Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Discalculiepdf PDF
Discalculiepdf PDF
Abstract
This article presents some computer assisted / unassisted models of intervention and a
prototype computer program designed for training of children with severe dyscalculia. The
case study reveals the need for complex long-term intervention for these pupils.
Keywords: severe dyscalculia, adapted intervention, Approximate Number System
99
RRTTLC 2016
100
RRTTLC 2016
101
RRTTLC 2016
102
RRTTLC 2016
103
RRTTLC 2016
104
RRTTLC 2016
105
RRTTLC 2016
106
RRTTLC 2016
107
RRTTLC 2016
Gliga, F., Gliga, T. (2012). Romanian Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Nabors Oláh,
screening instrument for dyscalculia. L., Locuniak, M. N. (2006). Number
Procedia-Social and Behavioral sense growth in kindergarten: A
Sciences, 33, 15-19 longitudinal investigation of children
Gliga, F., Ivanescu, A.,Gliga, T. (2014). at risk for mathematics difficulties.
Impairments of Approximate Number Child development, 77(1), 153-175.
System in Children with Severe Kaufmann, L., Handl, P., Thöny, B.
Mathematical Learning Disabilities, (2003). Evaluation of a Numeracy
WCES Malta, 2014 Intervention Program Focusing on
(https://www.researchgate.net/public Basic Numerical Knowledge and
ation/) Conceptual Knowledge A Pilot Study.
Gliga, F., Ivanescu, A. (2014). Computer Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(6),
training of approximate number 564-573.
system could improve math abilities. Park, J., Brannon, E. M. (2013). Training
In The International Scientific the approximate number system
Conference eLearning and Software for improves math proficiency.
Education (Vol. 3, p. 218). " Carol I" Psychological science.
National Defence University. Piazza, M. (2010). Neurocognitive start-
Halberda, J., Feigenson, L. (2008). --up tools for symbolic number
Developmental change in the acuity of representations. Trends in cognitive
the" Number Sense": The Approximate sciences, 14(12), 542---551.
Number System in 3, 4, 5, and 6 year Raghubar, K.P., Barnes, M.A., Hecht,
olds and adults. Developmental S.A. (2010). Working memory and
psychology, 44(5), 1457. mathematics: A review of
Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M.M., developmental, individual difference,
Feigenson, L. (2008) Individual and cognitive approaches. Learning
differences in non-verbal number and Individual Differences, 20(2):110-
acuity correlate with math’s 122,·april 2010
achievement. Nature, 455, 665–668. Individual Differences, 20, 110-122
Hyde, D.C., Khanum, S., Spelke, E.S. Räsänen, P., Salminen, J., Wilson, A. J.,
(2014). Brief non-symbolic, Aunio, P., Dehaene, S. (2009).
approximate number practice Computer-assisted intervention for
enhances subsequent exact symbolic children with low numeracy skills.
arithmetic in children. Cognition, 131, Cognitive Development, 24(4), 450-
92-1 472.
Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E. S., Streri, Vianin, P. (2011). Ajutorul strategic
A. (2009). Newborn infants perceive pentru elevii cu dificultăţi de învăţare,
abstract numbers. Proceedings of the Cluj-Napoca: Ed. ASCR
National Academy of Science USA, Von Aster, M. (2001). Die
106(25), 10382–10385. neuropsychologische Testbatterie für
108
RRTTLC 2016
109