Calculul culeei

Nr
crt e M- M+
  element Gn n Gc G1f G1r M1f M1r M1f M1r
1 5.02*9.9*2400 119275.2 1.1 131202.7 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 3.76*9.9*2400 89337.6 1.1 98271.36 0.43 0 0 0 42256.68 0
3 7.03*9.1*2400 153535.2 1.1 168888.7 0.38 -0.04 0 -6755.55 64177.71 0
4 0.57*9.1*2400 12448.8 1.1 13693.68 0.6 0.18 0 0 8216.208 2464.862
5 0.11*9.1*2400 2402.4 1.1 2642.64 0.89 0.46 0 0 2351.95 1215.614
6 0.3*9.1*2400 6552 1.1 7207.2 1.56 1.14 0 0 11243.23 8216.208
7 2*0.4*24.33*2400 46713.6 1.1 51384.96 2.83 2.42 0 0 145419.4 124351.6
430264.8 473291.3 0 -6755.55 273665.2 136248.3

M1f= 273665.2 Mfc= 301031.7

M1r= 129492.7 Mrc= 142442

 Ipoteza I – Culee construita fara terasament in spate

Verificări

1)Verificarea la starea limită de rezistenta

pmin
max ≤ p adm

daN
padm = pconv∗n=2.5∗1.2=3( )
cm 2

min NI MI
pmax = ± =2.71<3 (se verifica)
A talpa W talpa

N I =430264.8(daN )

Atalpa =3.40∗9.9=33.66(m2 )

M I =273665.2(daN∗m)

9.9∗3.402 3
W talpa = =19.07(m )
6

2)Verificarea la starea limita de stabilitate

yb 2
( ) B
≤m
m=0.12

MI
y b= +e =0.636
N I ad

3400
e ad=max 20 ;( 30 )
=max ( 20; 113.33 )=113.33 ( mm )=0.113 (m)

M I =273665.2(daN∗m)

N I =430264.8(daN )

B=3.40 ( m )=3400(mm)

0.636 2
( 3.40) =0.034<0.12( se verifica)

 Ipoteza II:Culee construita cu terasament în spate

-date:

Φ=33o

𝛾=1800 (daN/m3)

𝛿=2/3* Φ=22o

p1=γ∗H elev∗K a =1800∗5.45∗0.29=2844.9

( daN
m ) 2

H elev =inaltimea elevatiei=5.45(m)

∅
(
K a =coeficientul impingerii active=tg 2 45 0−
2)=0.29

daN
p2= p1 + γ∗H f ∗K a=2844.9+1800∗2.95∗0.29=4384.8( )
m2

Presiunea pământului de pe înălțimea fundației poate fi consideraă cu o valoare constanta

rezultând o diagrama de presiune dreptunghiulară.

1 1
Ea 1= ∗H elev ∗p 1∗A¿ = ∗5.45∗2844.9∗9.1=70546.41(daN )
2 2

A¿ =9.1( m)

Ea 2 =H f ∗p 2∗A=2.95∗4384.8∗9.9=128058.08(daN)
A=9.9(m)

Ea orizontal vertical
Ea1 65409.49 26427.15
Ea2 118733.38 47971.40

n=1.2

Gdren = Adren∗γ dren∗l dren =7.54∗1800∗9.10=123505.2 ( daN )

Adren =7.54 (m 2)

l dren =9.10(m)

G cdren =G dren∗n=123505.2∗1.2=148206.24 (daN )

N II =N I + Ea1 , v + Ea 2 , v +Gcdren=430264.8+26427.15+ 47971.40+ 148206.24=652869.59(daN )

H II =Ea 1, h+ Ea 2 , h=65409.49+118733.38=184142.87 ( daN )

M II =M I −Ea1 , v∗e va 1−Ea2 , v∗e va 2+ Ea 1 , h∗e ha 1 + Ea2 , h∗e ha 2−Gcdren∗e dren=408892.38(daN∗m)

e va 1=2.11 (m)

e va 2=1.70 ( m )

e ha 1=5.40( m)

e ha 2=1.48(m)

e dren =1.73(m)

Verificări în ipoteza II

1)Verificarea la starea limita de rezistenta

pmin
max ≤ p adm

daN
padm = pconv∗n=2.5∗1.2=3( )
c m2

min N II M II
pmax = ± =4.08<3(nu se verifica)
A talpa W talpa

N II =652869.59( daN )

Atalpa =3.40∗9.9=33.66(m2 )

