Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Products Conceptual Design
Products Conceptual Design
ISB 978-973-598-230-0
EDITURA
UIVERSITII
TRASILVAIA
BRAOV
3. Conceptual
variants
generation
Overall
function
structure
2.Overall
function
detailing
Conceptual
variants
IFORMATIO
BASE
Product
overall
function
Product
Design
Specification
(PDS)
4.
Technicaleconomical
evaluation
Product
Concept
1. Identification
of product overall
function
Requirements
+
Evaluation criteria:
i = 100 1,5 %
min = 0,5
2010
500091 Braov,
B-dul Iuliu Maniu 41A
Tel:0268 476050
Fax: 0268 476051
E-mail : editura@unitbv.ro
Tiprit la:
Prefa
Foreword
CUPRINS
1. Introducere...................................................................................................................... 13
2. oiuni de baz utilizate n designul conceptual al produselor................................... 17
2.1. Funcia global a unui produs; fluxurile i subfunciile funciei globale .............. 17
2.2. Structura unui produs i structura funciei globale a produsului........................... 24
2.3. Detalierea unei funcii; principii de rezolvare i variante conceptuale ................. 28
2.4. Sinteza conceptual a unei funcii compuse.......................................................... 44
3. Modelarea procesului de design al produselor tehnice ................................................ 53
3.1. Modelarea ciclului de via al unui produs tehnic................................................. 53
3.2. Modelarea proiectrii unui produs tehnic.............................................................. 57
3.2.1. Caracteristici de baz ale temei de proiectare.............................................. 57
3.2.2. Modelul lui Archer....................................................................................... 58
3.2.3. Modelul lui French ...................................................................................... 60
3.2.4. Modelul lui Pugh ......................................................................................... 62
3.2.5. Modelul lui Dieter........................................................................................ 63
3.2.6. Modelul Pahl & Beitz .................................................................................. 65
3.2.7. Modelul german VDI ................................................................................... 67
3.2.8. Concluzii i dezvoltri ................................................................................. 72
4. Modelarea proiectrii conceptuale a produselor tehnice ............................................ 81
4.1. Despre elaborarea listei de cerine (SDP).............................................................. 81
4.2. Algoritmi de modelare a proiectrii conceptuale .................................................. 94
4.2.1. Modelul lui Crosss...................................................................................... 94
4.2.2. Modelul Ulrich & Eppinger ........................................................................ 96
4.2.3. Modelul lui Dieter........................................................................................ 97
4.2.4. Modelul Pahl & Beitz .................................................................................. 97
4.2.5. Modelul german VDI ................................................................................. 100
4.2.6. Concluzii .................................................................................................... 101
4.3. Varianta generalizat de modelare a proiectrii conceptuale.............................. 109
4.3.1. Structura algoritmului generalizat de proiectare conceptual.................... 109
4.3.2. Algoritmul de sintez a variantelor conceptuale........................................ 112
4.3.3. Concluzii .................................................................................................... 116
4.4. Stabilirea soluiei conceptuale prin evaluarea variantelor conceptuale............... 120
4.4.1. Criterii de evaluare..................................................................................... 120
4.4.2. Evaluarea soluiilor n literatura de limb german................................... 123
4.4.3. Evaluarea soluiilor n literatura de limb englez .................................... 132
4.4.4. Despre cele dou variante de evaluare fin. Formula FRISCO ................. 133
5. Exemplu de proiectare conceptual a unui produs tehnic......................................... 140
5.0. Despre specificaiile de design ale produsului (SDP).......................................... 140
5.1. Identificarea funciei motoreductorului............................................................... 141
5.2. Detalierea funciei motoreductorului................................................................... 143
5.3. Generarea variantelor conceptuale ...................................................................... 146
5.3.1. Generarea (sinteza) variantelor de rezolvare ............................................. 146
5.3.2. Stabilirea variantelor conceptuale.............................................................. 147
5.4. Evaluarea variantelor conceptuale....................................................................... 156
8
CONTENTS
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 13
2. Basic concepts used in products conceptual design .................................................... 17
2.1. The overall function of a product; the flows and the sub-functions of the overall
function.................................................................................................................. 17
2.2. The product structure and the structure of the overall function ............................ 24
2.3. The function detailing; solving principles and solving structures......................... 28
2.4. Conceptual synthesis of a compound function...................................................... 44
3. Modeling of the technical products design process..................................................... 53
3.1. Modeling of a technical product life cycle............................................................ 53
3.2. Modeling of a technical product design ................................................................ 57
3.2.1. Basic characteristics of the design task........................................................ 57
3.2.2. Archers model............................................................................................. 58
3.2.3. Frenchs model ............................................................................................ 60
3.2.4. Pughs model ............................................................................................... 62
3.2.5. Dieters model ............................................................................................. 63
3.2.6. Pahls & Beitzs model .............................................................................. 65
3.2.7. The German model VDI............................................................................... 67
3.2.8. Conclusions and developments.................................................................... 72
4. Modeling of the technical products conceptual design .............................................. 81
4.1. On the requirements list (PDS) elaboration ......................................................... 81
4.2. Algorithms for the conceptual design modeling ................................................... 94
4.2.1. Crosss model .............................................................................................. 94
4.2.2. Ulrichs & Eppingers model ..................................................................... 96
4.2.3. Dieters model.............................................................................................. 97
4.2.4. Pahls & Beitzs model ............................................................................... 97
4.2.5. The German model VDI............................................................................. 100
4.2.6. Conclusions................................................................................................ 101
4.3. The generalized variant for the conceptual design modeling.............................. 109
4.3.1. The structure of the conceptual design generalized algorithm .................. 109
4.3.2. The algorithm for the synthesis of conceptual variants ............................. 112
4.3.3. Conclusions................................................................................................ 116
4.4. The conceptual solution settlement by the conceptual variants evaluation ....... 120
4.4.1. Evaluation criteria...................................................................................... 120
4.4.2. Solution evaluation in German literature................................................... 123
4.4.3. Solution evaluation in English literature.................................................... 132
4.4.4. On the two variants of fine evaluation. FRISCO formula ......................... 133
5. Example of a technical product conceptual design .................................................... 140
5.0. On the product design specifications (PDS)........................................................ 140
5.1. The identification of the motor-reducer function ................................................ 141
5.2. Detailing of the motor-reducer function............................................................. 143
5.3. Generation of the solving variants....................................................................... 146
5.3.1. Generation (synthesis) of the solving structures variants .......................... 146
5.3.2. Establishment of the conceptual variants................................................... 147
5.4. Evaluation of the conceptual variants ................................................................. 156
9
10
6. Solving examples for functions with usual technical use ........................................... 161
6.1. Summation of two motions; distribution of a motion into other two motions 161
6.1.1. Examples of use ......................................................................................... 161
6.1.2. Characteristic properties of a planetary gear unit ...................................... 169
6.2. Summation of two torques. Indeterminate distribution of a torque into
other two torques ................................................................................................. 177
6.2.1. Examples of use ......................................................................................... 177
6.2.2. Characteristic properties of a gear mechanism with M = 1 and L = 3....... 180
6.3. Power transmission with rotative speed reduction under a constant ratio .......... 183
6.3.1. Gear reducers with fixed axes.................................................................... 184
6.3.2. Planetary reducers with two sun gears....................................................... 188
6.3.3. Planetary reducers with a single sun gears ................................................ 196
6.4. Mechanical energy transmission without rotative speed modification ............... 207
6.4.1. Functions of the mobile joints.................................................................... 211
6.4.2. Types of mobile joints considering the shafts relative motions................. 211
6.4.3. Types of mobile joints considering the motion transmission uniformity .. 212
6.4.4. Types of the mobile couplings considering their morphological features. 215
6.4.5. On the functions and performances of the mobile joints ........................... 222
6.5. Propelling solutions in fluid mediums................................................................. 224
6.5.1. Phylogenetic view by means of some representative examples ................ 225
6.5.2. Conclusion ................................................................................................. 233
6.6. Bionic solutions and equivalent technical solutions............................................ 233
Appendices ............................................................................................................................ 241
APPENDIX A.1. Defining the main basic notions....................................................... 243
APPENDIX A.2. Efficiency modeling of the monomobile planetary unit .................. 254
APPENDIX A.3. Modeling of the Vaucanson planetary reducer ................................ 258
APPENDIX A.4. On the TRIZ method (theory of inventive problem
solving)............................................................................................ 268
References ............................................................................................................................. 277
11
3. Generarea
variantelor
conceptuale
Variante
conceptuale
Structura
funciei
globale
2.Detalierea
funciei
globale
BAZA
DE
INFORMAII
Funcia
global a
produsului
4. Evaluarea
tehnicoeconomic
Conceptul
produsului
1. Identificarea
funciei globale
a produsului
Lista de
cerine
(SDP)
Cerine
+
Criterii de evaluare:
i = 100 1,5 %
min = 0,5
12
1. INTRODUCERE
1. INTRODUCTION
2) caracteristici
funcionale
(exemple:
raport de transmitere, turaie maxim,
moment
maxim,
temperatur
de
funcionare etc.) i
2) functional
characteristics
(e.g.
transmission ratio, maximum speed,
maximum torque, running temperature)
and
fi
Dup
Micul
Dicionar
Enciclopedic
(Ed. @tiinific i Enciclopedic, Bucureti),
prin design industrial sau design se
nelege: activitatea de proiectare a
produselor, care urmeaz a fi fabricate la
scar industrial, n acord cu nevoile
societii.
14
15
Deoarece
opereaz
cu
substructuri
specifice unor discipline foarte diferite,
designul conceptual are ca obiectiv central
crearea
unei
structuri
metodologice
(alctuit din noiuni, metode i algoritmi)
destinat s asigure gsirea celui mai bun
concept de produs (n condiiile date), prin
realizarea unui management eficient al
informaiilor culese din tiin, tehnologie,
economie, pia, cultur, legislaie, politic
etc.
Because
operates
with
specific
substructures of different disciplines, the
conceptual design has as central objective
the development of a methodological
structure (consisting of notions, methods
and algorithms) that is meant to ensure the
best product concept (in given conditions),
by making an efficient management of the
information
gathered
from
science,
technology, economy, market, culture,
legislation, politics etc.
16
a) entiti de intrare:
a) input entities:
17
M*
FM
M
E
I
Ieire
Output
Intrare
Input
Funcia
global
FE
E*
M*
E*
Overall
function
I
I*
FI
I*
Fig. 2.1,a. Funcia global a unui produs: (M,E,I)/(M*,E*,I*) = notaiile entitilor de intrare
(M = material, E = energie, I = informaie) i respectiv de ieire. b. Structura de funcii, de ordinul
1M+1E+1I, derivat din funcia global prin detaliere (descompunere): FM, FE, FI = subfuncia
global corespunztoare fluxului de material, de energie i respectiv de informaie; = comenzi de
pornire/oprire, = conectare/deconectare material-energie, = variaii ale unor mrimi de stare:
granulaie (pentru rni), culoarea apei (pentru maina de splat), debitul de ap scurs (pentru
maina de stors), nlimea de ridicare (pentru cric).
Fig. 2.1,a. The overall function of the product: (M,E,I)/(M*,E*,I*) = the notations of the input
and output entities (M = material, E = energy, I = information). b. The structure (of the overall
function) of 1M 1E 1I order, derived from the overall function by detailing: FM, FE, FI = the
notations of the overall subfunction of the material flow, - energy flow and information flow
respectively; = start/stop, = material-energy connection/disconnection, = granulation (for the
coffee mill), waters colour (for the washing machine), the flow of the water (for the wring machine),
the lifting height (for the lifting jack).
b) entiti de ieire :
-de tip material: cafea mcinat;
-de tip energetic: cldur, zgomot i
energie muscular (pentru echilibrarea
momentului-motor);
-de tip informaional: granulaia cafelei
obinut prin mcinare.
b) output entities:
-of material type: milled coffee;
-of energetic type: heat, noise and
muscular energy (for the motor torque
equilibration);
-of informational type: the granulation of
the coffee, which is obtained by milling.
18
19
Entiti
INTRARE
M
E
IEIRE
M*
E*
I*
Produsul
RNI ELECTRIC DE
MAIN ELECTRIC DE
CAFEA
SPLAT
Rufe
Boabe prjite de cafea
murdare+ap+detergent
Energie electric
Control uman: date privind mrimile de stare ale materialelor
la intrare i mrimile de stare dorite la ieire; date i
instruciuni referitoare la punerea n funciune,
semnal de pornire
Cafea mcinat la granulaia Rufe curate ude; amestec de
impus
ap, detergent i murdrie
Cldur i zgomot
Energie potenial a bazei
Energie muscular pentru
pentru echilibrarea carcasei
echilibrarea carcasei
mainii
Date privind mrimile de stare ale materialelor rezultate la
ieire (nregistrate n memoria operatorului uman)
INTRARE
Entiti
M
E
I
IEIRE
M*
E*
I*
Produsul
STORCTOR ELECTRIC
CRIC DE AUTOTURISM
DE RUFE
Rufe ude
asiu de autoturism
Energie electric
Energie muscular
Control uman: date privind mrimile de stare ale materialelor
la intrare i mrimile de stare dorite la ieire; date i
instruciuni referitoare la punerea n funciune,
semnal de pornire
asiu ridicat la nlimea
Rufe stoarse; ap evacuat
necesar
Cldur, zgomot, energie
Cldur, energie potenial a
potenial a bazei pentru
bazei pentru echilibrarea
echilibrarea carcasei
cricului
Date privind mrimile de stare ale materialelor de ieire
(nregistrate n memoria operatorului uman)
20
Tab. 2.1 The input and output entities for the products of the following types:
coffee mill and washing machine (simplified variants)
Entities
M
INPUT
OUTPUT
M*
E*
I*
PRODUCT:
ELECTRIC WASHING
ELECTRIC COFFEE MILL
MACHINE
Dirty laundry + water +
Roasted coffee beans
detergent
Electric energy
Human control: data regarding the state parameters of the input
materials and the state parameters that are wished at the
output; data and instructions regarding the putting into service,
starting signal
Milled coffee at the imposed Wet clean laundry; mixture
granulation
of water, detergent and dirt
Heat and noise
The base potential energy for
Muscular energy for the
the equilibration of the
casing equilibration
machine casing
Data regarding the state parameters of the output materials
(recorded in the human operator memory)
Tab. 2.2 The input and output entities of the products of following types:
wring machine and car lifting jack (simplified variants)
INPUT
Entities
M
E
I
OUTPUT
M*
E*
I*
PRODUCT:
ELECTRIC WRING
CAR LIFTING JACK
MACHINE
Wet laundry
Car undercarriage
Electric energy
Muscular energy
Human control: data regarding the state parameters of the input
materials and the state parameters that are wished at the
output; data and instructions regarding the putting into service,
starting signal
Wrung out laundry;
The undercarriage lifted at
evacuated water
the necessary height
Heat, noise, base potential
Heat, base potential energy
energy for the casing
for the lifting jack
equilibration
equilibration
Data regarding the state parameters of the output materials
(recorded in the human operator memory)
21
Proprieti:
Properties:
22
2.
Specificaiile
de
design
ale
produsului cuprind:
a) Nevoile i dorinele clienilor convertite
n
condiii
tehnice,
estetice
i
economice;
b) Restricii
concureniale,
sociale,
ecologice i organizatorice;
c) Date privind posibilitile de desfacere i
volumul de fabricaie;
d) Date referitoare la mijloacele i
resursele tehnico-economice interne i
externe;
e) Condiii referitoare la politica i
orientrile firmei etc.
Proprieti:
Properties:
23
24
25
3
7
3a
5b
1
4
5a
5
6
5c
Cafea
boabe
M
Cafea
mcinat
FM1
FM2
M*
FM3
Cldur, zgomot,
energie potenial
muscular
Energie
electric
E
FE2
FE1
FI2
Granulaia
cafelei
Sistem de
control uman
I
E*
FE4
FE3
FI1
FI4
FI3
I*
Fig. 2.2,b. Structura de funcii, de ordinul 3M+4E+4I, derivat din structura de ordinul 1M+1E+1I
(fig. 2.1,b), prin detalierea (sub)funciilor globale FM, FE i FI pe baza schemei din fig. 2.2,a.
Cafea
mcinat
Cafea
boabe
M
FM2
FM1
FM3
Energie
electric
E
FE3
FE2
FE1
FE4
M*
Cldur, zgomot,
energie potenial
muscular
E*
FI2
Sistem de
control uman
I
Granulaia
cafelei
FI4
FI1
FI5
I*
Fig. 2.2,c. Reprezentarea simbolic a structurii de funcii din fig. 2.2,b, pe baza simbolizrii
VDI [20].
26
3
7
3a
5b
1
4
5a
5
6
Coffee
grains
Milled
coffee
5c
FM1
FM2
M*
FM3
Electrical
energy
FE1
FE3
FE4
E*
FI2
Human control
system
Coffee
granulation
FI1
FI4
FI3
I*
Fig. 2.2,b. Function structure of order 3M-4E-4I, derived from the structure of the order 1M1E-1I (Fig. 2.1,b) by detailing of the overall (sub)functions FM, FE and FI (based on the scheme
from the Fig. 2.2,a).
Milled
coffee
Coffee
grains
M
FM2
FM1
FM3
Electrical
energy
E
FE3
FE2
FE1
FE4
M*
Heat, noise,
potential
muscular energy
E*
FI2
Human control
system
I
Coffee
granulation
FI4
FI1
FI5
I*
Fig. 2.2,c. Symbolic representation of the function structure from the Fig. 2.2,b (based on the VDI
symbolization [20]).
27
either
simple
functions
decomposition is not possible),
(their
28
29
Funcii
(subfuncii)
de baz
Exemplu
Simbol
Exemplu
Simbol
Exemplu
Simbol
Mrimi
generale
Material
Energie
Informaie
Band
perforat
Depozitare
Conducere sau
transmitere
(cu schimbarea
poziiei)
Modificare cod
unor mrimi de
stare)
Modificare
(cu schimbarea
Codificare
Gaz detonant
Reea de platin
Transformare
(cu schimbarea
naturii)
Calculator de buzunar
30
Mrimi de
aceeai natur
nclzitor
ntreruptor
Perforator
de band
M
M
Triod
Vagon cu
motor liniar
nsumare
Tiprire 2-exemplare
Mrimi de
aceeai natur
Tab. 2.3. Tabel sinoptic cu simbolizrile VDI pentru principalele funcii de baz (prelucrare dup VDI 2222).
Abibild
Condensare
Pierdere
prin
propagare
ulei
Separator
pneumatic
Distribuire
Basis
functions
Example
Symbol
Example
Symbol
Example
Symbol
Entities
Material
Information
Perforated
tape
Storage
(state)
Leading or
transmission
(with the change
of the place )
Code modification
Codification
Bang-gas
Platinum net
Pocket calculator
31
Transformation
Modification
(with the change (with the change
of the nature )
of some state
Sizes of same
parameters )
nature
Heater
Switch
Tape
perforator
M
M
Triode
Electromagnetic
carriage
Summation
Sizes of same
nature
Table 2.3 Synoptic table with the VDI symbols of the main basic functions (processing after VDI 2222).
Condenser
Oil
Pneumatic
separator
Distribution
FM3:
varianta conceptual,
destinat
nregistrrii granulaiei curente, se bazeaz
pe receptarea vizual a imaginii granulelor,
prin capacul transparent 3, urmat de
prelucrarea mental a acesteia; dei
aparine fluxului de material, funcia FM3
opereaz n fluxul de informaii; evident,
soluia de principiu a acestei funcii nu
aparine produsului, ci utilizatorului uman;
FE1:
varianta
conceptual
realizeaz
conectarea (deconectarea) sursei electrice
prin nchiderea (respectiv deschiderea) unui
ntreruptor
(normal
deschis),
format
dintr-un buton de translaie 3a (montat n
capacul 3), o tij de contact 5a i un resort 5b
32
FE2:
varianta
conceptual,
pentru
transformarea energiei electrice n energie
mecanic de rotaie, se bazeaz pe efectul
induciei electro-magnetice i folosete
conceptul de motor electric asincron;
33
2
1a
1
7
5
1b
4
6
Rufe murdare +
ap + detergent
Rufe curate
ude
FM1
M1*
FM4
FM3
FM2
M2*
Energie
electric
Ap + detergent
+ murdrie
FE2
FE1
FE4
FE3
FE5
E*
FI2
Sistem de
control
uman
I
FI1
I*
FI4
FI3
Fig. 2.3,b. Structura de funcii, de ordinul 4M+5E+4I, derivat din structura de ordinul 1M+1E+1I
(fig. 2.1,b), prin detalierea (sub)funciilor globale FM, FE i FI, pe baza schemei din fig. 2.3,a.
