ADMITERE DOCTORAT 2021-2022

Sesiunea Septembrie 2021

Școala Doctorală Interdisciplinară (SDI) Domeniul de doctorat:
FINANȚE
Conducător doctorat:
Prof. dr. Gheorghița DINCĂ

TEME (TEMATICĂ) PENTRU CONCURS

TEMA 1: Analiza procesului de alocare a resurselor financiare publice din perspectiva teoriei
opțiunii publice
Conținut / Principalele aspecte abordate

1. Teoria opțiunii publice și contribuția acesteia in doemeniul finațelor publice

2. Analiza eșecurilor sistemului de stat – corupția, evaziunea fiscală, rent seeking-ul
3. Impactul corupției, evaziunii fiscale și rent seeking-ului asupra bunăstării economice

Bibliografie recomandată:
1. Krueger, A.O. The political economy of the rent-seeking society. Am. Econ.
Rev. 1974, 64, 291–303.
2. Ostrom, E.; Ostrom, V. The Quest for Meaning in Public Choice. Am. J. Econ.
Sociol. 2004, 63, 105–147
3. Van, G. A Mathematical Theory of Economic Growth: The Public Choice Growth Model,
MPRA 2020, Paper No 99940. Available
online: https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/99940/1/MPRA_paper_99940.pdf (acces
sed on 15 March 2021).
4. Butler, E. Public Choice-A Primer. Institute of Economic Affairs Occasional Paper
2012, 147. Available
online: https://papers.ssrn.com/Sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2028989
5. Schwartz, H. Public Choice Theory and Public Choices: Bureaucrats and State
Reorganization in Australia, Denmark, New Zealand and Sweden in the 1980s. Adm.
Soc. 1994, 26, 48–77.
 TEMA 2: Strategii, eficiență și rolul instituțiilor politice și bugetare

Conținut / Principalele aspecte abordate

1. Furnizarea bunurilor și serviciilor publice

2. Instituțiile politice și bugetare și eficiența alocării resurselor publice
3. Stretegii, planuri, bugete și coerența acestora pe mai multe cicluri electorale
4. Necesitatea reformelor

Recommended bibliograhy:
1. Chan, K.S. and S. Mestelman (1988). Institutions, Efficiency and the Strategic
Behaviour of Sponsors and Bureaucracy, Journal of Public Economics, 37: 91-102.
2. Sandler, T. (1999). Intergenerational public goods: Strategies, efficiency and
institutions, in Kaul, I., Grunberg, I. and Stern, M. (eds.), Global Public Goods:
International cooperation in the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.
20–50.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Eugenio-
Bobenrieth/publication/46440722_The_Political_Economy_of_International_Envi
ronmental_Cooperation/links/55ddb07308ae79830bb531ed/The-Political-
Economy-of-International-Environmental-Cooperation.pdf#page=58
3. De Borger, B., and K. Kerstens (1996). Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A
comparative analysis of FDH, DEA and econometric approaches. Regional Science
and Urban Economics, 26: 145-170.
4. Chan, K.S. and S. Mestelman (1988). Institutions, Efficiency and the Strategic
Behaviour of Sponsors and Bureaucracy, Journal of Public Economics, 37: 91-102.
5. Borge, Lars-Erik, Torberg Falch, and Per Tovmo. 2008. Public sector efficiency: The
roles of political and budgetary institutions, fiscal capacity and democratic
participation. Public Choice 136:475–95.

Conducător doctorat:

Prof. dr. Gheorghița DINCĂ

 ADMISSION TO DOCTORAL STUDIES
2020-2021
Session September 2021
Interdisciplinary Doctoral School Field of doctoral studies:
(SDI) FINANCE
PhD supervisor:
Ph.D. Professor Gheorghița DINCĂ

TOPICS FOR THE ADMISSION TO DOCTORAL STUDIES

TOPIC 1: Analyzing the allocation process of public financial resources from public choice
approach
Content / Main aspects to be considered

1. Public choice theory and its contribution in the field of public finance
2. Analysis of the failures of the state system- corruption, tax evasion, rent seeking
3. The impact of corruption, tax evasion and rent seeking on economic wealth

Recommended bibliography:
1. Krueger, A.O. The political economy of the rent-seeking society. Am. Econ.
Rev. 1974, 64, 291–303.
2. Ostrom, E.; Ostrom, V. The Quest for Meaning in Public Choice. Am. J. Econ.
Sociol. 2004, 63, 105–147
3. Van, G. A Mathematical Theory of Economic Growth: The Public Choice Growth Model,
MPRA 2020, Paper No 99940. Available
online: https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/99940/1/MPRA_paper_99940.pdf (acces
sed on 15 March 2021).
4. Butler, E. Public Choice-A Primer. Institute of Economic Affairs Occasional Paper
2012, 147. Available
online: https://papers.ssrn.com/Sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2028989
5. Schwartz, H. Public Choice Theory and Public Choices: Bureaucrats and State
Reorganization in Australia, Denmark, New Zealand and Sweden in the 1980s. Adm.
Soc. 1994, 26, 48–77.
 TOPIC 2: Strategies, efficiency and the role of political and bugetary institutions
Content / Main aspects to be considered

1. Provision of public goods and services

2. Political and budgetary institutions and efficeincy of the allocation of public
resources
3. Strategies, plans, budgets and their coherence over several electoral cycles
4. The need for reforms
Recommended bibliography:

1. Chan, K.S. and S. Mestelman (1988). Institutions, Efficiency and the Strategic
Behaviour of Sponsors and Bureaucracy, Journal of Public Economics, 37: 91-102.
2. Sandler, T. (1999). Intergenerational public goods: Strategies, efficiency and
institutions, in Kaul, I., Grunberg, I. and Stern, M. (eds.), Global Public Goods:
International cooperation in the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.
20–50.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Eugenio-
Bobenrieth/publication/46440722_The_Political_Economy_of_International_Envi
ronmental_Cooperation/links/55ddb07308ae79830bb531ed/The-Political-
Economy-of-International-Environmental-Cooperation.pdf#page=58
3. De Borger, B., and K. Kerstens (1996). Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A
comparative analysis of FDH, DEA and econometric approaches. Regional Science
and Urban Economics, 26: 145-170.
4. Chan, K.S. and S. Mestelman (1988). Institutions, Efficiency and the Strategic
Behaviour of Sponsors and Bureaucracy, Journal of Public Economics, 37: 91-102.
5. Borge, Lars-Erik, Torberg Falch, and Per Tovmo. 2008. Public sector efficiency: The
roles of political and budgetary institutions, fiscal capacity and democratic
participation. Public Choice 136:475–95.

PhD supervisor:

Ph.D. Professor Gheorghița DINCĂ