M II =408892.38 (daN∗m)
 9.9∗3.402 3
W talpa = =19.07(m )
6

2)Verificarea la starea limită de stabilitate

yb 2
( ) B
≤m

m=0.12

M II
y b= + e =0.739
N II ad

N II =652869.59( daN )

M II =408892.38 (daN∗m)

3400
e ad=max 20 ; ( 30 )
=max ( 20; 113.33 )=113.33 ( mm )=0.113 (m)

B=3.40 ( m )=3400(mm)

0.739 2
( 3.40) =0.047<0.12(se verifica)

3)Verificarea la starea limita de stabilitate la alunecare

M II
≤ 0.8
f ∗N II

f =frecarea dintre talpa fundatiei siteren=0.3

N II =652869.59( daN )

M II =408892.38 (daN∗m)

408892.38
=2.087≤ 0.8( nu se verifica)
0.3∗652869.59

 Ipoteza III:Culee construita cu suprastructura montata si calea executata pe

pod
G1=(nr . grinzi∗Ggr)/2=( 4∗33795) /2=67590(daN )
G 2=(G antr +G pl )/2=(20355.36+66206.25)/2=43280.81( daN)

G3=( gc3∗L gr) /2=(1056.12∗22.5)/2=11881.35(daN )

N III=N II +G 1 +G 2 +G 3=775621.75(daN)

H III =H II =184142.87 ( daN )

M III =M II −( G 1 +G 2 +G 3 )∗e=402754.77( daN∗m)

e=0.05 (m)

Verificari in ipoteza III

1)verificarea la starea limita de rezistenta

pmin
max ≤ p adm

daN
padm = pconv∗n=2.5∗1.2=3( )
c m2

min N III M III

pmax = ± =4.41< 3(nu se verifica)
A talpa W talpa

N III=775621.75(daN )

Atalpa =3.40∗9.9=33.66(m2 )

M III =402754.77(daN∗m)

9.9∗3.402 3
W talpa = =19.07(m )
6

2)Verificarea la starea limită de stabilitate

yb 2
( )
B
≤m

m=0.12

M III
y b= + e =0.519
N III ad

N III=775621.75(daN )

M III =402754.77(daN∗m)

3400
(
e ad=max 20 ;
30 )
=max ( 20; 113.33 )=113.33 ( mm )=0.113 (m)

B=3.40 ( m )=3400(mm)
 0.519 2
( 3.40) =0.023<0.12( se verifica)

 Ipoteza IV:convoi pe pod

 V80

RV 80 =20000∗( 1+0.94 +0.88+0.83 ) =73000 ( daN )

 A30

R A 30=12000∗( 1+0.92+0.19+ 0.11 ) +6000∗0.65=30540 ( daN )

  AOT

1∗21.75∗1
Ω AOT = =10.875
2

R AOT =300∗10.875=3262.5 ( daN )

RnA 30+ AOT =R A 30∗2+ R AOT ∗2=67605 ( daN )

N VIV80=N III + R V 80=775621.75+73000=848621.75(daN )

N IV
A 30 + AOT =N III + R A 30+ AOT =775621.75+67605=843226.75(daN)

H IV =H III =184142.87 ( daN )

M IV
V 80 =M III + RV 80∗e=402754.77−73000∗0.05

¿ 399104.77(daN∗m)

M IVA 30+ AOT =M III + R A 30+ AOT ∗e=402754.77−67605∗0.05=399374.52( daN∗m)

Verificari in ipoteza IV

 V80

1)Verificarea la starea limita de rezistenta

pmin
max ≤ p adm
 daN
padm = pconv∗n=2.5∗1.2=3( )
cm 2

min N VIV80 M IV
V 80
p max = ± =4.61< 3(nu se verifica)
A talpa W talpa

N VIV80=848621.75(daN )

Atalpa =3.40∗9.9=33.66(m2 )

M IV
V 80 =399104.77(daN∗m)

9.9∗3.402 3
W talpa = =19.07(m )
6

2)Verificarea la starea limita de stabilitate

yb 2
( ) B
≤m

m=0.12

M IV
V 80
y b= IV + e ad=0.583
N V 80

N VIV80=848621.75(daN )

M IV
V 80 =399104.77(daN∗m)

3400
e ad=max 20 ; ( 30 )
=max ( 20; 113.33 )=113.33 ( mm )=0.113 (m)

B=3.40 ( m )=3400(mm)

0.583 2
( 3.40 )
=0.029<0.12( se verifica)