Rufe curate
ude
Rufe murdare +
ap detergent
M
FM2
FM1
FM3
M1*
FM4
M2*
Energie
electric
Ap + detergent
+ murdrie
E
FE1
FE2
FM3
FE4
FE5
Cldur, zgomot,
energie potenial
a bazei
Gradul de
splare
FI2
Sistem de
control
uman
I
E*
FI3
FI1
FI4
I*
Fig. 2.3,c. Reprezentarea simbolic a structurii de funcii din fig. 2.3,b, pe baza simbolizrii
VDI [20].
34
2
1a
1
7
5
1b
4
6
Dirty clothes +
water + detergent
Wet clean
clothes
FM1
M1*
FM4
FM3
FM2
M2*
Water + detergent
+ dirt
Electrical
energy
FE2
FE1
FE4
FE3
FE5
E*
Heat, noise, potential
energy of the base
FI2
Human control
system
Washing
level
FI1
I*
FI4
FI3
Fig. 2.3,b. Functions structure of the order 4M-5E-4I derived from the structure of the order 1M-1E-1I
(fig. 2.1,b) by detailing of the overall (sub)function FM, FE and FI (based on the scheme from the fig. 2.3,a).
Dirty clothes +
water + detergent
M
Wet clean
clothes
FM2
FM1
FM3
M1*
FM4
M2*
Water + detergent
+ dirt
Electrical
energy
E
FE1
FE2
FM3
FE4
FE5
E*
Heat, noise, potential
energy of the base
FI2
Human control
system
I
Washing
level
FI3
FI1
FI4
I*
Fig. 2.3,c. Symbolic representation of the functions structure from the fig. 2.3,b (based on the VDI
symbolization [20]).
35
2a
2b
3
9
4
5
Rufe stoarse
M1*
Rufe ude
M
FM1
FM2
M2*
FM4
FM3
Ap
Energie
electric
FE2
FE1
Cldur, zgomot,
energie potenial
a bazei
FI2
Sistem de
control
I
E*
FE4
FE3
FI1
I*
FI4
FI3
Gradul de
stoarcere
Fig. 2.4,b. Structura de funcii, de ordinul 4M+4E+4I, derivat din structura de ordinul 1M+1E+1I
(fig. 2.1,b), prin detalierea (sub)funciilor globale FM, FE i FI, pe baza schemei din fig. 2.4,a.
Rufe stoarse
Rufe ude
M
M1*
FM2
FM1
FM3
FM4
M2*
Ap
E
FE1
FE2
FE3
E*
FE4
Energie
electric
Cldur, zgomot,
energie potenial
a bazei
FI2
Sistem de
control uman
I
Gradul de
stoarcere
FI1
FI3
FI4
I*
Fig. 2.4,c. Reprezentarea simbolic a structurii de funcii din fig. 2.4,b, pe baza simbolizrii VDI [20].
36
2a
2b
3
9
4
5
Wrung clothes
M1*
Wet clothes
M
FM1
FM2
M2*
FM4
FM3
Water
Electrical
energy
FE2
FE1
FE4
FE3
FI2
E*
Heat, noise,
potential energy of
the base
Human control
system
Wrung
level
FI1
I*
FI4
FI3
Fig. 2.4,b. Functions structure of the order 4M-4E-4I derived from the structure of the order
1M-1E-1I (Fig. 2.1,b) by detailing of the overall (sub)functions FM, FE and FI (based on the scheme
from the Fig. 2.4,a).
Wrung clothes
Wet clothes
M
M1*
FM2
FM1
FM3
FM4
Electrical
energy
E
FE1
FE3
FE2
M2*
Water
Heat, noise,
potential energy of
the base
E*
FE4
FI2
Human control
system
I
Wrung
level
FI1
FI3
FI4
I*
Fig. 2.4,c. Symbolic representation of the functions structure from the Fig. 2.4,b (based on the VDI
symbolisation [20]).
37
Q
5
1
4
3
6
r
2
asiu n poziie
ridicat
FM1
M*
FM3
FM2
Cldur, zgomot,
energie potenial
a bazei
Energie
muscular
FE2
FE1
E*
FE4
FE3
FI2
Sistem de control
uman
nlimea de
ridicare
FI1
I*
FI4
FI3
Fig. 2.5,b. Structura de funcii, de ordinul 3M+4E+4I, derivat din structura de ordinul 1M+1E+1I
(fig. 2.1,b), prin detalierea (sub)funciilor globale FM, FE i FI, pe baza schemei din fig. 2.5,a.
asiu n poziie
ridicat
asiu n
poziie iniial
M
M*
FM2
FM1
Energie
muscular
FM3
Cldur, zgomot,
energie potenial
a bazei
FE3
E*
FE4
FE2
FE1
FI2
Sistem de
control uman
I
nlimea
de ridicare
FI1
FI3
FI4
I*
Fig. 2.5,c. Reprezentarea simbolic a structurii de funcii din fig. 2.5,b, pe baza simbolizrii VDI [20].
38
linkage
of
parallelogram
type;
5;6 contact soles with the chassis and the
ground; 7-8-9 kinematical chain of RE
type (R = revolute joint, E = helical joint),
F muscular motive force, r crank radius,
crank speed; Q resistant force,
v lifting speed.
Q
5
1
4
10
3
6
FM1
M*
FM3
FM2
Muscular energy
E
FE2
FE1
FE4
FE3
Heat, potential
energy of the base
E*
FI2
The lifting
height
FI1
I*
FI4
FI3
Fig. 2.5,b. Functions structure of the order 3M-4E-4I derived from the structure of the order 1M1E-1I (Fig. 2.1,b) by detailing of the overall (sub)functions FM, FE and FI (based on the scheme
from the Fig. 2.5,a).
Car frame in the
lifted position
M*
FM2
FM1
Muscular
energy
FM3
Heat, potential
energy of the base
FE3
E
FE1
E*
FE4
FE2
FI2
Human control
system
I
The lifting
height
FI1
FI3
FI4
I*
Fig. 2.5,c. Symbolic representation of the functions structure from the fig. 2.5,b (based on the VDI
symbolisation [20]).
39
Proprieti:
a) Gradul de detaliere (descompunere), al
unei structuri de funcii, este exprimat prin
ordinul structurii, care crete odat cu
numrul
subfunciilor
din
fluxurile
componente.
Properties:
a) The detailing (decomposition) degree of
a structure of functions is expressed
through the structure order, which increases
with the number of subfunctions from the
component flows.
Exemple:
Examples:
40
41
Ak
X
Y
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
A6
A7
A8
A9
A10
A11
A12
A13
A14
A15
A16
Intrare
Input
Ieire
Output
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
Denumire
Denomination
NOR
INHIBITION 1
INHIBITION 2
AND
EQUIVALENT
EXCLUSIVE OR
NAND
IMPLICATION
OR
A5
&
A8
=
Y
AND: A5 = XY
X
Y
EQUIVALENT: A8 = X YVXY
X
A12
&
A9
=1
Y
NAND:A12 = XY
X
Y
A15
A4
&
Y
OR: A15 = XVY
X
Y
INHIBITION 2: A4 = XY
X
A2
A13
Y
NOR: A2 = XVY
IMPLICATION: A13 = XV Y
X
IDENTITY: A= X
NOT: A = X
42
HOMEWORK
2.2:
Considering
the
conceptual solutions (Fig.2.3,a, 2.4,a, and
2.5,a) and the functions structures
(Fig.2.3,b, c, 2.4,b, c and 2.5,b, c) of some
technical products, it is required:
43
3
2
h
Fig. 2.6. Motoreductor planetar cu frn (soluie de principiu): 1-2-3-h = reductor planetar; 4-5 =
rotorul i statorul motorului electric; 6 = elice de rcire; 7 = frn cu comand electromagnetic.
Fig.2.6. Motor speed reducer (principle solution): 1-2-3-h = planetary reducer; 4-5 = rotor and stator
of the electromotor; 6 = cooling screw; 7 = brake with electromagnetic decoupling.
d) detalierea structurii de funcii, de la punctul
c), i prezentarea simbolic a acesteia;
e) soluiile conceptuale ale subfunciilor din
structura de funcii de la punctul d).
f) s se modeleze, pe baza tab. 2.4, funcia
cuplajului
cu
decuplare
electromagnetic, din fig. 2.6
44
M*
FM2
FM1
Energie muscular
Muscular energy
FM3
Cldur, zgomot,
energie potenial a
bazei
FE3
E
FE1
E*
Heat, potential
energy of the base
FE4
FE2
FI2
nlimea de ridicare
The lifting height
FI1
FI3
FI4
I*
Fig. 2.7. Structura simbolic a funciei compuse privind ridicarea asiului unui autoturism
(v. fig. 2.5).
Fig.2.7. Symbolic structure of a compound function regarding the lifting of a car chassis (see Fig.2.5).
Sinteza conceptual a funciei compuse
date (fig. 2.7) se reduce la sinteza i
compunerea subfunciilor: FM1, FM2, FE2
i FE3 (celelalte subfuncii nu intervin n
sintez, fiind ndeplinite de operatorul
uman).
45
Subfuncii
Subfunctions
Nr
Simbol
,o
Symbol
1.1
M
1.2
M
2.1
3.1
4.1
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
Efectul
amplificrii
forei
Force
amplification
effect
4.2
1.3
Efectul de
conducere
Leading effect
3.2
E
Efectul de
sprijinire
Prop-effect
2.2
Efecte fizice
Physical
effects
Efectul de
ireversibilitat
e
Irreversibility
effect
Nr.3 Nr.1
No.3 No.1
Nr.4
No.4
Nr.5 Nr.2
No.5 No.2
Nr.6
No.6
Fig. 2.8. Exemple de generare a variantelor de rezolvare, pentru funcia compus din fig. 2.7,
cu ajutorul matricei morfologice (adaptare dup VDI 2222): 1.1 - Conectare material-energie, 2.1 Conducere material, 3.1 - Transmiterea energiei cu amplificarea forei, 4.1 - Transmiterea ireversibil
a energiei.
Fig.2.8 Six examples of solving variants generation by means of morphological matrix in the
case of the compound function from the Fig.2.7 (adapted from VDI 2222): 1.1 - Material-energy
summation, 2.1 - Material leading, 3.1 - Energy transmission with force amplification, 4.1 - Energy
irreversible transmission.
Se remarc faptul c, n variantele cu
numerele de ordine 2,Q,6, exist i linii n
care purttorul de efect considerat este o
combinaie a doi sau chiar trei purttori de
pe aceeai linie.
46
Subfuncia
Subfunction
Nr. 1
Nr. 2
Nr. 3
Nr. 4
Nr. 5
Nr. 6
1
2
3
4
1.3
2.3
3.3
4.4
1.3
2.3+2.6
3.3+3.6
4.6
1.3
2.3
3.3+3.4
4.3
1.3
2.3
3.3+3.5
4.4
1.3
2.4+2.6
3.3+3.5+3.6
4.6
1.3
2.5
3.3+3.5
4.6
Schema structural
Structural scheme
Fig. 2.9. Principiile de rezolvare componente i schemele de principiu (schemele structurale) ale
variantelor de rezolvare exemplificate n fig. 2.8 (adaptare dup VDI 2222).
Fig.2.9. The component solving principles and the principle schemes (structural schemes) of the six
solving variants from the Fig.2.8.
toate variantele de rezolvare valide ale
funciei compuse, adic toate soluiile
conceptuale poteniale ale produsului cutat.
Sinteza (generarea) variantelor de rezolvare
este urmat de prestabilirea caracteristicilor
tehnice pentru fiecare variant n parte.
47
Proprieti:
Properties:
48
Proprieti:
49
Tab. 2.5. Exemple de efecte (principii) fizice utilizate n generarea principiilor de rezolvare
(prelucrare dup [9]).
Table 2.5. Examples of the phisical effects what are used for the generation of the solving principles
(processed from [9]).
Efectul fizic (principiul fizic)
r2
r1
Schema de principiu
Principle scheme
F2
a1
r
F2 = 1 F1
r2
F2
F1
Denumire i ecuaie
,ame and equation
Efectul de prghie
Lever effect
F1
a2
Efectul de prghie
Lever effect
A1
A2
M = F r
F2
F1
Efectul Coulomb
Coulomb effect
Fn
v
F1
F = Fn
- coeficient de frecare /
l = E A
Dl
F2
N
S
l
F1
Q1
F = c l
v
R
F
m
Efectul Coriolis
Coriolis effect
Fc = 2 m vr
I
A
l
l2
x1
x2
Efectul Magnus
Magnus effect
F = 2 R 2 l v
Efectul centrifugal
Centrifugal effect
F = m r 2
an = r 2
Legea Biot-Savart
Biot-Savarts law
F = B l I
Efectul electromagnetic
Electromagnetic effect
,2 A
I
F
l
ac = 2 vr
F=
F2 = F1
A1
F1
A2
Q2
Efectul magnetic
Magnetic effect
1
F=
1 2 2
4 0 r
l
F = ma
vr
F2 =
Efectul electrostatic
Electrostatic effect
Q Q
1
F=
12 2
4 0 r
l
Efectul inerial
Inertial effect
F2
Efectul de presiune
Pressure effect
Efectul de pan
Wedge effect
x1
x1
frictional coefficient
Efectul de elasticitate
Elasticity effect
A c
Denumire i ecuaie
,ame and equation
Efectul de genunchi
Knee effect
F1
F2 =
tan 1 + tan 2
I2
50
Efectul induciei
electromagnetice
Electromagnetic
induction effect
U = B l v
AE /
CAHG
Randament
global /
Global efficiency
[%]
Viteza perifeic /
Peripheral speed
[ms-1]
Turaie /
Rotary speed
[min-1]
Putere /
Power [Kw]
> 1,2 10
Raport de
transmitere /
Speed ratio
Moment /
Torque [Nm]
Denumire /
Denomination
Exemple /
Examples
Poziia axelor /
The axes are
Paralele/
Parallel
AM /
WG
<105
Paralele /
Parallel
Coaxiale /
Coaxial
Paralele /
Parallel
Paralele sau
ncruciate /
Parallel or
crossed
Perpendicular pe suprafa /
Perpendicular on the surface
ACH /
BHG
Concurente
/
Concurrent
Coulomb
Hooke
Mijlocit / Mediately
AC /
PAG
ncruciate /
Crossed
Perpendicular pe suprafa /
Perpendicular on the surface
Tangenial la
suprafa / Tangential
at the surface
8emijlocit / Directly
Hooke
Concurente/
ncruciate
Concurrent
or crossed
Efectul fizic /
Physical effect
Fora se transmite /
Force is transmited
Direcia forei /
Force direction
Tab.2.6. Principii de rezolvare pentru modificarea micrii continue de rotaie, printr-un raport de
transmitere constant (extras i prelucrare din VDI 2222/1997).
Table 2.6 Solving principles regarding the modification of the continuous rotary motion under a
constant transmission ratio (processing after VDI 2222).
20 i
<90
(50000)
<3000
(18500)
9996
<100
(200)
<7000
(100000)
1 i 6
<450
(4000)
9692
<15
(125)
<10000
10 i 120
<500
(1000)
8045
<25 (70)
<40000
1 i 5
<70 (70)
9250
<20 (50)
<25000
<250 (250)
9895
<20 (25)
<70000
(500000)
9830
<15
(100)
<10000
<15 (25)
<500
9995
<25 (40)
<6000
(10000)
<80
<10000
20
10 i 1
MRF /
FG
1 i 10
<105
32 i 32
0115000
(80000)
>7
104
5 i 85
0,1315
TLR /
RCG
1
i6
6
<220
(4000)
TLD /
TCG
1
i6
6
0,1220
(2200)
TCD /
TBG
1
i 12
12
0,2500
0,99
<1
<20000
(50000)
TLB /
BCG
1
i 10
10
<0,05
<90
<30 (60)
<100
UP /
PG
i
9886
AC / PAG = Angrenaj cilindric / Parallel axis gears; ACH / BHG = Angrenaj conic sau hipoid / Bevel gears or
hypoid gears; AM / WG = Angrenaj melcat / Worm and worm gear; AE / CAHG = Angrenaj elicoidal / Crossed
axis helical gears; MRF / FG = Mecanism cu roi de friciune / Friction gears; UP / PG = Unitate planetar /
Planetary gearset; TLR / RCG = Transmisie cu lan cu role / Roller chain gearing; TLD / TCG = Transmisie cu
lan dinat / Toothed chain gearing; TCD / TBG = Transmisie cu curea dinat / Toothed belt gearing;
TLB / BCG = Transmisie cu lan cu bile / Ball chain gearing.
51
HOMEWORK
2.4:
Considering
the
compound function that was established in
homework 2.3, it is required to perform the
conceptual design of this function, under the
premises that the product is unknown.
According to the requirements list, the
motor speed reducer must ensure the
irreversible transmission of energy, while
the speed reducer must accomplish a
constant transmission ratio i = 50, with a
minimum efficiency of 70%.
52
3. MODELAREA PROCESULUI
DE DESIGN AL PRODUSELOR
TEHNICE
3. MODELING OF THE
TECHNICAL PRODUCTS'
DESIGN PROCESS
53
Market / Need /
Problem
Product planning /
Task setting
Proiectare / Dezvoltare
Cerine. Obiective
Planificare /
formulare tem
Utilizare / Consumare /
ntreinere
Recuperare
energie
Potential / Goals of
company
Design / Development
Use / Consumption /
Maintenance
Energy
recovery
Refolosire
nlturare/ Mediu
Requirements
Pia / Cerine /
Problem
Recycling
Disposal / Environment
54
Cerine pia
Potenial firm
Market demands
Companys potential
Task formulation
Formulare tem
VDI 2221
VDI 2221
Proiectare /
Dezvoltare
Design /
Development
Fabricare, testare
Manufacturing, testing
VDI 2220
VDI 2220
Desfacere
Sale
VDI 2222
VDI 2222
Utilizare
Utilization
VDI 2223
VDI 2223
Reciclare
Recycling
Alte utilizri
Another utilization
nlturare
Disposal
55
2.
Nevoia
social
PROIECTAREA
PRODUSULUI
Docum.
produsului
1.
3.
Identificarea
nevoii sociale
Pri
nlturate
Fabricarea
produsului
Pri
reutilizate/
reciclate
BAZ DE
I FORMAII
Produs
finit
4.
Reciclare,
reutilizare i
nlturare
Vnzare i
instalare
Produs
uzat
5.
Exploatare i
ntreinere
Produs
instalat
Fig. 3.3. Ciclul de via al unui produs tehnic ntr-o nou variant de modelare.
2.
Social
need
PRODUCT
DESIGN
Product
document
1.
3.
Social need
identification
Disposal
parts
Product
manufacture
Recycling
parts
I FORMATIO
BASIS
Finished
product
6.
4.
Recycling
and disposal
Sell and
installation
Wornout
product
5.
Use and
maintenance
Installed
product
Fig. 3.3. The technical product life cycle in a new modeling variant.
56
a)
-
a)
-
57
f)
-
f)
-
58
Pregtire
Cerine
Programare
Experien
Faza de
analiz
Colectare
informaii
Colectare
informaii
Observaii
Msurri
Raionamente
inductive
Analiz
Analiz
Faza de
creaie
Sintez
Dezvoltare
Sintez
Evaluare
Judecat
Raionamente
deductive
Decizie
Dezvoltare
Faza
executiv
Comunicare
Soluii
Programare
Comunicare
Descriere
Traducere
Transmitere
Fig. 3.4. Modelarea procesului de design al unui produs tehnic dup Archer [1].
