Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Obiective
Stabilirea tipurilor de variabile
Strategii de msurare
Analiza, interpretarea si raportarea rezultatelor
Selecteaz programul adecvat: Excel, SPSS Folosete programele pentru analize statistice simple si prezentarea grafica a rezultatelor Interpreteaz rezultatele
Tipuri de variabile
Variabile de confuzie*
Predictor*
Rezultat
Modificatori ai efectului*
*Considerate general ca expunere la factori de risc
Studii de caz, serii de cazuri, editoriale, opinii / comentarii, rapoarte review Studii descriptive
Studii cu 2 variabile
Studii clinice
Variabile
Realitatea
Cercetarea asupra eficientei de tratament face subiectul unui numr mic de articole. Evidence based medicine este considerat un concept ce folosete baze de date inclusiv studii sistematice de caz pentru a ghida intervenii terapeutice. Dovezile trebuie evaluate intr-un context terapeutic efectiv, Ce tip de intervenie capt sens pentru mine ca practician?
ntrebri clinice
Care este cea mai bun alegere terapeutic pentru pacientul meu? Este acest program suficient de bine documentat teoretic? Funcioneaz acest program terapeutic? Ct timp dureaz acest program? Ce urmeaz dup aceea?
Utilitatea clinicii!
Clinicienii Sunt n linia I a asistentei medicale Au expertiza clinica necesara i cunosc bine pacienii Sunt formai pentru gndire tiinifica Sunt obinuii cu colectarea datelor tiu sa identifice rezultate
Msurtori de baz
O Linie de baz este o msurtoare a ratei de rspuns in absena tratamentului Linii de baz Stabilete necesitatea tratamentului Permite mbuntirea documentaiei Ne permite s mbuntim studiul
Date de baz
Se creeaz un set de exemplare ale intelor studiului Pregtim o fi de nregistrare Folosim msurtori conform criteriilor de referin
Experimentatori diferii?
Fiablitate Inter - operator
Este universal?
Investigatorul ar trebui sa foloseasc un instrument larg aplicat care sa ajute la compararea datelor i diminuarea erorilor de raportare, pentru a face posibila compararea cu date din literatura.
Metode de colectare
1. Colectare Randomizata (Simpla)
2. Colectare Sistematica
3. Colectare Stratificata
4. Colectare pe grupe / segmente
Exemple de variabile calitative sunt ocupatia, sexul, status marital, etc. Variabilele care permit cuantificarea i care pot fi msurate sunt considerate variabile cantitative. Exemple de variabile cantitative sunt greutatea, naltimea, vrsta. Variabilele cantitative pot fi clasificate ca discrete sau continue
Tipuri de variabile
1.
Variabile de tip categorii (e.g., Sex, Status Marital, religie, naionalitate, profesie) Variabile de tip continuu (e.g., vrsta, venit, greutate, inaltime) Variabile discrete (e.g., Numar de copii) Variabile Binare sau Dihotomice (e.g., ntrebri la care se da raspuns prin Da sau Nu)
2.
3. 4.
Scale de Date
1. Nominale: Aceste date nu reprezint o cantitate (e.g., Status Marital, Sex)
2. Ordinale: Aceste date reprezint o serie ordonata de elemente interrelaionate (e.g., nivelul de educatie) 3. Interval: Aceste date reprezint o cantitate msurata pe un scala de interval avnd un numr egal de uniti i un punct zero arbitrar. (e.g.: Temperatura in Celsius) 4. Raport : Variabile, cum este greutatea pentru care putem compara semnificatia uneia fata de cealalta (, 100 Kg este dublul a 50 Kg)
Variabila Independent
O caracteristica pentru care se face o msurtoare i/sau observaie, care influeneaz un eveniment sau rezultat (variabila dependenta).
NOTA Variabila independenta nu este influenat de eveniment sau rezultat, dar o poate determina sau contribui la variaia sa.
Variabila Dependent
O variabil a crei valoare este dependent de efectul altor variabile (variabile independente) in raportul de cauzalitate studiat. Sinonime: variabila rezultat sau rspuns.
NOT
Un eveniment sau rezultat a crui variatie ncercam sa o explicam prin influenta variabilelor independente.
Variabile Intermediare
O variabila care apare intr-o relaie de cauzalitate de la o variabila independenta la o variabila dependenta. Sinonime: intervenie, mediere NOTE produce variaii in variabila dependenta i variaz datorita variabilei independente. O asemenea variabila este asociata att cu variabila dependenta cat i cu variabila independenta.
Variabile de confuzie
Un factor (care este el insusi determinant al rezultatului), care perturba efectul aparent al unei variabile de studiu asupra rezultatului. NOTA Un asemenea factor poate fi distribuit inegal intre cei expui i neexpui i astfel influeneaz magnitudinea aparenta i chiar direcia efectului.
