDGBLUDH W.[., S>MGVFGH< X.O.
Jq]FEIJv_tAFC J @tuJvDFC y]BEBqJsBtu y]B]BtuABE yb_DJzx y]J yBExb_DJJ
u_sy_]Fu@]x EBrq@^F WW Hw]B^JsJC. (..). *. G. 82"8*.
2\. P<nAY>EGH N.i. HAEFyB]JDx! tu]B_DJ_, tJtu_sFuJAF J BtBa_DDBtuJ ]_w@ICzJJ WW
JrJBIBwJC ]Ftu_DJ. (..). |. 81. 1. G. 1)("18(.
2'. ^BY h.oI.,J.o^.pq<B,X.oJ.R<B. IJCDJ_ uC_Ix^ s_uFIIBE DF qEJ_DJC @tuJz E
IJtuC^ ABDtAJ^ aBaBE WWJrJBIBwJC ]Ftu_DJ.(..).|.81.). G.81-"8(..
1.
0n< 8\1.1..2!8\1.1).8\..2(!-22.18!-22.1*
=>?@ABC>DEFGAH I@JBJ?>KJFLM @AFLEN>O Zea mays L > Sorgum
bicolor L B PFCJB>HQ JLNJF>LECMNJRJ NE?JFLALGA BCAR> S}_I_Dv@A }.,
u_x]z H. DtuJu@u _D_uJAJ J JrJBIBwJJ ]Ftu_DJ Hc}.
IFaB]FuB]Dx^ J E_w_uFzJBDDx^ ByxuF^ Jr@v_DB EIJCDJ_ tFIJzJIFuBE
&L
)
M
, Mg
(M
, N
M
DF yF]Fs_u]x EBqDBwB tuFu@tF, @tuJvDB J EBqDB y]BEBqJsBtuJ
]Ftu_DJ A@A@]@rx wJa]Jq )8' J tB]wB tB]u }BIqBE_D_tA ). y]J
BuDBtJu_IDBs D_qBtuFuA_ EIFwJ. tuFDBEI_DB, vuB ED_t_DJ_ .,.8s} Lg0l
(
E
t]_q_ AB]D_EB tJtu_sx ExrxEF_u uFAB_ _ yB E_IJvJD_ tDJ_DJ_ 3
p
E
tJtu_s_ AB]_D"IJtu, AFAB_ y]BJt^BqJu y]J JrJBIBwJv_tAB rFt@^_,
Ba@tIBEI_DDB q_tuEJ_s p
-...
t Y
Z
"1,* }F. c_qBtuFuBA EIFwJ E yBvE_ DF
6"Bs uFy_ BDuBw_D_rF ]Ftu_DJ E aBIb_ tu_y_DJ JDwJaJ]@_u EBqD@{
y]BEBqJsBtu E tJtu_s_ tu_a_I " DJDJ_ IJtuC E BuIJvJ_ Bu E_]^DJ^
s_uFs_]BE. ]Ftu_DJ, Ba]FaBuFDDx^ tFIJzJIFuFsJ yF]Fs_u]x EBqDBwB
tuFu@tF, E uBs vJtI_ J, 3
p ,
DF^BqCutC DF aBI__ ExtBABs @]BED_ AFA E @tIBEJC^
ByuJsFIDBwB, uFA J D_qBtuFuBvDBwB @EIFD_DJC. p]_qyBIFwF_utC, vuB
yBqq_]FDJ_ EBqDBwB tuFu@tF E_]^DJ^ IJtu_E DF ByuJsFIDBs @]BED_ E
@tIBEJC^ BuDBtJu_IDBwB q_JzJuF EIFwJ Ba_ty_vJEF_utC
tFIJzJIFuFsJ D_
uBIAB tuFaJIJrFzJ_ wJq]FEIJv_tAB y]BEBqJsBtuJ J D_y]_]xEDxs
Ba_ty_v_DJ_s EBqB, DB J FAuJEJrFzJ_ q_Cu_IDBtuJ AB]D_EB tJtu_sx
]Ftu_DJ.
0n< 8\1.1..2!8\1.1).8\..2(!-22.18!-22.1*
HT*#&ulic c(n*uci5iT (! Zea mays, L &n* Sorgum bicolor,L /l&n' in
c(n*ii(n' (! #el&i5e l&cU (! & 7(i'u#e SMelenciuc M., otefr $. :nstitute of
Tenetics and 5hksiologies of plants $SM.
:n laboratork and vegetative e7periences influence salicklates &L)M, Mg(M,
NM on parameters of the [ater status, stomatal and [ater conductivitk of Zea mays L
hkbrid )8' and Sorgum bicolor, L c5. Moldovenesc). is investigated at relative
lacO of a moisture. :t is established, that entering .,.8s}
Lg0l( in the environment of
root skstem causes the same decrease on si%e 3p in skstem froot = sheetQ [hat occurs
at a fphksiological droughtQ, caused bk action
5+T -... [ith
"1,* }F. 3acO of a
moisture of ground on a 6: a stage ontogenesis plants in the greater degree inhibits
[ater conductivitk in skstem fa stalO " the bottom leavesQ as against top metamer.$t
the plants processed salicklates parameters of the [ater status including 3p are at
higher level as in conditions optimum, and insufficient humidifking. :t is supposed,
that maintenance of the [ater status of the top leaves on an optimum level in
conditions of relative deficienck of a moisture is provided salicklates not onlk
stabili%ation of hkdraulic conductivitk maintenance, but also intensification of activitk
of root skstem of plants.
11