Preparation
Requirements
Programming
Experience
Analysis
phase
Information
collecting
Information
collecting
Observations
Measurements
Inductive
reasoning
Analysis
Analysis
Creative
phase
Synthesis
Development
Solutions
Programming
Synthesis
Evaluation
Judgement
Deductive
reasoning
Decision
Development
Executive
phase
Communication
Communication
Fig. 3.4. Modeling of a technical product design process after Archer [1].
59
Description
Translation
Transmission
5. Development, which contains the prototype project elaboration and validation, and
Etapa
secund,
intitulat
proiectare
conceptual, utilizeaz ca entitate de intrare
formularea problemei i are ca rezultat
(entitate de ieire): schema sau schemele
selectate ale produsului.
60
Cerine
Need
Analiza
problemei
Analysis of
problem
Formulare
problem
Statement
of problem
Proiectare
conceptual
Conceptual
design
Scheme
selectate
Selected
schemes
Proiectare
constructiv
Embodiment
of schemes
Detaliere
Detailing
Prelucrare,
desenare
etc.
Working,
drawings
etc.
61
62
Pia
Cerine
Formulare
list de cerine
Proiectarea
conceptual
Proiectarea
tehnic
(de detaliu)
g
h
e
a
Tehnical
design
b
c
b
Conceptual
design
h
f
e
Specification
c
Market
Elements of
specification
c
Manufacture
Fabricare
f
b
d
f
b
Sell
Vnzare
63
Proiectare
constructiv
3. Concept generation
8. Detail design
7. Parametric design
6. Configuration design
5. Product architecture
Conceptual
design
8. Detaliere
7. Proiect final
6. Proiect preliminar
2. Gather information
1. Define problem
4. Evaluare variante
3. Generare variante
2. Colectare informaii
1. Definirea problemei
5. Arhitectura produsului
Proiectare conceptual
Embodiment
design
4. Evaluarea
conceptelor
(soluiilor
conceptuale) cu ajutorul matricelor de
decizie i selectarea soluiei optime.
64
care
Phase II:
The
embodiment
design,
consisting of steps 5, 6 and 7 and
65
Sarcin
1. Clarificare sarcin
Elaborare list cerine
List de cerine
Conceptual
design
Pr. conceptual
Embodiment design
Preliminary layout
Definitive layout
Pr. de detaliu
Proiect definitiv
5. Finalizarea detaliilor
Completarea desenelor de detaliu
i a documentelor de fabricaie
Verificarea documentelor
5. Finalize details
Complete detail drawings and
production documents
Check all documents
Documentaie
Documentation
Soluie
Solution
Detail design
4. Optimizarea i finalizarea
desenelor
Verificarea proiectului i a
costurilor
Pregtirea documentelor de
fabricaie
Concept
Proiect preliminar
3. Dezvoltarea proiectelor
preliminare
Selectarea celor mai bune proiecte
Rafinarea i evaluarea
tehnico economic
Revenire i mbuntire
Concept
Pr. constructiv
Clarification of
the task
Clarificare
sarcin
Task
66
design,
67
Rezultate
Etape
Faze
Sarcin
Faza I
Determinarea funciilor i
structurilor de funcii
Structura de funcii
Faza II
Faza III
Pregtirea fabricaiei i a
instruciunilor de operare
Faza IV
Documentaie produs
5. Project
modules.
7. Preparation
of
manufacture
operation instructions.
68
development
for
the
into
key
and
Results
Stages
Phases
Task
Phase I
Requirements list
Phase II
Phase III
Preliminary layouts
6
Phase IV
Product documents
Further realisation
Fig. 3.9. The VDI 2221 general design approach [20].
Ji n acest caz (fig. 3.9), procesul de design
cuprinde patru faze relativ distincte:
69
Tab. 3.1. Exemplu simplificat de aplicare intuitiv a modelului VDI (fig. 3.9), n cazul unei plci
hidraulice de control (prelucrat dup VDI 2221).
Rezultate
Tem
R1
Puterea de ieire:.
Lungime maxim:
Temperatur de funcionare:
.
Definire
sarcin
Etape
R2
Structura funciei
3.1
Efecte .
R3
Soluia de principiu - efecte
(Schema hidraulic)
3.2
R3
Purttori de efecte
Conducere
Conectare
Sub-funcii
Acionare
acionare
4
R4
conducere
conectare
Purttor de efecte
2
3
radial
urub
piston
piston tr.
cursor
rot.
arc
presiune
magnet
1
axial
x x
Structuri de rezolvare
Cilindru de presiune
Piston
Arc
Design constructiv
R5
R6
Design de
detaliu
7
R7
70
Tab. 3.1. Simplified example of a VDI model application (see Fig.3.9): a control hydraulic plate
(after VDI 2221)
Results
Task
R1
Output power:.
Maximum length:
Working temperature:
.
Task
definition
Steps
2
R2
3.1
Function structure
R3
3.2
Effects carriers
R3
Conduction
Connection
connection
actuation
Actuation
Principle solution configuration
(geometrical scheme)
4
R4
Effects carrier
2
3
radial
screw
rot.
tr. piston
cursor
piston
spring
pressure
magnet
1
axial
Conceptual design
Effects.
x y
Pressure cylinder
Piston
Spring
Embodiment design
R5
R6
Detailing
7
R7
71
72
c) Dihotomia divergen-convergen
73
74
Configurarea dimensional
a modulelor
Modul de antrenare
Electromecanic
Documentele cu datele
optice i anexele de fabricare
Documentaie
constructiv
Proiect global
Proiect preliminar
al sistemului de micare
Modul de micare
Mecanic
Planurile
fluxurilor
Planul logic i
proiectul acestuia
Programul de
funcionare
Programe
Structura
programului
Software
Documentaia
programelor
Structur de conectare
Electronic
74
Fig. 3.10. Exemplu de extindere a modelului VDI n cazul unui produs mecatronic, din ramura mecanicii fine (surs VDI 2221)
Realizarea n continuare
Prelucrarea datelor
Proiectarea
sistemului optic
Schem optic
Optic
Soluii de principiu
Structuri de funcii
Lista de cerine
Rezultate
Faze
Proiectarea
constructiv
6 Configurarea produsului
global
Divizarea n module
fezabile
Stabilirea funciilor i a
structurilor acestora
Clarificarea i definirea
temei
Tem
Etape
Proiectare
conceptual
Proiectarea
de detaliu
Modules dimensional
configuration
Global product
configuration
Embodiment
documentation
Global project
Flows
planes
Actuation module
Electromechanics
Movement module
Mechanics
Optical system
design
Optical scheme
Optics
Principle solutions
Function structure
Requirements List
Results
Programs
documentation
Logical plane
and its project
Connecting structure
Electronics
Functioning
program
Programs
Program structure
Software
75
Fig. 3.10. Example of extending the VDI model for a mechatronic product from fine mechanics (source VDI 2221).
Further realization
Data processing
Task
Steps
Phases
Conceptual
design
Embodiment
design
Detailing
design
75
Funcie global
Tasks
Planing
Planificare
Sarcini
Global function
Subfuncii
Conceptual design
Design conceptual
Subfunctions
Principii de
rezolvare
Structuri de
rezolvare
Solving
pronciples
Solving
structures
Variante concept
Embodiment design
Design constructiv
Concept variants
Proiecte dimensionale
Asamblri
selectate
variants for
subassemblies
Final project
Proiect final
Proiectarea de
detaliu a
componentelor
Documentaie de
fabricaie
Fig. 3.11.
Divergene i convergene n
procesul de design. Elementele nnegrite indic
variantele alese pentru demararea fazei
urmtoare (surs: VDI 2222).
Selected
assemblings
Project
Detailing
Design de detaliu
Variante
proiect pentru
subansambluri
Dimensional projects
Components
detailing
Manufacture
documentation
76
1
2
3I
3 II
3 III
3IV
4I
4 II
4 III
4 IV
5I
5 II
5 III
5 IV
6I
6 II
6 III
6 IV
7I
7 II
7 III
7 IV
Fig. 3.12. Explicitarea modelului VDI n condiiile proiectrii de tip paralel (surs: VDI 2221).
Fig. 3.12. The VDI model explanation in the conditions of parallel design (source: VDI 2221).
Proiectarea concurent se refer la
utilizarea unui model de proiectare, n
condiiile aplicrii ingineriei concurente.
furnizorilor
cu
77
2.
Nevoia
social
PROIECTAREA
PRODUSULUI
Docum.
produsului
3.
1.
Identificarea
nevoii sociale
Fabricarea
produsului
Pri
reutilizate/
reciclate
Pri
nlturate
BAZ DE
I FORMAII
Produs
finit
6.
4.
Reciclare,
reutilizare i
nlturare
Vnzare i
instalare
Produs
uzat
5.
Exploatare i
ntreinere
Produs
instalat
2.PROIECTAREA
CO CEPTUAL
Soluia
conceptual
SDP
(Lista de
cerine)
5evoia social
1.
Elaborarea
SDP (listei
de cerine)
3.
4.
Elaborarea
documentaiei de
produs
Proiectarea
constructiv
BAZ DE
I FORMAII
Documentaia produsului
78
Proiect
final
2.
Social
need
PRODUCT
DESIGN
Product
document
1.
3.
Social need
identification
Product
manufacture
Recycling
parts
Disposal
parts
I FORMATIO
BASIS
Finished
product
6.
4.
Recycling and
disposal
Sell and
installation
Worn-out
product
5.
Use and
maintenance
Installed
product
2.CO CEPTUAL
DESIG
PDS
Conceptual
solution
(Requirements list)
Social need
1.
PDS (Requirements list)
elaboration
3.
Embodiment
design
I FORMATIO
BASIS
Final
layout
4.
Product
documentation
establishing
Product documentation
79
80
4. MODELAREA PROIECTRII
CONCEPTUALE A
PRODUSELOR TEHNICE
4. CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
MODELING OF TECHNICAL
PRODUCTS
This
multi-disciplinary
and
extremely
laborious activity starts from a certain social
need and is finished through a requirements
list (or PDS, see Fig. 3.13,b), completed with
81
4) Energy
(e.g.
electrical
energy,
mechanical energy, chemical energy,
state parameters, inputs, outputs,
efficiency);
tipul
de
montaj,
82
15) Reciclare
(reutilizare,
reprocesare,
depozitare, nlturare etc.);
Another
German
variant
for
the
identification of requirements, in terms of
the product life phases, is qualitatively
processed in Fig. 4.3, after Ehrlenspiel
[8, 9, 20]: in columns there are enclosed the
requirements types (technical, economical,
organizational, legislative etc.) and in rows the product life phases.
83
Pia
Alte surse
Firm
Analiza situaiei
-Recunoaterea fazei ciclului de via
-Construirea matricei produs pia
-Aprecierea competenei propriei firme
-Determinarea strii tehnologice
-Estimarea dezvoltrii viitoare
Analiza situaiei
Cmpuri de cutare
Idei de produs
Definirea produselor
Propunere produs
Clarificare i elaborare
84
Market
Other sources
Firm
State analysis
-Recognition of the life-cycle phase
-Buiding of the product market matrix
-Estimation of the own firm competence
-Establishment of the technological state
-Estimation of the future development
State analysis
Searching fields
Product ideas
Products defining
Product proposal
85
LISTA DE CERIE
Pag 1
Modificri
(date)
C (cerin)
sau
D (dorin)
C
C
D
C
D
C
D
C
D
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
D
C
Persoana
responsabil
Cerine
Fig. 4.2. Lista de cerine (SDP) pentru proiectul de produs: nivelmetru de combustibil (exemplu
simplificat, prelucrat dup: Pahl i Beitz [16]).
86
REQUIREMETS LIST
Pag 1
C
(requirement)
or D (wish)
Modifications
(data)
C
C
D
C
D
C
D
C
D
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
D
C
Responsible person
Requirements
11.
Recipient, fastening, distance
The recipient volume 20 160 l, specified form
Material: steel or plastic
Fastening on the recipient:
h
With flange
Fig. 4.2. The requirements list (PDS) for the product project: fuel surveyors level (simplified
example, after: Pahl and Beitz [16]).
87
Tipul cerinelor
Fizico tehnice
Etapele
vieii produsului
Referitoare
la OM
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Planificarea
Proiectarea
Fabricarea
Desfacerea
Instalare / exploatare
Reciclare / nlturare
Economice
&ormative
Organizatorice
Diverse
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
Fig. 4.3. Variant matriceal simplificat de generare a cerinelor, n funcie de fazele de via
ale produsului (prelucrare dup [8, 9, 20]).
Tema
Literatura de
specialitate
Rapoarte, procedee,
manuale
Brevete
Produse concurente
i produse
asemntoare
Caracteristicile
produselor
Date
statistice
Persoane oficiale i
particulare
reprezentative
Identificarea
ofertelor pieei
Publicaii
despre pia
Opinii / reacii la
produsele n
exploatare
Chestionare
Grafice cu ofertele
pieei
Analiza parametric
Analiza
necesitilor
Identif. cerinelor
pieei
Analiza matriceal
Identif. celui mai
bun produs
concurent
Formularea
SDP
a
Produs
Data
Performana:
Ediia
Parametrii
Modelul nostru
Prezentul proiect
curent
(intenie)
Poziie n lume
(int)
Descriere
Sigurana:
Descriere
b
Fig. 4.4,a. Sistematizarea ariei de cercetare i analiz pentru elaborarea SDP (listei de cerine), dup
Pugh [17] i b. Tip de formular pentru redactarea PDS, dup aceeai surs [17].
88
Requirements
With respect to
type Physical the Human Economical &ormative Organizational Others
technical
Steps of
Being
product life
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
Planning
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
Design
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
Manufacture
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
Sale
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
Installation / exploitation 5
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
Recycling /removal
6
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
Fig. 4.3. Simplified matrix for requirements generation, in terms of the product life phases
(processed from [8, 9, 20]).
Task
Technical literature
Reports, procedures,
handbooks
Patents
Competitive
products and similar
products
Representative officials
and private persons
Publications
about the market
Products
characteristics
Opinions/ reactions
at the products
under exploitation
Statistic
data
statistice
Identification of
the market offers
Questionnaires
Parametric analysis
Needs analysis
Identif. of the market
requirements
Matrixes analysis
Identif. of the best
competitive product
Formulation of
the PDS
a
Product
Date
Performance:
Edition
Parameters
The best competitive Our current model The present project
product
(intention)
Position in the
world (target)
Description
Safety:
Description
b
Fig. 4.4,a. Systematization of the research and analysis area for elaboration of the PDS (requirements
list) after Pugh [17] and b. Type of blank form for drawing up the PDS, from the same source [17].
89
9 = corelaie puternic
3 = corelaie medie
1 = corelaie slab
B3
1
3
A1
1
1
4. Acces uor la
compartimente
1/
0,09
3/
0,9
9/
1,62
9/
1,62
3/
0,24
6. Acces privat
7. Poziie
vertical stabil
3/
0,18
3/
0,54
9 / 1,62
9/
0,72
3/
0,18
1/
0,06
8. Numrul ciclurilor de
ncuiere
1/
0,3
9/
0,81
1/
0,18
5. Durabilitate
3/
0,6
Ponderea relativ
9/
2,7
3 / 0,27
Ponderea absolut
3. Uor de purtat
1/
0,2
9/
0,81
Rata de mbuntire
9/
1,8
3/
0,27
2. Uor de
deschis
7. Fora de ncuiere
1. Uor de
nchis
6. Sigurana de ncuiere
5. Material
4. Numr de compartimente
2. Greutate net
1. Volum
A2
0,09
1,67
6,68
0,20
2,5
10
0,30
0,09
1,25
6.25
0,18
1,33
2,67
0,08
2,06
33,6
AB
Importan
absolut
2,97
1,26
3,66
1,01
1,98
1,59
1,35
1,89
15,71
Importana
relativ
0,19
0,08
0,24
0,06
0,13
0,1
0,08
0,12
Produs
concurent
800
3,9
0,6
4x103
Produsul
propriu
750
3,5
0,5
5x103
750
3,5
0,5
5,4x103
cm3
kg
tip
tip
cicl.
Valori int
Uniti de
msur
B1
Scala de
apreciere 15
B2
Fig. 4.5. Exemplu de aplicare a metodei QFD n cazul unui produs de tip geant de voiaj (adaptare
dup [2,18]): A = cerinele clientului, A1 = importana cerinelor i aprecierea produselor,
A2 = obiectivele dezvoltrii, B = caracteristici tehnice, AB = matricea corelaiei dintre cerine i
caracteristici tehnice, B1 = analiza caracteristicilor tehnice, B2 = valorile int ale caracteristicilor
tehnice, B3 = matricea corelaiei dintre caracteristicile tehnice.
90
9 = strong correlation
3 = medium correlation
1 = weak correlation
B3
1
3
A1
1
1
4. Easy access at
compartments
1/
0,09
9/
1,62
9/
1,62
3/
0,24
3/
0,18
3/
0,54
9 / 1,62
9/
0,72
3/
0,18
1/
0,06
1/
0,3
9/
0,81
6. Private access
7. Stable vertical
position
3/
0,6
3/
0,9
1/
0,18
5. Durability
3 / 0,27
Relative weight
9/
2,7
9/
0,81
Absolute weight
3. Easy to carry
1/
0,2
3/
0,27
Rate of improvement
9/
1,8
2. Easy to open
7. Locking force
1. Easy to close
6. Locking safety
5. Material
4. Number of compartments
2. Net weight
1. Volume
B
A
A2
0,09
1,67
6,68
0,20
2,5
10
0,30
0,09
1,25
6.25
0,18
1,33
2,67
0,08
0,06
33,6
AB
Absolute
importance
2,97
1,26
3,66
1,01
1,98
1,59
1,35
1,89
15,71
Relative
importance
0,19
0,08
0,24
0,06
0,13
0,1
0,08
0,12
The competitive
product
800
3,9
0,6
4x103
The own
product
750
3,5
0,5
5x103
Target values
750
3,5
0,5
5,4x103
Units of
measurement
cm3
kg
type
type
cycles
B1
Assessment scale
15
B2
Fig. 4.5. Example of application the method QFD for the case of a product of handbag type
(adaptation after [2, 18]): A = the client requirements, A1 = the requirements importance and products
assessment, A2 = the development objectives, B = the technical characteristics, AB = the matrix of the
correlation between requirements and technical characteristics, B1 = the analysis of the technical
characteristics, B2 = the target values for the technical characteristics, B3 = the matrix of the
correlation between the technical characteristics.
91
A = cerinele clientului;
A = clients requirements;
of
the
requirements
A1 = estimation
importance (from the clients point of view),
assessment of the own product and of a
competitive product, regarding these
requirements fulfillment (the assessment is
made on a value scale from 1 to 5);
92
corelaiilor
dintre
B3 = matricea
caracteristicile tehnice ale produsului.
The
previous
succinct
presentation
highlights the following aspects:
93
IV. Soluie
global
I. Problem
global
Clarificare
obiective
mbuntirea
detaliilor
Stabilire
funcii
Evaluare alternative
Formulare
cerine
Determinare
caracteristici
Generare alternative
(variante)
III. Subsoluii
II. Subproblme
94
1. Clarificarea obiectivelor,
1. Clarification of objectives,
2. Stabilirea funciilor,
2. Establishment of functions,
3. Formularea cerinelor,
3. Formulation of requirements,
4. Determinarea caracteristicilor,
4. Determination of characteristics,
5. Generarea alternativelor,
5. Generation of alternatives,
6. Evaluarea variantelor,
6. Assessment of variants,
7. mbuntirea detaliilor.
7. Improving of details.
prin
globale
IV. Global
solution
I. Global
problem
1 Clarification of
objectives
7 Improvement of
details
2 Establishment of
functions
6 Evaluation of
alternatives
3 Formulation of
requirements
4 Determination
of characteristics
5 Generation of
alternatives (variants)
III. Subsolutions
II. Subproblems
Fig. 4.6. The model of the conceptual design process, after Cross [1].