Organizarea Datelor
1. Tabel de frecventa 2. Histograma de frecventa 3. Histograma de frecventa relativa 4. Histograma 5. Poligon de frecventa 6. Poligon de frecventa relativa 7. Grafic cu coloane 8. Grafic placinta 9. Tabel Trunchi cu ramuri 10.Box plot
Tabel de frecventa
Suppose we are interested in studying the number of children in the families living in a community. The following data has been collected based on a random sample of n = 30 families from the community. 2, 2, 5, 3, 0, 1, 3, 2, 3, 4, 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 3, 2, 4, 1, 0, 5, 8, 6, 5, 4 , 2, 4, 4, 7, 6 Organize this data in a Frequency Table!
Tabel de frecventa
X=No. of Children Count (Freq.)
0 1 2 3 2 3 5 5
Relative Freq.
2/30=0.067 3/30=0.100 5/30=0.167 5/30=0.167
4
5 6 7 8
6
4 2 2 1
6/30=0.200
4/30=0.133 2/30=0.067 2/30=0.067 1/30=0.033
Grafic de frecventa
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Freq.
Tabel de frecventa
Now suppose we need to construct a similar frequency table for the age of patients with Heart related problems in a clinic. The following data has been collected based on a random sample of n = 30 patients who went to the emergency room of the clinic for Heart related problems. The measurements are: 42, 38, 51, 53, 40, 68, 62, 36, 32, 45, 51, 67, 53, 59, 47, 63, 52, 64, 61, 43, 56, 58, 66, 54, 56, 52, 40, 55, 72, 69.
Tabel de frecventa
Age Groups Frequency Relative Frequency
2/30=0.067
32 -36.99
37- 41.99
42-46.99 47-51.99 52-56.99 57-61.99 62-66.99 67-72 Total
3
4 3 8 3 4 3 n=30
3/30=0.100
4/30=0.134 3/30=0.100 8/30=0.267 3/30=0.100 4/30=0.134 3/30=0.100 1.00
Empiric
For a Normal distribution approximately,
a) 68% of the measurements fall within one standard deviation around the mean
b) 95% of the measurements fall within two standard deviations around the mean c) 99.7% of the measurements fall within three standard deviations around the mean
Concepte necesare
Scale de msura Distribuie, tendina centrala, variabilitate, probabilitate Prevalenta i incidenta bolilor Rezultate ale bolilor (mortalitate, morbiditate) Asocieri (corelaie sau covariana) Impact asupra sanatatii (diferene de risc i rapoarte) Sensibilitate, specificitate, valoare predictiva
Scale
Nominal qualitative classification of equal value: gender, race, color, city Ordinal - qualitative classification which can be rank ordered: socioeconomic status of families Interval - Numerical or quantitative data: can be rank ordered and sizes compared : temperature Ratio - interval data with absolute zero value: time or space
Variabilitate, Probabilitate
Mean Median Mode Standard deviation Statistical Significance p < .01
Interval de ncredere
Do Not Reject Ho
Correct decision
Type II error
Prevalena i Incidena
Prevalence
probability of disease in entire population at any point in time 2% of the population has diabetes probability that patient without disease develops disease during interval 0.2% or 2 per 1000 new cases per year
Incidence
Sensibilitate, Specificitate
sensitivity = a / (a+c) specificity = d / (b+d)
Patients with disease
Test is positive Test is negative
a c
b d
Valoare Predictiva
Positive predictive
value = a / ( a+b)
Negative predictive
value = d / (c+d) Post-test probability of disease given positive test = a / (a+b) Post-test probability of disease given negative test = c / (c+d)
a
c
b
d
Resurse
An Introduction
http://www.poems.msu.edu/InfoMastery/default.htm
Diagnosis
Sensitivity and specificity Predictive values Likelihood ratios
InfoRetriever
Randomization of patients Prospective evaluation of patients Well-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria
Beneficiile Randomizarii
Prevents the systematic introduction of bias.
Minimizes the possibility of allocation bias.
Confuzia - factori
Relationship between coffee and pancreatic cancer, BUT Smoking is a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer Smoking is associated with coffee drinking but it is not a result of coffee drinking.
Detectarea confuziei
If an association is observed between coffee drinking and pancreatic cancer
Coffee actually causes pancreatic cancer, or The coffee drinking and pancreatic cancer association is the result of confounding by cigarette smoking.