 A30+AOT

1)Verificarea la starea limita de rezistenta

pmin
max ≤ p adm

daN
padm = pconv∗n=2.5∗1.2=3( )
cm2
 min N IV
A 30+ AOT M IV
A 30+ AOT
p max = ± =4.59< 3(nu se verifica)
A talpa W talpa

N IV
A 30 + AOT =843226.75( daN )

Atalpa =3.40∗9.9=33.66(m2 )

M IVA 30+ AOT =399374.52(daN∗m)

9.9∗3.402 3
W talpa = =19.07(m )
6

2)Verificarea la starea limita de stabilitate

yb 2
( ) B
≤m

m=0.12

M IV
V 80
y b= IV + e ad=0.586
N V 80

N IV
A 30 + AOT =843226.75( daN )

M IVA 30+ AOT =399374.52(daN∗m)

3400
e ad=max 20 ; ( 30 )
=max ( 20; 113.33 )=113.33 ( mm )=0.113 (m) ¿

B=3.40 ( m )=3400(mm)

0.586 2
( 3.40) =0.029<0.12(se ve rifica)

 Ipoteza V: Convoi in spatele culei

Prezenta convoiului in spatele culei este echivalenta cu un strat de pamant dispus pe zona
carosabila avand o inaltime functie de clasa de incarcare

Pentru clasa de incarcare E,avem h s=3

daN
ps =γ∗h s∗k a=1800∗1.3∗0.29=689.832( )
m2
 daN
γ =1800 ( )
m3

ps =presiunea din suprasarcina

Es1=reactiunea din impingerea pamantului din suprasarcina pe inaltimea elevatiei

Es2=reactiunea din impingerea pamantului din suprasarcina pe inaltimea fundatiei

E S 1= ps∗H elev∗( 7.80+2∗1.00 )=689.832∗7.35∗9.80=49688.59(daN )

E s 2=p s∗H f ∗( 7.80+2∗1.00 ) =689.832∗2.95∗9.80=19943.04(daN )

Es Normat
orizontal vertical
Es1 46070.45 18613.67
Es2 18490.86 7470.79
Grupar   A30+AOT V80
e de n Es,c(daN n Es,c(daN)
actiuni )
I Es1 49688.59 Es1V(daN) 18613.7 1.4 26059.1 1.2 22336.4
Es1H(daN) 46070.5 1.4 64498.6 1.2 55284.5
Es2 19943.04 Es2V(daN) 7470.79 1.4 10459.1 1.2 8964.95
Es2H(daN) 18490.9 1.4 25887.2 1.2 22189
II Es1 49688.59 Es1V(daN) 18613.7 1.1 20847.3 0.96 17869.1
2
Es1H(daN) 46070.5 1.1 51598.9 0.96 44227.6
2
Es2 19943.04 Es2V(daN) 7470.79 1.1 8367.28 0.96 7171.96
2
Es2H(daN) 18490.9 1.1 20709.8 0.96 17751.2
2
III Es1 49688.59 Es1V(daN) 18613.7 0.9 18241.4 0.84 15635.5
8
Es1H(daN) 46070.5 0.9 45149 0.84 38699.2
8
Es2 19943.04 Es2V(daN) 7470.79 0.9 7321.37 0.84 6275.46
8
Es2H(daN) 18490.9 0.9 18121 0.84 15532.3
8
e Hs 1=6.63 (m)

e Hs 2=1.48(m)

e Vs 1=2.11 (m)

e Vs 2=1.70(m)
 Gruparea de actiuni I II III
872441.345 868789.520
NV (daN) 879744.994
2 8
A30+AO 256451.537 247412.953
HV (daN) 274528.704
T 2 8
792548.237 674596.122
MV (daNm) 713913.494
4 2
873662.831 870532.696
NV (daN) 879923.102
6 4
246121.727 238374.370
V80 HV (daN) 261616.442
6 4
736110.813 668709.604 635009.000
MV (daNm)
5 8 5

Verificări în ipoteza V

 V80

-GRUPAREA I

1)Verificarea la starea limita de rezistenta

pmin
max ≤ p adm

daN
padm = pconv∗n=2.5∗1.2=3( )
cm 2

min N VV 80 M VV 80
pmax = ± =6.47< 3(nu se verifica)
A talpa W talpa

N VV 80=879923.102( daN )

Atalpa =3.40∗9.9=33.66(m2 )

M VV 80 =736110.8135 (daN∗m)

