Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Laboratorul de Nanotehnologii L1
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
Definitie
Spectroscopia RX presupune analiza efectului interactiei radiatiei
electromagnetice (foton RX energie de ordinul keV, lungime de unda de
ordinul 1 Angstrom) cu proba
Geometry
Structure
- Analytic
FotonulRX
pstreaz proprietatile
radiatiei
electromagnetice
energia;
viteza;
Lungine de unda
Amplitudin
e
amplitudinea;
frecventa;
unghiul de faza;
radiatiei electromagnetice X cu
proba
polarizarea;
directia de
propagare.
126A, Erou Iancu Nicolae Street, R-077190 , Bucharest, ROMANIA
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
Istoric
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray#History; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray#
Crystallography;)
Descoperirea
Wilhelm Conrad Rntgen - 1895 este creditat pentru descoperire, fiind
primul care le-a studiat sistematic desi nu este primul care le-a
observat efectele. Tubul cu raze X a fost inventat in 1875 - tubul Crookes, de
catre fizicienii care studiau razele catodice electronii de energii mari,
accelerati la potentiale de ordinul 1-100 kV.
Ivan Pulyui, William Crookes, Johann Wilhelm Hittorf, Eugen Goldstein, Heinrich Hertz,
Philipp Lenard, Hermann von Helmholtz, Nikola Tesla, Thomas Edison,
Charles Glover Barkla, Max von Laue.
In April 1887-1892 Nikola Tesla began to investigate X-rays using high voltages and tubes
of his own design. He invented and developed a special single-electrode X-ray tube which
differed from other X-ray tubes in having no target electrode. The principle behind Tesla's
device is called the Bremsstrahlung process in which a high-energy secondary X-ray
emission is produced when concerning various experiments in his 1897 X-ray lecture
before the New York Academy of Sciences. In this lecture Tesla stated the method of
construction and safe operation of X-ray equipment. His X-ray experimentation by
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
Halite
Na
Cl
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
2d hkl sin
For parallel planes of atoms, with a space dhkl
between them, constructive interference only occurs
when Braggs law is satisfied.
In our diffractometers, the X-ray wavelength is fixed.
Each plane of atoms produces a diffraction peak at
a specific angle .
The direction perpendicular to the planes must bisect
the incident and diffracted beams.
126A, Erou Iancu Nicolae Street, R-077190 , Bucharest, ROMANIA
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
Detector
X-ray
tube
The incident angle between the X-ray source and the sample is .
The diffraction angle, between the incident beam and the detector angle, is 2.
The Bragg-Brentano geometry constrains to be always of the detector
angle 2
This constraint results in the incident angle the detector angle being equal
to
Do not get confused: this is an artificial constraint. Diffraction does not
rely on the incident and detector angles being equal.
126A, Erou Iancu Nicolae Street, R-077190 , Bucharest, ROMANIA
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
(affecting measurements)
We need:
10 10
and beyond)
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
Incident beam
Sample
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
Reduced dI list
hkl
dhkl ()
Relative
Intensity
(%)
25.2000
372.0000
25.2400
460.0000
25.2800
576.0000
25.3200
752.0000
{012} 3.4935
49.8
25.3600
1088.0000
25.4000
1488.0000
{104} 2.5583
85.8
25.4400
1892.0000
{110} 2.3852
36.1
25.4800
2104.0000
{006} 2.1701
1.9
25.5200
1720.0000
25.5600
1216.0000
{113} 2.0903
100.0
25.6000
732.0000
{202} 1.9680
1.4
25.6400
456.0000
25.6800
380.0000
126A,
Erou Iancu
Nicolae Street, R-077190 , Bucharest, ROMANIA
25.7200
328.0000
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
K
B 2
L cos
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
126A, Erou Iancu Nicolae Street, R-077190 , Bucharest,
ROMANIA
www.imt.ro mihai.danila@imt.ro
2 (deg.)
Detectors
point detectors
observe one point of space at a time
slow, but compatible with most/all optics
scintillation and gas proportional detectors count all photons, within an
energy window, that hit them
Si(Li) detectors can electronically analyze or filter wavelengths
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
Scintillation counter
Proportional counter
Counter
CCD camera
Image plate detector (IP)
Photographic film
Linear CCD
Pixel detectors
Photographic film
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
Amorphous
Materials
Crystalline
Materials
Crystalline Materials
new applications
X-ray investigations:
XRR: layer thickness, density, roughness, interface layers
XRD: thermal
stability
orientation/perfection, thermal
Stability, etc.
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
21 wt%
Anatase, TiO2
Intensity(Counts)
28 wt% Hematite,
Fe2O3
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
2 (deg.)
126A, Erou Iancu Nicolae Street, R-077190 , Bucharest, ROMANIA
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
I
X
K
I
X
X(b)*I(Al2O3)/I(b)
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
Intensity(Counts)
10
15
20
25
30
35
2 (deg.)
126A, Erou Iancu Nicolae Street, R-077190 , Bucharest, ROMANIA
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
Bragg-Brentano vs PB measurements
Classical sealed X-Ray tube compared to
Rotating Anode
Sealed 2.3 kW
X-ray tube
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
parafocusing geometry
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
H2O In
H2O Out
Cu
Be
window
ANODE
Be
window
eXRAYS
XRAYS
www.imt.ro
FILAMENT
(cathode)
metal
glass
(vacuum)
(vacuum)
AC CURRENT
mihai.danila@imt.ro
L
M
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
K1
K2
K2
K1
K2
W L1
mihai.danila@imt.ro
2d hkl sin
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
Other optics:
limit divergence of the X-ray beam
Divergence limiting slits
Parallel plate collimators
Soller slits
refocus X rays into parallel paths
parallel-beam optics
parabolic mirrors and capillary
lenses
focusing mirrors and lenses
remove unwanted wavelengths
monochromators
Kb filters
www.imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
Bearden
(1967)
Holzer et al.
