Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
(2)
N. ranu, C. Banu, G. Oprian, M. Budescu, V. Munteanu, O. Ioni / Caracteristicile barelor din polimeri armai cu fibre de sticl 327
solicitate la traciune
a barei din CPAFS, n mm
2
.
Modulul de elasticitate la ntindere, E
L
, n
MPa, a fost calculat din diferena valorilor
nregistrate la 50% i 20% pe curbele de tensiuni i
deformaii specifice, conform Ecuatiei (2):
50 20
50 20
L
E
(2)
unde:
50
este tensiunea corespunztoare
procentului de 50% din fora maxim de rupere la
ntindere a barei din CPAFS, n MPa i
50
este
deformaia specific corespunztoare procentului
de 50% din aceeai nccare, n %,
20
este
tensiunea corespunztoare procentului de 20% din
fora maxim de rupere la ntindere a barei din
CPAFS, n MPa i
20
este deformaia specific
corespunztoare procentului de 20% din
deformaia specific la aceeai ncrcare, n %.
Valoarea modulului de elasticitate longitudinal
calculat cu relaia (2), este apropiat valorilor
teoretice stabilite prin relaiile din mecanica mediilor
compozite armate cu fibre [20 - 22].
Valoarea ultim a deformaiei specifice,
u
a
fost nregistrat de ctre traductorul mainii
universale de ncercat i calculat din rezistena
ultim la ntindere i modulul de elasticitate
longitudinal, conform Ecuaiei (3):
u
u
L
E
= (3)
unde:
u
este rezistena la ntindere a barei din
CPAFS, n MPa i
u
este deformaia specific
ultim, n %.
3. Rezultate experimentale
n urma testrii celor 30 de probe au fost
determinate experimental proprietile mecanice la
ntindere. O sintez a rezultatelor obinute n
programul de testare este prezentat n tabelul 2.
where
50
is the stress at 50% of the ultimate
tensile capacity in MPa,
50
is the corresponding
strain at the same load, in %,
20
is the stress at
20% of the ultimate tensile capacity in MPa and
20
. is the strain at the same load, in %. The value
of the longitudinal elastic modulus determined with
formula (2) is close to the theoretical values
established using the formulas from mechanics of
fibrous composites [20 - 22].
The ultimate strain,
u
was recorded by the
transducer of the universal machine and also
calculated from the ultimate tensile strength and
modulus of elasticity according to Equation (3)
u
u
L
E
= (3)
where:
u
is the ultimate tensile strength, in MPa
and
E
L
is the tensile modulus of elasticity, in MPa.
3. Experimental results
Based on the experimental tests on the 30
GFRP specimens the mechanical properties of the
composite bars loaded in tension have been
evaluated. A synthesis of the experimental results
is presented in Table 2.
The experimentally determined tensile
properties given in Table 2 show that all the tests
have a small scatter; the maximum coefficient of
variation, (4.65%), has been determined for the
elastic modulus of specimens with a 16 mm
diameter.
The uniformity of the mechanical
characteristics, underlined by small values of the
coefficients of variation proves the quality of the
reinforcing bars and the suitability of pultrusion as
a manufacturing procedure for such composite
products.
Tabelul 2
Rezultate la ntindere obinute pe epruvetele din CPAFS / Tensile test results on GFRP samples
GFRP 8 GFRP 12 GFRP 16
[MPa] E [MPa] [%] [MPa] E [MPa] [%] [MPa] E [MPa] [%]
Valoare medie / Average value 1280.77 58631.26 2.19 1269.05 54599.71 2.32 1267.19 53659.61 2.37
Deviaie standard
Standard deviation
27.94 1895.61 0.07 29.28 1192.39 0.04 34.15 2497.75 0.10
Coeficientul de variaie
Coefficient of variation [%]
2.18 3.23 3.20 2.31 2.18 1.91 2.70 4.65 4.35
Proprietile la ntindere determinate
experimental incluse n tabelul 2 prezint diferene
mici; coeficientul de variaie maxim egal cu (4,65%)
a fost determinat pentru modulul de elasticitate al
probei din CPFAS cu diametrul de 16mm.
Uniformitatea caracteristicilor mecanice
subliniat prin valorile mici ale coeficienilor de
variaie confirm calitatea barelor de armare din
CPAFS i utilitatea pultruderii ca proces de
fabricare a unor astfel de produse compozite.
Barele din CPAFS au o comportare
The composite bars behave in a quasi-linear
manner up to failure, Figure 3. No yielding has
been observed during the test. Average tensile
strength values from 1280 MPa (for a 8 mm
diameter) to 1267 MPa (for a 16 mm diameter)
have been obtained. These high values of tensile
strength recommend the use of GFRP bars as
tensile reinforcement for concrete elements.