9.9∗3.402 3
W talpa = =19.07(m )
6

2)Verificarea la starea limita de stabilitate

yb 2
( )
B
≤m

m=0.12
 M VV 80
y b= V + e ad=0.949
N V 80

N VV 80=879923.102( daN )

M VV 80 =736110.8135 (daN∗m)

3400
e ad=max 20 ; ( 30 )
=max ( 20; 113.33 )=113.33 ( mm )=0.113 (m)

B=3.40 ( m )=3400(mm)

0.949 2
( 3.40 ) =0.07<0.12(se verifica)

-GRUPAREA II

1)Verificarea la starea limita de rezistenta

pmin
max ≤ p adm

daN
padm = pconv∗n=2.5∗1.2=3( )
c m2

min N VV 80 M VV 80
pmax = ± =6.10< 3(nu se verifica)
A talpa W talpa

N VV 80=873662.8316(daN )

Atalpa =3.40∗9.9=33.66(m2 )

M VV 80=668709.6048(daN∗m)

9.9∗3.402 3
W talpa = =19.07(m )
6

2)Verificarea la starea limita de stabilitate

yb 2
( ) B
≤m

m=0.12

M VV 80
y b= V + e ad =0.878
N V 80

N VV 80=873662.8316(daN )

M VV 80=668709.6048(daN∗m)
 3400
e ad=max 20 ; ( 30 )
=max ( 20; 113.33 )=113.33 ( mm )=0.113 (m)

B=3.40 ( m )=3400(mm)

0.878 2
( 3.40 )
=0.066<0.12(se verifica)

-GRUPAREA III

1)verificarea la starea limita de rezistenta

pmin
max ≤ p adm

daN
padm = pconv∗n=2.5∗1.2=3( )
c m2

min N VV 8 0 M VV 80
p max = ± =5.91<3 (nu se verifica)
A talpa W talpa

N VV 80=870532.6964(daN )

Atalpa =3.40∗9.9=33.66(m2 )

M VV 80=635009.0005(daN∗m)

9.9∗3.402 3
W talpa = =19.07(m )
6

2)verificarea la starea limita de stabilitate

yb 2
( ) B
≤m

m=0.12

M VV 80
y b= V + e ad=0.842
N V 80

N VV 80=870532.6964(daN )

M VV 80=635009.0005(daN∗m)

3400
e ad=max 20 ; ( 30 )
=max ( 20; 113.33 )=113.33 ( mm )=0.113 (m)

B=3.40 ( m )=3400(mm)
 0.842 2
( 3.40 )
=0.061< 0.12(se verifica)

A30+AOT

-GRUPAREA I

1)Verificarea la starea limita de rezistenta

pmin
max ≤ p adm

daN
padm = pconv∗n=2.5∗1.2=3( )
c m2
V V
min N A 30+ AOT M A 30+ AOT
p max = ± =6.76>3 (nu se verifica)
A talpa W talpa

N VA 30 + AOT =879744.994 (daN )

Atalpa =3.40∗9.9=33.66(m2 )

M VA 30+ AOT =792548.2374( daN∗m)

9.9∗3.402 3
W talpa = =19.07(m )
6

2)Verificarea la starea limita de stabilitate

yb 2
( )
B
≤m

m=0.12

M VV 80
y b= + e ad =1.01
N VV 80

N VA 30 + AOT =879744.994 (daN )

M VA 30+ AOT =792548.2374( daN∗m)

3400
e ad=max 20 ; ( 30 )
=max ( 20; 113.33 )=113.33 ( mm )=0.113 (m)

B=3.40 ( m )=3400(mm)
 1.01 2
( ) 3.40
=0.088<0.12(se verifica)

-GRUPAREA II

1)Verificarea la starea limita de rezistenta

pmin
max ≤ p adm

daN
padm = pconv∗n=2.5∗1.2=3( )
cm 2

min N VA 30+ AOT M VA 30+ AOT

pmax = ± =6.33>3 (nu se verifica)
A talpa W talpa

N VA 30 + AOT =872441.3452(daN )

Atalpa =3.40∗9.9=33.66(m2 )

M VA 30+ AOT =713913.494( daN∗m)

9.9∗3.402 3
W talpa = =19.07(m )
6

2)Verificarea la starea limita de stabilitate

yb 2
( )
B
≤m

m=0.12

M VV 80
y b= V + e ad=0.931
N V 80

N VA 30 + AOT =872441.3452(daN )

M VA 30+ AOT =713913.494( daN∗m)

3400
e ad=max 20 ;( 30 )
=max ( 20; 113.33 )=113.33 ( mm )=0.113 (m)