(1997)
Cobalt
Anodes
Bearden
(1967)
Cu K1
1.54056
1.540598
Co K1
1.788965 1.789010
Cu K2
1.54439
1.544426
Co K2
1.792850 1.792900
Cu K
1.39220
1.392250
Co K
1.62079
1.620830
Cr K1
2.28970
2.289760
Molybdenum
Anodes
Holzer et al.
(1997)
Chromium
Anodes
Mo K1
0.709300
0.709319
Mo K2
0.713590 0.713609
Cr K2
2.293606 2.293663
Mo K
0.632288 0.632305
Cr K
2.08487
2.084920
Often quoted values from Cullity (1956) and Bearden, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39 (1967)
are incorrect.
Values from Bearden (1967) are reprinted in international Tables for X-Ray
Crystallography and most XRD textbooks.
Most recent values are from Hlzer et al. Phys. Rev. A 56 (1997)
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
Instrumental Broadening
Crystallite Size
Microstrain (lattice distortions)
Faulting
Dislocations
Antiphase Domain Boundaries
Grain Surface Relaxation
Solid Solution Inhomogeneity
Temperature Factors
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
Lattice Parameters
The position of the diffraction peaks are a
product of the space between planes of
atoms.
Consequently, we can use XRD to probe
anything that affects that interplanar spacing.
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
10.0
(111)
00-004-0784> Gold - Au
Intensity(Counts)
8.0
(311)
(200)
6.0
(220)
4.0
(222)
2.0
(400)
3
x10
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Two-Theta (deg)
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
Preferred orientation
If the crystallites in a powder sample have plate or
needle like shapes it can be very difficult to get them to
adopt random orientations
top-loading, where you press the powder into a
holder, can cause problems with preferred orientation
in samples such as metal sheets or wires there is almost
always preferred orientation due to the manufacturing
process
for samples with systematic orientation, XRD can be
used to quantify the texture in the specimen
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
sample rotation
sample inclination
2
= 90-
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
layer structure
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
30.7
30.8
30.9
31.0
31.1
2 (deg.)
www.imt.ro
31.2
31.3
31.4
mihai.danila@imt.ro
d,Layer
d,Layer
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
G
eSionG
e
004
O
m
ega32.93860
2Theta66.17160
Phi0.00
Psi0.19
X9.00
Y-10.00
counts/s
10M
www.imt.ro
1M
L
100K
10K
1K
100
10
1
0.1
-1000
-500
mihai.danila@imt.ro
500
1000
1500
O
m
ega/2T
heta(s)
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
10
-1
10
Reflectivity
-2
10
exp.
sim.
Ge concentration
(more general: d/d )
Cap:
(53.2 1.0) nm
SiGe: (118.0 0.5) nm
x:
(19.80 0.08) %
Ge:
-3
d/d = 0.005x2+0.03675x
10
-4
10
-5
Prof. P. Zaumseil
10
Layer thickness
-6
10
-3000
-2000
-1000
1000
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
-1
10
Reflectivity
-2
10
-3
10
Ge content [ % ]
10
20
exp.
sim.
19.48 %
15
10
5
0
55.42
31.68
20 40 60 80 100 120
Depth [nm]
-4
10
-5
10
-6
10
-3000
-2000
-1000
1000
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
8 29 4. 0
7. 9
4 81 25. 8
4. 6
2 79 23. 6
2. 7
1 62 01. 9
1. 6
94 0. 6
54 54. 5
M ap 4 4b .a 0
31 64. 8
18 36. 3
G
aInAsonGaAs
444
Om
ega15.15600
2Theta140.55000
10 65. 4
618. 2
358. 7
208. 1
120. 8
70. 1
40. 7
23. 6
13. 7
7. 9
4. 6
2. 7
1. 6
Ma p4 4b .a 0
G
aInAsonG
aAs
444
O
m
ega15.15600
2Theta140.55000
Phi90.00
Psi0.27
X0.00
Y0.00
Phi90.00
Psi0.27
X0.00
Y0.00
Q
y*10000(rlu)
O
m
ega
0.8
5500
0.6
5450
0.4
0.2
5400
-0.0
-0.2
5350
-0.4
5300
-0.6
-0.8
-1.0
5250
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
-0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
O
m
ega/2T
h
eta
www.imt.ro
7600
7650
mihai.danila@imt.ro
7700
7750
7800
7850
Q
x*10000(rlu)
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
REFLECTIVITY PROFILE
10
10
10
10
10
10
Meas. data
Simulation
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
0.0000
1.0000
Au
Glass
2.0000
3.0000
2theta angle (deg.)
t = 41.968(3)nm = 19.3g/cm3
-
= 2.213g/cm3
4.0000
Density distr.
30.00000
= 1.028(2)nm
= 0.6nm
Density Distr.
40.00000
Density (g/cm3)
Reflectivity (a.u.)
10
20.00000
10.00000
0.00000
www.imt.ro
0.000
mihai.danila@imt.ro
10.000
20.000
30.000
Depth (nm)
40.000
50.000
Simulation with
IHP simulation
program
RCRefSimW
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
dSi
= 287.5 nm
dY2O3 = 26.0 nm
dPr2O3 =
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
6.6 nm
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro
www.imt.ro
mihai.danila@imt.ro