The modulus of elasticity (from 53659 MPa
to 58631MPa) is about 3.8 times lower than that of
steel, therefore the composite reinforcing bars are
328 N. ranu, C. Banu, G. Oprian, M. Budescu, V. Munteanu, O. Ioni / Tensile characteristics of glass fibre reinforced
polymeric bars
cvasiliniar pn la rupere (fig. 3); pe curbe
caracteristice nu s-au observat tendine de curgere.
Valorile medii ale rezistenelor la ntindere de la
1280 MPa (pentru 8 mm n diametru) la 1267 MPa
(pentru 16mm n diametru) indic o grupare
favorabil a rezultatelor. Valorile ridicate ale
rezistenei la traciune recomand utilizarea barelor
din CPAFS ca armturi ntinse pentru elementele
din beton.
Modulul de elasticitate (de la 53659 MPa
pn la 58631 MPa) este de circa 3,8 ori mai mic
dect modulul de elasticitate al oelului, prin
urmare, barele compozite pentru armare nu sunt
potrivite pentru criterii severe de rigiditate. Din
figura 3, se observ c deformaia specific ultim
la ntindere este redus, caracteristic ce impune o
abordare diferit a proiectrii elementelor din beton
folosind bare din CPAFS pentru armare.
not suitable for severe stiffness criteria. It can be
seen from Figure 3 that the ultimate tensile strain
is quite low, feature that will impose a different
design approach of reinforced concrete elements
using reinforcing GFRP composite bars.
Failure is brittle and it occurs in the free span
of the test specimen when the tensile strength of
composite material is reached. The glass fibres in
fracture region spread in a brush like fashion,
Figure 4.
4. Numerical modelling
The mechanical properties of the GFRP
bar used in the Finite Element Modelling (FEM)
and analysis have been determined using the
micromechanics approach. Direct and indirect
rules of mixtures have been used in order to obtain
the longitudinal and transverse mechanical
parameters [20, 22].
Fig.3 - Diagrama tensiuni deformaii specifice la ntindere pentru
epruvetele din CPAFS / Tensile stress-strain diagrams for
GFRP test specimens.
Cedarea este casant i apare n lungimea
de testare a probei cnd se atinge rezistena la
ntindere a materialului compozit. n zona de
rupere, fibrele de sticl cedeaz prin expandarea
lateral a fibrelor (fig. 4).
4. Modelarea numeric
Proprietile mecanice ale barelor din
CPAFS utilizate n modelarea i analiza cu
elemente finite au fost determinate folosind
principiile micromecanicii. Pentru evaluarea
preliminar a caracteristicilor mecanice n direcie
longitudinal i transversal s-au folosit relaiile
bazate pe regula amestecurilor i regula invers a
amestecurilor [20, 22].
n timpul ncercrilor experimentale s-au
observat cedri multiple n zonele de ancorare.
Aceste probleme sunt atribuite faptului c
deplasrile relative dintre bara din CPAFS i anco-
raj consum un volum de energie care n cele din
Fig.4 - Ruperea fragil a barei din CPAFS / Brittle fracture of
the GFRP sample.
During the performed laboratory tests
multiple failures in the bar anchorage regions have
been observed. These problems were attributed to
the fact that relative displacement between the
GFRP bar and the anchorage system consumed a
certain amount of energy that otherwise should
have been undertaken by the bar cross-section.
For this reason, in the FEM analysis, the bottom
part of the bar was considered fully fixed over the
external surface. The obtained stress and strain
maps, Figures 5a, 5b, 5c, illustrate relatively
concentrically distributions of the tensile stresses.
The material model used in the analysis considers
the composite bar as an orthotropic element with
the characteristics determined earlier.
In the discretization process pentahedral
elements have been used PN12L, utilizing the
facilities of LUSAS software package [23, 24] for
the analysis of the composite bar; several laminae
have been included in a single element. For these
elements the three degrees of freedom per node
have been utilized to interpolate a displacement
N. ranu, C. Banu, G. Oprian, M. Budescu, V. Munteanu, O. Ioni / Caracteristicile barelor din polimeri armai cu fibre de sticl 329
solicitate la traciune
a
b
c
Fig. 5 - Comparaie ntre curbele caracteristice determinate experimental i cele obinute prin simulare numeric / Comparison between
experimental characteristic curves and those obtained by numerical simulation: (a) - bara din CPAFS cu diametrul de 8 mm /
GFRP bars with 8mm diameter; (b) - bara din CPAFS cu diametrul de 12 mm / GFRP bars with 12mm diameter; (c) - bara din
CPAFS cu diametrul de 16 mm / GFRP bars with 16mm diameter.
330 N. ranu, C. Banu, G. Oprian, M. Budescu, V. Munteanu, O. Ioni / Tensile characteristics of glass fibre reinforced
polymeric bars
urma este preluat de seciunea de bar. Din
aceste motive, analiza cu elemente finite (AEF),
poate clarifica starea de tensiuni i deformaii
specifice din ancora metalic care la un capt este
considerat fix.