B=3.40 ( m )=3400(mm)

0.931 2
( 3.40 ) =0.075< 0.12(se verifica)
-GRUPAREA III

1)Verificarea la starea limita de rezistenta

pmin
max ≤ p adm

daN
padm = pconv∗n=2.5∗1.2=3( )
m2

min N VA 30+ AOT M VA 30+ AOT

p max = ± =6.11> 3(nu se verifica)
A talpa W talpa

N VA 30 + AOT =868789.5208(daN )

Atalpa =3.40∗9.9=33.66(m2 )

M VA 30+ AOT =674596.1222(daN∗m)

9.9∗3.402 3
W talpa = =19.07(m )
6

2)verificarea la starea limita de stabilitate

yb 2
( )
B
≤m

m=0.12

M VA 30+ AOT
y b= V
+e ad =0.88
N A 30+ AOT

N VA 30 + AOT =868789.5208(daN )

M VA 30+ AOT =674596.1222(daN∗m)

3400
e ad=max 20 ;( 30 )
=max ( 20; 113.33 )=113.33 ( mm )=0.113 (m)

B=3.40 ( m )=3400(mm)

0.88 2
( )
3.40
=0.068<0.12( se verifica)

 Ipoteza VI-convoiul franeaza pe pod

 Sensul fortei de franare se alege pentru a se obtine situatia cea mai dezavantajoasa.

Punctul de aplicatie al fortei se considera la nivelul caii

Actiunea de frecare pe pod este compatibila doar pt convoiul A30

F n=n∗P∗B=0.3∗30000∗1=9000(daN )

n=coeficient care tine cont de lungimea grinzii=0.3

P=30000 (daN )

b 2
B= = =1
2 2

F cII =Fn∗n=9000∗1.12=10080(daN )

n=1.12

N VI =N AV 30+ AOT
, gr II =872441.3452( daN )

H VI =H VA 30+ AOT
,gr II ± F cII =256451.5372+ 10080=266531.54 (daN )

M VI =M VA 30+ AOT
, gr II ± F cII ∗e=713913.494+10080∗10.30=817737.49(daNm)

e=H elev + H f =7.35+2.95=10.30(m)

Verificari in ipoteza VI

1)Verificarea la starea limita de rezistenta

pmin
max ≤ p adm

daN
padm = pconv∗n=2.5∗1.2=3( )
c m2

min N VI
A 30+ AOT M VI
pmax = ± A 30+ AOT =6.88>3 (nu se verifica)
A talpa W talpa

N VI
A 30 + AOT =872441.3452(daN )

Atalpa =3.40∗9.9=33.66(m2 )

M VIA 30+ AOT =817737.49(daN∗m)

9.9∗3.402 3
W talpa = =19.07(m )
6

2)Verificarea la starea limita de stabilitate

 yb 2
( )
B
≤m

m=0.12

M VIA 30+ AOT

y b= +e ad =1.05
N VI
A 30+ AOT

N VI
A 30 + AOT =872441.3452(daN )

M VIA 30+ AOT =817737.49(daN∗m)

3400
(
e ad=max 20 ;
30 )
=max ( 20; 113.33 )=113.33 ( mm )=0.113 (m)

B=3.40 ( m )=3400(mm)

1.05 2
( )
3.40
=0.095< 0.12(se verifica)

 Ipoteza VII
1)Actiunea seismului asupra culeei prin intermediul pamantului:

ps =ψ∗p

ψ=1+2∗φ∗k s∗tg ϕ=1+2∗0.35∗0.2∗0.649=1.09

φ=coeficient de reducerea efectelor incarcarii seismice=0.35

k s=coeficient seismic functie de zona seismica=0.2

tg ϕ=tg 33o=0.649

a)Ipoteza II
 p1 , S=ψ∗p 1=1.09∗2844.9=3100.841(daN /m 2 )

p2 , S=ψ∗p 2=1.09∗4384.8=4779.432(daN /m2 )

1 1
Ea 1 , S= ∗p1 , S∗H elev∗A= ∗3100.841∗7.35∗9.9=112816.35( daN )
2 2

Ea 2 , S= p 2, S∗H f ∗A ¿ =4779.432∗2.95∗9.1=128303.85(daN )

Ea 1 , SV =E a 1 ,S∗sin δ =Ea 1 , S∗sin22 o=112826.35∗0.3746=42265.49(daN)

Ea 1 , SH =Ea 1 , S∗cos δ =Ea 1 , S∗cos 22o=112826.35∗0.927=104610.77(daN)