95
by
3. Generarea
variantelor-concept
ale
produsului, care reprezint etapa cheie a
modelului,
96
4. Evaluarea
conceptelor
(soluiilor
conceptuale)
i
selectarea
soluiei
(soluiilor) optime.
1. Abstractizarea
i
problemelor eseniale,
identificarea
97
1. Identificarea
nevoilor
clientului
2. Stabilirea
specificaiilor
int
4. Selectarea
unui concept
de produs
3. Generarea
conceptelor
produsului
5. Actualizarea
specificaiilor
Efectuarea
analizei
economice
Analiza
produselor
concurente
Dezvoltarea
proiectului
Dezvoltarea conceptului
3.1. Clarificarea
problemei
List de cerine
Subprobleme
Abstractizarea i identificarea
problemelor eseniale
Stabilirea structurilor de funcii
Concepte
existente
Cutarea principiilor de
rezolvare a subfunciilor
Concepte
noi
Combinarea principiilor de
rezolvare n structuri de rezolvare
Proiectarea conceptual
Soluii integrate
Soluia de principiu
(concept)
3.5. Corectarea
soluiilor
98
1. Identification
of clients needs
2. Establishment
of target
specifications
4. Selection of
a product
concept
3. Generation of
product
concepts
Accomplishment
of economical
analysis
Analysis of
competitive
products
5. Actualization
of specifications
Project
development
Concept development
Fig. 4.7. The model of the concept development, after Ulrich and Eppinger [19].
3.1. Clarification
of the problem
Requirements list
Subproblems
Existent
concepts
<ew
concepts
Conceptual design
3.4. Systemic
exploration
Integrated
solutions
Principle solution
(concept)
3.5. Corection
of solutions
99
to
100
4.2.6. Concluzii
4.2.6. Conclusions
- Crosss
model
uses
a
relaxed
terminology, in which there are used
notions of general type, like (see
Fig. 4.6): objective, problem and subproblem, function and sub-function,
requirement, characteristic, alternative
(variant), sub-solution and solution etc.
- Modelul
lui
Cross
folosete
o
terminologie relaxat, n care sunt
utilizate noiuni de tip general, precum
(v. fig. 4.6): obiectiv, problem i
subproblem, funcie i subfuncie,
cerin,
caracteristic,
alternativ
(variant), subsoluie i soluie etc.
101
Etape
Rezultate
Faze
Sarcin
Faza I
List de cerine
Determinarea funciilor i
structurilor de funcii
Structura de module
Structura de funcii
Faza II
Faza III
Proiecte preliminare
Proiect definitiv
Pregtirea fabricaiei i a
instruciunilor de operare
Faza IV
Documentaie
produs
Realizarea mai departe
Fig. 4.10. Evidenierea prin umbrire a algoritmului proiectrii conceptuale din algoritmul de
proiectare a unui produs dup metoda VDI [20].
102
Steps
Results
Phases
Task
Phase I
Requirements list
Structure of modules
Structure of functions
Phase II
Phase III
Definitive project
Phase IV
Product documentation
Further accomplishment
Fig. 4.10. The algorithm of the conceptual design, highlighted through shading, from the algorithm
for a product design, from VDI method [20].
103
Etape de lucru
Baza de date
Rezultate
Tema
Clarificarea i precizarea
problemei
2.1
Stabilirea funciei
globale
2.2
Identificarea subfunciilor i a
structurilor de funcii
3.1
Cutarea principiilor de
rezolvare n planul
efectelor fizice
Cutarea principiilor de
3.2 rezolv. n planul config.
4 mprirea n module
fezabile i configurare
7 pn la documentaie
Tema principal
Lista de cerine
Funcii generale
Funcia
global
Funcii generale
Structuri de
funcii
Efecte fizice
Mecanisme
cinematice
Organe de maini
Tipuri de legturi
Soluii de
principiu
(efecte)
Soluii de
principiu (efecte
i config.)
Proiectarea conceptual
Matricea de cutare
pentru formularea
problemelor
Documentaia
produsului
Realizarea n continuare
Fig. 4.11. Detalierea algoritmului proiectrii conceptuale prin divizarea etapelor 2 i 3 din fig. 4.10 [20].
104
Working steps
Data basis
Results
Task
2.1
Establishment of the
global function
General functions
The global
function
General functions
Structures of
functions
Physical effects
Kinematical
mechanisms
Machine elements
Types of inks
Principle
solutions
(effects)
Principles
solutions (effects
and config.)
C o n c e pt u a l d e s i g n
Product
documentation
Further accomplishment
Fig. 4.11. Detailing of the conceptual design algorithm by dividing steps 2 and 3 from Fig. 4.10 [20].
105
106
Problem
Problem
Analiza problemei
(Descompunerea problemei n
subprobleme de diverse ordine)
Sinteza sistemului
(Cutarea subsislemelor - soluii
care rezolv subproblemele de ordin
2
superior i determinarea sistemelor soluii, prin compunerea
combinatorie a subsistemelor gsite)
System synthesis
(Search of subsystems solutions that
solve the sub-problems of superior
2
order and establishment of systems solutions, through combining and
composing the found subsystem)
Analiza sistemului
3
Problem analysis
(Problem decomposition into subproblems of different orders)
System analysis
3 (Establishment of the characteristics
(Determinarea caracteristicilor
realizate de sistemele - soluii
obinute)
Evaluarea
Evaluation
4 (Estimation of the obtained system-
Decizia
Faza urmtoare
Decision
(Selection of the system-solutions
that will be developed)
&ext phase
107
1. Problem analysis
1. Analiza problemei
Planul soluiilor
Solutions plan
2. System synthesis
2. Sinteza sistemului
108
109
2.PROIECTAREA
COCEPTUALA
Soluia
conceptual
SDP
(Lista de
cerine)
&evoia social
1.
3.
Elaborarea
SDP (listei
de cerine)
BAZA DE
INFORMAII
4.
Proiectarea
constructiv
Proiect
final
Elaborarea
documentaiei de
produs
Documentaia produsului
3. Generarea
variantelor
conceptuale
Clasa
variantelor
conceptuale
Structura
funciei
globale
2.Detalierea
funciei
globale
BAZA DE
INFORMAII
4. Evaluare
tehnicoeconomic
Funcia
global a
produsului
Soluia
conceptual
1. Identificarea
funciei globale
a produsului
a
produsului
SDP
(Lista de
cerine)
Fig. 4.14,b. Algoritm generalizat pentru detalierea proiectrii conceptuale (etapa 2 din fig. 4.14,a).
110
2. COCEPTUAL
DESIG
Conceptual
solution
PDS
(Requir.
list)
Social need
1.
3.
THE
INFORMATION
BASE
Elaboration
of the PDS
(requir. list)
4.
Embodiment
design
Final
project
Elaboration of
the product
documentation
Product documentation
3. Generation of
conceptual
variants
The class
of the
conceptual
variants
The
structure of
the global
function
2.The global
function
detailing
The
product
global
function
INFORMATION
BASE
1. Identification
of the product
global function
4. Technical
and
economical
evaluation
The
product
conceptual
solution
PDS
(Requir.
List)
Fig. 4.14,b. Generalized algorithm for detailing the conceptual design (step 2 from Fig. 4.14,a).
111
112
Rezultat: Principii
rezolvare noi.
i/sau
variante
de
principles
and/or
113
Structura
funciei
globale
cu Principii de Rezolvare
<ecunoscute (PRN) i
cu Principii de Rezolvare
Cunoscute (PRC).
Funcii
P.R.C
Funcii
P.R.
2. SINTEZA principiilor de
rezolvare prin identificarea
efectelor i configurarea
purttorilor de efecte;
compunerea principiilor de
rezolvare (dac este cazul)
Principii i
variante de
rezolvare
noi
BAZA DE
INFORMAII
3. Identificarea i
sistematizarea soluiilor
existente
Clasa
soluiilor
existente
Clasa
variantelor
conceptuale
Fig. 4.15. Algoritm pentru detalierea generrii variantelor conceptuale (etapa 3 din fig. 4.14,b).
114
The
structure of
the global
function
S.P.U.
functions
<ew solving
principles
and solving
variants
THE
INFORMATION
BASE
3. Identification and
systematization of existent
solutions
The class of
existent
solutions
The class of
conceptual
variants
Fig. 4.15. Algorithm for detailing the generation of the solving structures (step 3 from Fig. 4.14,b).
115
companies),
scientific,
technical
and
economical reports, elaborated by different
institutions and associations, web-sites in the
field etc.
4.3.3. Concluzii
4.3.3. Conclusions
116
SDP
Criterii de evaluare
(Obiective secundare: dorine;
condiii de protecie)
Subfuncii
cu principii de rezolvare
necunoscute
n planul
efectelor fizice
cu principii de rezolvare
cunoscute
Soluii existente: n
planul efectelor i
configuraiilor
n planul
configuraiilor
S.C.
117
PDS
Evaluation criteria
(Secondary objectives:
wishes; protection conditions)
Sub-functions
With unknown solving
principles
In the plan of
physical effects
In the plan of
configurations
C.S.
Fig. 4.16. Detailing of the conceptual design algorithm from Fig. 4.14,b.
118
Structura
funciei globale
conine
Soluiile subfunciilor
componente
conin
P.O. tip V
P.O.
tip I
119
n
proiectarea
variant,
soluia
conceptual este cunoscut n toate cele
trei plane: al efectelor, al configuraiei
purttorilor de efecte i al conexiunilor;
ca urmare, proiectarea variant este o
form de proiectare constructiv prin
similitudine (dup model); n [2], acest
tip de proiectare este numit, de
asemenea, modificare.
120
- simplification
of
assemblage
and
maintenance (technical-economical criterion);
minimizarea
costurilor
(criteriu economic);
- minimization of technological
(economical criterion);
minimizarea riscului de
(criteriu de siguran);
tehnologice
accidentare
costs
frecare
a) Funcia
produsului:
optimizarea
caracteristicilor purttorilor de efecte ale
subfunciilor secundare importante.
121
b) Structura
produsului:
reducerea
numrului de componente, reducerea
complexitii, reducerea gabaritului etc.
c) Sigurana omului i a mediului: utilizarea
preferenial a tehnicilor directe de
siguran, protejarea mediului.
d) Ergonomia produsului: mbuntirea
corelaiei
om-main,
mbuntirea
aspectului estetic.
e) Fabricaie: simplificarea metodelor i
procedeelor de fabricaie; evitarea
echipamentelor scumpe.
f) Control calitate: simplificarea procedeelor de testare i verificare.
g) Montaj: simplificarea i reducerea timpului
de montaj, evitarea mijloacelor speciale.
h) Transport: evitarea mijloace speciale de
transport, eliminarea riscurilor.
i) Instalare i ntreinere: simplificarea
operaiilor de instalare i utilizare,
simplificarea i reducerea operaiilor de
ntreinere.
j) Reciclare/nlturare:
recuperarea
uoar a componentelor, nlturarea n
condiii de siguran.
k) Costuri: eliminarea costurilor curente
speciale
i
costurilor
asociate,
eliminarea riscurilor de depire a
termenelor.
n urma stabilirii criteriilor de apreciere
comparativ, se poate trece la evaluarea
propriu-zis. n cazurile produselor cu structuri
de rezolvare numeroase, evaluarea se
desfoar, de regul, n dou faze succesive:
122
123
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
14
14
= 0 ,7
20
17
17
= 0 ,85
20
17
17
= 0 ,85
20
17
17
= 0 ,85
20
16
16
= 0 ,8
20
Soluia
Criterii
tehnice
1. Perturbaii mici
ale cinematicii de
cuplare
2. Punere simpl n
funciune
3. Schimbarea
uoar a
cuplajului
4. Sigurana
funcional
5. Construcie
simpl
Total
Total
Rt =
20
a
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
9
9
= 0 ,56
16
11
11
= 0 ,69
16
13
13
= 0 ,81
16
13
13
= 0 ,81
16
9
9
= 0 ,56
16
Soluia
Criterii
economice
1. Costuri
reduse de
materiale
2. Costuri
reduse de
reasamblare
3. Timp scurt
de testare
4. Posibilitate
de realizare n
atelierul
propriu
Total
Total
Re =
16
b
Fig. 4.17,a i b. Exemplu de evaluare grosier, aplicat unui numr de cinci soluii
(variante conceptuale) ale unui excitator axial (prelucrare dup Pahl i Beitz [16]):
a) Matricea de evaluare tehnic i b) Matricea de evaluare economic.
124
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
14
14
= 0 ,7
20
17
17
= 0 ,85
20
17
17
= 0 ,85
20
17
17
= 0 ,85
20
16
16
= 0 ,8
20
Solution
131
Technical
criteria
1. Small
perturbations of the
coupling
kinematics
2. Simple setting
into service
3. Easy change of
the coupling
4. Functional safety
5. Simple
construction
Total
Total
Rt =
20
a
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
9
9
= 0 ,56
16
11
11
= 0 ,69
16
13
13
= 0 ,81
16
13
13
= 0 ,81
16
9
9
= 0 ,56
16
Solution
Economic
criteria
1. Reduced
materials costs
2. Reduced
reassembling
costs
3. Short testing
time
4. The
possibility of
manufacturing
in the own
workshop
Total
Total
Re =
16
b
Fig. 4.17,a and b. Example of rough evaluation, applied to a number of five solutions (conceptual
variants) referring to an axial exciter (adapted after Pahl and Beitz [16]): a) The matrix of technical
evaluation and b) The matrix of economical evaluation.
125
<ivel 2
Funcionare
sigur
W11 =
0,4
Wk11 =
0,4
<ivel 3
Reproductibilitate
bun a curbei
cuplu-timp
W111 = Wk111 =
0,7
0,28
Tolerana la
suprancarcare
Wk112 = Wk112 =
0,3
0,12
Siguran
mecanic nalt
131
W121 = Wk121 =
0,7
0,21
<ivel 4
Uzuri reduse ale
prilor mobile
W1111 = Wk1111 =
0,2
0,056
Wk12 =
0,3
<ivel 1
W122 = Wk122 =
0,3
0,09
Mecanism de
testat simplu i
sigur
W1 =
1
Puine erori
posibile de
operare
Wk1 =
1
Fabricare
simpl
W13 =
0,1
Wk13 =
0,1
0,056
Sensibilitate
redus la vibraii
W1112 = Wk1112 =
0,5
0,14
0,14
Puini factori
perturbatori
W1113 = Wk1113 =
0,3
0,084
0,084
0,12
0,21
Siguran
nalt
W12 =
0,3
Wi
0,09
&umr mic de
componente
W1311 = Wk1311 =
0,5
0,03
Fabricare simpl
a componentelor
Complexitate
redus a
componentelor
W131 = Wk131 =
0,6
0,06
W1312 = Wk1312 =
0,2
0,012
Asamblare
simpl
W132 = Wk132 =
0,4
0,04
W1313 = Wk1313 =
0,3
0,018
0,03
0,012
0,018
0,04
0,06
Caracteristici
funcionale bune
W14 =
0,2
Wk14 =
0,2
Intreinere
simpl
Schimbare rapid
a legturilor la
testare
W141 = Wk141 =
0,3
0,06
W1421 = Wk1421 =
0,6
0,084
Manipulare
simpl
Wk142 = Wk142 =
0,7
0,14
W1422 = Wk1422 =
0,4
0,056
0,084
0,056
=1
Fig. 4.17,c. Arborele obiectivelor (secundare) pentru produsul de tip excitator axial
(prelucrare dup Pahl i Beitz [16]).
126
Level 2
Safe working
W11 =
0,4
Wk11 =
0,4
Level 3
Level 4
Reduced wears of
the mobile parts
W111 = Wk111 =
0,7
0,28
W1111 = Wk1111 =
0,2
0,056
Tolerance at
overloading
Reduced
sensibility to
vibrations
W1112 = Wk1112 =
0,5
0,14
Wk112 = Wk112 =
0,3
0,12
High mechanical
safety
131
W121 = Wk121 =
0,7
0,21
Wk12 =
0,3
Level 1
W1 =
1
Wk1 =
1
Simple
manufacturing
W13 =
0,1
Wk13 =
0,1
0,14
W1113 = Wk1113 =
0,3
0,084
0,084
0,12
0,21
0,09
A few possible
operating errors
W122 = Wk122 =
0,3
0,09
0,056
A few disturbing
factors
High safety
W12 =
0,3
Wi
Small number of
components
W1311 = Wk1311 =
0,5
0,03
0,03
Reduced
complexity of
components
Simple
manufacturing of
components
W131 = Wk131 =
0,6
0,06
W1312 = Wk1312 =
0,2
0,012
Simple
assembling
W132 = Wk132 =
0,4
0,04
W1313 = Wk1313 =
0,3
0,018
0,012
0,018
0,04
0,06
Simple
maintenance
Good functional
characteristics
W14 =
0,2
Wk14 =
0,2
Fast changing of
links while testing
W141 = Wk141 =
0,3
0,06
W1421 = Wk1421 =
0,6
0,084
Simple
manipulation
Good accesibility
of the measurement system
Wk142 = Wk142 =
0,7
0,14
W1422 = Wk1422 =
0,4
0,056
0,084
0,056
=1
Fig. 4.17,c. The (secondary) objectives tree for a product of type axial exciter (adapted after Pahl and
Beitz [16]).
127
131
128
131
Rk = (Ni)/(10n),
k = 2 (pentru soluia II), 3 (pentru soluia III),
4 (pentru soluia IV), n = 13 criterii.
Rk = (Ni)/(10n),
k = 2 (for solution II), 3 (for solution III),
4 (for solution IV), n = 13 criteria.
WRk = ( Wi Ni)/10, k = 2, 3, 4.
129
130
131
0,06
0,084
0,056
Asamblare simpl
Intreinere simpl
Schimbare rapid a
legturilor la testare
Buna accesibilitate a
sistemelor de masur
10
11
12
13
= 1
0,018
0,012
0,03
0,09
Operare cu
posibile erori
Nr. de
componente
Complexitatea
componentelor
Proporia comp.
tipizate i
cumprate
Simplitatea
montrii
Timpul i costul
ntreinerii
Timpul estimat
pentru schimbarea conexiunilor
la testare
Accesibilitatea
sist. de msurare
Rezerv
suprasarcin
Sigurana mecanic ateptat
Frecvena
natural
Perturbaii
Uzur
Parametri
redus
85
Total
R2= 0,65
bun
120
redus
medie
<i
ot
min
medie
medie
redus
ridicat
10
redus
2370
redus
Mrime
-1
U
M
-
Soluia II
WR2=0,68
6,816
0,392
0,588
0,480
0,200
0,108
0,084
0,120
0,630
1,470
0,840
0,588
0,980
0,336
Wi.<i
ot
ponderat
Total
bun
120
redus
medie
medie
medie
medie
redus
ridicat
10
redus
2370
medie
Mrime
R3= 0,60
78
<i
ot
WR3=0,64
6,446
0,392
0,588
0,420
0,200
0,108
0,060
0,120
0,540
1,470
0,840
0,504
0,980
0,224
Wi.<i
ot
ponderat
Soluia III
Total
medie
180
ridicat
ridicat
ridicat
ridicat
redus
foarte
ridicat
medie
20
(medie)
< 410
redus
Mrime
R4= 0,52
68
<i
ot
WR4=0,54
5,388
0,280
0,336
0,180
0,280
0,144
0,036
0,180
0,360
1,680
0,960
0,336
0,280
0,336
Wi.<i
ot
ponderat
Soluia IV
130
Fig. 4.18. Evaluarea fin (prin notare ponderat) a soluiilor II, III i IV (din 4.17,a i b), pe baza criteriilor i coeficienilor de pondere Wi rezultai din
fig. 4.17,c (prelucrare dup Pahl i Beitz [16]).
n = 13
0,04
0,21
0,12
0,084
0,14
0,056
Wi
Nr
Criteriul de evaluare
131
0,06
0,084
0,056
Simple maintenance
Good accessibility of
the measurement
systems
10
11
12
13
= 1
0,018
0,012
0,03
0,09
Natural
frequency
Perturbations
Deposit
overload
The expected
mechanical
safety
Operation with
possible errors
No. of
components
Components
complexity
The proportion of
standard type and
bought comp.