Evaluarea confuziei
If you know something is a possible confounder, in the data analysis use
Stratification, or Adjustment
Randomizarea
Random allocation
Tipuri de randomizare
Standard ways: Random number tables Computer programs NOT legitimate Birth date Last digit of the medical record number Odd/even room number
Tipuri de randomizare
Simple Blocked Randomization Stratified Randomization
Randomizare simpla
Randomize each patient to a treatment with a known probability
Could have imbalance in # / group or trends in group assignment Could have different distributions of a trait like gender in the two arms
Randomizare n bloc
Insure the # of patients assigned to each treatment is not far out of balance Variable block size
Randomizare stratificata
A priori certain factors likely important (e.g. Age, Gender) Randomize so different levels of the factor are balanced between treatment groups Cannot evaluate the stratification variable
Randomizare stratificata
For each subgroup or strata perform a separate block randomization Common strata
Rezultat
Introductory Statistical Definitions What is Randomization? Randomized Study Design Experimental vs. Observational Non-Randomized Study Design Stat Software, Books, Articles
Grup paralel
Randomize patients to one of k treatments Response
Measure at end of study Delta or % change from baseline Repeated measures Function of multiple measures
2 studii
Study 1
A U.S. study (2000) compared 469 patients with brain cancer to 422 patients who did not have brain cancer. The patients cell phone use was measured using a questionnaire. The two groups use of cell phones was similar.
Study 2
An Australian study (1997) conducted a study with 200 transgenic mice. One hundred were exposed for two 30 minute periods a day to the same kind of microwaves with roughly the same power as the kind transmitted from a cell phone. The other 100 mice were not exposed. After 18 months, the brain tumor rate for the exposed mice was twice as high as that for the unexposed mice.
Diferente?
How do the two studies differ?
Study 1
Study 2
?
Why do the results of different medical studies sometimes disagree?
Evaluarea faptelor
Suppose a friend recently diagnosed with brain cancer was a frequent cell phone user. Is this strong evidence that frequent cell phone use increases the likelihood of getting brain cancer?
Informal observations of this type are called _____________ _____________. You should rely on reputable research studies, not anecdotes.
The researcher observes values of the response and explanatory variables for the sampled subjects without imposing any treatments Example: The researcher assigns experimental conditions (also called treatments) to subjects (also called experimental units) and then observes outcomes on the response variable. Treatments correspond to values of the explanatory variable Example:
Experiment
Cross-Sectional
Observational studies that take a cross section of the population at the current time Observational studies in which subjects are followed into the future
Prospective
A simple random sample of n subjects from a population is one in which each possible sample of that size has the _______ chance of being selected.
A stratified random sample divides the population into separate groups, called ________, and then selects an SRS from each stratum.
A cluster random sample can be used if the target population naturally divides into groups, each of which is representative of the entire target population. In this method, a SRS of groups (or strata) is taken. Every member of the selected groups is put into the sample.
Systematic Sampling
A systematic sample selects every kth person from the sample frame. The researcher randomly selects a number between 1 and k in order to know which person to select first, then selects every kth person after this.
It is the easiest most widespread form of sampling. Each subject has an _______ chance to be in the sample. The sample enables us to determine how likely it is that descriptive statistics (like the sample mean) fall close to corresponding values for which we would like to make inference (like the population mean).
It ensures that there are enough _________ in each group that you want to compare. It does not require a sampling frame of subjects. It is less ___________ to implement.
Cluster Sampling
The sample tends to favor some parts of the population over others. In other words, the results from the sample are not representative of the population.
Tipuri de erori
Undercoverage
Occurs when a sampling frame leaves out some groups in the population
Nonresponse bias
Occurs when some sampled subjects cannot be reached, refuse to participate or fail to answer some questions
Occurs when the subject gives an incorrect response or when the question wording or the way the interviewer asks the questions is confusing or misleading
Response bias
Randomization
Eliminates ______ that can result when researchers assign treatments to the subjects Balances the group on variables that you know affect the response Balances the group on _________ variables that may be unknown to you
Exemplu
A pharmaceutical company has developed a new drug for treating high blood pressure. To determine the effectiveness of the drug, the company conducted an experiment in which subjects with a history of high blood pressure were treated with the new drug.
A later experiment randomly divided subjects with a history of high blood pressure into two groups. Group A was treated with the new drug as before. Group B received the most popular drug on the market at that time. The subjects were unaware of which treatment they received. 60% of the patients in Group A improved, while 63% of the patients in Group B improved. The __________ experiment is better because
Exemplu
To investigate whether antidepressants help smokers to quit smoking, one study used 429 men and women who were 18 or older and had smoked 15 cigarettes or more per day in the previous year. They were all highly motivated to quit and in good health. They were assigned to one of two groups: one group took an antidepressant called Zyban, while the other group did not take anything. At the end of a year, the study observed whether each subject had successfully abstained from smoking.
Studii i erori
Types of studies: Observational studies and experiments Experiments control for lurking variables Sampling designs: SRS, stratified random samples and cluster samples SRS is the preferred method Potential sources of bias: Undercoverage Response bias Nonresponse bias Convenience sampling Voluntary response sampling Elements of good experiments: Control group, randomization and blinding
Precauii
If a group is underrepresented in the sample, we cannot make inference about it.
We must be careful when interpreting the results of observational studies. For comparison of several treatments to be valid, you must apply all treatments to similar groups of experimental units. Interesting questions are usually pretty tough to answer. This is due in part to the fact that no single experiment or observational study can determine causation.