Ea 2 , SV =E a 2 ,S∗sin δ =Ea 1 , S∗sin 22o=128303.85∗0.3746=48063.46(daN )

Ea 2 , SH =Ea 2 , S∗cos δ=Ea 1 , S∗cos 22o=128303.85∗0.927=118961.58(daN )

b)Ipoteza V

daN
ps , S =ψ∗ps =1.09∗689.832=752.543( )
m2

Eas 1 , S= p s ,S∗H elev∗(7.80+ 2∗1.00 )=54205.67(daN )

Eas 2 , S= p s ,S∗H f ∗( 7.80+2∗1.00 )=21756.02(daN )

Eas 1 , SV =E as1 , S∗sin δ=¿ E as 1, S∗sin 22=¿ 54205.67∗0.374=20272.92(daN )¿ ¿

Eas 1 , SH =Eas 1 ,S∗cos δ=¿ E as1 , S∗cos 22=¿ 54205.67∗0.927=50248.65(daN )¿ ¿

Eas 2 , SV =E as2 , S∗sin δ =¿ E as 2 ,S∗sin 22=¿ 21756.02∗0.374=8136.75(daN )¿ ¿

Eas 2 , SH =Eas 2 ,S∗cos δ=¿ E as 2, S∗cos 22=¿21756.02∗0.927=20167.83(daN ) ¿¿

2)Calculul efortului din actiunea directa:Calculul se face conform P100/2006,in modul simplificat
considerand culeea un sistem dinamic cu 2 grade de libertate vibrand dupa modul I fundamental
de vibratie
G1=Gn1 +Gn2 +Gn3 + Rnu =67590+43280.81+11881.35+ 73000=195752.16 ( daN )

Rnu =max ( RnA 30+ AOT ; R nV 80 )=max ( 67605; 73000 ) =73000(daN )

G2=Gnculee =430264.8(daN )

Se calculeaza forta seismica globala cu relatia.

S=c∗G=( α∗k s∗β∗φ∗ε )∗( G1+ G2) =( 1∗0.2∗2∗0.35∗2.88 )∗( 195752.16+ 430264.8 )=252410.03(daN )

α =1 ; coeficient de importanta a constructiei

k s=0.2 ; coeficient al zone seismice

β=2 ; coeficient de amplificare dinamica∈modulul I de vibratie

φ=0.35 ; coeficient de reducere a efectelor incarcarii seismice

2

∑ ( G i∗li )2 (195752.16∗8.4+ 430264.8∗5.69)2

1
ε= 2 2
= =0.964
( 195752.16+ 430264.8 )∗( 195752.16∗8.4 2 +430264.8∗5,692)
∑ Gi∗∑ ( Gi∗l2i )
1 1

S∗G1∗l 1
S1= 2
=101414.75 (daN )
∑ Gi∗li
i=1

S∗G2∗l 2
S2= 2
=150995.28(daN )
∑ Gi∗li
i=1

N VII =G 2+ E a 1 ,SV + E a 2 ,SV +G 1 + E as1 , SV + Eas 2 ,SV =744755.58 ( daN )

H VII =S 2+ E a 1 ,SH + Ea 2 , SH + S 1+ E aS 1 ,SH + EaS 2 , SH =546398.86(daN )

M VII =S1∗l 1+ S 2∗l 2=1711047.04 (daNm)

Verificari in ipoteza VII

1)Verificarea la starea limita de rezistenta

pmin
max ≤ p adm

daN
padm = pconv∗n=2.5∗1.2=3( )
c m2

min N VII M VII

pmax = ± =11.18 >3(nu se verifica)
A talpa W talpa

N VII =744755.58(daN )
2
Atalpa =3.40∗9.9=33.66(m )

M VII =1711047.04 (daN∗m)

9.9∗3.402 3
W talpa = =19.07(m )
6

2)Verificarea la starea limita de stabilitate

yb 2
( )
B
≤m

m=0.12

M VII
y b= + e =2.41
N VII ad

N VII =744755.58(daN )

M VII =1711047.04 (daN∗m)

3400
(
e ad=max 20 ;
30 )
=max ( 20; 113.33 )=113.33 ( mm )=0.113 (m)

B=3.40 ( m )=3400(mm)

2.41 2
( )
3.40
=0.50<0.12(nu se verifica)

2)Verificarea la starea limita de stabilitate la alunecare

 M VII 1711047.04
= =7.65> 0.8(nu se verifica)
f ∗N VII 0.3∗744755.58