Simplicity of
assemblage
Maintenance
time and cost
The estimated
time for
changing the
connections
while testing
Accessibility
measurement
system
Wear
Parameters
reduced
min
85
Total
R2= 0,65
7
7
<i
ote
good
120
reduced
medium
medium
reduced
medium
high
reduced
10
2370
reduced
Quantity
-1
U
M
-
Solution II
WR2=0,68
6,816
0,392
0,588
0,480
0,200
0,108
0,084
0,120
0,630
1,470
0,588
0,840
0,980
0,336
Wi.<i
Weighted
grade
Total
good
120
reduced
medium
medium
medium
medium
reduced
high
reduced
10
2370
medium
Quantity
R3= 0,60
78
6
7
<i
ote
WR3=0,64
6,446
0,392
0,588
0,420
0,200
0,108
0,060
0,120
0,540
1,470
0,504
0,840
0,980
0,224
Wi.<i
Weighted
grade
Solution III
Total
medium
180
high
high
high
high
reduced
medium
Very
high
(medium)
20
< 410
reduced
Quantity
R4= 0,52
68
4
8
<i
ote
WR4=0,54
5,388
0,280
0,336
0,180
0,280
0,144
0,036
0,180
0,360
1,680
0,336
0,960
0,280
0,336
Wi.<i
Weighted
grade
Solution IV
131
n = 13
0,04
A few possible
operating errors
Small number of
components
Reduced components
complexity
Many parts are
standardized and can be
bought
Simple assembling
0,21
0,084
0,12
0,14
3
4
0,056
Wi
No
Evaluation criterion
131
Solutions
Soluii
Criterii
Criteria
A
B
C
D
E
F
+
+
+
-
I
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
I
I
+
+
I
I
I
+
I
+
+
-
7
RR
EE
FF
EE
RR
IE
NN
C
E
10
11
+
+
I
I
+
+
I
+
-
+
+
+
+
I
+
I
Fig. 4.19. Exemplu de evaluare grosier (cernere), cu ajutorul matricei de evaluare de tip Pugh
(prelucrare dup Pugh [17]).
Fig. 4.19. Example of rough evaluation (screening), by means of the evaluation matrix of Pugh type
(adapted after Pugh [17]).
132
131
133
Cernerea soluiilor
&otarea ponderat a
soluiilor
Generarea
soluiilor
A l e g e r e a
c o n c e p t u l u i
131
a
Criterii
1. Uurina manevrrii
2. Uurina utilizrii
3. Uurina citirii
4. Precizia dozajului
5. Durabilitate
6. Uurina fabricrii
7. Portabilitate
Sum de +
Sum de 0
Sum de Suma global
Locul
Continu?
0
0
0
0
0
+
+
2
5
0
2
1
Da
0
0
0
0
+
1
4
2
-1
6
Nu
G
0
+
0
0
0
0
1
5
1
0
3
Revizuire
b
Soluii (variante conceptuale) selectate prin cernere
Criterii
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Coef. de
pondere
5%
15%
10%
25%
15%
20%
10%
Locul
Continu?
A
Not
DF
Not
ponderat
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
TOTAL:
0.15
0.45
0.3
0.75
0.45
0.6
0.3
3.00
4
Nu
Not
ponderat
Not
3
4
3
3
5
3
3
TOTAL:
(DA)
0.15
0.6
0.3
0.75
0.75
0.6
0.3
3.45
1
Dezvoltare
Not
4
4
5
2
4
2
3
TOTAL:
G+
Not
ponderat
0.2
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.4
0.3
3.10
2
Nu
Not
Not
ponderat
4
3
5
3
3
2
3
TOTAL:
c
Fig. 4.20. Exemplu de evaluare grosier (cernere) i evaluare fin (notare ponderat) aplicate unor
variante conceptuale ale unei seringi medicale (adaptare dup Ulrich i Eppinger [19]).
134
0.2
0.45
0.5
0.75
0.45
0.4
0.3
3.05
3
Nu
Solutions screening
Solutions
generation
Weighted grading of
solutions
C h o s e
o f
c o n c e p t
131
a
Criteria
1. Easiness of
operation
2. Easiness of using
3. Easiness of reading
4. Accuracy of dosage
5. Durability
6. Easiness of
manufacture
7. Portability
Sum of +
Sum of 0
Sum of Global sum
Place
Continues?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
+
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
+
0
+
0
0
+
0
+
0
0
+
2
5
0
2
1
Yes
+
1
4
2
-1
6
No
0
1
3
3
-2
7
No
0
0
7
0
0
3
Combination
+
2
4
1
1
2
Yes
0
2
3
2
0
3
Combination
0
1
5
1
0
3
Revision
b
Solutions (conceptual variants) selected by screening
Criteria
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Coef. of
weight
5%
15%
10%
25%
15%
20%
10%
Place
Continues?
A
Note
Weighted
grade
3
0.15
3
0.45
3
0.3
3
0.75
3
0.45
3
0.6
3
0.3
TOTAL: 3.00
4
No
DF
Note
Weighted
grade
3
0.15
4
0.6
3
0.3
3
0.75
5
0.75
3
0.6
3
0.3
TOTAL: 3.45
1
(YES)Development
Note
G+
Weighted
grade
4
4
5
2
4
2
3
TOTAL:
0.2
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.4
0.3
3.10
2
No
Note
Weighted
grade
4
0.2
3
0.45
5
0.5
3
0.75
3
0.45
2
0.4
3
0.3
TOTAL: 3.05
3
No
c
Fig. 4.20. Example of rough evaluation (screening) and fine evaluation (weighted grading) applied to some
conceptual variants of a syringe (adapted after Ulrich and Eppinger [19]).
135
131
Rezolvare:
Cu
ajutorul
matricei
n n = 4 4 din fig. 4.21,a, se determin
mai nti punctajul Pk i apoi locul Lk al
fiecrui criteriu k (k = 1, 2, 3, 4).
136
131
Wk = (2Pk- Pmin+Sk+0,5)/(0,5n+Pmax-Pk);
Pmax = max(Pk, k = 1 Nn);
Pmin = min(Pk, k = 1 Nn);
wk = Wk/(Wk), k = 1,N,n.
wk = Wk/(Wk), k = 1,N,n.
- there are established the places of the conceptual variants, by comparing the scores.
Comparativ
cu
abordarea
german
(v. fig. 4.17 i 4.18), abordrile de tipul celei
din fig. 4.21 sunt relativ mai simple, dar i
mai puin precise.
137
Criteriul
k
1
2
3
4
Criteriul
a
b
c
d
Pk
Lk
Sk
Wk
wk
0,5
0
0
0
1
0,5
0,5
0,5
1
1
0,5
0,5
1
1
1
0,5
3,5
2,5
1,5
0,5
1
2
3
4
3
2
1
0
Suma:
5
2,33
1
0,2
8,53
0,59
0,27
0,12
0,02
1
131
Wk
Criteriul
a
b
c
d
wk
0,59
0,27
0,12
0,02
Suma:
Locul:
Varianta conceptuala I
<k
wk.<k
8
4,72
6
1,62
7
0,84
9
0,18
30
7,36
3
Varianta conceptuala II
<k
wk.<k
8
4.72
9
2.43
6
0.72
7
0.14
30
8,01
1
138
Criterion
k
1
2
3
4
Criterion
a
b
c
d
Pk
Lk
Sk
0,5
0
0
0
1
0,5
0
0
1
1
0,5
0
1
1
1
0,5
3,5
2,5
1,5
0,5
1
2
3
4
3
2
1
0
Sum:
Wk
wk
5
2,33
1
0,2
8,53
0,59
0,27
0,12
0,02
1
Wk =
2 Pk Pmin + S k + 0,5
;
0,5 n + Pmax Pk
131
Wk
Wk
Criterion
a
b
c
d
wk
0,59
0,27
0,12
0,02
Sum:
Place:
b
Fig. 4.21,a. Establishment of the relative coefficients of weight of the criteria a, b, c and d;
b. Ordering of the three conceptual variants (I, II and III) on the basis of the sum of weighted
grades ( w k N k ).
139
5. EXEMPLU DE PROIECTARE
CONCEPTUAL A UNUI
PRODUS TEHNIC
5. EXAMPLE OF A TECHNICAL
PRODUCT CONCEPTUAL
DESIGN
7. Precizia de poziionare: 5.
140
11. Randamentul
minim admis pentru
reductor: min = 0,5 (deci, reductorul
trebuie s amplifice momentul motorului
de cel puin min i = 50 ori).
11. The
reducer
admissible
minimum
efficiency: min = 0.5 (i.e. the reducer must
the motor moment at least mini = 50
times).
Its structure
(Fig.5.1,b) and
FM1: conectarea
energie mecanic;
material
(platform)-
of
1M+1E+1I
141
(platform)
order
angular
Funcia global
a platformei
rotative
M
E
FM
M*
FE
E*
FI
M*
E
The global
function of the
rotational
platform
I*
I*
b
FM1
FM2
FE1
FE2
M*
FM3
FE3
FE4
E2*
E1*
FI2
FI1
FI3
FI4
I*
c
FM1
FM3
M1*
FM2
FE3
FE1
FE4
FE2
E2*
FI2
E1*
FI1
FI3
FI4
I*
d
Fig. 5.1,a. Funcia global a platformei rotative; b. Structura de funcii de ordinul 1M+1E+1I,
derivat din funcia global; c i d. Structura de funcii de ordinul 3M+4E+4I, n varianta descriptiv
(c) i n varianta simbolic (d); subfuncia FE2 desemneaz funcia global a motoreductorului.
Fig. 5.1,a. The rotational platform global function; b. The structure of functions of 1M+1E+1I order,
derived from the global function; c and d. The structure of sub-functions of 3M+4E+4I order, in the
descriptive variant (c) and in the symbolic variant (d); the sub-function FE2 designates the motorreducer global function.
142
n concluzie, funcia global a motoreductorului este reprezentat de subfuncia FE2, din componena structurii de
ordinul 3M+ 4E+ 4I (fig. 5.1,c i d).
143
E1
E2
FE2
E1*
a
FE21
FE23
FE22
FE24
E1
E2
E1*
b
Subfuncia
FE21 Transformarea
energiei electrice n
energie mecanic
FE22 Transmiterea
ireversibil a
energiei mecanice
Efectul fizic
Efectul forei
electromagnetice
Efectul
frecrii
coulombiene
Efectul de
prghie
Efectul
frecrii
coulombiene
c
Subfuncia
Variante
de rezolvare
VR1
VR2
VR3
VR4
VR5
VR6
FE21
FE22
FE23
1.2
2.3
3.2
1.2
2.1
3.1+3.1+3.1
1.2
2.2
3.1+3.3
1.2
2.2
3.3
1.2
2.2
3.3
1.2
2.2
3.3
Exemplu: varianta de rezolvare VR1 = 1.2+2.3+3.2+(4.1+4.2)
d
FE24
4.1+4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1+4.3
4.1
144
E1
E2
FE2
E1*
FE21
FE23
FE22
FE24
E1
E2
E1*
Sub-function
Physical effects
FE21 Transformation
of the electrical
energy into
mechanical
energy
FE22 Movement
blocking
1.2
Asynchronous
motor
1.3
Synchronous
motor
The effect of
2.1
Columbian friction
Coupling
normally coupled
with electromagn.
decoupling
FE23 Speed reduction Lever effect
3.1
(torque
Spur gear pair
amplification)
with fixed axes
2.3
Brake
Irreversible gear
(between motor
pair
rotor and -stator)
4.2
3.3
Forced lubricate Pin cycloidal
gear
The effect of
4.1
Columbian friction High quality of
manufacturing
2.2
3.2
3.3
Worm drive with Planetary gear
fixed axes
Subfunction
Solving variants
SV1
SV2
SV3
SV4
SV5
SV6
FE21
FE22
FE23
1.2
2.3
3.2
1.2
2.1
3.1 + 3.1 + 3.1
1.2
2.2
3.1 + 3.3
1.2
2.3
3.3
1.2
2.2
3.3
1.2
2.3
3.3
Example: solving variant SV1 = 1.2 + 2.3 + 3.2 + (4.1 + 4.2)
d
FE24
4.1 + 4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1+4.3
4.1
Fig. 5.2,a. The motor-reducer global function; b. The structure of sub-functions in a symbolic variant;
c. The morphological matrix for the generation of solving variants; d. Examples of solving variants.
145
FE24: Maximization
of
the
moment
amplification ratio, by reducing the friction
losses (secondary sub-function).
5.3.1. Generarea
rezolvare i
variantelor
(sinteza)
146
SR1 = 1.2+2.3+3.2+(4.1+4.2).
147
1
T1
h=0
1
T1
1(dr./
rg.)
2
2
+
T2
T6
Frn
Brake
b
3=0
Frn
Brake
H1
6=0
H2
T1
TH2
1
5
H 3=0
TH
T1
4 H2
6=0
2
3=0
c
Frn
3=0
Brake
H
TH
T1
TH
T1
H
1
2
3
e
Fig. 5.3. Schemele simplificate (fr motor) ale variantelor de rezolvare din fig. 5.2,d.
Fig. 5.3. Simplified schemes (without motor) of the solving variants from Fig. 5.2,d.
148
(5.1)
(5.1)
(5.2)
(5.2)
149
(5.3)
(5.3)
(5.4)
(5.4)
150
n care:
where:
31,H1 = (H1,3TH1)/(1,3T1) =
= (TH1/T1)/ i31,H1 =
= [1i01(01)w1] /(1i01) =
= [1+9(0,97)+1] /(1+9) = 0,9730,
w1 = sgn(1,H1T1)=
= sgn[(1,H1T1)/(1,3T1)] =
= sgn [(1,H1)/(1,H13,H1)] =
= sgn [i01/(i011)] = sgn [9/(91)] = +1;
31,H1 = (H1,3TH1)/(1,3T1) =
= (TH1/T1)/ i31,H1 =
= [1i01(01)w1] /(1i01) =
= [1+9(0.97)+1] /(1+9) = 0.9730,
w1 = sgn(1,H1T1)=
= sgn[(1,H1T1)/(1,3T1)] =
= sgn [(1,H1)/(1,H13,H1)] =
= sgn [i01/(i011)] = sgn [9/(91)] = +1;
64,H2 = (H2,6TH2)/(4,6T4)=
= (TH2/T4)/ i 64,H2=
= [1i02(02)w2] /(1i02)=
= [1+9(0,97)+1] /(1+9)= 0,9730,
w2 = sgn(4,H2T4)=
= sgn[(4,H2T4)/(4,6T4)] =
= sgn [(4,H2)/(4,H2-6,H2)]
= sgn [i02/(i021)] =
= sgn [9/(91)] = +1;
64,H2 = (H2,6TH2)/(4,6T4)=
= (TH2/T4)/ i 64,H2=
= [1i02(02)w2] /(1i02)=
= [1+9(0.97)+1] /(1+9)= 0.9730,
w2 = sgn(4,H2T4)=
= sgn[(4,H2T4)/(4,6T4)] =
= sgn [(4,H2)/(4,H2-6,H2)]
= sgn [i02/(i021)] =
= sgn [9/(91)] = +1;
6H2,4 = (4,6T4)/(H2,6TH2)=
= (T4/TH2)/ i 6H2,4=
= (1i02)/[1i02(02)x2] =
= (1+9)/[1+9(0,97)-1] =0,9729,
x2= w2 = 1;
6H2,4 = (4,6T4)/(H2,6TH2)=
= (T4/TH2)/ i 6H2,4=
= (1i02)/[1i02(02)x2] =
= (1+9)/[1+9(0.97)-1] =0.9729,
x2= w2 = 1;
3H1,1 = (1,3T1)/(H1,3TH1)=
= (T1/TH1)/ i 3H1,1=
= (1i01)/[1i01(01)x1] =
= (1+9)/[1+9(0,97)-1] = 0,9729,
x1= w1 = 1.
3H1,1 = (1,3T1)/(H1,3TH1)=
= (T1/TH1)/ i 3H1,1=
= (1i01)/[1i01(01)x1] =
= (1+9)/[1+9(0.97)-1] = 0.9729,
x1= w1 = 1.
151
(5.5)
(5.5)
(5.6)
(5.6)
din
152
the
manufacturing
technology
is
relatively simple, but needs high
accuracies.
(5.7)
(5.7)
(5.8)
153
(5.8)
the
manufacturing
technology
is
relatively simple, but it needs high
accuracies.
154
(5.9)
(5.9)
(5.10)
(5.10)
pentru
155
the
manufacturing
extremely pretentious.
technology
is
156
Varianta conceptual
Figura 5.3
VR1
a
VR2
b
VR3
c
VR4
d
VR5
e
VR6
f
z1 = 1
z2 = 100
z1 = 20
z2 = 100
z3 = 20
z4 = 100
z5 = 25
z6 = 100
z1 = 18
z2 = 162
z3 = 15
z5 = 135
z1 = 400
z2 = 396
z2 = 100
z3 = 101
z1 = 200
z2 = 198
z3 = 198
100
-100
100
100
-100
100
0,65
0,98
0,985
0,995
0,999
0,995
12 =
0,65
16 =
0,941
1H =
0,9467
H1=
0,5025
H1 =
0,831
H1 =
0,5025
21 = 0
61 =
0,941
H1 =
0,9465
1H = 0
1H =
0,79
1H = 0
-65
94,1
-94,67
-50,25
83,1
-50,25
CARACTERISTICI TEH.ICE
1. 1umerele de dini
ale roilor
2. Raportul de
reducere al turaiei
de intrare
3. Randamentul unui
angrenaj cu axe fixe
4. Randamentul
reductorului
(acionare direct)
5. Randamentul
reductorului n
premiza acionrii
inverse inv
6. Raportul de
amplificare a
momentului de intrare
40
0,80
2
31
0,62
5
35
0,7
4
35
0,7
4
42
0,84
1
36
0,72
3
Fig 5.4. Caracteristicile tehnice ale variantelor conceptuale; aprecierea satisfacerii criteriilor de
evaluare cu ajutorul notelor (pe o scar de la 1 la 10) i ordonarea variantelor conceptuale prin
cernere.
157
Conceptual variant
Figure 5.3
SV1
a
SV 2
b
SV 3
c
SV 4
d
SV 5
e
SV 6
f
z1 = 1
z2 = 100
z1 = 20
z2 = 100
z3 = 20
z4 = 100
z5 = 25
z6 = 100
z1 = 18
z2 = 162
z3 = 15
z5 = 135
z1 = 400
z2 = 396
z2 = 100
z3 = 101
z1 = 200
z2 = 198
z3 = 198
100
-100
100
100
-100
100
0,65
0,98
0,985
0,995
0,999
0,995
12 =
0,65
16 =
0,941
1H =
0,9467
H1=
0,5025
H1 =
0,831
H1 =
0,5025
21 = 0
61 =
0,941
H1 =
0,9465
1H = 0
1H =
0,79
1H = 0
-65
94,1
-94,67
-50,25
83,1
-50,25
40
0,80
2
31
0,62
5
35
0,7
4
35
0,7
4
42
0,84
1
36
0,72
3
TECH.ICAL FEATURES
1. The gears numbers
of teeth
Fig 5.4. The technical features of the conceptual variants; assessment of the evaluation criteria
fulfillment by using grades (scale from 1 to 10) and ordering the conceptual variants by screening.
