Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Yamanaka and Gurdon discovered that mature and specialized cells "can be
(nervously also?!) reprogrammed to become immature cells capable of
developing into all tissues of the body," the Nobel Assembly at Sweden's
Karolinska Institute said. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20121009a1.html
CONTENTS i985
//garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1985/A1985AEP1600002.pd
http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1985/A1985AEP1600002.
http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1985/A1985AEP1600002 . I
hhttp://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1985/A1985AEP1600002.pdf
http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1985/A1985AEP1600002.pdfSI L
In 1957, a physician researcher out of the National Cancer Institute, Richmond Prehn, M.D.,
published a landmark study co-authored with his laboratory assistant, Joan M. Main. Its findings
turned conventional wisdom about cancer and the immune system on its head.
What they discovered was that surgically removing tumors from sarcoma-ridden mice not only cured
the mice of cancer the treated mice also were immune to all subsequent efforts to reinoculate them
with the same sarcoma.
Prehn and Malin were revolutionary, Dr. Curti says. Before their 1957 study, even the suggestion
that the immune system had a role to play in cancer treatment would have been regarded in many
scientific circles with skepticism. Now the hope was that new cancer therapies and vaccines could be
developed that would rival both chemotherapy and radiation in their effectiveness.
But despite thousands of attempts to capitalize on Prehn and Mains success, that hope has gone
largely unrealized.
What we have learned is that a successful immune system response in humans depends on not just
one event, but a series of events from the presentation of a foreign marker on the surface of the
cancer cell to the homing behavior of killer T-cells to the tumor site, Dr. Curti says. These are like
links in a chain, and any weak link can spell disaster for an effective immune system response.
http://oregon.providence.org/patients/facilities/providence-portland-medicalcenter/Pages/formsandinformationlanding.aspx?&TemplateName=Bringing+out+the+big+guns+to+ki
ll+cancer&TemplateType=FormsandInstructions
In the past time, at this address, were also made references to this material.
There is a similarity between the approach of Prehn and Main and surgical method of denervation of
solid tumors (ablation and their quasi immediate inoculation to the same animal), theoretically
fundamented as the treatment of the cancer in Gravitational Theory of Life.
Based on this procedural similarities and on the recovery situation of Prehn and Main results (But
despite thousands of attempts to capitalize on Prehn and Mains success, that hope has gone largely
unrealized.) I used this material as a possible experimental prove of the validity of the
principle of denervation in curing solid tumors (together with the chemical method which
follows the same principle contained also in the U.S. patent below, without that the
denervation to be included among the claims):
http://www.patentlens.net/patentlens/patents.html?patnums=US_2005_0031648_A1&language=&).
But mostly for that the logic of placement of immune system at the base of the processes
highlighted by Prehn and Main (which I couldn't totally dismantle until now) is wrong.
This is what finds also Dr. Curti in the above material: things are more complicated. There
are relationships between different processes which appear to be like a closed chain. Under
these conditions the positions of "cause" and "effect" are entirely relative: they keeps
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3018371/
It shows that, at a linear evolution of ratio of quantity of immune reactants / quantity of
target" tissue, the growth process is nonlinear. I.e. the two values (the ratio and the growth)
keeps changing the role of "cause" (as in the case of x and y in a second degree equation: both
can take new values simultaneously and independently, so that may arise the situation in
which at one y value may be assigned two distinct values of x). It result that this connection
is not causal. So, it is controlled from the outside. And "outside" of the biochemical processes
can be only the electric signals.
Let's say it's just coincidence. But the most significant element passed unnoticed until now
(at least for me):
What is this? They could be immunized but, as a researcher, you must don't have
preconceived ideas:
"In fact, the direct "observation" processes are completely ignored in an experiment.
Experiments means only protocols that lead from the "cause" to the "effect".
The "cause" and the "effect" are arbitrary categories, chosen on the basis of some formally
considered signals": the objects and phenomena do not inherently contain these principles.
It is well-known the situation where objects and / or phenomena have changed arbitrarily
their status: from "cause" to "effect" and vice versa, depending on the "theory" that it shape
them. "Signals" perceived by many individuals (which generates "conventions") have a role in
this process.(SUNT CIMPANZEU), posted in Romanian).
And "immunization" must refers to a pathogen not to a process.
I.e. the term can possibly refer to METILCOLANTREN not to a tumor (the disease itself).