Hrile de tensiuni i deformaii specifice
sunt ilustrate n Figurile 5a, 5b, 5c. Bara din
CPAFS a fost considerat ortotrop, avnd
caracteristicile mecanice determinate anterior.
n procesul de discretizare a barei
compozite au fost folosite elemente pentaedrice de
tip PN12L [23, 24] n care volumul barei a fost
definit printr-o succesiune de lamele compozite.
innd seama de faptul c fiecrui nod i s-au
atribuit trei grade de libertate la stabilirea cmpului
deplasrilor s-a utilizat interpolarea liniar pe
grosimea lamelei compozite i interpolarea
cuadratic n planul acesteia.
Fiecare strat a fost definit prin matricea de
rigiditate caracteristic materialului ortotrop.
Valoarea maxim a tensiunii de ntindere obinut
prin simulare numeric a fost de 1350 MPa.
Aceast valoare este apropiat de valoarea dat
de productor i cea obinut n cadrul ncercrilor
experimentale.
5. Concluzii
Utilizarea barelor din CPAFS pentru armare
necesit o caracterizare detaliat pentru
cunoaterea complet a proprietilor necesare
proiectrii.
ntruct aceste bare de armare sunt
solicitate la traciune proprietile principale sunt:
modulul de elasticitate, rezistena ultim din
ntindere i deformaia specific limit la ntindere.
Forma i dimensiunile barelor de armare din
CPAFS necesit ancoraje speciale pentru a evita
lunecarea din bacurile mainii de ncercat i pentru
a obine o distribuie convenabil a tensiunilor.
n lucrare este prezentat organizarea
programului experimental astfel nct s fie
ndeplinite cerinele de testare existente precum i
rezultatele obinute pe probe cu trei diametre
diferite.
Toate rezultatele experimentale confirm
comportarea linear elastic a barelor de armare din
CPAFS i comportarea fragil a materialului.
Pultruderea este o metod recomandat de
fabricare a barelor compozite pentru armare,
produsele rezultate avnd proprieti apropiate i
mprtiere mic a rezultatelor.
Datorit modulului de elasticitate sczut,
barele din CPAFS sunt recomandate pentru
elemente cu cerine de rezisten ridicate dar mai
puin potrivite pentru elementele la care predomin
criteriile de rigiditate.
Modelarea numeric pe epruvetele solicitate
la ntindere confirm validitatea metodei de testare
experimental adoptat.
field that varies linearly over the thickness and
quadratically in-plane for the higher order
elements. Each layer has been specified by an
orthotropic material stiffness matrix. As it may be
seen in Figure 5, a maximum value of more than
1350 MPa in terms of tensile stresses were
obtained. This value is in good agreement with the
value given by the manufacturer and from the
experimental tests.
5. Conclusions
The use of GFRP as reinforcing bars
requires a detailed characterisation of these
elements so that the design properties are fully
known.
Since these reinforcing bars are subjected to
tension the essential properties are: the elastic
modulus, the ultimate strength and the ultimate
tensile strain.
The shape and the dimensions of GFRP
reinforcing bars required special anchorages to
avoid slippage from the testing machine grips and
a suitable stress distribution.
The paper presents the organisation of the
experimental setup to meet the requirements of the
existing test methods and the results obtained on
samples with three different diameters.
All experimental results confirm the linearly
elastic behaviour of GFRP composites in
reinforcing bars and the brittle behaviour of the
material.
Pultrusion is an appropriate method of
fabrication for composite reinforcing bars, giving
products with similar properties and low scattering.
Due to their low elastic modulus GFRP
reinforcing bars are recommended in strength
based design but less suitable when the stiffness
criteria are prevailing.
The numerical modelling performed on the
test specimen loading in tension confirms the
suitability of the testing procedure.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by CNCSIS - UEFISCSU,
project number 737, PNII - IDEI code 369/2008 on hybrid
structures made of polymeric composites and traditional building
materials.
*******************************************************
N. ranu, C. Banu, G. Oprian, M. Budescu, V. Munteanu, O. Ioni / Caracteristicile barelor din polimeri armai cu fibre de sticl 331
solicitate la traciune
Mulumiri
ncercrile au fost efectuate n cadrul proiectului PNII -
IDEI cod 369/2008 - 737 cu titlul: Structuri inginereti hibride cu
performante superioare din compozite polimerice i materiale
tradiionale. Autorii mulumesc CNCSIS UEFISCSU pentru
sprijinul financiar acordat.
REFERENCES
1. fib FRP reinforcement in RC structures, fib Task Group 9.3,
fib Bulletin 14, International Federation for Structural
Concrete (fib), Lausanne, 2007.