158
k Criteriul
Criteriul
Criterion
Pk
Lk
Sk
Wk
wk
0,5
0
0
0
0
1
0,5
0
0
0
1
1
0,5
0
0
1
1
1
0,5
0
1
1
1
1
0,5
4,5
3,5
2,5
1,5
0,5
1
2
3
4
5
4
3
2
1
0
5,2
2,85
1,55
0,73
0,15
10,48
0,5
0,27
0,15
0,07
0,01
1,00
Criterion
1
2
3
4
5
A
B
C
D
E
Suma / Sum:
FRISCO formula:
2 Pk Pmin + S k + 0,5
Wk =
;
0,5 n + Pmax Pk
wk =
Wk
a
VR/SV1
Criteriul
Criterion
A
wk
0,5
0,27
0,15
0,07
0,01
Suma / Sum:
Locul / Place:
B
C
D
E
VR/SV 3
VR/SV 4
VR/SV 5
VR/SV 6
1k
wk1k
1k
wk1k
1k
wk1k
1k
wk1k
1k
wk1k
8
6
9
8
9
40
4
1,62
1,35
0,56
0,09
7,62
2
7
9
6
7
6
35
3,5
2,43
0,9
0,49
0,06
7,38
3
8
5
9
4
9
35
4
1,35
1,35
0,28
0,09
7,07
4
9
8
8
9
8
42
4,5
2,16
1,2
0,63
0,08
8,57
1
6
5
8
8
9
36
3
1,35
1,2
0,56
0,09
6,2
5
b
Fig. 5.5,a. Stabilirea coeficienilor de pondere relativ wk, cu ajutorul formulei FRISCO i
b. Reordonarea variantelor conceptuale situate pe primele cinci locuri n faza de cernere (fig. 5.4).
Fig. 5.5,a. Establishment of the relative weight coefficients wk, by using the FRISCO formula and
b. Reordering of the conceptual variants that are situated on the first five places in the screening phase
(Fig. 5.4).
n conformitate cu rata de evaluare R,
rezultat prin cernere (v. fig. 5.4), se obine
urmtoarea
ordonare
a
variantelor
conceptuale: VR5 (locul 1), VR 1 (locul 2),
VR 6 (locul 3), la egalitate VR 3 i VR 4
(locul 4), SR2 (locul 5).
159
160
161
a1
b1
c1
(6.1)
(6.1)
163
C.V./G.B.
C.A./F.B.
Fig. 6.2. Variant detaliat a exemplului de rezolvare din fig. 6.1,c1 (C.V. = cutie de viteze; C.A. = cutie
de avansuri).
Fig. 6.2. A detailed variant of the solving example from Fig. 6.1,c1 (G.B.= gear box; F.B.= feeding box).
164
(6.2)
(6.2)
165
Fig. 6.3. Exemplu de nsumare a dou micri, cu ajutorul unei uniti planetare difereniale (34-3536-H), folosit n transmisia unui strung de detalonat, pentru detalonarea frezelor cu dini nclinai.
Fig. 6.3. Example of summing two motions, using a 2 DOF planetary gear (differential 34-35-36-H),
used in the transmission of a backing-off lathe, for relieving the cutters with helical teeth.
Fig. 6.4. Exemplu de nsumare a dou micri, cu ajutorul unei uniti planetare difereniale (1-2-3H), folosit n transmisia unui variator de turaie.
Fig. 6.4. Example of summing two motions, using a 2 DOF planetary gear (differential 1-2-3-H), used
in the transmission of a speed variator.
166
vA / vC = [(R0,5b)] / [(R+0,5b)] =
vA / vC = [(R0.5b)] / [(R+0.5b)] =
= (R0,5b) / (R+0,5b);
= (R0.5b) / (R+0.5b);
vA / vC = (r )/( r ) =>
/ = (R0,5b) / (R+0,5b);
vA / vC = (r )/( r ) =>
/ = (R0.5b) / (R+0.5b);
(6.3)
(6.3)
b
Fig. 6.5,a. Modelul cinematic al rulrii roi-drum, n cazul unei puni motoare, la deplasarea n curbe
(R= raz de virare aleatoare): micarea de antrenare a punii se distribuie nedeterminat pe roile
acesteia; b. Exemplu de distribuire nedeterminat a micrii H, n micrile i , cu ajutorul
unei uniti planetare difereniale simetrice (i0 = 1) inter-roi.
Fig. 6.5,a. The kinematical model of wheels-road rolling, in the case of a rear axle, while the car is
turning (R = the random turning radius): the driving motion of the axle is distributed on its wheels
indeterminately; b. Example for the indeterminate distribution of the motion H, into the motions
and , using an inter-wheels symmetrical differential (i0 = 1).
167
H = A + B
H = A + B .
(6.4)
(6.4)
and 3 = RC II (for actuating the driving axles I and II of a 44 car), using an asymmetrical ( i0 1 )
inter-axles differential (RC I and RC II are the central reducers, in their casings being enclosed also
the inter-wheels symmetrical differentials).
168
169
Fig. 6.7. Exemplu detaliat de distribuire nedeterminat a micrii (inter-puni i inter-roi) n cazul
unui autocamion cu 2 puni motoare (4x4): C.V. = cutie de viteze, C.D. = cutie de distribuie, Dp =
unitate planetar diferenial inter-puni (asimetric), RC I i RC II = reductor central al punii I i
respectiv II, D I i D II = unitate planetar diferenial inter-roi (simetric) aferent punii I i
respectiv II.
Fig. 6.7. Detailed example for the indeterminate distribution of a motion (inter-axles and interwheels) in the case of a truck with 2 driving axles (44): C.V. = gear box, C.D. = distributing box, Dp
= inter-axles differential (asymmetrical), RC I and RC II = central reducer of the I and respectively the
II axle, D I and D II = inter-wheels differential (symmetrical) afferent to the axle I and II.
170
2
3
1
3H =
= 3H
H - H = 0
1H =
= 1H
H
H
T1
TH
1
T1
TH
T3
H=0
T3
(z1=30)
3
a
TH
1
T1= ?
H =?
3 (z3=90)
M=2
L=3
HH = 0
(TH )
1H =
= 1H
3
T3= ?
H=0
1
M=1
L=2
3H =
= 3H
T1
H = H (1 , 3 ) = ?
T1 = T1 (TH ) = ?
T = T (T ) = ?
3
H
3
T3
i0 = i13H =
1H
=?
3 H
Fig. 6.8,a i b. Exemplu de unitate planetar diferenial (bimobil: M = 2), cu 2 roi centrale (1 i
3) i satelit simplu (2): schem structural (a) i schem bloc (b); c i d. Unitatea cu axe fixe derivat
din unitatea planetar prin inversiunea micrii fa de braul H: schem structural (c) i schem
bloc (d).
Fig. 6.8,a and b. Example of differential unit (2 DOF planetary gear unit: M = 2), with 2 sun gears
(1 and 3) and one satellite (2): structural scheme (a) and block scheme (b); c and d. The unit with
fixed axes derived from the planetary gear unit by inverting the motion vs. the carrier H: structural
scheme (c) and block scheme (d).
171
Tab. 6.1. Exemple uzuale de uniti planetare difereniale (bimobile) i de uniti monomobile,
derivate din cele difereniale prin blocarea unui element central.
Mecanisme planetare monomobile (M = 1)
-planetare
-cu axe fixe
M = 2 micri
independente
(de ex: s1 , s H )
M = 1 - o micare
independent
(de ex: s13 = s1 )
M = 2 micri
independente
(de ex: 1 , H )
M = 1 - o micare
independent
(de ex: 13 = 1 )
M = 1 - o micare
independent
(de ex: 1H = 1 )
M = 2 micri
independente
(de ex: 1 , H )
M = 1 - o micare
independent
(de ex: 14 = 1 )
M = 1 - o micare
independent
(de ex: 1H = 1 )
M = 2 micri
independente
(de ex: 1 , H )
M = 1 - o micare
independent
(de ex: 13 = 1 )
M = 1 - o micare
independent
(de ex: 1H = 1 )
M = 2 micri
independente
(de ex: 1 , H )
M = 1 - o micare
independent
(de ex: 14 = 1 )
M = 1 - o micare
independent
(de ex: 1H = 1 )
172
M = 1 - o micare
independent
(de ex: s1H = s1 )
Tab. 6.1. Usual examples of 2 DOF planetary gear units (differential units) and 1 DOF units, which
are derived from the differential units by blocking a central element.
1 DOF gear units (M = 1)
-planetary
-with fixed axes
M = 2 independent
motions
(for ex: s1 , s H )
M = 1 independent
motion
(for ex: s13 = s1 )
M = 2 independent
motions (for
ex: 1 , H )
M = 1 independent motion
(for ex: 13 = 1 )
M = 1 independent
motion
(for ex: 1H = 1 )
M = 2 independent
motions
(for ex: 1 , H )
M = 1 independent
motion
(for ex: 14 = 1 )
M = 1 independent
motion
(for ex: 1H = 1 )
M = 2 independent
motions (for ex:
1 , H )
M = 1 independent
motion
(for ex: 13 = 1 )
M = 1 independent
motion
(for ex: 1H = 1 )
M = 2 independent
motions (for ex:
1 , H )
M = 1 independent
motion
for ex: 14 = 1 )
M = 1 independent
motion
(for ex: 1H = 1 )
173
M = 1 independent
motion
(for ex: s1H = s1 )
1. Caracterizare structural
1. Structural characterization
H = H (1 ,3) = ?
H = H (1 ,3) = ?
(6.5)
(6.5)
T1 = T1(TH) = ? ; T3 = T3(TH) = ?
T1 = T1(TH) = ? ; T3 = T3(TH) = ?
(6.5)
(6.5)
174
(6.6)
(6.6)
1 + 33 4H = 0;
(6.6)
1 + 33 4H = 0;
(6.6)
(6.7)
(6.7)
H = 0,251 + 0,753 .
(6.7)
H = 0.251 + 0.753 .
(6.7)
(6.8)
(6.8)
T1 = TH /(1i0) = 0,25TH;
T1 = TH /(1i0) = 0.25TH;
T3 = THi0/(1i0) = 0,75TH.
(6.9)
T3 = THi0/(1i0) = 0.75TH.
(6.9)
4. Proprietile
difereniale
planetare
Proprietile
cinematice
i
statice,
caracteristice unitii planetare difereniale
date, se obin interpretnd funciile de
transmitere (6.7) i (6.9).
unitii
175
0,251 + 0,753 = H,
0.251 +0.753 = H,
(6.7)
(6.7)
In the case of the examples from Fig. 6.56.7, when the car is moving on a sliding
road, this property can cause a driving
wheel skating or, rarer, sliding of the rear
axle (for the cars with p 2 rear axles); this
skating interferes when the adherence
wheel-road or axle-road becomes null.
176
177
1 = ?
1 = ?
(motor 1)
T1
T1
elice
(propeller)
T2
T5=?
2=?
a1
L=3
M=1
T5=?
(motor)
L=3
M=1
pompa 1
(pump 1)
2=?
(motor 2)
a2
T2
1
1
T1
pompa 2
(pump 2)
1
T1
T5
T5
2
4
T2
T2
b1
+T4
5
-T4
T5=?
+T4
5
T1
+T3
-T3
1=?
b2
-T4
T1
2=?
T5=?
+T3
-T3
T2
c1
1=?
2=?
T2
c2
Fig. 6.9. Exemple pentru evidenierea funciei de nsumare a 2 momente (a1, b1, c1) i de distribuire
nedeterminat a unui moment n alte 2 momente (a2, b2, c2).
Fig. 6.9. Examples of highlighting the function of summing 2 torques (a1, b1, c1) and of indeterminate
distribution of one torque into other 2 torques (a2, b2, c2).
178
(6.10)
(6.10)
Motor 1
A
H
3=4
Elice
Propeller
2
Motor 2
A
H
Fig. 6.10. Variant de aplicare a exemplului din fig. 6.9,a1, b1, c1, n cazul antrenrii, cu dou
motoare, a elicei unei nave maritime.
Fig. 6.10. An application variant of the example from Fig. 6.9,a1, b1, c1, for the actuation of the
propeller from a sea-going ship with two motors.
179
(6.11)
(6.11)
Further
there
are
established
the
characteristic properties of the mechanism
illustrated in Fig. 6.11,a; this is a 1 DOF
gear mechanism (M = 1) with three (L = 3)
external links (1, 2 and 5); being possible
different combinations of inputs and
outputs, it was preferred that the nature of
the external links to remain not specified
1. Caracterizare structural
1. Structural characterization
3 = 4 = 5 i T5 T3 T4 = 0.
3 = 4 = 5 and T5 T3 T4 = 0.
(6.12)
(6.12)
180
1 (z1=20)
1
5
T1
4 (z4=45)
T5
2
3 (z3=40)
a
T2
2 (z2=30)
1=?
T1
1=?
+T4
-T4
MI =1
T1
T5=?
+T3
-T3
MII =1
2=?
M =1
L=3
T5=?
2
T2
b
T2
2=?
Fig. 6.11. Exemplu simplificat pentru analiza proprietilor statice i cinematice ale unui mecanism cu
roi dinate monomobil (M = 1), cu 3 legturi exterioare (L = 3 intrri i ieiri).
Fig. 6.11. Simplified example for the analysis of the static and kinematical properties of a 1 DOF gear
mechanism (M = 1), with 3 external links (L = 3 inputs and outputs).
n consecin, funciile de transmitere, realizate
de mecanismul considerat (fig. 6.11), au
urmtoarele expresii calitative:
1 = 1(5 ) = ? ; 2 = 2(5) = ?
(6.13)
1 = 1(5 ) = ? ; 2 = 2(5) = ?
(6.13)
T5 = T5(T1 ,T2) = ?
(6.14)
T5 = T5(T1 ,T2) = ?
(6.14)
Further
there
are
established
the
quantitative expressions of the transmission
functions that were previously identified.
1 = 3 i1,3 = 23 ;
1 = 3 i1,3 = 23 ;
181
2 = 4 i2,4 = 1,54 ;
3 4 5 : 3 = 4 = 5 .
2 = 4 i2,4 = 1.54 ;
3 4 5 : 3 = 4 = 5 .
(6.15)
(6.15)
(6.16)
(6.16)
3. Funcia de transmitere a
momentelor
(6.17)
(6.17)
T5 = 2T1 +1,5T2.
(6.18)
T5 = 2T1 +1.5T2.
(6.18)
Proprietile
cinematice
i
statice,
caracteristice mecanismului cu M = 1 i
L = 3, din fig. 6.11, se obin interpretnd
funciile de transmitere (6.16) i (6.18).
(6.18)
(6.18)
182
a)
b) nsumarea a 2 momente;
c) distribuirea nedeterminat
moment, n alte 2 momente.
b) summation of 2 torques;
a
unui
Transmiterea
puterii
mecanice,
cu
reducerea turaiei sub un raport de
transmitere constant, reprezint funcia unei
largi clase de produse, cunoscute sub
denumirea de reductoare de turaie.
Utilizarea acestor produse este impus, n
primul rnd, de neconcordana uzual dintre
turaiile ridicate ale motoarelor i turaiile
relativ joase ale efectoarelor.
183
a) reducerea randamentului,
b) creterea gabaritului radial / axial,
c) creterea gradului de complexitate,
d) creterea costurilor tehnologice etc.
drepi
184
f
b
aw
aw
h
d
Fig. 6.12. Angrenaje evolventice utilizate frecvent n sinteza reductoarelor de turaie cu axe fixe:
angrenaje cilindrice exterioare (a, b i c); angrenaj cilindric interior (d); angrenaje conice (e i f);
angrenaj melcat (g); angrenaj hipoid (h).
Fig. 6.12. Involute gear pairs that are frequently used in the synthesis of speed reducers with fixed
axes: external spur gear pairs (a, b and c); internal spur gear pair (d); bevel gear pairs (e and f); worm
drive (g); hypoid gear pair (h).
185
186
i12H = 3,15
H
12
= 0,97
H=0
H=0
T4
T2
1
T1
1
T1
a1
b1
T4 4
3 1
H=0
1
T1
2
c1
T4
T1
+
H=0
d1
Fig. 6.13. Exemple de rezolvare a funciei privind reducerea turaiei, folosind, ca principii de rezolvare,
angrenajele evolventice cu axe fixe: a, a1) reductor cilindric ntr-o treapt, b, b1) reductor cilindric n 2
trepte, c, c1) reductor conico-cilindric, d, d1) reductor cilindro-melcat.
Fig. 6.13. Example of solving the speed reduction function, using as solving principles the involute gear
pairs with fixed axes: a,a1) one-stage cylindrical reduction (a spur gear pair), b,b1) 2 stages cylindrical
reduction (two helical gear pairs), c,c1) conical-cylindrical reducer, d,d1) cylindrical-worm reducer.
187
(6.19)
(6.19)
188
(6.20)
31,H = (H,3TH)/(1,3T1) =
(6.20)
31,H = (H,3TH)/(1,3T1) =
(6.21)
(6.21)
(6.22)
(6.22)
i0 = i
1,3
=(8064)/(8460) = +1.015873 i
= sgn[1,0158/ (11,0158)] = 1,
= sgn[1.0158/ (11.0158)] = 1,
(6.23)
(6.23)
189
3=0
2
1,3
3=0
H
H
3=0
H,3
T1
TH
H
1
1
a1
3=0
3=0
2
H
H,3
1,3
TH
T1
2
2
b1
1
H
1,3
H,4
T1
TH
2
4=0
4=0
c1
3=0
4=0
1
2
H,3
TH
1,3
T1
H
H
d
d1
2
190
H,3
1,3
TH
T1
H
3=0
3=0
2
e1
i = i 3H1
1
1 0
= 3H1
0
1 0
i
1 / 0
1
1 + 0
0
0
1 + 0
5=6
1 / 0
TH
i0
A
H
TA
+
4
h1
Fig. 6.14. Exemple reprezentative de reductoare formate din uniti planetare cu 2 roi centrale: a
e), reductoare de tip unitate planetar monomobil; f) diagramele de variaie ale raportului de
transmitere ( i = i 3H1 ) i randamentului ( = 3H1 ) n cazul unitilor planetare monomobile cu i 0 +1 ,
g) motoreductor Maxon format prin nserierea a 2 uniti planetare de tipul celor din fig. 6.14,a i a1,
h, h1), reductor de tip unitate planetar bimobil cu lan de nchidere monomobil.
Fig. 6.14. Representative examples of reducers consisting of planetary gear units with 2 sun gears:
a e) reducers of 1 DOF planetary gear type; f) diagrams of the transmission ratio variation
( i = i 3H1 ) and of the efficiency variation ( = 3H1 ) in the case of 1 DOF planetary gear units with
i 0 +1 , g) the Maxon motor-reducer formed by a serial connection of 2 planetary gear units like the
ones from Fig. 6.14,a and a1; h, h1) Vaucanson reducer: a differential gear unit with a 1 DOF
closing chain type.
191
(6.24)
3H,1 = (1,3.T1)/(H,3TH) =
(6.24)
3H,1 = (1,3.T1)/(H,3TH) =
= (11,015873)/[11,015873(0,94)-1]
= (11.015873)/[11.015873(0.94)-1]
T1 = i
3
H,1 H,1TH =
T1 = i3H,13H,1TH = 630.1966TH =
630,1966TH =
=+12,389TH.
(6.25)
=+12.389TH.
(6.25)
Thus,
the
planetary
reducer
from
Fig. 6.14,b,b1 inverts and reduces the input
rotative speed 63 times and amplifies the
input torque of only 12.389 times.
n mod analog,
fig. 6.14,c,c1):
Analogue, in
Fig. 6.14,c,c1):
n premisa c (vezi
the
premise
that
(see
= sgn[1,0078/ (11,0078)] = 1,
= sgn[1.0078/ (11.0078)] = 1,
(6.26)
(6.26)
(6.27)
3H,1 = (1,3T1)/(H,3TH) =
(6.27)
3H,1 = (1,3T1)/(H,3TH) =
= (11,00781)/[11,00781(0,9127)-1] =
= (11.00781)/[11.00781(0.9127)-1] =
T1 = i
H,1 H,1TH =
= +9,5897TH.
T1 = i 3H,13H,1TH = 128.0330.0749TH =
= +9.5897TH.
(6.28)
128,0330,0749TH =
(6.28)
192
Deci,
reductorul
planetar
considerat
(fig. 6.14,c,c1) inverseaz i reduce de
128,033 ori turaia de intrare, cu o
amplificare de numai 9,5897 ori a momentul
motor.