Don't remove the lung affected by tuberculosis for his reintroduction in the body but you
must do the immunization of the body against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccin)
In other words, there it was exclusively about the denervated tumors, now "visible" to the
immune system. In this case the experiments of Prehn and Main are an incontestable proof of
effectiveness of treatment by the method of denervation of solid tumors.
By this way, I demand again the Ministry of Health to answer at my previous steps:
I created a theory which aims to establish a clear relationship between scientific formalism
and how it is generated: by the organisms, in general, and by the "intelligent" organisms, in
particular. From there it resulting a model of the genesis of cancer.
It is suggested by "Franois Jacob, Logic of living, Romanian Encyclopedic Publishing House, Bucharest, 1972, pp.
338:
Even if the injury (which produces cancer - my note) begins in the nucleus or cytoplasm,
or its origins are in a somatic mutation, or in the presence of a virus or a circuit disturbance,
everything that prevents cell to receiving a signal, can removing it outside of community.
Understanding cancer involves the entering in the logic of the system which imposes for the
cells the constraints of the body.
And are motivated and some methods of treatment induced by this approach, which have
been successfully tested (but illegally) on people in Romania. More information can be found
at http://www.scribd.com/jfkusa.
The system moves on" on this direction in a very hard way. If you are interested,
I'm waiting for a feedback.
Sincerely,
Eng. Phys. Gabriel Pascu, phone: +40733846532
- Gerovital
- By local administration of Lidocaine to or
to the vicinity of the cancer (maintaining the
continuous denervation until the death of the
tumor).
Very interesting: this approach is probably among the few in the world (yet I do not
know some others) which refers strictly to the denervation principle. Even in the U.S.
patent, on the use of botulinum toxin (mentioned above) the denervation is just a collateral
phenomenon to which it refers. These expectations, very specific, maybe follows the
publication, in Romania, of materials relating to the Gravitational Ttheory of Life, first
time in 2001. The time will answer this question.
Although, apparently, the experiment had negative results, below I will demonstrate that,
at least this experiment is an undeniable proof of the validity of methods of cancer
treatment based on the principle of denervation (resulting from Gravitational Theory of
Life).
I get back to what I said above (Cancers secrets) in relation to the mechanism of
formal removal of a structure from the general context of the body (which is equivalent
with a physical damage for it):
So, is reached the inaccurate situation in which "THE PART leads on "THE
WHOLE"! This is also the essence of the process of "learning": subjecting the "body"
of a single type of stimulus, exclusively and repeated, with higher frequency than that at
which body can return, every time, at the initial state (and, thus, to maintaining the
global state of homeostasis, relative to normal environmental conditions). Forcing him to
react only with the structures imposed by the nature of that stimulus, is generated the
pulling out of these specific structures from the general context of functioning of the
body (which means a really physical "aggression").
The nuance which should be emphasized is that the process of "learning" is identical to
any other process carried out by repetition and which, by default, generates stress.
And stress is a physical assault even though, by its nature (purely formal) cannot be
described as the effect of a physical causes, narrowly defined in time and space.
It is produced by repetition, with a frequency value over a certain limit, of any kind of
stimulus that generate only repeated partial reactions, initially by conditioned reflex
mechanisms (rational), and after that, only by reflex mechanisms (e.g. riding a bicycle).
I described above the model of the Gravitational Theory of Life relative to that type of
stimulus, and his role in the evolution of the processes that lead to cancer.
On the basis of that "unexpected" results, in part of discussions", it says that
denervation process with capsaicin did not directly intensified in metastasis.
As I stated above,
These kinds of reactions, generated by the system, are covered by the experiment in
question.
If the tumor grows and the system which must check the growth (the sensitive system) is
removed from his function at what can we expect? It makes sense that the tumor(s) will
grow easier. Then why there were some different expectations (such as that this kind of
treatment has to lead at the stop of tumor evolution)?
"Nu am spus nimnui nimic pana nu m-am documentat temeinic. Voiam s fiu sigur c
ceea ce susin eu nu este o nebunie. Apoi a trebuit s caut un medic care s fi
avut tangen cu aceast boal si, totodat, s aib bunvoina de a lucra alturi
de mine", spune Gabriel Pascu.
n cursul acestui an, Gabriel Pascu a contactat un medic primar ORL-ist, chirurgul
Dorel Manu de la Spitalul Titan, care opereaz tumori canceroase maligne de peste
20 de ani. Medicul a rmas surprins de teoria fizicianului si a pornit la
verificarea ipotezei de lucru. "Informaiile sunt absolut noi si de o simplitate
uluitoare. Dup opinia mea, ansele de succes sunt de 60 la sut, pn acum.