2. H.Y. Leung and R.V. Balendran, Flexural behaviour of
concrete beams internally reinforced with GFRP rods and
steel rebars, Structural Survey, 2003, 21(4), 146.
3. L. Ombres, T. Alkhrdaji T., A. Nanni, Flexural analysis of
one-way concrete slabs reinforced with GFRP rebars, in
Crivelli-Visconti, I. (Ed.), International Meeting on
Composite Materials, PLAST 2000, Proceedings,
Advancing with Composites, Milan, p. 243.
4. D. Tinazzi, C. Modena, and A. Nanni, Strengthening of
Masonry Assemblages with FRP Rods and Laminates,
International Meeting on Composite Materials, PLAST
2000, Proceedings, Advancing with Composites 2000, Ed.
I. Crivelli-Visconti, Milan, Italy, May 9-11, 2000, 411.
5. N. ranu, G. Oprian, M. Budescu and I. Gosav, Hollow
concrete poles with Polymeric Composite Reinforcement,
Journal of Applied Sciences, 2009, 9(14), 2584.
6. F. Luca, Matta, and A. Nanni, Structural response of full-
scale reinforced concrete columns with internal frp
reinforcement under compressive load, Proceedings of the
9
th
International Symposium of Fiber Reinforced Polymer
Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, Sydney, 2009, 4.
7. Weber Newly developed GFRP rebar in diaphragm walls of
large tunnelling projects, Tunelling and underground space
technology,2006, 21(3-4), 437.
8. C. Florea, C. Tric Rusu, and G. Praporgescu, Specific
characteristics of composite materials useable in explosive
environments, Romanian Journal of Materials, 2009, 39(1),
65.
9. C. Gentile, D. Svecova, and S.H. Rizkalla, Timber Beams
Strengthened with GFRP Bars: Development and
Applications, J. Compos. for Constr. 2002, 6(1), 11.
10. *** ACI 440.3R-04 Guide test methods for fiber-reinforced
polymers (FRPs) for reinforcing or strengthening concrete
structures, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills,
USA, 2004.
11. *** ASTM D3916 Standard Test Method for Tensile
Properties of Pultruded Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Plastic
Rod, West Conshohocken, PA, 2008.
12. S. Kocaoz, V.A. Samaranayake and A. Nanni, Tensile
characterization of glass FRP bars, Composites: Part B,
2005, 36, 127.
13. F. Micelli, and A. Nanni, Tensile Characterisation of FRP
rods for reinforced concrete structures, Mechanics of
Composite Materials, 2003, 39(4), 293.
14. Y.C. Wang, P.M.H. Wong, and V. Kodur, An experimental
study of the mechanical properties of fibre reinforced
polymer (FRP) and steel reinforcing bars at elevated
temperatures, Composites Structures , 2007, 80, 131.
15. N.ranu, M. Budescu, L. Bejan, G. Oprian, V. Munteanu,
and C. Banu, Hybrid structures made of polymeric
composites and traditional building materials, Technical
Report, CNCSIS - UEFISCSU, project number 737, PNII -
IDEI code 369/2008.
16. *** Schck ComBAR, http://www.schoeck-combar.com/.
17. F.T. Wallenberger, J. C. Watson, and H. Li, Glass Fibers,
ASM International, Ohio, 2001.
18. T. Pepper, Polyester Resins, ASM International, Ohio,
2001.
19. *** ASTM D618 - 08 Standard Practice for Conditioning
Plastics for Testing, West Conshohocken, USA, 2008.
20. B. Agarwal, L. Broutman and K. Chandrashekhara,
Analysis and performance of fiber composites, John
Wiley&Sons, New Jersey, 2006.
21. L. Bejan, N. ranu, Eigentensors and eigenelastic
constants for woven composites, Journal of optoelectronics
and advanced materials, 2007, 9(9), 2902.
22. I. M. Daniel and O. Ishai, Engineering Mechanics of
Composite Materials, Oxford Univ. Pr., New York, 2005.
23. C. Banu, N. ranu, G. Oprian, and V. Munteanu, Finite
Element Analysis of Fiber Reinforced Polymers Bars, 8th
International Symposium Computational Civil Engineering
2010, Iai, Romania, 99.
24. *** LUSAS Modeller Reference Manual, Surrey, U.K.,
2008.
********************************************************************************************************************************
MANIFESTRI TIINIFICE / SCIENTIFIC EVENTS
XIII International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, ICCC
Madrid 3-8 July 2011
Main Topics:
Production process chemistry and engineering
Sustainable production
New cementitious matrix
Hydration and microstructure
Hydration and thermodynamics
Modelling
Properties of fresh and hardened concrete
Concrete durability
Standardization
Contact http://www.icccmadrid2011.org
********************************************************************************************************************************