Comentarii:
Comments:
= +(z2z3)/(z1z2) =(8460)/(8064) =
= +(z2z3)/(z1z2) =(8460)/(8064) =
= +0,984375 = 1/1,015873,
= +0.984375 = 1/1.015873,
= sgn[0,984/ (10,984)] = +1
= sgn[0.984/ (10.984)] = +1
(6.23)
i implicit:
and, implicitly:
(6.23)
(6.24)
(6.24)
= (1i0) / [1i0(0)w] =
= (1i0) / [1i0(0)w] =
= (10,984375) / [10,984375(0,94)+1]
= (10.984375) / [10.984375(0.94)+1]
T1 = i
H,1 H,1TH =
= +13,389TH.
T1 = i3H,13H,1TH = 640.2092TH =
640,2092TH =
= +13.389TH.
(6.25)
193
(6.25)
3H,1= (1i0)/[1i0(0)w] =
3H,1= (1i0)/[1i0(0)w] =
=(11,015873)/[11,015873(0,98)-1] =
=(11.015873)/[11.015873(0.98)-1] =
(6.25)
(6.25)
194
(6.29)
(6.29)
= 1/(11,015873) = 63 =>
= 1/(11.015873) = 63 =>
(6.30)
3H,1 = (1i0)/[1i0(0)w] =
(6.30)
3H,1 = (1i0)/[1i0(0)w] =
= (11,015873) / [11,015873(0,99)-1] =
= (11.015873) / [11.015873(0.99)-1] =
= 0,6073 =>
= 0.6073 =>
T1 = i
3
H,1 H,1TH =
= +38,264TH.
T1 = i 3H,13H,1TH = 630.6073TH =
630,6073TH =
= +38.264TH.
(6.31)
(6.31)
195
Reductoarele
de
tip
Vaucanson
(v. fig. 6.14,h,h1) pot realiza rapoarte mari
de transmitere | iA,H |, care, de regul, sunt
nsoite de randamente reduse; valorile
reduse ale randamentului sunt datorite, pe
de o parte, numrului relativ mare de
angrenaje i, pe de lat parte, circulaiei
fluxului energetic n circuit nchis. n anexa
A.3 este prezentat o analiz succint a
reductorului Vaucanson.
The
reducers
of
Vaucanson
type
(see Fig. 6.14,h,h1) can accomplish high
transmission ratios | iA,H |, which are
accompanied by reduced efficiencies; the
reduced values of the efficiency are due, on
one side, to the relative big number of gear
pairs and, on the other side, to the circulation
of the energetic flow in close circuit. A
succinct analysis of the Vaucanson reducer
is presented in Appendix A.3.
196
= 116/112 = +1,0357,
(6.32)
= 116/112 = +1.0357,
w = sgn(1,HT1) = sgn[(1,HT1)/(1,3T1)]=
(6.32)
w = sgn(1,HT1) = sgn[(1,HT1)/(1,3T1)]=
= sgn[1,0357/ (11,0357)] = 1,
= sgn[1.0357/ (11.0357)] = 1,
(6.33)
(6.33)
= 1/(11.0357) = 28 =>
= 1/(11.0357) = 28 =>
(6.34)
3H,1 = (1,3T1)/(H,3TH)=
(6.34)
3H,1 = (1,3T1)/(H,3TH)=
=(11,0357)/[11,0357(0,99)1] =
=(11.0357)/[11.0357(0.99)1] =
197
3=0
1
H,3
1,3
TH
T1
4
3=0
a1
3=0
H,3
TH
H
1
4 (x3)
1,3
T1
3=0
b1
3=0
H
H,3
TH
2 3=0
1
1
1,3
T1
c1
198
3=0
1,3
H,3
T1
TH
2
2
d
d1
2
2
3=0
1
H
3=0
1,3
H,3
TH
T1
3=0
e1
2
2
2
3=0
1
H
1,3
H,3
T1
TH
H
1
3=0
f
f1
Fig. 6.15. Exemple reprezentative de reductoare planetare cu o roat central: a, a1. cu angrenaj
evolventic i cuplaj radial de tip Oldham Green (reductor Strateline); b, b1. cu angrenaj evolventic i
semicuplaj Schmidt; c, c1. cu angrenaj octoidal i cuplaj Rzeppa; d, d1. cu angrenaj evolventic i
semicuplaj de tip Schmidt cu boluri; e, e1. cu angrenaj cicloidal cu boluri i semicuplaj de tip
Schmidt cu role; f, f1. cu angrenaj cicloidal i semicuplaj de tip Schmidt cu boluri i 2 satelii n
paralel.
Fig. 6.15. Representative examples of planetary reducers with one sun gear: a, a1. with an involute
gear pair and a radial coupling of Oldham Green type (Strateline reducer); b, b1. with an involute
gear pair and a Schmidt semi-coupling; c, c1. with an octoidal gear pair and a Rzeppa coupling; d, d1.
with an involute gear pair and a Schmidt pin semi-coupling; e, e1. with a cycloid gear pair with pins
and a semi-coupling of Schmidt type with rollers; f, f1. with a cycloid gear pair and a pin semicoupling of Schmidt type and 2 satellites into parallel.
199
T1 = i 3H,13H,1TH = 280,773TH =
= +21,65TH.
T1 = i 3H,13H,1TH = 280.773TH =
= +21.65TH.
(6.35)
(6.35)
Deci,
reductorul
planetar
considerat
(fig. 6.15,a,a1) inverseaz i reduce de 28
ori turaia de intrare, cu o amplificare de
21,65 ori a momentului motor. Pentru
echilibrarea satelitului 2 (fig. 6.15,a,a1),
reductorul folosete o contragreutate 4.
= 112/116 = +0,9655 i
(6.35)
(6.35)
= sgn[0,9655/(10,9655)] = +1,
= sgn[0.9655/(10.9655)] = +1,
(6.36)
(6.36)
(6.37)
3H,1 = (1,3T1)/(H,3TH) =
(6.37)
3H,1 = (1,3T1)/(H,3TH) =
=(10,9655)/[10,9655(0,99)+1] =
=(10.9655)/[10.9655(0.99)+1] =
T1 = i
H,1 H,1TH =
= 22,659TH.
T1 = i 3H,13H,1TH = 290.781TH =
290,781TH =
(6.38)
= 22.659TH.
200
(6.38)
201
= 116/115 = +1,0087,
(6.39)
= 116/115 = +1.0087,
(6.39)
(6.40)
3H,1 = (1,3T1)/(H,3TH) =
(6.40)
3H,1 = (1,3T1)/(H,3TH) =
=(11,0087)/[11,0087(0,996)1] =
=(11.0087)/[11.0087(0.996)1] =
T1= i
3
H,1 H,1TH
= +78,46TH.
(6.41)
(6.41)
iar n premisa c:
= 29/28 = +1,0357,
(6.42)
= 29/28 = +1.0357,
(6.42)
= 1/(11,0357) = 28 =>
= 1/(11.0357) = 28 =>
(6.43)
3H,1 = (1i0)/[1i0(0)w] =
(6.43)
3H,1 = (1i0)/[1i0(0)w] =
=(11,0357)/[11,0357(0,996)1] =
=(11.0357)/[11.0357(0.996)1] =
T1 = i3H,13H,1TH = +25,08TH.
T1 = i3H,13H,1TH = +25.08TH.
(6.44)
(6.44)
202
Tab. 6.2. Exemple de caracteristici tehnice ale unor reductoare cicloidale produse de firma CYCLO
(prelucrare dup Prospect nr. 38C-5-0892).
Tab. 6.2. Examples of technical characteristics of some cycloid reducers produced by CYCLO
company (processed from Prospect nr. 38C-5-0892).
FA
FAD
25
2. Reductoare armonice
2. Harmonic drives
203
Exemplele
de
reductoare
armonice
cilindrice, prezentate n continuare, sunt
preluate i prelucrate din prospecte ale
renumitei firme Harmonic Drive, fondat n
1970 n R.F.G i n Japonia i extins mai
trziu n SUA i Anglia.
204
3=0
H
2
c.O.
3
d
3=0
H
e
H,3
TH
T1
2
3=0
f
1,3
c.O.
3=0
e
f1
Fig. 6.16. Reductor armonic cilindric cu roat deformabil de tip oal: a, b, c) scheme pentru
explicitarea funcionrii; d, e) pri componente; f, f1) exemplu de utilizare (prelucrare dup un
prospect al firmei Harmonic Drive). Notaii: c.O. = cuplaj de tip Oldham; e = element elastic.
Fig. 6.16. Cylindrical harmonic drive with a flexspline (elastic gear) of pot type: a, b, c) schemes
for explaining the working; d, e) components; f, f1) usage example (processing after a prospect of
Harmonic Drive Company). Notations: c.O. = Oldham coupling; e = elastic element.
205
(6.45)
(6.45)
i0 =
= 1,H /3,H = i 1,2 i
= 102/100 = +1,02 i
i H1,3
2,3 =
(+1)(+z3/z2) =
(6.46)
(6.47)
i=
H,3 /1,3 = (H,H 3,H)/(1,H 3,H) =
= 1/ [1(1,H / 3,H) ] = 1/(1i0) =
= 1/(11,02) = 50 =>
1,3 = H,3 / i = H,3 / (50);
(6.48)
3H,1 = (1,3T1)/(H,3TH) =
3H,1 = (1,3T1)/(H,3TH) =
i 3H,1 =
(6.48)
(6.49)
206
(6.49)
Deci,
reductorul
armonic
considerat
(fig. 6.16,f,f1) inverseaz i reduce de 50 ori
turaia de intrare, cu o amplificare de 35,428
ori a momentului motor.
207
a
1
3=0
H
H,3
w1,3
TH
T1
3=0
2
c1
b
2=0
3=0
H
2=0
c
H
1
T1
H,3
1,3
TH
d1
Fig. 6.17,a c1. Reductor armonic cilindric cu roat deformabil de tip manon: a, b) pri
componente; c, c1) exemplu de utilizare (prelucrare dup un prospect al firmei Harmonic Drive);
d, d1) variant conic derivat din reductorul armonic cilindric ilustrat n fig. 6.16 (c = colivie; b = bil).
Fig. 6.17,a c1 Cylindrical harmonic drive with a flexspline (elastic gear) of collartype: a, b)
components; c, c1) usage example (processing after a prospect of Harmonic Drive Company);
d, d1) conical variant derived from the cylindrical harmonic drive from Fig. 6.16
(c = cage; b = ball).
208
c) The
irreversible
transmission
of
mechanical energy. Usually, the general
function, under this restriction, can be
solved by using a freewheeling clutch. A
solution of freewheeling clutch, with
cylindrical rollers, is illustrated in Fig. 6.18,c.
A classical example of such a clutch is the
driving wheel from a bicycle.
209
b1
Element motor /
Driving element
e1
Fig. 6.18. Exemple uzuale de cuplaje: a) cuplaj rigid cu flane, b, b1) cuplaje intermitente cu comand
mecanic, c) cuplaj unisens cu role cilindrice, d) cuplaje de siguran cu bile, e, e1) cuplaje elastice cu
elemente intermediare din cauciuc.
Fig. 6.18. Usual examples of couplings: a) rigid coupling with flanges, b, b1) intermittent couplings
with mechanical command, c) freewheeling clutch with cylindrical rollers, d) safety clutch with balls,
e, e1) elastic coupling with an intermediate rubber element.
210
211
212
c
Fig. 6.19. Tipurile cuplajelor mobile dup micrile relative ale arborilor: a) cuplaj axial, b) cuplaj
radial sau transversal, c) cuplaj unghiular, d) cuplaj unghiular-axial i e) cuplaj universal (radialunghiular-axial).
Fig. 6.19. Types of mobile joints in terms of the relative motions between shafts: a) axial joint,
b) radial or transversal joint, c) angular joint, d) angular-axial joint and e) universal (radial-angularaxial) joint.
Fig. 6.20. Exemplu de transmisie universal utilizat pentru antrenarea roilor directoare ale unui autoturism.
Fig. 6.20. Example of universal transmission used in actuating the driving wheels of a car.
213
Pentru
a
caracteriza
neuniformitatea
transmiterii micrii prin mecanismul asociat,
n timpul unei rotaii, se folosete o mrime
specific
numit
abatere
de
la
homocinetism. Uzual, abaterea de la
homocinetism se definete prin diferena
dintre unghiurile de rotaie ale arborilor de
ieire i intrare, = n 1, sau prin
raportul dintre diferena vitezelor unghiulare
ale arborilor de intrare i ieire i viteza
arborelui de intrare:
(n1)/1 = n / 11.
(n 1)/1 = n / 1 1.
(6.50)
(6.50)
2) hetero-kinematical
mechanism
(and
hetero-kinematical joint, implicitly), when the
difference is variable in time ( = n 1
= variable => n 1);
214
For the exemplification of the homokinematical radial joints, in Fig. 6.21 there
were illustrated 4 solutions of the Oldham
joint (Fig. 6.21,a-a3) and a solution (in 2
variants)
of
the
Schmidt
joint
(Fig. 6.21,b,b1).
215
a1
a2
a3
b1
Fig. 6.21. Exemple de cuplaje radiale: a a3) de tip Oldham i b, b1) de tip Schmidt.
Fig. 6.21. Examples of radial joints: a a3) of Oldham type and b, b1) of Schmidt type.
n
fig. 6.23
s-a
ilustrat
generarea
transmisiilor bicardanice homocinetice, cu
ajutorul operatorilor de simetrie direct
(oglindire) i simetrie rotit (cu un unghi ):
216
a1
c
c1
b1
Fig. 6.22. Exemple de cuplaje cardanice: a, a1) cuplaj unghiular cu cruce, b, b1) cuplaj unghiularaxial de tip bipod, c) mrimi i notaii specifice, c1) variaia abaterii de la homocinetism.
Fig. 6.22. Examples of Cardan joints: a, a1) angular joint with cross, b, b1) angular-axial joint of
bipod type, c) specific sizes and notations, c1) variations of the deviation from homo-kinematics.
217
cnd / when
c
Fig. 6.23. Generarea transmisiilor bicardanice homocinetice pe baza operatorilor de simetrie direct
(oglindire) i rotit cu un unghi : a) transmisie bicardanic n configuraie plan de tip A,
b) transmisie bicardanic n configuraie spaial i c) transmisie bicardanic n configuraie plan de
tip Z.
Fig. 6.23. Generation of homo-kinematical 2-Cardan transmissions using the operators of direct
symmetry (mirroring) and rotated symmetry with an angle : a) 2-Cardan transmission in a planar
configuration of A type, b) 2-Cardan transmission in a spatial configuration and c) 2-Cardan
transmission in a planar configuration of Z type.
218
a1
b1
c1
d1
Fig. 6.24. Exemple de cuplaje bicardanice cu diverse soluii de centrare (de realizare a simetriei):
a, a1) centrare printr-o policupl de tip sfer n cilindru (cu simetrie aproximativ), b, b1) centrare
printr-un angrenaj sferic ( 1 , n = suprafee conjugate n angrenare) de tip Borg-Warner (cu simetrie
exact), c, c1) centrare cu disc intermediar flotant de tip Walterscheid (cu simetrie exact),
d, d1) centrare printr-o policupl de tip cilindru-sfer-cilindru (cu simetrie exact).
Fig. 6.24. Examples of 2-Cardan joints with different centering solutions (for obtaining the
symmetry): a, a1) centering through a poly-joint of sphere in cylinder type (with an approximative
symmetry), b, b1) centering through a spherical gear pair ( 1 , n = adjoining surfaces into gearing)
of Borg-Warner type (with an exact symmetry), c, c1) centering with a intermediary floating disc of
Walterscheid type (with an exact symmetry), d, d1) centering through a poly-joint of cylinder-spherecylinder type (with an exact symmetry).
219
1b) Through
rotated
symmetry,
with
k180 (k N), there are obtained homokinematical 2-Cardan transmissions in spatial
configuration (with non-coplanar shafts);
220
a
1
c
2h
R
O1
O2
M
.Q
b1
b2
c1
c2
Fig. 6.25. Exemple de cuplaje cu bile: a) schem cinematic de principiu, n care liniile mediane ale
canalelor, 1 i 2 , sunt simetrice fa de planul bisector al unghiului obtuz dintre arbori (1800- );
b, c) scheme pentru explicitarea particularitilor de funcionare ale cuplajelor de tip Weiss (b) i
respectiv Rzeppa (c); b1, b2) cuplaje Weiss de tip unghiular (b1) i unghgiular-axial (b2); c1, c2) cuplaje
Rzeppa de tip unghiular (c1) i respectiv unghiular-axial (c2).
Fig. 6.25. Examples of ball joints: a) the kinematical principle scheme, in which the median lines of the
channels, 1 and 2 , are symmetrical vs. a bisector plan of the obtuse angle between the shafts
(1800- ); b, c) schemes for explaining the working features of the joints of Weiss type (b) and Rzeppa
type (c); b1, b2) Weiss joints of angular type (b1) and of angular-axial type (b2); c1, c2) Rzeppa joints of
angular type (c1) and angular-axial type (c2).
221
1. minimizarea heterocinetismului;
2. maximizarea capacitii
radiale i/sau axiale;
unghiulare,
portante
3. maximizarea
capacitii
(cuplului), pe o durat impus;
8. minimizarea
resurselor
tehnico
economice de realizare a produsului;
9. The maximization
degree etc.
222
of
the
recycling
a1
a2
a3
b
b1
Fig. 6.26. Exemple de cuplaje tripode: a a3) cuplaj unghiular-axial, b, b1) cuplaj unghiular.
Fig. 6.26. Examples of tripod joints: a a3) angular-axial joint b, b1) angular joint.
223
Tab. 6.3. Analiza comparativ a cuplajelor unghiulare de tip cardanic, Rzeppa i tripod.
Tab. 6.3. Comparative analysis of the angular joints of Cardan, Rzeppa and tripod type.
CRITERIUL
CRITERION
1
2
3
4
5
LOCUL II
PLACE II
Tripod
Cardan
Rzeppa
Rzeppa
Tripod
LOCUL I
PLACE I
Rzeppa
Tripod
Cardan
Cardan
Cardan
LOCUL III
PLACE III
Cardan
Rzeppa
Tripod
Tripod
Rzeppa
b) The Rzeppa joint (Fig. 6.25,c1) is homokinematical, has high values for the
efficiency and load-carrying capacity, but
has a high degree of constructive and
technological complexity!
224
225
226
227
228
229
d
c
d
b
c
f
a.
a.
f
c
b.
b.
Fig. 6.36. Sisteme-compas pentru decu-plarea
micrilor de reglare a pasului, fa de micarea
de rotaie a arborelui elicei unui elicopter.
c.
c.
c.
230
231
b.
a.
5
3
7
c.
232
6.5.2. Concluzie
6.5.2. Conclusion
233
234
a1
b1
c1
Fig. 6.38. Soluii bionice (a, b, c) i soluii tehnice echivalente (a1, b1, c1) pentru rezolvarea funciei
de tip prindere (prelucrare dup W. Cachtigall [14]).
Fig. 6.38. Bionic solutions (a, b, c) and equivalent technical solutions (a1, b1, c1) for solving the
function of catching type (processed after W. Cachtigall [14]).
235
a1
b1
c1
Fig. 6.39. Exemplu de soluie bionic (a, b, c) i de soluie tehnic echivalent (a1, b1, c1) pentru
rezolvarea funciei de tip mbinare nepermanent (prelucrare dup W. Cachtigall [14]).
Fig. 6.39. Example of bionic solution (a, b, c) and of equivalent technical solution (a1, b1, c1) for
solving the function of non-permanent joint type (processed after W. Cachtigall [14]).
236
a1
b1
c1
Fig. 6.40. Soluii bionice (a, b, c) i soluii tehnice echivalente (a1, b1, c1) pentru rezolvarea funciei
de tip legtur mobil (prelucrare dup W. Cachtigall [14]).