Oricum, convingerea mea rmne ca leacul mpotriva cancerului trebuie s fie ceva
extrem de simplu. In cazul de fa, peste cteva sptmni vom porni experimentele
pe cobai, apoi vom vedea. Pn atunci vom forma o echipa de specialiti pe mai
multe domenii pentru a ti exact in ce moment trebuie izolat tumora din punct de
vedere nervos, astfel ca fenomenul de cretere a esutului malign sa fie stopat,
iar organismul s nceap lupta cu tumora.
Eu cred ca aceasta intervenie va trebui s se produc in faza incipienta. Oricum
acest lucru se va releva in experiene pe animale. Dac totul merge bine, si cred
ca va merge, pn la mijlocul anului viitor metoda va putea fi aplicata la om. M
gndesc si la posibilitatea evitrii interveniei chirurgicale. Exist
posibilitatea injectrii locale a unei substane care stopeaz circulaia
informaiei nervoase in acea zon. O asemenea intervenie simplific si mai mult
lucrurile", spune chirurgul Dorel Manu.
La aceasta or, o copie a manuscrisului "Teoria gravitaionala a vieii" se afl
Numele si
prenumele
1
2
3
4
Bojor Ovidiu
Banc Andrei
Constandache G.
Cristea Aurelia
Dimoftache
5
Constantin
6 Dop Radu
7 Dorobantu Andrei
8 Dumitru Constantin
9 Farcas Dan
10 Filip Florin
11 Iamandescu I.B.
12 Ilinca Mircea
13 Luchian Octavian
14 Marginean Mircea
Mencinicopschi
15
Gh.
16 Oprescu Ion
17 Paun Ludovic
18 Popescu Cristian
19 Popescu Gabriel
20 Restian Adrian
Trausan-Matu
Stefan
22 Zagrean Leon
23 Dragan Simona
21
Telefon fix
Telefon
mobil
0724479193
0217262562
0217716744
0213192896
Adresa de e-mail
Observatii
ovidiu.bojor@home.ro
andrei.banc@gmail.com
g_constandache@yahoo.fr
0213188338
0722333999
0726694024
0788494648dumitruconstantindulcan@yahoo.com
0214138383
dandfarcas@yahoo.com
0212128658
0745035942
iamandb@yahoo.com
0232211686 0744514556
ilincamircea@yahoo.com
- secretar
general
0745088688
0723207061
0744575778
0216427368
0216427368 0722204992
0722336332
0212304911
mcpopescu@amaltea.ro
popescugg@yahoo.com
0724480247
arestian@hotmail.com
0724985518
trausan@racai.ro
3120880 0723584722
0256491880 0723250937
ioprescu@rnc.ro
leon.zagrean@gmail.com
sdragan@cardiologie.ro
- presedinte
fondator
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
Fabritius Klaus
Herman Sonia
Jompan Afilon
Lazarescu Mircea
Schneider Francisc
Savulescu April
Geo
Sirbu Carmen
Predescu Ovidiu
Tanase Dorina
Guja Cornelia
Ciulean Alexandru
Sorea Daniela
Lucia Simona
Dinescu
Laslo Claudia
Elena
Mironov Alexandru
Robberb Peter
Oostveen
Stoian Marin
Pascu Gabriel
0722345474
6874519
liasonia@gmail.com
0722318354
0743403631
0766230134
3172891 0722610505
3186906
3191448
6671973
6741757
0268315956
Ageos@b.astral.ro
0788353460
0720324231
0745121528
0720874396
sircar13@yahoo.com
opredescu@cliknet.ro
dorinatt@yahoo.com
cguja@yahoo.com
0727357695
danasorea@yahoo.fr
3484530 0722971696
0723345672
lucia_simona@yahoo.com
salasdesus@yahoo.com
0723394221
0744569507
drosa@arexim.ro
0727507179
0720680484
marin.stoian@gmail.com
gabipascu2000@yahoo.com
Prima pagina