Fig. 6.40. Bionic solutions (a, b, c) and equivalent technical solutions (a1, b1, c1) for solving the
function of mobile joint type (processed after W. Cachtigall [14]).
237
a1
b1
c1
Fig. 6.41. Soluii bionice (a, b, c) i soluii tehnice echivalente (a1, b1, c1) pentru rezolvarea funciei
de tip ptrundere (prelucrare dup W. Cachtigall [14]).
Fig. 6.41. Bionic solutions (a, b, c) and equivalent technical solutions (a1, b1, c1) for solving the
function of penetration type (processed after W. Cachtigall [14]).
238
239
240
ANEXE
APPENDICES
241
242
A. ANEXE
A. APPENDICES
Lexiconul
tehnic
Tehnic, Bucureti;
Editura
Wikipedia,
enciclopedia
www.wikipedia.org
Wikipedia,
the
free
www.wikipedia.org.
romn,
liber
encyclopedia
1. Produs:
creaie
uman,
destinat
satisfacerii unei nevoi sociale, care poate fi
modelat printr-un sistem deschis n care sunt
manipulate i/sau prelucrate entiti de tip:
material, energetic i/sau informaional.
2. Engineering
Design
[24]:
design
process of a system, component or process
to meet desired needs. It is a decisionmaking process (often iterative), in which the
basic
sciences,
mathematics
and
engineering sciences, are applied to convert
resources optimally to meet a stated
objective. Among the basic elements of this
process there are: the establishment of
objectives and criteria, synthesis, analysis,
construction, testing, and evaluation. This
process can be divided up into a ten-step
process, which includes: identifying a need,
defining the problem, conducting research,
243
244
245
246
15. Matrice
morfologic:
ordonare
tabelar, a subfunciilor i soluiilor pariale
aferente acestora, care permite compunerea
combinatorie a acestor soluii, n conformitate
cu structura de subfuncii a funciei compuse.
17. Conceptual
variant
or
working
structure: solving variant that fulfills all the
requirements from the list, both qualitatively
and quantitatively.
18. Evaluation
of
the
Conceptual
Variants: assigning of points to each
conceptual variant, for the degree of
fulfillment of each evaluation criterion, and
ordering of all conceptual variants on the
basis of the total score obtained by each of
them. Two types of evaluation are
highlighted: rough (when the evaluation
criteria are considered of equal importance)
and fine (when the evaluation criteria are
differentiated through unequal importance
coefficients).
19.
Soluia
de
principiu,
soluia
conceptual sau conceptul produsului:
varianta conceptual situat pe primul loc, n
urma ordonrii variantelor conceptuale prin
evaluare.
19. Principle
solution,
conceptual
solution or product concept: conceptual
variant placed on the first place after the
conceptual variants ordering by evaluation.
20. Design
Constructiv
(DC):
faza
procesului de design de produs care pornete
de
la
conceptul
unui
produs
247
248
249
26. Design
Types
versus
novelty.
According to [2; 16], depending on novelty,
the following types of design can be
distinguished: a) Original or innovative
design (which uses an innovative/original
concept to satisfy a social need); b) Adaptive
or synthesis design (when a known solution
is adapted to achieve another need and to
produce a new applications; usually, this
design involves synthesis); c) Variant design
or redesign (when some of the design
parameters are modified or certain product
parts must be redesigned from technological
or resistance reasons); d) Selection design
(which selects the product parts with suitable
performance and costs from the firm
catalogs).
250
whose
251
Se deosebesc:
- mecanisme de for sau transmisii
mecanice: mecanisme al cror obiectiv
principal este realizarea unor corelaii
impuse ntre mrimile de stare ale
fluxurilor energetice de intrare i de
ieire;
mecanisme
de
prindere-strngere
(mecanisme-dispozitiv): mecanisme care
n faza de prindere au fore neglijabile, iar
n faza de strngere au micri relative
reduse, care devin nule dup atingerea
forei necesare de strngere.
gripping
mechanisms
(devicemechanisms): mechanisms that in the
catching phase have negligible forces,
and in the gripping phase have reduced
relative motions that become null after the
necessary gripping force is reached.
252
253
0
H3 =
=
3H
13
13
H3 =
= 1H
H3
H3 H3 = 0
H 3
T3
T1
1
TH
T1
(TH)
H=0
1
(z1=20)
T3
3=0
a
3 (z3=80)
c
TH
TH
H3
13
H3 =
= 1H
H
1
1
T1
M=1
L= 2
3=0
T3
T1
HH = 0
H=
0
H3=
0
=
3H
M=1 3
L=2
T3
254
Formularea
problemei:
Cunoscnd
randamentul interior i raportul cinematic
interior
ale
unitii
planetare
(adic
randamentul i raportul mecanismului cu axe
fixe asociat prin inversiunea micrii):
i0 = i
H
1,3
i0 = i
H
1,3
3
1,H
3
1,H
(A.2.2)
(A.2.2)
(A.2.3)
255
(A.2.3)
T1 + T3 + TH = 0
T1 + T3 + TH = 0
(A.2.4)
(A.2.4)
w = sgn(1,HT1) = 1.
w = sgn(1,HT1) = 1.
(A.2.5)
(A.2.5)
(A.2.6)
(A.2.6)
= +4,76.
(A.2.7)
(A.2.8)
(A.2.7)
= +4.76.
(A.2.8)
256
3
H,1 =
=(T1/TH)/ i3H,1= ?
3
H,1=
3
H,1 =
(A.2.9)
3
1,H
=(T1/TH)/ i3H,1= ?
3
H,1=
= 1/(1 i0) =
(A.2.10)
= 1/(1 i0) =
(A.2.10)
(A.2.11)
(A.2.11)
= 1/5,255;
(A.2.12)
= 1/5.255;
(A.2.12)
(A.2.13)
(A.2.13)
257
n continuare se modeleaz i se
interpreteaz principalele proprieti ale
acestui reductor; pe baza acestora se
formuleaz concluzii utile pentru optimizarea
soluiilor de principiu ale acestui tip de produs
tehnic.
258
7( z 7 )
H = ?
TH = ?
1
6( z6 = z )
Ta
5( z5 = z )
4(z4 )
3
+
TH
TH = ?
H = ?
H
M3 =1
+ TH
+ T7 T7
1 M1 = 2
i03
i01 = i1H,3
i03 = i7 , 6
+ T6 6
1 i01 = i1H,3
T1 + T1
T6
a = +1
5 M2 =1
+ T4 4
Ta + Ta
i02 = i4 ,5
T3
T4
Ta = +1
3 + T3
i02
T5 + T5
d
Fig. A.3.1. Reductorul planetar Vaucanson: a) schema reductorului reprodus dup Doyon i
Liaigre [4], b) schema structural, c) schema bloc i d) schema bloc cu semnele momentelor care
ncarc roile i arborii.
Fig. A.3.1. Vaucansons planetary reducer: a) the reducer scheme, after Doyon and Liaigre [4],
b) structural scheme, c) block scheme and d) block scheme with the signs of torques that load the gears
and shafts.
259
M = M1 + M2 + M3 Lc = 2 + 1 + 1 3 = 1; (A.3.1)
M = M1 + M2 + M3 Lc = 2 + 1 + 1 3 = 1;
260
(A.3.1)
1= i013 + (1i01)H;
1= i013 + (1i01)H;
i01 =
iH1,3 =
1,H/3,H = z3/z1 = 1,
3 = 4;
3 = 4;
5 = 6 = a = 1.
(A.3.2)
5 = 6 = a = 1.
(A.3.2)
5 = 6 = a = 1,
1 = 7 = ai03 = 1i03 = 20/22,
5 = 6 = a = 1,
1 = 7 = ai03 = 1i03 = 20/22,
H = 1/(1i01) 3i01/(1i01) =
H = 1/(1i01) 3i01/(1i01) =
= (1 + 3)/2 = 10/506,
= (1 + 3)/2 = 10/506,
(A.3.3)
(A.3.3)
T1 + T3 + TH = 0,
1,H T1(01)x1 + T33,H = 0 T1i01(01)x1 + T3 = 0,
T1 + T3 + TH = 0,
1,H T1(01)x1 + T33,H = 0 T1i01(01)x1 + T3 = 0,
x2
x3 = sgn(7T7) = 1;
x2
261
T3 T4 = 0; T1 T7 = 0;
T5 T6 + Ta = 0; Ta = +1,
(A.3.4)
T3 T4 = 0; T1 T7 = 0;
T5 T6 + Ta = 0; Ta = +1,
(A.3.4)
Ta = +1,
T1 = Ta /[i03(03)x3 i01i02(01)x1(02)x2] =
Ta = +1,
= 1/ [i03(03)x3 + i02(01)x1(02)x2],
T3 = T1i01(01) = T1(01) ,
= 1/ [i03(03)x3 + i02(01)x1(02)x2],
T3 = T1i01(01)x1 = T1(01)x1,
T4 = T3 = T1i01(01)x1 = T1(01)x1,
T7 = T1,
T4 = T3 = T1i01(01)x1 = T1(01)x1,
T7 = T1,
T6 = T1i03(03)x3,
T6 = T1i03(03)x3,
T5 = T1i01i02(01)x1(02)x2 = T1i02(01)x1(02)x2,
TH = T1[1 i01(01)x1] = T1[1+ (01)x1],
i*a,H = TH /Ta=
=[1 i01(01)x1] / [i03(03)x3 i01i02(01)x1(02)x2] =
T5 = T1i01i02(01)x1(02)x2 = T1i02(01)x1(02)x2,
TH = T1[1 i01(01)x1] = T1[1+ (01)x1],
i*a,H = TH /Ta=
=[1 i01(01)x1] / [i03(03)x3 i01i02(01)x1(02)x2] =
x1
T1 = Ta /[i03(03)x3 i01i02(01)x1(02)x2] =
x1
262
Ta = Ta = +1,
T1 = 1/ (i02 + i03) = 1 / (+20/23 20/22) =
= 506/20 = 25,3,
T3 = T1 = 25,3,
T4 = T3 = T1 = +25,3,
T7 = T1 = +25,3,
T6 = T1i03 = (506/20)( 20/22) = +23,
T5 = T1i02 = (506/20)(+20/23) = 22,
TH = T1 (1 + 1) = +50,6,
i*a,H = TH /Ta = 50,6 = ia,H.
(A.3.6)
Ta = Ta = +1,
T1 = 1/ (i02 + i03) = 1 / (+20/23 20/22) =
= 506/20 = 25.3,
T3 = T1 = 25.3,
T4 = T3 = T1 = +25.3,
T7 = T1 = +25,3,
T6 = T1i03 = (506/20)( 20/22) = +23,
T5 = T1i02 = (506/20)(+20/23) = 22,
TH = T1 (1 + 1) = +50.6,
i*a,H = TH /Ta = 50.6 = ia,H.
(A.3.6)
x2 = sgn(4T4) = sgn[(+20/23)(+25.3)] =
x2 = sgn(4T4) = sgn[(+20/23)(+25.3)] =
= +1 4T4 > 0;
= +1 4T4 > 0;
x3 = sgn(7T7) = sgn[(20/22)(+25.3)] =
x3 = sgn(7T7) = sgn[(20/22)(+25.3)] =
= 1 7T7 < 0.
= 1 7T7 < 0.
(A.3.7)
(A.3.7)
Ta = +1,
T1 =1/ [i03(03)x3 + i02(01)x1(02)x2] =
=1/[(-20/22)(0,94)-1+(20/23)(0,8836)+1(0,94)+1]=
= 4,0837,
T3 = T1(01)x1 = 4,0837(0,8836)+1 = 3,6083,
T4 = T3 = +3,6083,
Ta = +1,
T1 =1/ [i03(03)x3 + i02(01)x1(02)x2] =
=1/[(-20/22)(0.94)-1+(20/23)(0.8836)+1(0.94)+1]=
= 4.0837,
T3 = T1(01)x1 = 4.0837(0.8836)+1 = 3.6083,
T4 = T3 = +3.6083,
263
T7 = T1 = +4,0837,
T6 = T1i03(03)x3 = 4,0837(20/22)(0,94)-1 =
= +3,9494,
T7 = T1 = +4.0837,
T6 = T1i03(03)x3 = 4.0837(20/22)(0.94)-1 =
= +3.9494,
T5 = T1i02(01)x1(02)x2 =
= 4,0837(+20/23)(0,8836)+1(0,94)+1 = 2,9494,
T5 = T1i02(01)x1(02)x2 =
= 4.0837(+20/23)(0.8836)+1(0.94)+1 = 2.9494,
264
calculat
A.3.5. Concluzii
A.3.5. Conclusions
s-a
265
0,1520
3,7124
23
i03
0,2370
i01
22
22
0,4228
i01
3
3,1376
3,9494
2,9494
4
1
23
i03
i02
22
0,1882
i02
2,9494
|rap.tr.vit.|
rand.min.%
0,1*rand.max.
|rap.tr.vit.|
rand.max.%
100
16
90
15
80
14
70
13
60
12
50
40
11
30
20
10
10
8
6
0
22
26
30
34
38
42
46
z4
50
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
z=z5=z6
Fig. A.3.3. Diagramele de variaie ale modulului raportului de transmitere |ia,H| (notat |rap.tr.vit|)
i randamentului a,H: a) n funcie de numrul de dini z4 (diagrama rand.min. s-a obinut n premisa c
01 = 0.942 0,883 i 02 = 03 = 0,94, iar diagrama rand.max. s-a obinut n premisa c 01 = 0.982
0,96 i 02 = 03 = 0,98); b) n funcie de numrul de dini z = z5 = z6.
Fig. A.3.3. The diagrams for the variation of the transmission ratio module |ia,H| (noted
|rap.tr.vit|) and of the efficiency a,H: a) in terms of the teeth number z4 (the diagram
rand.min.=minimum efficiency was obtained in the premise that 01 = 0.942 0.883 and 02 = 03 = 0.94,
and the diagram rand.max.=maximum efficiency was obtained in the premise that 01 = 0.982 0.96 and
02 = 03 = 0.98); b) in terms of the teeth number z = z5 = z6.
266
267
268
269
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Power
Waste of energy
Waste of substance
Loss of information
Waste of time
Amount of substance
Reliability
Accuracy of measurement
Accuracy of manufacturing
Harmful factors acting on object
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
270
3. Calitate
local
(asigur
fiecrei
componente a obiectului condiiile cele mai
favorabile pentru funcionarea acestuia;
componente diferite ale obiectului ndeplinesc
funcii diferite);
11. Prevenire
(compenseaz
fiabilitatea
relativ sczut a unui obiect prin msuri de
combatere luate n avans);
271
20. Continuitatea
unei
aciuni
utile
(efectueaz o aciune n continuu, n cazul n
care toate componentele unui obiect
funcioneaz la capacitate maxim; elimin
micrile inutile i intermediare);
272
28. nlocuirea
unui
sistem
mecanic
(nlocuiete un sistem mecanic printr-un
sistem optic, acustic sau olfactiv; utilizeaz
un
cmp
electric,
magnetic
sau
electromagnetic pentru interaciunea cu
obiectul; nlocuiete cmpurile: cmpuri
staionare cu cmpuri n micare, cmpuri
fixe cu cele care se schimb n timp, cmpuri
aleatoare cu cmpuri structurate; utilizeaz
un cmp n conjuncie cu particule
feromagnetice);
273
If
un
274
275
17,
10,
4
13,
4,
8
5,
35,
14,
2
35,
8,
2,
14
7,
17,
4,
35
29,
17,
38,
34
4.Lungimea obiectului
staionar / Length of
nonmoving object
10,
1,
29,
35
15,
8,
29,
34
17,
7,
10,
40
15,
17,
4
1,
7,
4,
17
29,
30,
34
19,
10,
15
26,
7,
9,
39
35,
8,
2,
14
28,
10
14,
15,
18,
4
1,
7,
4,
35
19,
14
13,
14,
8
35,
28,
40,
29
30,
2,
14,
18
35,
10,
19,
14
2,
26,
29,
40
2,
28,
13,
38
17,
19,
9,
36
18,
13,
1,
28
8,
1,
37,
18
8,
15,
29,
34
13,
28,
15,
12
2,
36,
18,
37
15,
9,
12,
37
1,
18,
36,
37
7,
14,
17,
4
5. Aria obiectului n
micare / Area of
moving object
35,
30,
13,
2
6. Aria obiectului
staionar / Area of
nonmoving object
13,
28,
15,
19
9. Vitez / Speed
2,
18,
37
29,
2,
40,
28
15,
35,
36,
37
29,
4,
38,
34
7. Volumul obiectului
n micare / Volume
of moving object
1,
18,
35,
36
2,
17,
29,
4
19,
30,
35,
2
29,
30
4,
34
8. Volumul obiectului
staionar / Volume of
nonmoving object
28,
10
276
Fig. A.4.1. Matrice TRIZ a contradiciilor (parial); prelucrare dup [2] / Fig. A.4.1. (Partial) TRIZ contradiction matrix; processed after [2]
8,
10,
19,
35
8,
10,
18,
37
2,
8,
15,
38
9. Vitez / Speed
Parametri Inginereti degradatori sau conflictuali (1-10) / Degrading Engineering Parameters (1-10)
BIBLIOGRAFIE / REFERENCES
1. CROSS, N. (The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK), Engineering Design Methods.
Strategies for Product Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994.
2. DIETER, G., SCHMIDT, L. (University of Maryland), Engineering Design, Mc Graw Hill,
Boston, 2009.
3. DIACONESCU, D. (Transilvania University of Brasov), Conceptual Design of Products (in
Romanian), Ed. Universitatii Transilvania din Brasov, 2005.
4. DUDI, F., DIACONESCU, D. (Transilvania University of Brasov), Mechanisms
structural optimization (in Romanian), Ed. Tehnic, Bucureti, 1987.
5. DUDI, F. et al. (Transilvania University of Brasov), Articulated mobile couplings (in
Romanian), Ed. Orientul Latin, 2001.
6. DUDI, F. et al. (Transilvania University of Brasov), Podo-morph mobile couplings (in
Romanian), Ed. Trisedes Press, 2001.
7. DUBBEL, Taschenbuch fr den Maschinenbau (Teil F), Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1995.
8. EHRLENSPIEL, K. (Technische Universitt Mnchen), Konstruktionslehre I und II,
Vorlesungen, Technische Universitt Mnchen, 1989.
9. EHRLENSPIEL, K. (Techn. Universitt Mnchen), Integrierte Produktentwicklung, Carl
Hanser Verlag, Mnchen, 1995.
10. FRENCH, M. (Lancaster Univ., UK), Conceptual Design for Engineers, Springer, 1999.
11. HTTE, Engineers handbook. Fundamentals (Part K), Ed. Tehnic, Bucureti, 1995.
12. KOLLER,R. (Technische Hochschule Aachen), Konstruktionslehre fr den
Maschinenbau, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1994.
13. MILOIU, G. et al. (Transilvania University of Braov), Modern mechanical transmissions
(in Romanian), Ed. Tehnic, Bucureti,1980.
14. NACHTIGALL, W. Konstruktionen. Biologie und Technik. VDI-Verlag, Dsseldorf.
15. OTTO, K.N. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), WOOD, K.L. (University of Texas at
Austin), Product Design, 2001 Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458.
16. PAHL, G. (Technische Hochschule Darmstadt) et al. Engineering Design, A Systematic
Approach, Springer-Verlag London, 2007.
17. PUGH, S. (University of Strathclyde, UK), Total Design, Addison-Wesley Publishing
Comp., Wokingham-England, 1997.
18. ROOZENBURG, N.F.M., EEKELS, J. (Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands),
Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996.
19. ULRICH, K., EPINGER, S. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Product Design and
Development, McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York, 2008.
20. V.D.I. (Verein Deutscher Ingenieure) - Richtlinien 2221, 2222.
21. http://www2.unitbv.ro/LinkClick.aspx?link=Doctorat/Analiza_criteriala.ppt&tabid=300&mid
=723 (Multi-criteria Analysis, Prof. S. BOBANCU).
22. http://www.johnstark.com
23. http://www.mazur.net/triz/index.html
24. www.wikipedia.org
277